User talk:Rudolphous

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

For archive User talk:Rudolphous/Archive

Nea Smyrni[edit]

The bot has added the Nea Smyrni category to images that have nothing to do with it e.g. Αθηνά Τουμπίδου.jpg--Catlemur (talk) 22:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures was taken in this city. But agree, that you have taken it out. Rudolphous (talk) 22:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Verkeerde categorie toegevoegd door Rudolphousbot[edit]

Dag Rudolphous, ik zag dat je bot bij File:Nothofagus antarctica D.jpg de categorie "Argentina photographs taken on 2000-07-06" heeft toegevoegd. Waarschijnlijk vanwege de categorie "Flora of Tierra del Fuego". De foto is echter genomen in België en niet in Argentinië. Ik weet dat men soms bij een plant een reeks "Flora of ..." categoriën zet. Jouw bot zou dan dezelfde reeks van landen photographs maken hetgeen mij niet juist lijkt. Wouter (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Wouter, dank voor de melding ik heb de categorie nagelopen. Rudolphous (talk) 18:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorization by the bot[edit]

I just reverted this edit: [1]. This is overcategorization. Category:Trifolieae in Vorarlberg is a subcategory of Category:Faboideae in Vorarlberg which is a subcategory of Category:Fabaceae in Vorarlberg. Therefore, adding Category:Fabaceae in Vorarlberg again was overcategorization. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rudolphous, the problem is the same with some categories "{species} in Ruhland": the Bot put to pictures a Category "{family} in Brandenburg". But the same category is upper category of pictures category "{species} in Ruhland", too. I've reverted this in the case of Category:Cerastium arvense in Ruhland. But there will be some others. Best regards --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo again, I've just fixed the file categories for Ruhland manually by Cat-a-lot. Think you will find out and fix the problem of the bot :-). And thanks for your work ! Best regards --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 11:32, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your messages. Will take care of this. Rudolphous (talk) 15:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

iNaturalist2Commons[edit]

Just wondering if you saw my comments at https://github.com/kaldari/iNaturalist2Commons/issues/9. Kaldari (talk) 05:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ansered there. Rudolphous (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goedemorgen[edit]

Ik begrijp uw wijzigingen op (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Netherlands_photographs_taken_on_2019-18-04&diff=next&oldid=553701772) niet. De foto is niet in 2019 gemaakt maar op 18 april 2021, 07:27:40. Groeten van --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goedemorgen Famberhorst, de categorie inhoud hoort te corresponderen met de titel. De foto zelf stond fout ingedeeld, bij deze aangepast. Mvg, Rudolphous (talk) 05:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bedankt voor de correctie. Maar het kwartje is bij mij nog steeds niet gevallen wat ik verkeerd had gedaan.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Een categorie die heet "Categorie:Netherlands photographs taken on 2019-xx-yy" moet ook een template hebben van 2019 en niet 2021 zoals eerst het geval was. xx moet overigens ook de maand zijn en yy de dag. Nu staat dit (nog steeds) verkeerd om en is de categorie leeg. 05:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Wat moet ik nu nog veranderen?--Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Famberhorst, ik heb de categorie die leeg is verwijderd. Nu klopt alles weer. Als bij de volgende categorie jaar-maand-dag notatie aangehouden wordt gaat het vast een stuk beter. Rudolphous (talk) 05:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Van Speijkstraat (Q19624365)[edit]

Hallo Rudolphous 1831 J C Jan Speyk 1881 (of iets in die aard), daar vraag ik me af waar die datum 1881 vandaan komt. Face-smile.svg Had je daar enig idee van of zou dit te achterhalen zijn? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lotje, misschien is 1881 het bouwjaar van de woningen? Zie ook. Mvg, Rudolphous (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt Rudolphous! Ik had aan iets met een jubileum gedacht: 50 jaar Face-smile.svg Grts. Lotje (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misidentification[edit]

Wilson Wabler (13995801737).jpg

Hi Rudolphous: This picture, which you uploaded back in 2019, has been misidentified. It is a male Western Tanager, not a Wilson's Warbler! Can you please move it to an appropriate filename, with categories adjusted to match? A quick look at photos in both categories will show you the differences; they're considerable! ;) MeegsC (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MeegsC, Thanks for your notification. Took the ID from the source. Made the proposed changes, Best regards. Rudolphous (talk) 17:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hypholoma fasciculare 97555853.jpg[edit]

Hello. Did you see that I had replied to your question on File talk:Hypholoma fasciculare 97555853.jpg? I think the mushroom is a Hypholoma capnoides. Strobilomyces (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strobilomyces, made the proposed changes. Have a nice day. Rudolphous (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Odd edit[edit]

Hi Rudolphous - any reasons for the change of Japan to Sri Lanka in this edit? The pic doesn't give any location, but the photographer's flickr photos are clearly Japanese in general; is there other evidence for suggesting the photo was taken in Sri Lanka? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MPF, corrected this photo and a couple of others. Rudolphous (talk) 15:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RudolphousBot deprecated API calls[edit]

Hey!

It seems RudolphousBot is doing action=query&prop=info&intoken API calls, which has been deprecated since 2014. In support of phab:T280806, any chance you could update it to a more modern version of token fetching?

If it helps, it seems to be using a User Agent of Unknown/Unknown JWBF/DEVEL Apache-HttpClient/4.3.4 (java 1.5)

Thanks!

Reedy (talk) 00:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a ping on this... Your bot has made 100K deprecated calls in the last 24H. Reedy (talk) 17:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am using JWBF 3.1.x which is the latest. There is an issue since 2014, but nobody picked this up. Any clue when the deprecated api will be removed? I can try to make the changes myself. Rudolphous (talk) 18:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misidentification of Fiji White-eye[edit]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Fiji_white-eye_%2831547492280%29.jpg

The correct ID is: Zosterops lateralis flaviceps. The bird is immature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cuckooroller (talk • contribs) 15:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, did make the corrections. Cheers, Rudolphous (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

Hi Rudolphous

Please help me with protection of Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2021/Winners as it will be of high exposure once mass message is sent today. Thank you --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tiven2240, think you can better ask someone who is more used in these kind of matters. Rudolphous (talk) 07:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mijn naam is haas (3406690331).jpg[edit]

Grapjas Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 15:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automatische piloot[edit]

De bot heeft rare bewerkingen uitgevoerd op File:Duivendrecht Thalys.jpg. De opname is in Antwerpen Centraal, niet in Nederland. Duivendrecht is trouwens ook niet in Amsterdam maar in de gemeente Overamstel. Enkel op de filename afgaan kan heel misleidend zijn.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:46, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Smiley.toerist: , er staat wel bij de beschrijving: Diverted and delayed Thalys run to an unusual destination on the destination board in Antwerp Central station Face-smile.svg Wat zou je voorstellen? Lotje (talk) 11:18, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
De plaats van opname is altijd (primair) bepalend. Bestemmingen spelen geen rol. Onder jouw redenering zou bij een luchthaven vertrekbord de tijdcategorieën van alle getoonde bestemmingen moeten opnemen.Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:24, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hoi Smiley. De bestandsnaam is idd niet betrouwbaar. Dat Duivendrecht geen Amsterdam is ben ik van op de hoogte. Dit was inderdaad op basis van "2010 in Amsterdam", dat in september 2019 om meerdere redenen foutief was toegevoegd. Mooi dat het is opgelost. Dank hiervoor. Rudolphous (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect categorization[edit]

Just letting you know your bot incorrectly categorized File:Murghab river in Mary (1) (46050578212).jpg as from Afghanistan when it is from Turkmenistan. Zoozaz1 (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I checked the infobox, but saw later this rivers also flows to Turkmenistan. Rechecked now these images. Rudolphous (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Netherlands[edit]

Rudolphous wat is het nut van deze en soorgelijke wijzigingen? Ik heb deze ongedaan gemaakt en bovendien ook categorie ALkmaar verwijderd (want categorie 2010 in Alkmaar in 2010 is daar een subcategorie van). HenkvD (talk)

Hallo HenkvD, ik vond een serie foto's in Heiloo en Alkmaar die niet gecategoriseerd waren. Deze was dat wel, dus helemaal eens met je wijzigingen. Rudolphous (talk) 10:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding location inside Taken On template[edit]

How long do you expect this bot task to last? I'm getting several hundred watchlist items per day (I can't turn off bots on my watchlist because there are other bots I have to monitor) which is rather annoying. Also, was there a community discussion or BRFA to approve a task of this scale? Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pi.1415926535, I stopped the RudolphousBot and filed a request. With kind regards, Rudolphous (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that {{According to Exif data}} has no parameter location. --Arnd (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did update the documentation of this template. Rudolphous (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More RudolphousBot issues[edit]

If and when you reactivate the bot, can you please reconfigure it to avoid overcategorizing files that already belong to subcategories of their respective "photograph by day by country" category?

For instance, those that make up Category:Rosamond Gifford Zoo, 8 May 2021, which was already a sub of Category:United States photographs taken on 2021-05-08 before the bot placed each individual image into the latter category as well.

-- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 20:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Rudolphous (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox op straten[edit]

Hoi Rudolphous, fijn dat je ook infoboxen toevoegt aan categorieën van straten. Meestal sla ik die stap over omdat er een bot is die dat (na wat tijd) ook doet. Zelf gebruik ik trouwens Petscan om categorieën zonder Wikidata-link op te zoeken (ik kies daar Commons, vul een categorie in, plus zo nodig een diepte van 1 als geneste categorieën aanwezig zijn en categorieën om uit te sluiten, bij 'page properties' alleen de Category namespace en dan bij 'Wikidata' alleen 'pages without item').

Ik zag wel dat er bij Category:Frederik Hendriklaan, The Hague wat mis ging met de wikidata-link en daardoor de infobox de tramhalte gaf. Ik heb die link nu verplaatst naar het item voor de straat, maar soms duurt het even of is er een edit nodig voordat de infobox mee verandert.

Verder dus dank voor het meehelpen deze categorieën te linken, want het maakt Commons en Wikidata beide bruikbaarder, bijvoorbeeld met de coördinaten (soms zijn de Wikidata-items over straten wat 'kaal' zonder extra informatie, zelf doe ik er soms wat data bij uit bijvoorbeeld externe BAG-bronnen maar die komen meestal niet mee in de infobox en kunnen altijd later semi-automatisch door weer iemand anders worden toegevoegd). Wikidatist (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Wikidatist, Bedankt voor je vriendelijke bericht. Ik zie dat hij nu correct is. Geen idee waarom hij de tramhalte aangaf. Soms kan je het proces versnellen door &action=purge aan de url toe te voegen. Die wikidata links zijn inderdaad een welkome aanvulling. Ik probeer er elke dag een aantal te doen, waardoor de artikelen zonder infobox elke dag weer een stukje minder wordt. Rudolphous (talk)

Fourth and Madison Building[edit]

Not recent but: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ann_Wilson_Of_Heart_(55219416).jpeg&diff=317203176&oldid=317189179

This placed this in an absolutely wrong and irrelevant category (and it had no others). I suspect I'm the first person to find it and have a clue what it is. - Jmabel ! talk 01:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Several other edits, same wrong category:

Jmabel ! talk 01:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is indeed not very recent. If I follow the gps coordinates of the pictures I get also Fourth and Madison Building on google. Do you know if the gps coordinate is right? Else this can be updated as well Rudolphous (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paralepistopsis amoenolens[edit]

Hello, I don't understand : why did you deleted the Category:Paralepistopsis amoenolens? Have a good day. ----Abalg (talk) 16:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abalg, Strange. Did delete some empty categories earlier today but this one is obvious not empty. Sorry for the inconvenience Rudolphous (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:20210806 Hortus Botanicus Leiden - Camassia quamash.jpg[edit]

Hi Rudolphous, please check this plant. It's not at all Camassia quamash. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This plant was labelled with https://photos.app.goo .gl/YMq6t556CJWnEWpN8. (url in two parts else wiki blocks it) Think it was wrongly labelled then. Do you know a better ID? Rudolphous (talk) 17:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Renamed it into unidentified plant for the time being. Rudolphous (talk) 05:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carole Facal[edit]

Carole was in my class in elementary school. She was not born in 1980. Odds are she was born in 1976, though it is possible that I'm a year off (those born from October to December 1975 would have also been in the same grade... 1977 is a long shot possibility if she skipped kindergarten or first grade) BrianPetterson (talk) 08:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brian, I was a bit wondering why you added this to my talk page. I think because RudolphousBot did add a wiki infobox to her commons category. The data itself is not maintained on Commons Wikimedia, but on WikiData. If you have a trusted source you can edit the data over here. Rudolphous (talk) 09:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


www.westhoekverbeeldt.be[edit]

Beste Rudolphous, ik maakte een eerste Wikipedia pagina aan in mijn kladblok. Ik maak gebruik van eigen foto's en van een paar foto's van de website. www.westhoekverbeeldt.be Ik kreeg daar enkele opmerkingen over aangaande de licentie. Ik stuurde daarvoor een mail naar Wikipedia commons om dit in orde te brengen. Ik kreeg van de eigenaars van de foto's de schriftelijke toestemming via e-mail om deze te publiceren. Ik werd al geholpen via een andere beheerder, maar hij gaf mij de tip om het nog eens te laten controleren door een Nederlandstalige beheerder. Ik zou graag mijn pagina publiceren en zeker zijn dat alles nu definitief in orde is. Alvast mijn oprechte dank. Bart Vergote — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bart Vergote (talk • contribs) 13:14, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bart, Op www.westhoekverbeeldt.be zie ik geen statement waaruit de licentie van de foto's blijkt. Als zij de auteursrechten in handen hebben van hun foto's kunnen zij deze wel onder een vrije licentie vrijgeven. Ze kunnen deze zelf uploaden naar Commons Wikimedia of via een verklaring naar OTRS vrijgeven. Als ze deze verklaring per mail gedaan hebben dan kan je de foto's uploaden en vervolgens linken naar deze verklaring. Ze kunnen de verkaring ook naar jou emailen dan dien je de mail inclusief headers door te sturen naar OTRS. En kan je in je geuploade foto's hiernaar verwijzen. Zie meer informatie ook op Commons:OTRS (kopje Als u NIET de rechthebbende bent) . Rudolphous (talk) 13:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uilebomen[edit]

Hi Rudolphous, I see you posted a number of pictures of The Hague under the category "Uilebomen" while the pictures were not taken there. I removed that category from those photos. You may wish to add other, more appropriate categories, to these pictures. Loranchet (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prima ik heb een paar categoriën handmatig toegevoegd. Rudolphous (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Acanthisittidae_of_New_Zealand[edit]

Category discussion warning

Acanthisittidae of New Zealand has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Spizaetus (talk) 04:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Acanthisittidae_by_country[edit]

Category discussion warning

Acanthisittidae by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Spizaetus (talk) 04:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]