User talk:Satdeep Gill

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Satdeep gill)
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Satdeep gill!

Contents

File:Le Pianiste.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Le Pianiste.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tom Morris (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, the best thing to do is ask on French Wikipedia about local copyright policies. On English Wikipedia, we allow images to be used under the US legal doctrine of "fair use". Commons doesn't contain material that contain non-free images. Try asking a French Wikipedia administrator. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

OK thanx for your help. --Satdeep gill (talk) 14:14, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Waris Shah.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Waris Shah.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:René Wellek.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:René Wellek.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Teja Singh Sutantar.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 18:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Bharat Prakash 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bharat Prakash 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Satdeep Gill,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Manmohan.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Manmohan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Manmohan.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Balbir Aatish.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Balbir Aatish.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 07:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:New Moti Bagh Palace, Patiala.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:New Moti Bagh Palace, Patiala.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Using your camera right...[edit]

At first, you have a good camera and - I presume - quiet good lenses. Enough to make really good pictures!

  • Use always the RAW versions, not JPGs out of the camera. There is a really big difference!
  • When focussing, take the spot meter. Otherwise the camera doesn´t know, which is the subject.
  • Use a tripod as often you can. I always work with a tripod, even a monopod is better. When using the full length of your lens (300mm), you won´t be steady enough to keep the camera stabil.
  • Learn how to process your pictures. Use a software like Lightroom (if you can afford), but also Raw Therapee (free) or Darktable (also free) can do a good work. Gimp is good for clearing some perspective problems. Every good photographer use some of this tools. But the best is to use Capture One Express (for Sony) which is free for download! (but just a trial-version)
  • Don´t use some Creative Programs of your camera, Use the AV-Mode. (I don´t know, what term Sony use) You are the photographer, not the camera!! Try to control everything - the camera itself will do it wrong! Don´t belive Sony in any case, whatever they say, its for idiots and not more than jakediyak blah blah.
  • The most important thing for a good picture is sharpness. Sharpness. Sharpness. Try to start with this.
  • Do some experiments with the same motif.
  • Get up early in the morning, the sky is clear, the light is much better. Avoid to make pictures with hazy environment until you know, how to handle it. Make pictures with a really clear blue sky. If you don´t have a blue sky, make close up images of houses or other objects. Or people - but only if they want it!
  • Read the fucking Manual! Skip everything, were you find the word automatic.
  • If you mean, that something might be a good subject, just take some time to understand it. Don´t rape the motif (I mean it)! Be respectful. Sometimes I spent hours, even days to understand it. Especially architectural motifs. Take a walk, go farther, than closer. Get into the idea. And then, make your pictures. And make plenty of them and decide later, which represents the idea which makes this building interesting for you. Plenty pictures means eventually sometimes hundreds! From the same subject!
  • If you work manually, use ISO 100 or 200, 200/sec, f/8. If possible. And always try to have the sun in the back. I this is not possible in the morning, try it on late afternoon.

Bullock cart in Punjab: This is typical for wrongdoing. Why do you use 200 mm instead of 70? If you want to have sharp pictures, do it as close as you can! In this case, the camera doesn´t know what the subject is. There are a lot of different measure methods, use one: The spot-method. The people and the bull is the focus point. Everything else is not important - just for filling the nothing. And use a tripod. 150/sec will be enough in this case.

Gurdwara: Where is the focus? Where are the contrasts? What kind of composition is that? Check out, if the aperture f/5 is too large for this lens, try f/8 (not smaller!). There is no reason at all to use f/5. Use a tripod. And - do you wanted to make a picture of the sky?

New Moti Bagh Palace: This image is much better, much sharper, but what happens right and left? There is always a massive perspective distortion with 18mm, you have to handle during postprocessing. In this case you must go back to get more space on both sides - because you will lose it, when you make the perspective correction. The best zoom is always zooming by foot!

Have fun! I spent two month in India, also parts of Punjab in 1976. It´s a country with some of the greatest motifs we have on earth! Greetings from Austria --Hubertl 08:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

{{ping|Hubertl]] Thanks a lot for this much information. I am sure I will be able to click a Quality image some day. I will start clicking only RAW images from now onwards. Teaching by using my images is really helpful. I will try not to make these mistakes again. Thanks again. I will reach out to you with better images to learn more.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
I´m sure, the QI process is the best education for new photograper! Be patient! --Hubertl 14:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Satdeep Gill, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/−

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Help desk#File format changes automatically while moving Audio Files[edit]

Hi Satdeep,

I want to let you know that I moved your question to Commons:Help desk#File format changes automatically while moving Audio Files. That is the appropriate place for such question. Thank you. Wikicology (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sanjhe Sah Laindian.pdf[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sanjhe Sah Laindian.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

File:100wikidays meetup at Wikimania 2016.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:100wikidays meetup at Wikimania 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

iopensa (talk) 09:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baptistry (Pisa).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baptistry (Pisa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

A Seagull in Rome.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Seagull in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ratna Pathak at DIFF 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratna Pathak at DIFF 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Asif Basra at DIFF.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asif Basra at DIFF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


File tagging File:Karamjit Grewal.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karamjit Grewal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Karamjit Grewal.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Old door at Deepgarh.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old door at Deepgarh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rokhsareh Ghaemmaghami.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rokhsareh Ghaemmaghami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Felix Nartey at Wikimania 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Felix Nartey at Wikimania 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mardetanha at Wikimania 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mardetanha at Wikimania 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rohit Dua at Wikimania 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohit Dua at Wikimania 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Punjabi Ear Cleaner - Portrait.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punjabi Ear Cleaner - Portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Farahnaz Ispahani at Times Litfest.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farahnaz Ispahani at Times Litfest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Farahnaz Ispahani in 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farahnaz Ispahani in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

A Liuto Chittara Player.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Liuto Chittara Player.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Farahnaz Ispahani at Times Litfest.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farahnaz Ispahani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Camera settings[edit]

Hi, If I may help you, you should not use automatic settings of your camera. For example, in File:Toadstool at Khanna, Punjab.jpg, you have Exposure time = 1/1,600 sec, F-number = f/4.5, and ISO speed rating = 1,000. You should reduce ISO to 100 and F-number to 9 whenever possible. Here you don't need such a high speed as 1/1,600 sec. 1/125 sec should be sufficient. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

@Yann: Although I am experimenting with the manual mode, I do understand now that ISO should have been reduced in this case and also the shutter speed should have been less. And F-number to 9 increases the depth of field and focuses on the whole subject right ? I will keep this in mind from now onwards. Thanks a lot.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 03:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I usually don't use the full manual mode, but either the "aperture priority" or "speed priority" mode and I set ISO on 100/200, and I let the camera choose the corresponding speed or aperture. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Farhan Akhtar - Times Litfest 2016, New Delhi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farhan Akhtar - Times Litfest 2016, New Delhi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Asif Basra at DIFF.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asif Basra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Woman covering her face with her child on her back.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman covering her face with her child on her back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

White-throated kingfisher near village Zulamgarh, Ludhiana district, Punjab.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher near village Zulamgarh, Ludhiana district, Punjab.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 04:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 04.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 04:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Back of White-thorated Kingfisher.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Back of White-thorated Kingfisher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

White-throated Kingfisher - White balance[edit]

Hallo Satdeep Gill, I have corrected the white balance of all your pictures and I hope you will agree with the result. In addition I have withdrawn my "oppose". Greetings --Llez (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Llez: I really appreciate this a lot. Thank you. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

What happened to the review page?[edit]

Hi, Satdeep. I want to let you know that somehow, the review page for the VIC in the scope Halcyon smyrnensis (White-throated Kingfisher) was deleted. You should ping or contact User:Charlesjsharp and User:Archaeodontosaurus and let them know you corrected the white balance of that photo, but there's no way for anyone to vote or comment if the review page is deleted, so if there's any way you can restore it, do that.

Best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Or rather, seeing the post above, User:Llez corrected the white balance. But the rest of my remarks stand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Do not rename an image during the contest. The link is broken. But you can always access it manually. Thanks to User:Llez for his work. A good example of cooperation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
@Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks for informing me about that. And yes, this is indeed a great show of cooperation in the community.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

File:West Bengal Wikimedians User Group logo - variation 3.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:West Bengal Wikimedians User Group logo - variation 3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh, Uttrakhand.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh, Uttrakhand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lanterns in Rishikesh.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanterns in Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Native Garhwali Woman In Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Masked wagtail near Rishikesh 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masked wagtail near Rishikesh 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Masked wagtail near Rishikesh 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masked wagtail near Rishikesh 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bags In Rishikesh.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bags In Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Langoor In Rishikesh.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langoor In Rishikesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 08:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

These files were accidentally added to the DR, I will remove them. Jcb (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Some baklava for you![edit]

Baklava - Turkish special, 80-ply.JPEG Love it MarkHilton (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)