User talk:S.moeller

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Wer mir etwas mitteilen möchte, bitte hier eintragen oder besser noch: per Email - ich logge mich nicht täglich hier ein. Danke --S.moeller 15:46, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

If anyone has as message for me - please write here or better: mail me - I'm very often on Wiki-Commons (but not every day!) Thanks --S.moeller 09:45, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[edit]

Nice image, but it is tilted rather heavily. Should be rotated a few degrees so that the reling on the ferry bridge is horizontal and the two candelabers more or less vertical. 21:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


Hi - I saw your complaint about Thuresson. I must say I completely agree with him... please keep in mind that more than 90% of the files on commons are photos. Placing them all under Category:Photos would render that category useles - it would be much too big to find anything, and it would become completely non-descriptive. "Media-Type" categories make sense for the more rare types, like Category:Sound - but even there, files should not be put directly into that category, but into one of the more specific sub-categories.

Please try to apply the must specific categories that fit the picture. For photographs, the categories should answer the questions "what?" and, for fixed things, "where?".

But thanks for contributing (and categorizing!) anyway. I know that the ways of the commons my be confusing to a newcommer, please have a look around and try to get a feel for the place :)

(Ich hab' das mal auf englisch geschrieben, damit es andere, wie z.B. Thuresson, auch verstehen) -- Duesentrieb(?!) 12:05, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your respons. Please don't take things so personally, I don't think Thuresson did this to upset you. Like everything in a wiki, maintaining and cleaning up categories is done by all users in cooperation, and he had to start somewhere. I agree that there should be no photos directly inside Category:Photos - there are some sub-categories, like Category:Aerial photos, that make some sense, and maybe there could be more - but creating a special photo category for everything (photos of animals, photos of playes in germany, etc) does not seem sensible to me. I also agree that Category:Photography (which exists) should be used for media about the art of photography. I'm sure you can work out something with Thuresson which would be acceptable to both of you.

Note that admins are just regular users with a few more options. Maintaining and Claning up categories takes a lot of time, and people (including me) often just fix the part they notice - I often find things that need cleanup, but I can't do all that by myself. I also belive that it is good practice to tell people to chainge their ways, so the problem does not arise any more. If you feel that there are pictures in Category:Photos that do not belong there (and I agree with that), and you have some time, just move them somewhere else. It's a wiki, after all...

regards -- Duesentrieb(?!) 13:36, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Windows screenshots[edit]

...can't be released into the PD, as the UI is copyright by Microsoft. ed g2stalk 16:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, linux should be okay. Although the shots are of Firefox, it still uses the standard Windows UI (fading blue bar, grey buttons...), which I imagine MS wouldn't want you trying to release under a free license. ed g2stalk 03:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

image for deletion[edit]

Better image is available at Image:Schnecke_20060815_011a.jpg

Image:Schnecke 20060815 010a.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Schnecke 20060815 010a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Snek01 01:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I have no problem with deleting the image! Please kill it! --S.Möller 14:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Scotland Fife Kingsbarns[edit]

Ich hab per deinem Wunsch Image:Scotland Fife Crail 20070725 0153.jpg als Duplikat gelöscht, aber bitte beim nächsten Mal in die Vorlage {{Bad name}} den ganzen Bildpfad der anderen Version - also auch das Image: reingeben, sonst ist das etwas schwer zu finden. -- Cecil 21:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Für das tolle Foto des bretonischen Ortes Quimper! Aarp65 (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)