User talk:Rostocker

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rostocker!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HRO1237-2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:HRO1237-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank erstmal für deine schönen Uploads. Aber ich glaube dieses Bild hast du zweimal hochgeladen. --McZusatz (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unten sind nochmal zwei, die ich gefunden habe. Du kannst übrigens auf der Löschdiskussionsseite deine Meinung kundtun, falls du willst. ;) Schönen Tag noch. --McZusatz (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HRO1293-2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:HRO1293-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HRO8605-2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:HRO8605-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo[edit]

... und willkommen in der Wikipedia. Vielen Dank für das Hochladen deiner Bilder! Gestatte mir bitte ein paar Anregungen: Bilder wie dieses haben ein paar für Wikipedia entscheidende Schwächen, die in anderen Fotocommunitys dagegen zu Begeisterung führen würden: 1. Der Name ist nicht aussagefähig; ein Benutzer, der nach einem bestimmten Zugtyp sucht, weil er seinen Artikel damit illustrieren möchte, findet dein Bild so nicht. 2. Der Zug ist unscharf. Das macht aus fotografischer Sicht die Szene sehr dynamisch, enzyklopädisch ist es aber ungeeignet. 3. solltest du Kategorien vergeben, damit deine Bilder gefunden werden. Bitte lass dich durch meine Kritik nicht ärgern, jedes Foto ist uns hier wichtig, alles andere lernt man schnell und Hilfe bekommst du immer. Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 13:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HRO8628.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:HRO8628.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.65.74.188 11:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:HRO1439.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:HRO1439.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.65.74.188 11:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Vorsicht an der Bahnsteigkante !.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vorsicht an der Bahnsteigkante !.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vorsicht an der Bahnsteigkante !.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 12:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Rügen July 2011.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rügen July 2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rügen July 2011.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

1989 12:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning[edit]

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Tok Pisin  Türkçe  українська  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−


float 
You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits, as you did to File:Rostock Kreuzfahrtschiff Emerald Princess.jpg, you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

please not that your images are freely licensed and this is irrevocable.Denniss (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Löschanträge[edit]

Hallo Rostocker,
Was meinst du mit "Bitte um Löschung wegen Urheberrecht. / Please extinction due to copyright law."? Du selbst hast das Foto als eigenes Werk vor >3 Jahren hochgeladen. --Túrelio (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tunnelblick.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tunnelblick.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   19:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:FKK7442.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:FKK7442.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]