User talk:Reinhardhauke

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


File:Moritz Pfälzer 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moritz Pfälzer 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Kirchzarten Markenhof 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kirchzarten Markenhof 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata[edit]

Could you explain what is happening here, where you removed 18 interwiki items and connected to a Wikidata page that contains only 3 of these? I get that moving over to Wikidata is good (I'm working on that a bit, too), but it would seem that in this case either you connected to the wrong item or you have 15 wikis to add to that item before this is a good idea. - Jmabel ! talk

The Category:San Martín de Oscos is connected to Kategorie:San Martín de Oscos/Categoría:Samartín d'Ozcos/Categoría:San Martín de Oscos. That is the princip, category to category when they exists. You can see thousands in Wikidata.--Reinhardhauke (talk) 06:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Normally, Commons categories connect to Wikipedia articles, not Wikipedia categories. - Jmabel ! talk 15:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

@Reinhardhauke: I see you continue to remove the links despite being told not to do so. If you continue without any discussion or raising the issue on an appropriate thread, I'll go boldly revert these edits. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, you broke the wikidata link to all Parroy interwikis and replaced it by wikidata Kategorie:Parroy, which is actually only an wikidata interwiki for de:wp. Please restore the full wikidata interwiki coupling. --Havang(nl) (talk) 18:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

See wikidata--Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

There is a level difference: commons bottom categories go to wikipedia atticles and vice-versa. Parroy is a bottom category. --Havang(nl) (talk) 18:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)