User talk:Rodrigo Padula

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Arquivo de discussões>>

Hi. I've seen you edit in this user talk page. I want to comunnicate with him since all their uploads are in a wrong category. Says "Lagoa", when that category is for an insect. Can you talk to him or help me to fix them? Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Ah, bien. Tienes alguna idea de la categoría que corresponde? --Ganímedes (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

GLAM project[edit]

I took a look at your pages on meta, Wikipedia, and Commons for your GLAM project with Museu da Imigração. Everything looks great! You might want to upload at least one file into your Commons category so the category doesn't get deleted.

Good luck with your project. - PKM (talk) 19:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

There has been much discussion about the use of institutional accunts for GLAM projects, and I am not sure where we are currently on that. You should probably ask your question on the cultural-partners mailing list. If you are not on that list, you can get more information here: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Mailing_lists
I've been away from active GLAM projects fir the last couple of years. - - PKM (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove[edit]

Please do not remove deletion boxes as you recently did [here]. That is not helpful to the process. If you have an opinion about a deletion, please feel free to voice it, but do not remove the standard notices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: so the best option is to leave a nonsense vandalism/edit/request by an IP ? It was not a real deletion request or valid argument as you can read there Rodrigo Padula (talk) 19:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The best would be to approach an admin (like myself) and ask for help. Alternatively leave a message at the Administrator's noticeboard. It is not a good idea to remove the notice boxes no matter how you personally feel about the situation as that action is reserved for administrators. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: Hummm, I guess undo function and vandalism combat were open to everyone. Can you provide me links with that information that you provided here ? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The entire process is described at COM:DEL. And it's a policy, so there's also a template.
@Ellin Beltz: That proccess is the same when the delection requestion is a vandalism created by an IP ? Because it was not a serios deletion request/discussion, it was pure vandalism Rodrigo Padula (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Yes, you leave the tags even when it's a problem and report either to a friendly admin or Admin's noticeboard, as stated before. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requests[edit]

Deutsch | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Svenska | Українська | +/−


Nuvola apps important.svg
Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Rodrigo Padula, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/− --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Pictures removed by bot - what to do[edit]

Hi Rodrigo,

I saw that you said that a bot has removed Ciro's pictures. Well, the important thing is that the pictures are here on Commons. All you have to do is add them again to the articles. For example, that bot made this edit [1]. Nothing can be done in that case because the file has been deleted from Commons, but with Ciro's pictures you just have to copy and paste the names of the pictures again into the articles. I think that's better than using the "undo" option because I don't know if there's a limit to how many times you can "undo" edits in a short period of time. If you need any help please let me know. For example, you can show me some of the articles where this has happened, and I will put the pictures in the articles again, but I've been blocked from the English Wikipedia, so please show me articles from other Wikipedias. Boa noite! Dontreader (talk) 04:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

@Dontreader: How can I see where the files were used before the removal? There are any way to check the bot logs regarding an special user or list of files? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought you or Ciro knew where the pictures were. I cannot think of a solution. I believe there is more than one bot that removes files (maybe one for the English Wikipedia, one for a different Wikipedia, etc.), and other file names might have been removed by random editors when the pictures disappeared. The pictures were tagged as "Missing permission" on 15 July (UTC), so they were probably deleted on 22 July (UTC). I don't know how soon the bots edit the affected pages, but of course we would have to look at bot edits from 22 July and later. I looked for two of Ciro's files in the history of the English Wikipedia bot here but they are not mentioned on that page. Please, do you know the name of the Portuguese Wikipedia bot that removes links to pictures? Dontreader (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ação Educativa.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ação Educativa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Praia de Camboinhas 2.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Praia de Camboinhas 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Arariboia 2.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Arariboia 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cascavel - crotalus durissus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cascavel - crotalus durissus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment[edit]

Hello! There are discussions about som technical issues regarding some of your nominations at QIC. It would be very good if you could take a look, leave a comment and help us sort out the problems. See:

That section works on a time-scedule so this needs to be fixed rather quickly. All the best, --cart-Talk 08:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Falsa coral - Siphlophis compressus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Falsa coral - Siphlophis compressus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Camaleão - Polychrus marmoratus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Camaleão - Polychrus marmoratus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Uploads[edit]

Hi, please make sure to fill in the source field of your uploads. You are flooding the Images without source maintenance category. Jcb (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Now you are apparently uploading with automated software, I have blocked your account for an hour to stop the bot. Please leave a message here if you read this and have turned of the bot, so that I can unblock you. I am monitoring this page. Jcb (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
When the block expired, the uploads started again, so I blocked your account again, this time for 6 hours. Please be aware that I will not be around to unblock you for the full six hours. That's the consequence of doing automated edits without monitoring them. Jcb (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
@Jcb: Hello. I and Rodrigo agreed, privately, that when he finished the uploads, I would make all the necessary corrections (category, licensing, titles, etc). I even created a template to use. So, please, you could revoke this block? Érico (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Ok, done. Jcb (talk) 01:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
@Jcb: template problem fixed! Bot up and running! Rodrigo Padula (talk) 02:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Jcb (talk) 09:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

--WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize again for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Wikimedia survey (corrected link)[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you are not a native speaker of English, I apologize for writing in English. If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you!! --WMF Surveys (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2018/Rules[edit]

Hello there! Please check your mail and reply to a letter with a topic WLE international (rules). We need to finalize them before the contests starts. Thank you! --アンタナナ 18:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)