User talk:Rhadamante

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


File:Ctp.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ctp.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 10:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:N,N-disubstitued_primary_amides[edit]

DMacks (talk) 18:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Différence nb d'articles de-fr.png[edit]

May you update this diagram?--Kopiersperre (talk) 21:53, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I don't think so, sorry. I lost the file in my previous computer, and I don't have quite the time to redo everything. Rhadamante (talk) 01:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Amides and category names[edit]

Leaving aside [[the question of whether the amides are primary, secondary, or tertiary, please note that the category name is misspelled: it should be "substituted", not "substitued" (which feels like a compromise between the English and French spellings: ("substitué" + "substituted") / 2 = substitued?))

I've spoken to an admin, who says that he's not willing to implement the automatic changing of all relevant category tags to correct that error for as long as the issue may be controversial.

I politely request that you post on that discussion page and assent to at least having the spelling error corrected. DS (talk) 14:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hidden categories[edit]

Why you hide this and other similar categories? --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 00:50, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Chemical structure and Organic compounds[edit]

I see from your contributions that you moved a lot of images from Category:Chemical structures to Category:Organic compounds (example [1]). It is fine to put these files in Category:Organic compounds, but you have to leave them in Category:Chemical structures, too, because these two categories are independent. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Chemical structures should only contain subcategories, not files. --Leyo 20:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I strongly agree with Leyo. Category:Chemical structures is a supercategory that should only contain subcategories. Rhadamante (talk) 04:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:O bridged oxohalide.png[edit]

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | മലയാളം | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:O bridged oxohalide.png to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Fluazinam.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fluazinam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 15:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Isobutanes[edit]

DMacks (talk) 07:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Silylamines[edit]

DMacks (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Alpha_and_beta_proteins_(a+b)[edit]

Wieralee (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Hemiaminal ether ketone.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hemiaminal ether ketone.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Oxazolidinones as carbamates[edit]

Looks like I was too focused on the oxazolidin-2-one‎ isomer:( Should Category:Oxazolidinones be diffused into -2- (subcat of Category:Carbamates), -4- (subcat of Category:Gamma-lactams), and -5- (subcat of Category:Gamma-lactones) subcats? That is, split it up among the various isomers File:Oxazolidinones.png of the general ring. DMacks (talk) 12:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

@DMacks: That's one solution, and probably, on the long term, the best. Another would be to let all these files in Oxazolidinones, and cross-categorize in the pertinent categories (carbamates/gamma-lactones) the adequate files, independently. But I have the feeling the first solution fits best the "Common's categorization optics", meaning multiple ultra-specialized sub-categories instead of cross-categorization. Rhadamante (talk) 06:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

please[edit]

don't blank category pages! There are better actions requiring less effort: Deletion request or {{speedy}} deletion request or {{bad name}} or category for discussion request. Best, --Achim (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Aurin_(chemical_element)[edit]

Achim (talk) 15:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Men or women[edit]

It's not just moving all files to the men category: [2][3] --Ailura (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

@Ailura: It should have, since before I created the "male" sub-category to make this category the generic category, this category should have contained the male footballers only... And it was the case for first ~100 I checked one by one...Rhadamante (talk) 23:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Mesembrine.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mesembrine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 19:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Louis Martel.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Marc Lortie.JPG[edit]

Just a note: please be more careful during recategorization. In this edit you removed the license along with the categories. Green Giant (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@Green Giant: Yep, I sometimes misclick when I select the categories I transfer, but I usually see immediately it when I create the new category, and put it back to the file seconds later. Strangely I didn't see it that time. I'll be more careful. --Rhadamante (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)