User talk:Rsocol
|
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Ro.wiki
[edit]Thanks. Evrik (talk) 14:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 18:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- The template mentioned above was the speedy delete template, because I mistakenly uploaded the file with a wrong name. Razvan Socol (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 2f0b1163858677d77dfe52046c88c170
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File:Statue of Avram Iancu (Targu Mures).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Powers (talk) 14:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
zhang
[edit]Hi, you said: "same image appears at many news sites". can you give me a hint, at which sites? --Алый Король (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Mostly Chinese sites: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. You can use Google Image Search to find other copies of a particular picture. Razvan Socol (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for marking copyvio
[edit]Hello, thanks for marking the copyvio of Cheryl Cole
Neozoon (talk) 19:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Andrei Stroe's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Rsocol,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Another kitten for you!
[edit]Thanks for marking the copyviolation of File:Crown Princess Mary of denmark.jpg
Neozoon (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Check your facts
[edit]http://www.flickr.com/photos/emotionaltoothpaste/2186000759/ Dken5 (talk)
- Well, the image File:Shelby Steele.jpg is a tv screenshoot (obviously), even if it was photographed (not copied directly from a TV tuner software). The person who uploaded the file on Flickr did so with disregard to the TV station's copyrights. Additionally, the CC-BY-NC-ND license is not compatible with Commons. Razvan Socol (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Question about image deletion
[edit]Hi, I'm a new Wikipedia user. You've User:Rsocol recently removed three images I had uploaded for a page that I'm working on in my user sandbox in Wikipedia which you can see under MonaMG/Sandbox. The photos I had uploaded from the artist's website into commons are for the page that I'm updating Nader Guirat on wikipedia. I had requested permission to use the photos by sending an email to the artist's management who own the photos and they gave me permission to use the photos. Please advise how to resolve this issue and upload the photos again. Thank you for your help. --Mona MG (talk) 11:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- You need to forward the email with the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, but please make sure that the copyright holder agrees to license the photos under a free license. See Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates for more information. Razvan Socol (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Question About Image Deletion - Update
[edit]Hi again. Re. my previous inquiry and per your advise. I've contacted the owners and they confirmed that an email with a link to the image files was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org yesterday Monday Nov. 14th. Please advise what would be the next step to take. Thank you again for all your help.--Mona MG (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alexe Church, Bucharest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Question About Images Deletion - Update II
[edit]Hi again. sorry to keep bothering you with this. I've followed your advice and waited for the images to be restored or a response from OTRS but received neither so far. So, I sent an ‘undelete’ request, reference 1.90, as you had suggested, and I mentioned the OTRS email, your name and included the file names as well, however again no response, in-fact there were responses to other ‘undelete’ requests entered after mine, so mine was passed over. Appreciate your kind assisance once again! Best Regards --Mona MG (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry to keep bothering you, but as you can see there is no response from anyone even on the notice board post..I don't understand this?? I seek your help yet again. Many Thanks!!--Mona MG (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Message from Pill moved to User talk:Mona MG
Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Ticket_number_.232011030410006577.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Help
[edit]Hello , can you help me please ?--Dadam97490 (talk) 17:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
US stamps published after 1978
[edit]Ooops, my mistake. Was unaware of this. I'll re-load them on wikipedia with a fair-use claim then. Please allow me a few hours to move them then delete them at the end of the day. Bwmoll3 (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. I'm sure they will be removed quickly. Bwmoll3 (talk) 18:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
File:JoJo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Centrul de comunicații prin satelit de la Cheia (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Stergeri directori de scoala
[edit]Prietene de ce propui la stergere? Au licenta de la Lupea autorul Monografiei. Asybaris01 (talk) 10:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Toate materialele luate de la Lupea au licenta libera, vezi [:ro:http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discu%C8%9Bie:Racovi%C8%9Ba,_Sibiu tichetul]. Daca ai nelamuriri intreaba-l pe japonez ca stie mai bine. Asybaris01 (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mănăstirea Cheia (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--Codrin.B (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
MAPN
[edit]Salut,
Până la urmă ai dat curs sugestiei mele de la Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/Archive_18#Ticket_number_.232011030410006577 cu privire la licența de pe site-ul MAPN? Ai primit vreun răspuns?--Strainu (talk) 14:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Nu, nu le-am scris. Până una alta, o să consider și eu că permisiunea se referea la orice imagini de pe http://www.mapn.ro/fotodb (cred că o să mai încarc niște imagini de acolo, pentru diverși miniștri). Razvan Socol (talk) 15:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Exista vreun template pentru pozele astea? Cred ca ar fi util--Codrin.B (talk) 16:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oare? S-ar putea să atragă mai multă atenție nedorită, dacă înțelegi ce vreau să spun.--Strainu (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- Atata timp cat permisiunile sunt puse la punct prin OTRS, eu cred ca e ok. Dar inteleg ce zici. E plin de dusmani. --Codrin.B (talk) 04:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Nu știu dacă e o problemă etnică, paranoia, "deletionism" sau un amestec. Cert e că ne-au făcut să pierdem destul de mult timp aiurea. Încep să mă gândesc serios dacă n-ar fi timpul pentru propria bibliotecă de imagini, așa cum și-au făcut canadienii propriul Wikisource. Din ce citesc pe listele de discuții, nu sunt singurul, mai ales după decizia curții supreme a SUA privitoare la reinstaurarea drepturilor de autor în 1996.--Strainu (talk) 11:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oare? S-ar putea să atragă mai multă atenție nedorită, dacă înțelegi ce vreau să spun.--Strainu (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- Exista vreun template pentru pozele astea? Cred ca ar fi util--Codrin.B (talk) 16:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Mă bucur că s-a pus în discuţie această problemă , eu nu aş fi îndrăznit să deranjez pe cineva pentru a cere un sfat sau o părere. Mă bucur că unul din contribuitorii la categorie a ridicat problema.
Am eliminat legătura de subordonare a Category:Hotel Select in Iaşi ca subcategorie a Category:Palaces in Iaşi deoarece aceasta avea ca subcategorie şi Category:Palatul Neuschotz. Era anormal ca această categorie, "Palaces in Iaşi" să aibă ca subcategorii două ipostaze ale aceleiaşi clădiri , una ţinând de funcţia ei actuală (hotel), şi alta ţinând de istoria sa (ca palat).
Cele 4 imagini din categoria mai sus amintită au fost introduse de mine şi în Category:Palatul Neuschotz, pentru a ilustra ambele ipostaze ale acestei clădiri, dar nu mi se pare normal ca la "Palaces in Iaşi" să avem două subcategorii pentru funcţii diferite ale aceleaşi clădiri. Dar în final, mă voi supune părerii majorităţii. --Argenna (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Actress Lindsay Lohan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
High Contrast (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- The page [6] attributes the photo to Rafael Amado Deras/Flickr. Additionally, the enstar.com article is published in 2012, while the photo was posted to Flickr in 2008. Razvan Socol (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Classic issue of file washing and this was falsely attributed. --High Contrast (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Actress Lindsay Lohan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Sinaia Casino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
128.250.5.245 07:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Commons-sickness
[edit]Vezi, d-asta prefer eu să evit discuțiile de ștergere aici. Omul n-are acces la coada info-ro, așa că pentru el nu există tichetul respectiv.--Strainu (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi! You removed Category:Tamara Buciuceanu from Category:1929 in Romania, which is debatable, but let's say it's acceptable since there is no such thing as a category like Category:1929 births in Romania which could bridge the two. However, you made the comment that the Category:1929 in Romania should contain pictures taken that year, and with that I would have a problem. I couldn't find anywhere such an interpretation for that "by year category", nor any guidelines. If you know about some, please point me to them. But please take a look at Category:1953 in Germany. It contains everything that happened in Germany in 1953 regardless of when the pictures were taken, which is logical. That includes subcategories like Category:1953 works in Germany -> Category:1953 church bells in Germany as well. So if someone took a picture of a 1953 German church bell in 2010, that picture belongs here! And please let me know when you have comments on my work or want me to correct/undo something. I would prefer dialog and communication than discovering things undone. Best! --Codrin.B (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
BTW, I would a category that would fit your statement, i.e. should contain pictures taken that year: Category:1929 photographs.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Actually the category goes well back in time. See Category:208 in China. So it should be clear that it has mostly to do with history and events, than with photos dated to that year. --Codrin.B (talk) 19:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for not notifying you about my revert. I have considered Category:1929 in France or Category:1929 in Switzerland. Razvan Socol (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
I see. Well they are wrong and contradicting themselves. As a "photographs" category cannot contain "works" and "events" subcategories, but it does. I clarified the scope for the Romania related categories.--Codrin.B (talk) 06:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Rsocol, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gull near Danube (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Fișiere
[edit]Nu este vina mea.Eu decât am transferat cum spunea pe ro.wp.Receptie123 (talk) 10:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Într-adevăr, problema este cauzată în primul rând de cei care au încărcat inițial fișierele respective. Totuși, am de gând să verific toate fișierele care au fost transferate de tine la Commons până acum, deoarece aici se verifică mai strict regulile decât pe ro.wiki. Te rog să nu mai transferi alte fișiere decât dacă ești sigur că imaginile respective au fost produse de către cel care le-a încărcat la ro.wiki și dacă nu sunt încălcate drepturile de autor ale altcuiva (de exemplu, conform Commons:Freedom of Panorama, clădirile sau sculpturile din România pot fi încărcate la Commons doar dacă arhitectul sau sculptorul respectiv a murit cu mai mult de 70 de ani în urmă). Razvan Socol (talk) 11:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Dacă este alt caz cum pot să verific?Receptie123 (talk) 11:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Dacă ai vreo îndoială asupra drepturilor de autor asupra unui fișier marcat pentru transferare la Commons, cel mai bine este să sari peste el, lăsându-l altor utilizatori mai experimentați. Dacă o imagine pare a fi "prea bună" pentru a fi realizată de cel care a încărcat-o, poți să o cauți cu http://images.google.com ca să vezi dacă apare și în alte locuri, dar e important să verifici data la care a fost încărcat la Wikipedia și data la care a fost publicat în celelalte locuri, ca să vezi în ce sens a fost copiată imaginea. Dacă este vorba despre o clădire sau o sculptură, ar trebui să te interesezi cine a fost arhitectul sau sculptorul și să verifici când a murit. Un alt criteriu important sunt datele din tag-ul EXIF al imaginilor, care prezintă informații despre aparatul de fotografiat cu care a fost realizată imaginea. Dar cel mai simplu, dacă ai vreun dubiu, lasă imaginea respectivă în pace sau scrie-mi mie. Razvan Socol (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Mulțumesc pentru ajutor.Așa voi face! Am treabă săptămâna viitoare.Voi continua pe Wikipedia din 1 iunie.Receptie123 (talk) 12:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Răzvan, o parte din vină o port eu. L-am rugat pe Receptie123 să transfere tot ce găsește în ro:C:TLC, iar pentru că majoritatea din fișierele alea le-am etichetat eu, vina îmi aparține mie (prin decizia că „acest fișier poate fi transferat la commons”). Anyways, ceea ce se șterge de la commons trebuia mai devreme sau mai târziu șters și de la rowiki — pe mine nu mă doare că se șterg fișierele, vreau doar să îi garantez lui Receptie123 un mediu cât mai liniștit de lucru în efortul său de transfer a imaginilor libere la commons. Numai bine. // Gikü said done Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:29 (UTC)
Bine, cred că s-a cam încheat discuția.În concluzie Voi continua să transfere fișiere de la ro.wp la Commons pentru că (cum a contatat și Gikü) ori se șterg la commons or la ro.wp (este aproape același lucru).
- Am o rugăminte.Este posibil dacă se propun pentru ștergere să nu fiu avertizat eu (nu sunt fișierele mele)?Receptie123 (talk) 06:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Gikü, dacă ai fi transferat tu (sau alt utilizator cu experiență) acele fișiere la Commons, cred că ai mai fi verificat încă odată dacă tag-ul privind drepturile de autor este cel corect, le-ai fi încadrat în categoria cea mai potrivită, ai fi completat descrierea acolo unde lipsește și, mai ales, ai fi răspuns la mesajele privind acele fișiere. Dacă nu facem toate astea, mai bine nu le mai transferăm deloc, pentru că unele dintre fișierele care nu ar fi acceptabile la Commons ar putea fi păstrate la ro.wiki, ca fair-use, dacă sunt imagini valoroase, relevante pentru articolele respective.
- Receptie123, obiceiul (încetățenit de mult timp) este ca cel care încarcă fișierul să fie cel avertizat în caz că acel fișier este propus pentru ștergere. Dacă nu ești dispus sau nu ești capabil să răspunzi la acele avertismente, atunci nu mai transfera fișierele respective la Commons. Te rog să scoți mesajul respectiv din antetul paginii tale de discuție. Astfel, dacă vrea cineva să-ți scrie vreun mesaj, măcar am o șansă să îl văd eu sau Gikü. Razvan Socol (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Bine am înteles amândouă lucrurile (2. de pe pagina mea de utilizator).Voi reveni la greșelile care le-am făcut.Receptie123 (talk) 14:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Tropaeum Traiani
[edit]salut. Exista trei monumente descoperite in cadrul tropaeum traiani. Monumentul Memorial dedicat legiunii disparute in Dacia (XXI rapax sau alta :)) monumentul unui general roman presupus multa vreme a fi cornelius fuscus si tropeum traiani. Mormantul din imagine nu se gaseste in oras ci la 40 de m de monumentul triumfal de la adamclisi. CristianChirita (talk)
- Înțeleg că File:UnknownRomanGeneralTomb2.JPG și File:UnknownRomanGeneralTomb.JPG trebuie să rămână în categoria Category:Tropaeum Traiani (nu în Category:Civitas Tropaensium, unde le mutasem eu), așa că le voi muta la loc. Razvan Socol (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Baia de aramă
[edit]Încarci tu și restul fișierelor? Dacă da, dă-mi și mie un mesaj când termini, ca să le validez licența.--Strainu (talk) 10:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Romania dates
[edit]It had Philippine times Fixed. Platonides (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- A temporary block to control the damage would have been appropiate. It was lucky that I saw your message quite fast. I reverted those bot edits. Platonides (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Rsocol, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Rsocol, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
Please can you re-do your voting for this. I had to remove File:Laab im Walde - Bärenberg - Gelbwürfeliger Dickkopffalter (Carterocephalus palaemon).jpg as it did not contain a flower. You gave it 2 points. -- Colin (talk) 06:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks, Razvan Socol (talk) 07:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Strainu's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Strainu's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_uploaded_by_Mmoru.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Photo challenge
[edit]I've replied on my talk page. If you can do the "Winners" pages that would be a big help. If you have any questions, leave a message on my talk page and I'll try to answer this evening. But I won't have time to do the Winners pages till much later this evening without your help. And it would be very useful if someone else was capable of doing this. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mănăstirea Cheia (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, 106.68.123.120 13:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Professor Simon Baron-Cohen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ivi104 (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Professor Simon Baron-Cohen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
My name is not dave (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Gaudeamus
[edit]Hello. You are right, it was a stupid mistake and I fixed it. --Babu (talk) 16:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!
[edit]Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.
Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.
Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Schimbare fotografie la un profil
[edit]Buna ziua,va multumesc ca mi ati scris, eu doresc sa schimb o fotografie la un profil,am reusit sa o incarc cu wizard dar nu stiu sa o schim in profilul persoanei. Nu sunt progrsmator IT si nici nu lucrez in acest domeniu,mi se pare foarte dificil de lucrat cu acest program. As dori in masura in care timpul va permite sa imi explicati cum as putea schimba fotografia. Va multumesc pentru ajutor. Lucian nastase — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nastase Lucian Photo (talk • contribs) 07:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @AntiCompositeNumber: The upload was done in good faith. As Flickr upload bot has confirmed, the file https://www.flickr.com/photos/27963141@N00/6348187041 was licensed as CC-BY when the file was uploaded (and also today). If a discussion was held and you have determined that the book cover and the application icons that appear in the picture are visible enough to hold a separate copyright, I won't object to the deletion. Razvan Socol (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- I determined that the file was a derivative work of non-free software and was thus non-free per COM:SCREENSHOT. The photographic work is CC-BY, but the screen image has not been released under that license, rendering the combined derivative work non-free. There was no discussion because it met the criteria of COM:CSD#F3 (derivative works of non-free content). If you wish to object to the deletion, you may open a discussion at COM:UDR. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have read Commons:De minimis and I think this case goes on the "unlikely" side, so I will not open an undeletion request. Thanks for the explanation, Razvan Socol (talk) 18:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- I determined that the file was a derivative work of non-free software and was thus non-free per COM:SCREENSHOT. The photographic work is CC-BY, but the screen image has not been released under that license, rendering the combined derivative work non-free. There was no discussion because it met the criteria of COM:CSD#F3 (derivative works of non-free content). If you wish to object to the deletion, you may open a discussion at COM:UDR. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!
[edit]Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.
Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.
Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.
Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Halele Centrale, Ploiești (1).JPG
- File:Halele Centrale, Ploiești (2).JPG
- File:Halele Centrale, Ploiești (3).JPG
- File:Halele Centrale, Ploiești (4).JPG
- File:Halele Centrale, Ploiești (5).JPG
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)