User talk:SarahStierch

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear SarahStierch, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Random no source tagging without actually examining the image pages does not really help to retain your Admin status. @Odder: please examine these admin actions to prevent damage to the project. --Denniss (talk) 08:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi User:Denniss. I really appreciate you coming by my talk page. It looks like I accidentally "messed up" three files. I understand the error regarding the US Public Domain work, a silly error on my part. I worked on HUNDREDS of files yesterday, clearing much needed back log (which no one seems to notice the good work I did :) ) and occasionally a few errors pop in. I do not think EXIF data is sufficient enough for a source, no matter what others might say - EXIF merely shows someone took the photo, but who - is it the uploaders camera or someone else? I have seen situations like that in the past - this seems to be the issue with some of the images. Regardless, my apologies for wasting your time in cleaning up the mess I have made on THREE files. For the record, keeping a friendly attitude and assuming good faith is the way to keep admins and editors on this website - not being patronizing. Thank you for your contributions to the free knowledge movement and for letting me know about these errors, I will perhaps work on clearing less backlog at once to avoid error. Sarah (talk) 17:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Also, thanks User:Odder for letting me know about my status. I have two accounts, which is stated on my user page, and I tend do edit a lot on my Missvain account. I wonder if there is an opportunity to merge these two accounts so I can have admin on Missvain instead. I'll have to look into that. Sarah (talk) 17:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Sarah, I don't think it is actually technically possible to merge two differently named accounts on Wikimedia wikis. The term account merge that you might have seen mentioned around referred to merging the same local user name into one global account (for Single User Login finalisation); I'm not aware of it ever being possible to merge two differently named accounts (either local or global) into one. What we can do, however--and it has been done in the past--is to remove the admin flag from your current account (this one) and add them to the Missvain account. If you'd like to proceed with this, then just for the purpose of having a local archive, please file a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard, and I'll request on Meta that stewards remove the admin bit from the SarahStierch account and add it to the Missvain account myself. However, the two accounts will just keep on existing simultaneously as they do now as it's not possible to delete either of them. Let me know what you think about this. odder (talk) 20:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
See also phab:T49918. --XXN, 14:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Image sur Commons[edit]

13 après le départ de chalons le Petit-Sillery.jpg

Bonjour cher SarahStierch,

merci pour votre interpellation. Je ne sais que mettre dans la partie qui vous chagrine tant ? La brocante du village de Sacy, par un jour pluvieux de novembre 2010, est-ce ce genre d'information qui changera quoi que ce soit au statut de cette image ? C'est une image traffiquée dans les années 1908. L'éditeur à mélange en ensemble de vues de village entre Reims et Bouy avec, toujours la même de l'aéroplane de Farman. Joli trucage pour l'époque qui a donné une série de cartes postales laissant croire que le photographe a été plus rapide que l'avion pour trouver des angles de prise de vue, des personnages qui posent. Tout celà sans connaitre la trajectoire de Farman, qui à l'époque n'avait pas depose de plan de vol et devait être fortement balloté par les éléments.

Je vous laisse donc supprimer toutes les cartes postales éditées il y a 108 ans si celà gene Commons et Wikipedia. Le 13 au début du nom de l'image signifie que c'est la treizième de la série, n'en oubliez pas.

Petite remarque en passant ː dans le bandeau que vous avez ajouté dans ma page de siscussion est noté "Je remarque que la page « Fichier » n'indique pas à l'heure actuelle qui a créé le contenu,"", si je peut me permettre, une heure ne peut pas déposer de contenu. Celà laissant la requête dans un flou , pour le moins difficile à comprendre. Bien cordialement Garitan (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, la date du 21 n'est pas loin, vous n'avez pas répondu à mon petit texte ? Que va-t-il se passer pour le ficher cite ? Je reste donc dans l'attente en espérant que toutes les cartes postales ne vous pas être supprimées ! Bien cordialement. Gérald Garitan (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Random removal of picture 'Cessna 1994 red square.jpg'[edit]

Dear SarahStierch The log shows that you removed a photo called 'Cessna 1994 red square.jpg' on February 24, 2016, the reason stated 'no permission'. The picture was taken on July 25, 1994 on Red Square in Moscow and is property of the band Cessna (Band) in the picture. I happened to be the band's lead singer, so I should know. Furthermore, I noticed you were threatened to lose your adminship on Feb 13, 2016. The instructions were to log on and perform at least five admin actions. My conclusion is that your unnecessary removal of a photo the details of which cannot possibly be of your knowledge is directly connected to the pending loss of your adminship and was merely an action to prevent losing that adminship. I suggest a reversal of the removal of the picture on Feb 14 and an apology are in order. Yours, Arnd (Vokalz)

"AIMP4_alt.jpg", removed[edit]


It seems you removed a screenshot titled "AIMP4_alt.jpg", made by me. I'd like to know the reason.

Thank you.

Edit: "I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published (and there is no other copyright involved)." taken from here:

So, I guess you removed my screenshot by mistake because there's no reason at all of removing it. Please, solve this.