User talk:Rlevente

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rlevente!

-- 19:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Cultural heritage monuments in Hungary[edit]

Szia! VinceB mondta, hogy te is kategorizálod a fenti kategóriában levő képeket. Annyit szeretnék kérni, hogy a templomokat hadd én kategorizáljam, mert 1 hónapja megcsináltam már a Churches in Hungary kategóriában a templomokat. Zastava S. Jugoslavije.png Szajci pošta 17:35, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Igen, én a reformátust úgy, ahogy te, de ha van város, akkor a városba teszem be. A római katolikust pedig nemcsak védőszent szerint, de megye ill. városba is beteszem. Arra már nem vállalkoztam, hogy stílus ill. évszázad szerint is bekategorizálom, mert az már sok lenne. A védőszentet egyébként a nagyvofely.hu oldalról nézem :D Zastava S. Jugoslavije.png Szajci pošta 18:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Megnéztem a képet, egy dolgot hagytál ki, hogy gyms megyei római katolikus templomok, most beletettem. De a többi kategória rendben van. Arra figyelj még, hogy lehet, hogy én korábban bekategorizáltam egy templomot, de külön kategóriát nem hoztam létre neki, mert csak 1 kép volt róla, de 2 képnél már külön kategóriát csinálok neki. Zastava S. Jugoslavije.png Szajci pošta 18:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Rendben. Én a fenti kategóriában rendezgetem a templomokat éppen. Zastava S. Jugoslavije.png Szajci pošta 18:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Rlevente. You have new messages at Rotatebot's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Pope Francis coat of arms[edit]

Ok. Tomorrow. Poznaniak (dyskusja) 20:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done. Poznaniak (dyskusja) 12:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Filemover?[edit]

Maybe you want request the filemover right here. I think you are experienced enough. --Didym (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Rlevente, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/−

--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! --Rlevente (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


File:Nagybánya, Szentháromság-templom 02.jpg[edit]

Hi Rlevente, where exactly is this relief located, inside the church or outside? --Túrelio (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Nagybánya, Szentháromság-templom 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nagybánya, Szentháromság-templom 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry; I thought it was located in Hungary. But Romania has no freedom-of-panorama exemption. As it seems to be a recent work, you might try to contact the sculptor and ask him/her for a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Rlevente,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Rlevente,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

World War I memorial in Újpest.JPG[edit]

Szia! Az lenne a kérdésem a 'World War I memorial in Újpest.JPG' kép hol készült pontosan? Köszi előre is. - - Globetrotter19

Várkert bazár[edit]

Szia! Nem ugyanaz, a Várkert Palace ez akar lenni: [1]. Ennek megfelelően ki kellene takarítani onnan a Várkert Bazáros képeket, és valószínűleg érdemes leírást adni hozzá ami linkel a wp cikkre is. --Antissimo (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Fidesz-KDNP.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fidesz-KDNP.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tgr (talk) 04:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Deák Ferenc sírja 1.JPG[edit]

Szia! Review-oltam néhány képet, s ennél a képnél (File:Deák Ferenc sírja 1.JPG) észrevettem, hogy egy korábbi változat teljesen másképp' néz ki, azaz lehetségesnek tartom, hogy a feltöltő két különböző képet is fel szeretett volna tölteni, de valahogyan így sikerült neki; de persze ebben nem vagyok biztos. Ha mégis, akkor szerinted meg lehet valahogyan oldani, hogy esetleg az első kép is felkerüljön ide? Köszönettel: --Sphenodon (talk) 11:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Köszi! :) --Sphenodon (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Megcsináltam útmutatásod alapján a feltöltést (ez volt az első ilyen feltöltésem, korábban csak olyant tettem, hogy rátöltöttem egyre egy újabb verziót). Nem tudtam, hogyan adjam meg a licencet: végül egy „kisregényt” írtam, hogy látni lehessen, mi az ábra. Ha megkérlek, majd ránézel, hogy így rendben van-e? Köszönettel: --Sphenodon (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Köszönöm szépen, így most nyugodt vagyok! :) --Sphenodon (talk) 07:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

pls check[edit]

Hi, is this edit valid? If not pls invstigate. Thx. --JuTa 19:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

szia[edit]

a magyar wikipédiában létre hoznád eszta három szócliket ami it alul leirok előre is köszönöm

  • nyíregyházi Göllesz Viktor Speciális Szakiskola, Általános Iskola
  • Nyíregyházi Bárczi Gusztáv Speciális Iskola
  • nyiregyházi nevelési tanácsadó

Levente 2 -2014. október 22., 15:43 HA ha írni akarsz it van-https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Levente_2

File:Szokolay in Parndorf with the Huszti-Duo Vienna cropped.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Szokolay in Parndorf with the Huszti-Duo Vienna cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Szokyorsi (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Insignia Hungary Political Party MSZP.svg[edit]

Reagáltam rá a vitalapomon Madboy74 (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Reverts of Red Army in Budapest[edit]

Hi, Would you please leave me a message to let me know why you reverted my edits of red army soldiers in Budapest from the category "Red Army in Bucharest‎". It sounds like the right place for them to be. Thank you.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 12:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Karosi Júlia.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karosi Júlia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 13:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Népsport 1953-11-26.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Népsport 1953-11-26.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Népsport 1953-11-26.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Köszönet[edit]

Köszönöm a tanácsokat a képek kategórizálásánál. .Elfogadok más példákat is mivel az angol tudásom 0,2 Utolsó bejezésnél íród, hogy egy képnél nem kell külön kategoriát készíteni. Csináltam én ilyet? Holaci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holaci (talk • contribs) 15:19, 02 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Müller Péter.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Müller Péter.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Szilágyi-engedély[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Szilágyi-engedély has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Malatinszky (talk) 15:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Köszönet és segítségkérés[edit]

Szia! Elősször is köszönet a segítségért File:Nagyvasútállomásnál. Tata várostérkép. - Komárom-Esztergom megye, Tata.JPG kép ügyében. Ennek hatására két napja a kép származékát is helyreállították a File:Nagyvasútállomásnál. Tatai buszjáratok, térkép. - Komárom-Esztergom megye, Tata.JPG.

Sajnos alig egy nappal később ismét egy FoP-os képet töröltek.

A File:Gyömrő fitness, logo in Hungary.jpg képet,- amely egy épületelemet ábrázol, (kb 1m-szer fél méter),- amit az utcán késztettem, szóval szerintem ez FoP licenszes.

Pechemre nincs streetview a googlen (pedig ez a város főtere), és nekem sincs a teljes épületről képem, de találtam az interneten egy képet,- itt,- ami mutatja hogy az épületen kívűl (középen) található a jel.

A File:Ignácz Ilona City Sports Hall in Gyömrő, Hungary.jpg és a File:Hankó István Art Center (SE) in Gyömrő Hungary.jpg képek két szomszédos épületet ábrázolnak amiket én tettem fel (egy-egy perccel korábbi ill. későbbi késztésűek az Exif alapján) ez igazolhatja még azt, hogy ott jártam.

Abban kérném a segítségedet,-ha úgy gondolod, hogy az ilyen kép FoP,-hogy segíts angolul megfogalmazni a kérelmem. Esetleg jelezni annál aki törölte. Utána én egyedül megpróbálom a 'helyreállító oldalon'.

Köszönettel! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Szia @Globetrotter19! Én valami ilyet írnék: Please undelete this photo, because it shows a part of a building. It was shot from the street, so it is under FoP. The building can be see here, the logo is on the center of the house. - Ugye az épület közepén levő zöld alapon fehér figurát ábrázoló logóról van szó? --Rlevente (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Szia @Rlevente! Igen. Elösszőr irjak annak aki törölte vagy egyből a helyreállító oldalra. Az illetőnek már írtam saját oldalamon is, nála is igaz angolul csak, hogy street photo. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Most látom csak ezt írta itt

A logo on a wall isn't erected with a permanent character. Ping deleting admin Jcb. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC) I agree. FoP does not mean that one can publish pictures of whatever object, one has to take into account the country specific rules. Jcb (talk)

Szia! Köszönöm! Sikerült! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 22:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)