User talk:Schlurcher

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Soft redirect page
Babel user information
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-4 This user has near native speaker knowledge of English.
la-2 Hic usor media Latinitate contribuere potest.
ru-1 Этот участник владеет русским языком на начальном уровне.
Users by language

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schiffsmodell Belem2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schiffsmodell Belem2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Spielwürfel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spielwürfel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alpsee Germany.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alpsee Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heidelberg-Affe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heidelberg-Affe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schlossbeleuchtung 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schlossbeleuchtung 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liebesschloss.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Liebesschloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Schwetzingen Schlosspark Eingangsbereich Luftbild.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schlossgarten Schwetzingen, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heidelberg Altstadt Schloss Luftbild.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heidelberg Altstadt Schloss Luftbild.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Bot bug[edit]

Hello, Your bot has a bug. For example here it isn't removing the redundant \n\n. Please see COM:Regex. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I have activated the Cosmetic Changes Module within pywikibot. This will from now on take care of these instances. --Schlurcher (talk) 22:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
I doubt that will help, please do all cleanups as described at COM:Regex. Hmm. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
It is intended to add two lines before categories to separate them from the main text. Any additional lines are deleted. I verified both behaviours. As code cosmetic changes are always difficult, I will stick to the standard of pywikibot. Please make your proposal there and I will naturally incorporate it after the update through a bot softwareupdate. --Schlurcher (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You have to follow wikimedia-commons standards, not pywikibot standards. Standard for all bots is one line, i don't have to make a proposal for changing your bot because you have to follow wikimedia commons rules. And you bot is making such edits now, thus i had to block your bot for malfunction. Ich will wirklich nicht nervig oder kleinlich sein, sorry. Aber sowas war sicher nicht von deinem Bot vorgesehen. Solltest du java sprechen gibt es bereits ein ready-to-use script das man auch weiterentwickeln kann denn dann bräuchtest du nicht alles in pywikibot einbauen. Lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
In der Tat, die letzten Änderungen sollten nicht passieren. Ich schau mir das heute Abend einmal in Ruhe an. Sponstan würde ich sagen, das liegt daran, dass parallel ein anderer Bot die gleichen Seiten bearbeitet. Bei diesem Bot treten die gleichen 'Probleme' auf. Kannst du mir bitte einen Link auf die Diskussion für eine Linie schreiben? Ich war seit ca. 4 Jahren hier nicht mehr aktiv und damals war noch zwei Linien die Regel. Solche Diskussionen waren auch der Grund, warum ich generell keine kosmetischen Änderungen eingebaut hatte. --159.180.162.12 12:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Fast alle Dateien haben eine Zeile, alle neue Dateien (auch im UploadWizard und so). Das Python cleanup Script funktioniert nicht richtig auf commons, das hatte ich mal schon mal getestet. Aber immer besser nur die Kat entfernen als noch Zeilen zu ;). Bitte sag beschied wenn ich entsperren kann. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Ich habe den Bot erstmal deaktiviert, gibt ja auch genug andere die das machen. Da ich das ehr aus programmiertechnischem Interesse heraus machen schau ich mir das heute Abend einmal in Ruhe an. Falls du ihn also im Laufe das Nachmittags entsperren könntest wäre das nett. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Alte Dateien wurde mit zwei Leerzeilen [1] hochgeladen. Wenigstens trügt mich meine Erinnerung nicht ganz. Den Stilwechsel habe ich wohl verpasst. Das bringt mich ehr zum Dogma keiner Cosmetic Changes zurück. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Mass decat of Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard[edit]

Hey, are you running AWB for this? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 00:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was using pywiki framework for this task. Please note that AWB allows only a list of 25'000 pages. I normally use AWB for Bot Work Requests and to test regex'es. --Schlurcher (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

http -> https[edit]

Bitte mal prüfen warum der Bot dort das "Source" Feld in der Infobox übersehen hat. --Denniss (talk) 07:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . Thank you. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Commons:File description page regular expressions[edit]

Regarding Special:Diff/285872503, as a patroller, I would like to let you know that common mistake is adding second "category" keyword, but without brackets, e.g. [[Category:Category:Some category]]. So you might consider changing the regexp or develop a new one. --jdx Re: 08:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

A search does not lead to any results [2] (but it times out ...). I'll have a look into this when I find a real example. --Schlurcher (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Verlinkte Jahre[edit]

Hallo Schlurcher, weil wir gerade so schön am Aufräumen sind... Was meinst du, sollte man verlinkte Jahre im Datum (Beispiel: File:Odet-Julien Leboucher (1793) Historia de la última guerra.png) rausnehmen? --Arnd (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Ich sehe zwar keinen Grund dafür die Jahre zu verlinken, aber ich sehe auch genausowenig einen Grund die Verlinkung herauszunehmen, wenn sie ein Nutzer extra gesetzt hat. Im Zweifel halte ich mich mit meinem Bot ehr zurück. --Schlurcher (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Incorrect marking as own work[edit]

SchlurcherBot make this edit, but it seems clearly wrong to me. The infobox is not filled out very well, but {{Own}} specifically says it's not for use on things like "repro from art book" and thus shouldn't be added to files that have that (or anything else SchlurcherBot doesn't recognize) in the source field.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

It's an own work from the author given on the picture, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner. Still, the bot should not do controversial edits. I stopped him for now, as actually quite some edits are like this. --Schlurcher (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I checked further on this, there are about 10'000+ cases for this. So in my opinion, this does justify a separate template: {{Repro from art book}}
Also it will make it way more easily to identify these later on. What do you think? --Schlurcher (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

User:SchlurcherBot[edit]

Congratulations! New task was approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks --Schlurcher (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

__NOTOC__[edit]

Hi Schlurcher, what do you think: could i remove this from these files? --Arnd (talk) 09:22, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arnd, my Bot is currently working it's way through all files (slowly but gradually) starting from the first one ever uploaded and will remove them anyhow. The bot also processes all the new updates on a bi-daily fashion. So it will be anyhow done in about a month or so and then also be corrected for all new ones. The __NOTOC__ is simply not needed, as it is the default setting for the file namespace. So this is more to reduce unnecessary and potentially difficult to understand code. Still, if you want to do it directly, please go ahead, I will not stop you :-). The benefit of having it done by bot is simply that it will not spam the recent changes and watch lists of users.
This said and looking at your user page I saw that you also do a lot regarding the "Internationalization" of file pages. Keep on the good work! If you feel anything is missed by my bot, please let me know and I will add it. --Schlurcher (talk) 19:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
ok, i will tell you. Currently i am cleaning up dates. Since most of the work is at least semi-automated i often see other "problems" which i solve en passant. --Arnd (talk) 07:53, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Btw, what about NOTOC in galleries? Can we also remove it? [3] --Arnd (talk) 13:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

To the best of my knowledge (and a short test on a random gallery) the is only applied to the file namespace. So it potentially makes sense to have it for some galleries. Thus, I personally will not touch this. --Schlurcher (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Interestingly almost all files with NOTOC come from xyWP e.g. File:Red Arrows at Farnborough Airshow (ca 2004).jpg with the summary "Transferred from xy.wikipedia". Do you know what this actually means? Seems not a bot, maybe a script. And why every time NOTOC is automatically added? --Arnd (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Commons is younger than some of the xyWP. At that time, pictures were uploaded to the individual xyWP. They were later transferred to Commons. Whereas __NOTOC__ is the default for the Commons file namespace, it was not the case for the German Wikipedia (there I know). So a lot of users added this to the German Wikipedia File descriptions. Thus, it was also transferred to Commons afterwards, where it is not needed. --Schlurcher (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

"Category cleanup"?[edit]

Hallo Schlurcher, diese Bearbeitung von deinem Bot habe ich wieder rückgängig gemacht. Die Straßenbahntypen L und l sind unterschiedliche Typen und es ergibt absolut Sinn, sie beide zu kategorisieren. Ich vermute, dass dein Bot davon ausgeht, dass Kategorienamen nicht case-sensitive sind? So funktionieren MediaWiki-Kategorien allerdings nicht. Tokfo (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Tokfo, ich werde dies später heute Abend zu case-insensitive ändern. Danke für den Hinweis. --Schlurcher (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

✓ 

Done

--Schlurcher (talk) 06:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Date and other housekeeping fixes[edit]

Do you have a published definition of which changes are approved, in particular formatting of dates? I'm wondering about whether to add more of these formats pre-upload in my batch upload scripts. -- (talk) 12:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

The most comprehensive list is: Commons:File description page regular expressions. You can also peek into my unit test examples with give a flavor of the changes performed: [4] --Schlurcher (talk) 18:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
This is one of yours: [5]. You can also use {{unknown|date}} if you prefer. --Schlurcher (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for that, I was unaware that the REGEX page existed and your unit test set looks comprehensive. I'll investigate when I rewrite one of my larger scripts and see what I can reuse. :-) -- (talk) 23:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Bot issue[edit]

This does not look to be an intended function. It moved templates to the bottom with edit summary "grouping categories at the bottom". The templates include categories, but no categories were actually moved (and the templates do not belong with the categories). — Rhododendrites talk |  20:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

The intended function is to collect all categories that are scattered throughout the file description and collect them at the bottom; both for readability as well as to reflect the occurrence on the page. The diff-highlighting of the Wikimedia software is here a bit misleading. If you look at the changed page, you will see that the bot moved all categories to the bottom of the page. The diff however suggest that the templates were moved up before the categories, which is simply another way of highlighting the change. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Ah. You are right. I misread the diff when I looked. Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk |  20:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)