User talk:Rochelimit

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rochelimit!

File:Gereja-tugu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gereja-tugu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Midori (talk) 09:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Rochelimit!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Jiwasraya-nillmij.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jiwasraya-nillmij.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

You have a message at User_talk:Dharmadhyaksha#File:COLLECTIE_TROPENMUSEUM_Affiches_voor_Bollywood-films_op_de_voorgevel_van_Bioscoop_Manggarai_TMnr_20018017.jpg. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Taman Suropati 1949.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Taman Suropati 1949.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tekstman (talk) 08:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

The worst kind of people in Wikipedia[edit]

Are those who deletes old pictures with stupendous reasoning I will not write here. Samples: Russavia, Dharmadhyaksha, Tekstman.--Rochelimit (talk) 17:17, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Very sad not being able to upload photos of Indonesian building, however[edit]

Thanks for the information sir! Unfortunately only one image I ever upload to Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia, a picture of Pertamina head office. I would say that the Indonesian chapter of Wikimedia seems to never taking so-called "building panorama restriction" problem in Indonesia seriously, like many other region-specific Wikimedia.

To made it worse, I no longer contribute at Commons due to such ridiculous and stupid restriction, while my car spotting routine began to wane...... Sabung.hamster (talk) 07:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, really sad Sabung.hamster. In fact you can see my previous posts just above, how ridiculous the reasoning behind the image deletion. They can even decide to delete pictures of Jakarta from the 1970s, officially uploaded by Tropenmuseum!?? How ridiculous is that!? That's just bad! and the worst thing is, these users who decided to report and delete pictures, are barely weeks in Commons, some are probably just kids meddling around!
However, don't let the restriction upset you because, yes, Indonesian wikipedia ignores the building panorama restriction, that's a good thing. So you may upload everything (of good quality) to Wikipedia Indonesia instead and wait (years?) until they lifted the restriction, and then all the pics will be automatically transferred to common.
The main point of Wikipedia is free knowledge for everyone, and by uploading your pictures, you are contributing knowledge to everybody. These Common users who delete good quality neutral pictures for the sake of regulation are plainly the worst kind of users in Wikimedia.--Rochelimit (talk) 15:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
I agree about the so-called Panorama restriction, Rochelimit. I felt they are taking copyright regulation too seriously, while in same time architects in Indonesia rarely care about his work being photographed and being shared en masse through Internet or books, and photographers who don't know that photographing buildings simply infringes architect's right. Not forget to mention Wikimedia Indonesia being lazy about FoP problem like I mention before.
The deletion on Tropenmuseum uploads for same reason, I agree only for images subjected to statues and buildings, because it is simply a plain stupid.
For me, the only way to stop this mess is, 1. upload images on Indonesian Wikipedia, and 2. meddling with legislator to renew the 2013 Copyright law, in order to add the emphasis of "fully free depiction of buildings, statues and craftsman's work located at public premises". For this reason, I stick on Flickr for new images of buildings, regardless. Sabung.hamster (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)