User talk:Ronhjones/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Please link images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Ronhjones/Archive 1!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Finn Rindahl 12:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Ronhjones!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Transparency

Hi Ron. There is something weird with your SVG images: They are transparent, but not behind den letters (e.g. in File:Butaperazine.svg). I don't know why this is the case. --Leyo 12:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Is that a problem then? They seem to display well enough on the WP pages, e.g en:Butaperazine, and I checked that in both IE7 and FF3.
I know why they are not transparent - they were created in a molecule editor (either IsisDraw or SymyxDraw), saved as a MOL file and converted to SVG with Mol2Svg (which I found by a link on en:Chemical file format - where it says "MDL MOL file can be converted to wikipedia recommended SVG graphics format by Mol2Svg converter freeware"). As far as I can see, Mol2Svg draws all the bond lines according to the MOL file co-ordinates - then places the hetero atoms at the intersections along with small blanking rectangles which covers the bond join and makes the atom symbols stand clear of the bonds. If you load up the svg into a svg editor (e.g inkscape), then you can move the items and see what I mean. Ron 18:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Just a short reply for now: There are some wikipedias where the background of images in galleries and thumbs are shown in a light gray (example). There, these white squares would become visible. Unfortunately, I do not use IsisDraw (anymore) or SymyxDraw (never used). Hence, I cannot really help you. However, there might be other users who are experienced in these programs. --Leyo 22:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I do not think it is IsisDraw or SymyxDraw (SymyxDraw is the later version of IsisDraw). I think it's the conversion of a standard MOL file to SVG that presents a problem. Maybe better to completely add a whole white box behind the molecule as shown on your example page with Allyl Alcohol. Ron 22:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
IMHO a transparent background is better than a white one. I asked on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals for assistance. --Leyo 05:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:Chemical structures

Hi Ronhjones. Please do not categorize structures into this main category. --Leyo 21:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Now I am very confused. I have followed the guidelines on en:Manual_of_Style_(chemistry)/Structure_drawing to the letter - basically uploading with this page - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload and then using this pre-defined template (mine is only slighly modified for my software system - this is the original one) to paste into the summary template...
{{Information
| Description= {{en|Chemical structure of [[:en:...|]]}}
| Source= {{Own}}
| Date= 2015-06-30
| Author= ~~~
| Permission= {{PD-chem}}
| other_versions=
}}

== Comments ==

High-resolution black/white .PNG made with [[:en:ChemDraw|ChemDraw]] and [[:en:IrfanView|IrfanView]] — see [[:en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing|WikiProject Chemistry - structure drawing]] for detailed instructions. Please drop me a note if you need the source file.

[[Category:Chemical structures]]
Note the category is already part of the template text!
Are you saying that the data on en:Manual_of_Style_(chemistry)/Structure_drawing is in error? - what would you like it to be?
You just have to proceed reading below the template:
“Change your structure to the most specific subcategory (or subcategories) of Category:Chemical compounds”
--Leyo 05:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I see, not the best worded instructions in the world. Ron 18:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
You can improve the wording.
If you really do not find appropriate categories in some cases, you can also use {{query chemical}}. But please try to find categories yourself first. --Leyo 19:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Almagate.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Almagate.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 13:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


Licensing of your files

Hi, and first of all thanks for your contributions to Commons. You seem to have uploaded a lot of chemical structure images tagged with both {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} and {{PD-self}}. However, the first license is effectively redundant: the GFDL grants no permissions that you haven't already granted by releasing the file into the public domain. Also, somewhat incidentally, the GFDL template now brings up an extra box about the license migration and puts the files into Category:License migration candidates, which tends to be rather backlogged enough already.

If you're concerned about the legal validity of the public domain release, you might want to consider the {{CC0}} waiver, which does essentially the same thing but more thoroughly and with greater attention to legal details. Alternatively, if you just with to include the GFDL license tag on your files for some other reason, could you please add the parameter "|migration=redundant" to it (like I've done here) when you upload new images in the future, so that people won't need to waste time sorting each of them separately?

Thanks, and have a nice day. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the message - seems I was using an old version of the recomemded template...
I will alter my default template to the new version. Ron 23:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. If you'd like, I can do a bot run to change the licenses on all your earlier chemical structure uploads. Is that OK with you? —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 14:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Superb idea, thank you. Please edit them Ron 18:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
OK, ✓ Done. I think I got them all. Have a nice day. :-) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 00:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Ronhjones!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 00:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Norethindrone enanthate.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Norethindrone enanthate.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Edgar181 (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)



Thanks for the quick fix. Edgar181 (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Almagate.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Almagate.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 07:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Ronhjones!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Ani the cathedral.jpg

Hi — instead of posting such a template on my talk page, you could have asked for some explanations. My answer would have been this: this file has been downloaded on WP:en by user Meowy being the copyright holder (as indicated in its description). Meowy is also the webmaster of the website VirtualANI. You can check it with him if you like, but the speedy deletion is just wrong. Sardur (talk) 08:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

There is no way I can verify if Meowy is the webmaster of VirtualANI. The website has "Most content is copyright ©VirtualANI. All rights reserved." - thus there is no compatible license shown that will allow it to be uploaded here. There are ways of allowing it to be shown here - see COM:L, but this was not followed in this case. Once a copyright problem has been seen it has to be flagged as soon as possible, otherwise it would leave the site open to legal problems.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
There was an easy way: contacting me, or even easier and more efficient, contacting Meowy. The license he used on WP:en was compatible (as he is the author), and an OTRS could have been used in order to confirm it.
Anyway, the file is now deleted, and is not really needed, so I won't "fight" for it. I just didn't like to find such a post as yours on my talk page while I usually do my best to respect policies when I upload a file here. Sardur (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Contacting anyone takes time, editors may not read messages for days, copyright problems are not allowed to stay for any length of time. I did not delete this version, I only tagged it, as I'm not an admin on Commons - so it was deleted bu User:High Contrast. The message on your talk page is a standard template that's used for all such cases. Note that the version on en:Wikipedia is also gone for the same reason (I did delete that version), as there was no OTRS ticket there either.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Emila_Fox.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Emila_Fox.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 02:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Madeline_Zima.jpg

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses File:Madeline_Zima.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.

Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.


Deutsch | English | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | norsk bokmål | português | português do Brasil | slovenščina | svenska | русский | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 01:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Redundant svg of Trinitrotoluene.svg

I see you gave an updated File:Trinitrotoluene.svg that uses good vectorization and ACS style. However, we also already have File:Trinitrotoluene acsv.svg, which by its name is ACS-style and by inspection is even less "pure graphics vectorized" than yours (yours strokes the characters, the other uses text items). Maybe that one should be moved to replace yours? DMacks (talk) 11:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not like the font of the suffixes in File:Trinitrotoluene acsv.svg. --Leyo 13:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
The subscript numbers? They're marked as just "class=smalltext", no font spec for either them or the atom-symbols. Looks like wikimedia's png converter/renderer does some weird things--the numbers are serif in some image-sizes and sans-serif in others?! DMacks (talk) 14:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
That's why in images of chemical structures, all text should be converted to paths. --Leyo 14:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Ahah! So it's the other one that might be deletable (lower-quality same-format of this subject)? DMacks (talk) 14:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
IMHO in this case, both should be kept. They differ by the position of the double bonds. In order to have a uniform look in case of several structures in an article, one or the other might be preferred. --Leyo 16:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Urgh! I agree the numbers look wrong. The text is sans-serif font (OK) and the numbers are serif font (not correct). I don't like that one, sorry.
FWIW - my route to svg is to draw in IsisDraw - using the JACS settings file to control text, text size, bond lengths, etc., print to EPS file (using an Apple Laserwriter driver set to EPS) - looking through the EPS, I cannot see any text so my guess is that this driver is rendering the text as a path. Then I use Scribus to import the EPS, after adjusting the page size to about 10px bigger than the drawing, I export to svg. The resulting svg is a perfect match for how the drawing looked back in IsisDraw.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Your SVG files look good. I would prefer if you could increase their nominal size by a factor of two or more. --Leyo 20:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
OK, I'll have a go - the basic size was obviously determined by the JACS settings file - still I should be able to double all the sizes and keep the proportions the same OR I might be able to do something in the eps to svg conversion step.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I'll look into the serif mess as an svg rendering bug in WP and let the rest of this alone. DMacks (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
I agree - if one clicks on the "bad" picture at File:Trinitrotoluene acsv.svg (which is a png rendition by WP - if one right clicks the image and tries file save it shows a png extension) - to view the actual svg as an actual svg rendered in firefox then - it's OK. As Leyo says maybe it's best to have the text as paths, then no conversion can be required later.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Shavona.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Shavona.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Shavona.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 13:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Shavona.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shavona.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MorganKevinJ(talk) 13:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

This file was uploaded to en-Wiki (I just moved it), and the uploader then used a sock to put in a fake OTRS ticket. I've made a comment in the deletion log on the en-Wiki version to that effect, so it does not get restored.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Lock_operation.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lock_operation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Powers (talk) 18:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Ronhjones!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:TmMntricarbonyl.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 23:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:TpMntricarbonyl2.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 00:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:TpMntricarbonyl.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 00:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File:BY-reduction of carbonyls.svg

Hi Ron. Could you please change “R1” and “R2” to “R1” and “R2” (see en:WP:Chem/Structures#General)? BTW: The file description pages of your SVG files would benefit from a higher nominal size. --Leyo 21:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

OK - I'll have a play with sizes - that's just what I get with setting SymyxDraw to JACS settings, I suppose I can double all sizes up and keep the aspect ratio the same.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Doubling would be good, I think. --Leyo 19:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Now uploaded. What do you think?  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Looks good, thanks. If you would want to change anything, then reduce the size of the superscripts a litte bit. ;-) --Leyo 20:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:ExampleZnTm.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 00:39, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Ronhjones!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bay.gif

Hi Ron. Please have a look there. --Leyo 23:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

File:I123.tif

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:I123.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 16:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

File:G._B._Senanayake.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:G._B._Senanayake.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Quadell (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:GC_WEBSITE_HOME.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GC_WEBSITE_HOME.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prof. Professorson (talk) 18:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:BibleAcademyWeb.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Transferring images

May I know how you are moving the images to Commons? Are you using any tools? Two of the images you transferred had Template loops which I fixed. [1], [2]. May be you can take care of it next time. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm using your Commons Mover tool, if you remember... :-) I did see those loops and could not work out how to fix it, I had a couple of tries (using the show preview), but it only got worse. I thought someone would work it out for me. Now I can see what you removed, I know what to do next time.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I remember now. Btw, a better tool to move images to Commons is available at Wikipedia:FTCG. May be you should switch over to that tool. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
I give it a look when I've finished with the current drive - en:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Images_and_Media/Commons/Drives/Jan_2012/Logs  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gauerbachdc.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gauerbachdc.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gauerbachdc.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Images by en:User:Pubwvj

Hi! You moved two images by en:User:Pubwvj to Commons and added an OTRS ticket to one of them (File:BigUnTusks6184w.jpg) but not to the other one (File:BigUnBedHeadSnow0428w.jpg). Wouldn't the OTRS ticket apply to both of them? According to a notice on my talk page on English Wikipedia, the user is the photographer of both images, although I'm not sure what the OTRS ticket says. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that one. Something odd must have gone on with the transfer, it was added to the en-wiki image (I just checked the deleted version). Very strange. Nothing is ever simple, c'ést la vie...  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Good that the error was spotted, then. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

File:GAPSTADIUM.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GAPSTADIUM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 12:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


Large image donation

{{helpme}} I posted this at the village pump but no one answered - Try here as well!

Photographer Cesare Brizio has agreed to donate 1300+ images here. Can any one suggest how we might achive this? any bot writers help? Images may be taken from the web page OR originals can be sent to anyone on a DVD if required

Data from OTRS ticket 2012021810002796 follows (permission obatined to copy this here)
++++++++++++++
Dear Ron Jones: yes, I confirm that I am actually glad to release all the images located at via the "View Media" link at http://tolweb.org/onlinecontributors/app?service=external/ImageContributorDetailPage&sp=1810 as "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)". Furthermore, I can provide upon request higher resolution versions (1024x768 or more) of almost all the same images.

By the way, I would gladly release as "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)" all the audio samples (recordings of animal sounds) available at the web pages listed here:

best regards,

Cesare Brizio
+++++++++++++
 Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Reply obtained on Village Pump  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Category problem

Hi, It was brought to my attention that, at en:Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 92#Odd behaviour in category, you once described a problem similar to what I described yesterday at Commons:Village pump#Odd display in a category. From Bugzilla:29787, I understand that you could fix it easily enough. However, I'm not sure what I must do exactly to fix the problem here. May I request your advice? Thanks in advance. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

I remember it well. Edit each page, just add a space or blank line to the page and save - system sees a different page size and does the save (if you click edit and then hit save - it doesn't do anything!). Then the system will recognise the file as an image again.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:57, 24 March 2012 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Ronhjones, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!--Ginés90 (talk) 03:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Trycatch (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

en:Women in Music

A few weeks ago, I asked you for advice on how best to upload pix for use on wikipedia (re: [Ticket#2012030110016293]). You recommended using wiki commons. You also offered to walk us through the process. We are now ready to proceed. But first a question. The donor (a university book publisher) gave us the photos in tiff. What are the disadvantages? Should we first request another format? Note that Mx96 is leading this project, I am a contributor. Eurodog 20:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
From commons Permitted file types: png, gif, jpg, jpeg, xcf, mid, ogg, ogv, svg, djvu, tiff, tif, oga.. We like to have the best quality, tiff is better than jpg. Pages are not rendered direct from the full image just with a size frame - all images have been converted to a web friendly image of the correct size prior to page display. So there's no advantage on picking any format over any other.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Today, I uploaded 11 images to wikimedia. I am not new to editing articles, but am new to uploading images. Could you please verify that I gave adequate permission? Because your online hours don't sync with mine (East Coast, USA), is there a way to reach you via email? Thanks for your help! Mx96WCO (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful - The data is fine but more is needed. You have put Courtesy of the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts, Music Division, and The University of Arkansas Press. Therefore you need to show that the owner (I assume The University of Arkansas Press?) has donated the material.
As I said in my OTRS message, one ideally needs the urls of the image. Having uploaded them, then that is not a problem. A few simple changes I think you need to make to all the images. - here's the data from File:Frédérique Petrides 7.tif as an example
Now...
== {{int:license-header}} ==

{{cc-by-sa-3.0}}
{{OTRS pending}}
{{own}} means you took the photo and own the copyright, so that's needs changing to the real source
remove the "self" parameter - that means you are the copyright holder, removing the self just shows the license
{{OTRS pending}} gives you time to sort out the license with the University press.
So that's all you need to do with the actual images, then you need to get the copyright holder to e-mail in the form at Commons:Email templates/Consent to OTRS - replacing the grey bits with the relevant data  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
If you are not sure how to format the form, let me know and I will create one for you.
E-mail - both my talk pages (here and en-Wiki) have an e-mail link on the left, for obvious reasons I don't publish it for the spammers to use! NB:I'm off to Grangemouth for tomorrow/Thurs, not sure when I might log in after tonight (probably Thurs eve, it's only 4 hours drive.)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Mr. Jones, many thanks; it is extremely kind and helpful of you to provide such detailed information; we (my collaborator in this, Eurodog, is out of town on business) will be in touch with you concerning this next week. Mx96WCO (talk)

File:Focalin.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Focalin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

' (Talk) 19:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Regarding deletion

I have replied to your deletion request here--Camilo Sanchez (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

FoP DR categories

Hello,

When you nominate for deletion a picture, with a freedom of panorama rationale, could you add the DR page on the Category:FOP-related deletion requests category (or a by-country subcategory if existing)?

This will allow us to review the cases when those countries will change the legislation to allow freedom of panorama and already help us to read previous DR to see what is applicable in what case.

Thank you for your help. --Dereckson (talk) 18:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Garter swallowing frog.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Garter swallowing frog.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Psychonaut (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Dirt Baby.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dirt Baby.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Global Shopping Mall.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Global Shopping Mall.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wizardman 15:57, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Richa Chadda.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Richa Chadda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 10:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Skip Stewart and Patty Wagstaff.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Skip Stewart and Patty Wagstaff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ariadacapo (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:GAPSTADIUM.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GAPSTADIUM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rapsar (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Image File:Bambi magazine logo.png

This is regarding the image that you posted an OTRS ticket to, File:Bambi magazine logo.png I have just verifying the images permission as it happened to be in this Category: Category:Items with OTRS permission confirmed but no license it was posted on the Commons OTRS Noticeboard see here so, I was checking to verify the license of the image but it returned as, No Permission! So since you were the one dealing with that ticket. Which listed on the files page is 2012061510014736. So I was wondering if you made a mistake and put the wrong ticket number in or such. Thanks, --Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Prometheus 3 Revolution.jpg and File:Skip Stewart and Shockwave.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Prometheus 3 Revolution.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Skip Stewart and Shockwave.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hello Ronhjones, apologies for the automated deletion requests. I do realize you are not the original uploader of these files. I hope you will not take these requests personally. Don’t hesitate to let me know if you think I’m going too fast. Thanks, Ariadacapo (talk) 08:09, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry about them :-)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 02:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Richard Sinclair

Posted by Richard Sinclair 28 Jan 2012. I understand that a photograph of me (taken by Jaak Geebelen), has been deemed the property of Creative Commons. And I can request it's removal. This photograph appears on Wikipedia English and France and probably all the others? as well as the France version has been lifted to create a 'Richard Sinclair' musician page on Facebook. I request that you please remove this picture : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishier:Richardsinclair.jpg. and this offensive, fraudulent page if you are able to : https://www.facebook.com/pages/RichardSinclair/105524906147639?ref=nf

I hope this will facilitate my being able to have my Name back, my User Name, on a Musician page, on Facebook. Richard Sinclair. Email: (removed)

File:B Money.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:B Money.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

—Bill william comptonTalk 04:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Brooke Vincent.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brooke Vincent.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 01:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Production of levetiracetam.png

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


File:2-bromobutyric acid production.png

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Production of levetiracetam.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Production of levetiracetam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 22:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Accylation.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Accylation.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Enolate bromo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Enolate bromo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Acculation.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Acculation.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Some kind of reaction.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Some kind of reaction.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 07:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bromination.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bromination.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:2-bromobutanoic acid reaction.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2-bromobutanoic acid reaction.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 07:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:2-aminobutanoic acid.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2-aminobutanoic acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 22:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

File:2-bromobutyric acid production.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2-bromobutyric acid production.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

All above notified to the original uploader on en-Wiki  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! That school project seems to have been a hit&run and there's pretty much nothing left of their contributions to the 2-bromobutyric acid article. DMacks (talk) 02:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Football Festival in Dubai 2005.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Football Festival in Dubai 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.133.39 12:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

OTRS

Thanks for handling that. Regards, — Hex (❝?!❞) 16:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Boise State vs LSU December 14 2012.jpeg

You uploaded this file some hours ago but it was somehow tagged with the unusual/wrong Category:Wikipedia administration. Do you have any idea how this cat was added to this image? If it was added by yourself please don't do this in future uploads, if you didn't add it yourself it may be a bug in the uploader you used. --Denniss (talk)

Odd - must be a bug... As far as I know the uploader uses Wikisense, I'll keep an eye out for it if it occurs again.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Firefox fix

I recently uploaded 2 Flickr images to wikipedia and they were displaying fine on the article. But after you moved them to wikimedia they no longer display in the article in the Firefox browser (in IE it was fine). Any fix to this? Timmyshin (talk) 04:45, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

en:WP:PURGE and en:WP:REFRESH come to mind. ISTR the "thumbnail refresh bug" has reared it's ugly head again - not just limited to image moves. The article en:Bao Zheng renders just fine in my Firefox.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Administrator?

Hi, Ronh Jones. You has interest in a request for adminship on Commons? I can't see any reason for not and I see that have experience as sysop on English Wikipedia. What do you think? Greetings, Érico Wouters msg 03:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

I can honestly say that I've not thought about it - yes I'm an admin on en-wiki and an OTRS volunteer as well, which does take up a bit of time! I could see uses for it - especially with the OTRS work (I've had to request for the odd image to be undeleted when resolving a ticket). If you wish to nominate me then feel free, I can see a use for the permission.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Please, accept here. Érico Wouters msg 00:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Evidence of Specification and High Accessibility in Causeway Bay.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Evidence of Specification and High Accessibility in Causeway Bay.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Glhs03.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Glhs03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 01:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Germantown Academy Alma Mater.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Germantown Academy Alma Mater.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GrapedApe (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Italiano | 日本語 | Հայերեն | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Ronhjones, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard an it subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--99of9 (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Congrats! Keep the good work! Érico Wouters msg 04:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Good luck with the tools! --cyrfaw (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you all for your support. Looks like I've another learning curve to climb ;-)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations and good luck! A 100% score is impressive. :) As you're a new admin, this page made by Jim might be of use for you. Trijnsteltalk 22:44, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy question

Hi Ron. Can you take a look at User talk:INeverCry#Files from State of Florida when you get a chance? Thanks. INeverCry 20:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Katɵpanomeɡas and Katepanomegas

Checked : Katɵpanomeɡas, it's not the same "e", I think an troll create a very similar account to noise the real and great Katepanomegas! He copy the discussion page and all the user page but it's clearly a different personn. I don't know what you can make for this. Mathieu C. (talk) 07:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

File:T38 Stilet.jpg

Dear expert Ronhjones,

please handle this issue. Thanks for informing me about this file.

Kindest regards, High Contrast (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Gh tech.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gh tech.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bkell (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Losartan syn.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Losartan syn.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ed (Edgar181) 19:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Gate entering Tipasa.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gate entering Tipasa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bkell (talk) 20:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Gibo Teodoro.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gibo Teodoro.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Xeltran (talk) 07:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Gateway mall.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gateway mall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Anna-Victoria-Wood-95.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anna-Victoria-Wood-95.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 09:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

User:4xchamp

Hi Ron. Since you just deleted two of the files I tagged, I think you should have a look at this user's recent uploads in general. There are lots of derivative works like collections of news articles, posters, leaflets and whatnot. I highly doubt that 4xchamp made them all themselves. De728631 (talk) 22:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Tagged a lot of them  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Gibraltar5pounds.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gibraltar5pounds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Underlying lk (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Picture of Powerboat Unowot from Geoffrey Bagleys page.

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia and the system seems to have me running around in circles.

I am hoping to get this picture reinstated.

I messaged the previous editor who flagged it for deletion but i have heard nothing back.

The picture in question is of an oil painting which I own.

As i am happy for the picture to be used and distributed I am not sure what further I can do to prevent it from being removed.

Thanks.

Unless you purchased the copyright in writing when you bought the painting, then the artist (and subsequently the artist's beneficiaries) would hold the copyright to the painting. As the owner you are free to display it, but your purchase does not allow you to make copies of it for distribution and use by the general public. You would have to get the copyright owner to release the copyright to a suitable level (e.g. CC-BY-SA) to allow it to be in commons.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:31, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Missed some

Try this. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Well she only asked for one image - she probably didn't even know about the others, she saw it on searching on Google. I suppose it would be kind to fix those as well. Thanks  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me, sir.

File:Asan medical center front.jpg is not PD File. See the Asan medical center webpage, and it is copyvio. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - can't win them all - trying to rationalise images used on 2 wikis - at least I can delete my own mistakes.  Ronhjones  (Talk)

Were you aware ...

Were you aware that you deleted a .png file, and tried to replace it with an .svg file, and that the replacements don't take place?

(show/hide) 00:25, 4 May 2013 Ronhjones (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Grandes Armes Kingdom of Westphalia.jpg.png (Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:Grandes Armes Jérôme Bonaparte (1784-1860) 2.svg) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log)

Personally I have been converting these requests to {{other version}} as to my reading of the policy it says file type mismatches should stay. Further as per the instructions on user:CommonsDelinker/commands the bot will not do the replacements, so if they need to be done, it needs to be a manual task.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

One lives and learns... The png was a copy without attribution of the svg - so it was also technically a copyright violation. I'll check out the usage of the file tonight if the bot won't work.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:07, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Well if the bot did not do it - someone did - no articles linked to the png anymore.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Unipol Tower 1.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Unipol Tower 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 11:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Mebroqualone.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mebroqualone.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ricordisamoa 01:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

You might want to comment on this.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vlad Tepes 002.gif Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Ticket 2013060410011767

Please don't do this, you confuse people with such statements. Every day lots of people write a permission to OTRS, thinking that they are the copyright holder because they are the depicted person. We, as OTRS volunteers and Commons administrators, (should) know better. It's our task to explain to the contributors how it works, not to confuse them with contradicting statements. And I'm actually not happy with the way you just overruled me, without any attempt of communication. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

He did actually come to me first - you will note my e-mail address in the CC. He did not tell me what he planned to do, so I missed picking it up.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Front facade of SM Lanang Premier, December 2012.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Front facade of SM Lanang Premier, December 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

File:James Wesley Rawles Founders Book cover.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:James Wesley Rawles Founders Book cover.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alan (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

File:James Wesley Rawles Founders Book cover.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:James Wesley Rawles Founders Book cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Galloper gun2.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Galloper gun2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LFaraone (talk) 21:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Peter Coffin; "Untitled (Tree Pants)" at The Wanås Foundation, Skåne, Sweden.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Peter Coffin; "Untitled (Tree Pants)" at The Wanås Foundation, Skåne, Sweden.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ukexpat (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Retrospect-Epica-ChasingtheDragon.png

http://micheleafgreco.blogspot.com is my blog. Star840 (talk)

You cannot prove that here - all editors are anonymous - you will need to use the form at Commons:Email templates/Consent to donate the copyright - unless you place suitable license on the web page.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Oxycodone2D.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Oxycodone2D.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 08:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Remifentanil2D.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Remifentanil2D.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:G R-FDD Dynasty Ed Burke Million-1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:G R-FDD Dynasty Ed Burke Million-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 08:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

File:G R-Jess Zoomin-2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:G R-Jess Zoomin-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 09:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

File:II MelnragėBotanTab.jpg

Helo! It's nice to meet new college of wp.commons (i.e. new for me)! I'm surprised with Your's files on chemistry! They are great! Could You help me and upload N-(1-Naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (also named Bratton-Marshall's reagent, may be either other salt, e.g.di-methochloride or other existing salt)? I'd like to write an article on czech wikipedia about it. Thanks in advance! Next matter: You've deleted file File:II MelnragėBotanTab.jpg. I'm not sure why: a photo was done in public place and its object - scheme is actually determined to inform all visitors. There was no reference to copyrights. As to my guess, public scedules, schemes, maps are not subjects of copyright? (excuse me for my poor English, as I'm Czech) Sincerelly --Kusurija (talk) 08:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Been out all day - I'll look at the structures later this week. File:II MelnragėBotanTab.jpg - Photo of a poster, which contains images (therefore becomes a derivative image)- any 2D artwork is usually fully protected. Looks like it was in Lithuania - see Freedom_of_panorama#Lithuania  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

File:N-(1-Naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride.svg

Thank You much for uploading! But there is one small mistake: there is not hydrogen on ω-NH+, which shouldn't be missed. One more question: would You mind upload one chemical equation, if I upload a photo of it written by hand; transferred to typewritten and in .svg format? Thanks. Yours sincerelly --Kusurija (talk) 07:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Like most chemical drawing packages - they all default to not show hydrogens - I've changed the setting to show on "hetero and terminal" - see how you like that one.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
New item - why not just send to me at the e-mail address hidden here (open edit window to see it) - note I'm just about to go away for two weeks so it will have to wait until I return.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:DivergentPetasis.png

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DivergentPetasis.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 20:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

✓ 'Done' Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Fentanyl2D.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fentanyl2D.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 04:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Morphine Numbered Position.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Morphine Numbered Position.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 10:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Once Again (film).jpg

Can I know under what conditions and authority have you deleted this file? I won this file. How can you just delete something without knowing the facts and decide if it's a violation? This should be restored asapRyder212 (talk) 21:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

It will not be restored. You did not make the poster. You therefore have no claim over the copyright. The copyright belongs to the person (or company) that made the poster, unless they give explicit copyright release in writing. They may give/sell as many posters as they like to who they please - but they always retain the copyright.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Maybe...

...you wish to dream on here. --High Contrast (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Heteroatom.jpg

And also:

Hi Ronhjones. Your files listed above are in Category:Chemical images that should use vector graphics. Could you please check, if the tag may be removed (in the case of high resolution PNGs), if there is already an SVG version, or if you consider uploading an updated version of higher resolution/quality on top of the old? Thank you. Leyo 13:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

As far as I remember, these were the best of the non-svg files on en-wiki, and they were therefore moved over - the really poor ones are still on en-wiki! I've had no plans for this set, it would be nicer if someone with some time to spare (not me at present) did make svg versions, but I don't see it as an essential thing.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:57, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I did this posting using VFC together with postings to other users. I was not aware that all your uploads in this category were transferred from en.wikipedia and not self-made. --Leyo 22:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Eddavis.jpg

I was wondering why this file was deleted. It had the correct flickr licence here --Flaming Ferrari (talk) 17:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

If was from a Flickr account that is a known copyright violator - so ended up in Category:Flickr images from blacklisted accounts reviewed by FlickreviewR. The photo was taken by the UK army and had quite clearly "Crown Copyright" in the EXIF data. There was also File:Sir Adrian Bradshaw.jpg which was taken by a foreign army and had "Copyright status = Copyrighted" in the EXIF. On the plus side File:Stuart Skeates.jpg was taken by the US army and as such had a nice "Public Domain" in the EXIF, so the license for that one has been changed to {{PD-USGov-Military-Marines}}  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for clarifying this. I was under the impression that the account was the official account of ISAF so didn't think there would be any copyright issues, but obviously I was wrong. I'll try to be more careful in future. --Flaming Ferrari (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
The bot uses this list User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors to tag bad Flickr uploaders - if you click the "Photostream" link when viewing an image you get a url like http://www.flickr.com/photos/29456680@N06. It may well be some sort of official account, doesn't mean that they understand copyright.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Perospirone2D1.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Perospirone2D1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ed (Edgar181) 18:43, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Ronhjones,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:100 Hits Garage & Bassline CD in HMV (Ft Robbie Glover).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:100 Hits Garage & Bassline CD in HMV (Ft Robbie Glover).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Guy 23:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Canadian Forces Flags

Hello. Thank you for your diligent efforts in removing copyrighted images. However, I didn't have the chance to save them at home to transfer them to the English Wikipedia. Is there any chance I would be able to transfer them? Thanks for all of your time. Trackratte (talk) 01:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Just so you know these files have been listed at undeletion requests.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

If they don't get undeleted - I can help you move them  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Sounds good and thankyou. A discussion has already been started at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Royal Military College of Canada.svg. Instead of starting several at the same time, I think it would be easiest to focus on the one only and then apply to the rest. Trackratte (talk) 20:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Let's see what the community have to say...  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

UnDR

You recently deleted several images of the Canadian Forces. They were improperly tagged as "Fair Use" but are not violations. I have filed an UnDR, please grant it. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

I have replied on the page  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Canadian Space Agency Coat of Arms.svg

I noticed that you un-deleted the Canadian Space Agency Coat of Arms.svg, despite it being a derivative of a copyrighted work (which was linked to in the request). I have opened a regular DR as you suggested, but I didn't think SVG versions of copyrighted works, even if slightly different, were considered new works rather than derivative works. I understand that in this case it's a COA, but as far as i know that only explains the rationale behind a new work (based on the blazon) rather than a derivative work. I would appreciate your comments either way. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canadian Space Agency Coat of Arms.svg. Thank you, The Haz talk 01:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

It was undeleted with several other Canadian images (see talks above) - I saw it as a derivative - if you took the original and, say, changed the colours of the stars, then that's a derivative. How far one can move away from the original image until it no longer resembles it, it a moot point. Who ever drew the svg (and I've made a few myself), must have had the original image alongside to work from - thus it's a close copy (I've turned jpgs into svgs by having the jpg load into the drawing program and them adding the vector elements on top of it, finally deleting the jpg when complete - it's not exactly the same, but it's a derivative) (copy to DR if you want)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:21, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Madhukar_Dhas_on_MTV_Set.jpg

Hi, I noticed that you deleted this page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Madhukar_Dhas_on_MTV_Set.jpg for copyright reasons. Kindly note that the uploader is the owner of the website that you referenced, BigDooker.com. I've not used the Commons much, so I don't know how to request undeletion. Do help! Susheel c (talk) 07:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

All editors in Wikimedia are effectively anonymous. There is no way we can validate who a user really is within these pages. Therefore the best way to upload images is to upload them to Wikimedia first - then it can not be said that the image was copied from elsewhere. If the image was on the web already, then it needs some explicit permission. Either
  1. The remote image page needs to show the appropriate license - e.g using code from http://creativecommons.org/choose/results-one?license_code=by-sa&jurisdiction=&version=3.0&lang=en. Allowable licenses are usually CC-BY-SA, CC-BY and CC-zero.
  2. The copyright holder (that will normally be the photographer - unless there is a written release of copyright from him/her) needs to send in the form at Commons:Email templates/Consent
Then the image can be undeleted.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok, the uploader / owner of the website is my uncle, so I'll ask him to do the needful. Thanks Susheel c (talk) 18:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Eduardo Garcia Caffi.jpg and File:GARCIACAFFI.jpg

You deleted File:Eduardo Garcia Caffi.jpg as a facebook copyvio a few days back, however it looks like the same user has uploaded the picture again, this time as File:GARCIACAFFI.jpg, can you check and action this ? LGA talkedits 23:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Good spot, tagged up, user warned.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Mail

PEarley (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Carbuterol.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Carbuterol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 03:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Antix (Rapper), Holland 2012.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Antix (Rapper), Holland 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Xylose cyanohydrin reaction.gif

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Xylose cyanohydrin reaction.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kopiersperre (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Tariq Yaqoob Rizwi.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tariq Yaqoob Rizwi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:28, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Was an en-wiki transfer - no image match at the time of moving. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Re; Karsh photos from Wisdom magazine

These are the files from the Josuf Karsh category that are from Wisdom magazine:

Some of these were deleted previously. Wasn't sure where else to list these, in case they should be sent to DR. We hope (talk) 20:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Let me talk to the Karsh estate - since I'm in touch at OTRS - they can clarify if they claim copyright. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
@We hope - The estate says they are all copyrighted. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
That's what I thought. Do you want to start the DRs as you're presently dealing with the OTRS material from the Karsh estate? We hope (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
OK Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! We hope (talk) 23:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Link for the Six Images Commons:Deletion requests/File:Artur Rubinstein - cover.jpg
I had a bad feeling about these when I saw the table of contents for the Hemingway photo and there was a copyright notation for all Karsh photos in the issue. We hope (talk) 23:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Martin_Blankemeyer.jpg

dear ron: you have removed my picture from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martin_Blankemeyer.jpg, because you found it at http://www.filmhaus.koeln/ihk-wahl-2014/zur-person/ - i actually did ask the photographer (peter boettcher) for his consent to use the picture on facebook before uploading it and he agreed. probably, we didn't follow the wikipedia standards correctly to make this clear. could you please help me to re-upload the picture again and make clear, that the author of the work has agreed to its use here? thank you in advance & all the best, --Blenco (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

See Commons:Email templates/Consent - once permission received, picture can be undeleted. It's impossible to re-upload a deleted image - the system will spot it. Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
first, i have to say that i meant "Wikipedia" when i wrote "Facebook" ;-). Regarding your advice, i'll follow the instructions in the link you gave me - thanks for your help (i'm not familiar with wikimedia commons, unfortunately), --Blenco (talk) 07:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Sila Stetter Reaction.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sila Stetter Reaction.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 08:18, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Gilroy, CA.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gilroy, CA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Cefbuperazone.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cefbuperazone.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ed (Edgar181) 12:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Fantasy Fest 2006 Wet T-Shirt Contest 24 Whipped cream titties.jpg

Please restore. I just explained on the file page above the tag why this is not a copyvio. Thank you. --Vydra (talk) 23:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Explanations are supposed to go on the talk page - as stated in the banner. The banner would then change when there is a created talk page, to highlight the talk item. I've moved your comment to the talk page for future reference. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Hm. First, thanks for restoring. Second, the German version of said banner, Template:Copyvio/de (which is what I see), says "Solltest du nicht mit der Schnelllöschung einverstanden sein, so erkläre auf der Bildseite oder ihrer Diskussionsseite warum." Which means the explanation can go either on the file page or the talk page. If that is not correct, please change it. --Vydra (talk) 23:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Ah - maybe one to fix - en says "Appeal: If you think that the file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please explain why on its talk page." - and once a talk page is created you get "Please check the talk page before deleting where information pertaining copyright might have been added." Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Mikhail_Kaluzhsky.jpg

Hi! I got a permission from the author of this photo that it can be used on Wiki with appropriate license. Would not upload it otherwise. :) Could you restore it, please?

Thanks! Sincerely, Bisamratta (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Then you will have to use Commons:Email templates/Consent to get the permission approved. Then the image will be undeleted. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

File:R-truth finisher.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:R-truth finisher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PointsofNoReturn (talk) 21:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Antix (Rapper), Holland 2012.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Antix (Rapper), Holland 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gavduff007 (talk) 07:28, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Commons email problem

I tried to send you an email via Commons, but the message was returned to me saying: "A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error."

I do not understand why my message could not be delivered. Has, perhaps, an administrator blocked my use of Commons mail? My mail on WP is not working either, and I'm staring to feel unwanted around here.

Malcolm Schosha (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

If you get blocked then there is an option "Prevent user from sending email" - but you are not blocked. Checked my logged address - looks OK to me. But email is disabled on en-wiki, this might have an effect. Forget that - I've just seen the commons e-mail in my inbox (not read e-mails yet) Will reply. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for checking. Much appreciated.
Having my mail blocked on WP is a substantial problem because that is the only method of communication I have left there. But I have used it only a few times over the years, and do not understand why that was disabled.
Malcolm Schosha (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

question about copyright

Hi Ronhjones -- If you have the time, could you take a look at the section titled "File:Macou stamp..." on my talk page. You can respond to me there. You can erase this message. Thanks--Foobarnix (talk) 18:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Replied Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Menitrazepam.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Menitrazepam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Page ID 40526047

Hi, this photo is own work even though used before. how can i upload please. Thank you

@Invictusv7: The copyright holder (usually the photographer) must send in the form at Commons:Email templates/Consent Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Selena at London Film festival redcarpet.JPG

Hi! I was wrong when I nominated it for speedy deletion. Photos published in the blog selenadu.wordpress.com are different. Shame on me. Could you undelete it? --Juggler2005 (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

@Juggler2005: ✓ DoneRonhjones  (Talk) 03:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Fipexide.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fipexide.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kopiersperre (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Gabol Tribe Mens welcoming Sardar Nabil Ahmed Gabol.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gabol Tribe Mens welcoming Sardar Nabil Ahmed Gabol.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saqib (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Williams2013.jpg

It wasn't a 2.0 file copyrighted photo on Flickr? --Tartufo (msg) 10:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

There was no Flickr link - the known data was "Photograph taken by Nic Bezzina; see http://www.nme.com/ratemy/342904/nme-photo-awards-2014-professional/item/353823" Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
That's very strange. Thanks for the reply --Tartufo (msg) 20:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia 'List of cocaine analogues' article images needed

Hello,

I notice you make a lot of molecular structure 2D images. I am currently restricted to a library computer and cannot make images for upload.

I was wondering if you could assist me in my endeavor of adding certain images for inclusion at the Wikipedia 'List of cocaine analogues' page.

What I need is mostly those from Singh's SAR of Cocaine paper (45 pages in on the page finder; pg. 970 or so as enumerated on the paper itself: the chemical structures 183a-(through)-d, 184a & b, 185a-d, 186-188 on 'Scheme 42', on pg. 50 (974) structures 196a-o, 197a-g, 198a-e, 199a & b, 200 & 201a-e ... and more down to page 61 or so; namely N-modified analogs & such.)

Any help making these would be greatly appreciated. Nagelfar (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@Nagelfar: Not this week! PC has died and gone to makers, I'm stuck with a small laptop. When PC returns then maybe I can help, maybe some instals to do first - suspect dead c: hard drive! If you are OK with a short wait then I will have a go when all is repaired. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:45, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
OK, I have someone willing to make the images and release the license, this individual can upload the images, but I can't download onto this library computer. I can't upload (or don't know how) to here directly from websites. But the first of the images I requested is here. If you could just download, rename and upload, I can do the article inclusion. I don't know if that's an issue because it wasn't "made by you" but neither of us care about it's intellectual property (for all I care you can say you made it when you upload it). In the meantime maybe one of us will figure it out. Thanks for getting back to me Nagelfar (talk) 21:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
jpg is not an acceptable format for chemical structures. They will be expected to be svg. They will sometimes be happy with a high resolution png, but svg is the best format for the structures. There is some useful advice at en:Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Chemistry/Structure_drawing or how to get a good svg drawing. Do check to make sure the structures you need are not already done at Category:Cocaine Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Gabrielle Rifkind 2.jpeg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gabrielle Rifkind 2.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gabrielle Rifkind 2.jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

-mattbuck (Talk) 11:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Mattbuck, I can't see anything wrong with this image. The original upload log at en.wikipedia confirms that Orgmep licensed the file with {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL|migration=redundant}}. Unless you've found credit to a specific photographer, I don't see a reason to tag this for missing permission. De728631 (talk) 23:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Single purpose account, no metadata... And I just found it's her twitter picture. Let's just DR this. Oh, De728631, feel free to use {{ping}} rather than leaving me talkback notices. Easier for all concerned I think. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Tropicacid.PNG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tropicacid.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 00:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Pending fair use deletes

It seems that puting images into this category had no effect. At least for images from Commons:Deletion requests/File:William Henry Holt.jpg. Which bot is intended to work on it and when? Ankry (talk) 08:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ankry: I suspect the bot is not that well - User talk:Commons fair use upload bot - best ask User:Fæ Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Need some help

Yesterday I sent you an email from WP, and this morning from Commons. Since I have gotten no confirmation for either email, I am assuming that (for reasons unknown) some administrator has blocked my access to the email function on all my accounts. You may remember that I had this problem previously when I tried to contact you.

................................................

I just noticed that a WP robot made some changes to my blocked, User: Malcolm Schosha, account. For instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Malcolm_Schosha~enwiki

Since I am blocked from editing Wikipedia, but my Commons and Meta accounts are not blocked, unifying my WP accounts does not seem a helpful change.

Also the reason given for my being blocked, "Blocked indefinitely. Reason: Abusing multiple accounts," is incorrect. The reason that wonderful WP administrator, Gwen Gale, gave when she blocked me was WP:PA. (Personally I think it is nonsense to have been indeffed for the arguments that occurred on my user page, but that was her reason and I have given up arguing about that for now.

I would like to get things moved back to the way you left them, if that is possible. Your help would be, once again, much appreciated.

Thank you. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)