User talk:Riverobserver

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Riverobserver!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Riverobserver!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

File:ErasmusSeidel1594bis1655.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:55, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Rubenow-Tafel[edit]

Sehr schön! Hast Du noch die fehlenden zwei Crops und eine Vollansicht?--Kresspahl (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Ja, heute hier erst mal der Herr Lamside. Beste Grüße.--Riverobserver (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Danke!--Kresspahl (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Edvard Munch[edit]

Die Gemeinfreiheit beginnt mit dem 1. Januar des Jahres, das auf das 70. Todesjahr des Urhebers folgt. D.h. Werke von Urhebern die im Laufe des Jahres 1944 gestorben sind werden mit dem 1.1.2015 gemeinfrei, in diesem Zusammenhang ist der 1. Januar auch Public Domain Day. Ich liste die Werke unter Category talk:Edvard Munch, dort wird sie am 1.1. jemand finden. --Martin H. (talk) 14:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC) So, jetzt dürften die Bilder ja gemeinfrei sein. Kann Sie nun mal jemand "wiederbeleben"?--Riverobserver (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:JohannTuerckheim1749.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JohannTuerckheim1749.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

File:WolfgangMuff1934.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:WolfgangMuff1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Bitte Urheberrechte beachten[edit]

Hallo Riverobserver,

"PD-Old" heißt nicht, dass ein Bild 70 Jahre nach Veröffentlichung gemeinfrei wird. Es heißt vielmehr, dass es 70 Jahre nach dem Tod seines Urhebers gemeinfrei wird. Bei Fotos ist der Urheber regelmäßig der Fotograf. Bei Fotos von 1920 oder später kann man nicht davon ausgehen, dass der Urheber auf jeden Fall spätestens bis 1943 tot war; erst heute habe ich wieder eine Postkarte von 1908 gesehen, deren Fotograf noch bis 1954 lebte. Bei den oben aufgelisteten Bildern muss daher der Urheber samt Todesjahr angegeben werden, andernfalls werden sie höchstwahrscheinlich gelöscht. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 20:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MarkusWelser.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MarkusWelser.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Cornelius Gurlitt[edit]

Hinweis auf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:CorneliusGurlitt.jpg --Vsop.de (talk) 16:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Schmidberg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for the new, larger version. But please also state your source for the image in the source field of the file description. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 20:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

File:BreslauFriedrichGottlobEndler.jpg[edit]

Sie haben diesen "Plan von Breslau und den ehemaligen Festungs-Werken (Ausschnitt) von F.G.Endler" eingescannt und hochgeladen -- erstmal herzlichen Dank dafür! Aber wo kann ich den ganzen Plan finden? Wo kann man das von Ihnen eingescannte Original finden? --L.Willms (talk) 08:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Zwei Exemplare gefunden in Worldcat --L.Willms (talk) 14:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Der Plan wurde nachgedruckt als Blatt 5 in Breslau auf alten Plänen 1562–1946 Wydawnictwo VIA NOVA Wroclaw, ISBN 83-88649-60-4. Ich vermute das Original liegt in der Unibibliothek Breslau.--Riverobserver (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis! Dies Buch (oder Sammelmappe) gibts laut KVK in vier Bibliotheken in Deutschland, für mich am einfachsten zu erreichen die DNB, die das Buch allerdings nur in Leipzig hat und nicht "bei mir" in Frankfurt. Das Original ist in dem Buch, dessen Fundstellen ich in meiner vorigen Antwort verlinkt hatte. Das Buch selber ist digitalisiert bei der BSB (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) online zu lesen, aber die im Anhang beigelegte Karte haben die nicht eingescannt... Frage ... wenn Sie das in dem Nachdruck von 2003 gesehen haben -- wie groß ist der Plan? Würde der in ein A3-Blatt reinpassen? --- Mh, eher nicht. Die PDF-Datei mit den Scans des Originalbuchs hat ein Seitenformat von ca 61 x 37 cm (es schwankt), und der Plan ist fast so hoch wie das Buch selbst, und mehrfach in der Breite gefaltet, wie man hinter der letzten Textseite in dem Digitalisat erkennen kann. Schau'n mer mal. MfG, L.Willms (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Also in der polnischen Sammelmappe von 2003 ist als Originalgröße der Karte 56 x 43,5 cm angegeben. Leider ist die Reproduktion in der Mappe (Faltblatt) zu groß für meinen Scanner, deshalb musste ich einen Ausschnitt machen. MfG, --Riverobserver (talk) 03:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Für einen A3-Scanner ist das noch zu groß. Ich werd mir die Mappe mal nach Frankfurt bestellen und sehen, was sich machen läßt. Danke und Gruß, L.Willms (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Ich hab die Beschreibung der Karte etwas erweitert. --L.Willms (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Ich hab nunmehr ein Bild der gesamten Karte hochgeladen unter File:Plan-von-Breslau-und-den-ehemaligen-Festungswerken 1808 Artist Friedrich-Gottlob-Endler publisher Johan-Friedrich-Korn-der-Aeltere.png. Die beiden Versionen hab ich über den Eintrag "other versions" in den Information verlinkt. --L.Willms (talk) 07:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Prima, danke!--Riverobserver (talk) 11:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

File:ChristianGarveAntonGraff.jpg[edit]

Obwohl Du dem Bild einen Dateinamen gegeben hast, der auf Creator:Anton Graff hinweist, hast Du als Urheber „unbekannt“ bzw. die entsprechende Vorlage eingetragen. Hast Du noch Zugriff auf die Quelle und kannst nochmal nachsehen, was richtig ist, oder war das einfach ein Versehen beim Eintragen? — Speravir_Talk – 22:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Stimmt, war eine Unachtsamkeit von mir, habe die Angaben zu dem Bild aktualisiert. Quelle war [1]. Beste Grüße. --Riverobserver (talk) 04:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Aha, Henne nach einer Vorlage von Graff, oder? Ansonsten wäre vielleicht eine Dateiumbenennung sinnvoll. — Speravir_Talk – 15:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)