User talk:Schlurcher

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Soft redirect page
Babel user information
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English.
la-2 Hic usor media Latinitate contribuere potest.
ru-1 Этот участник владеет русским языком на начальном уровне.
Users by language

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schiffsmodell Belem2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiffsmodell Belem2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Spielwürfel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spielwürfel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alpsee Germany.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpsee Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heidelberg-Affe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidelberg-Affe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schlossbeleuchtung 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossbeleuchtung 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bot[edit]

Hello Schlurcher. You have told me that I could ask you again if some bot for your work was needed. There are quite many things that could be useful and if that's stil fine with you, I'll let you know. I am thinkg of one thing that I think would be quite nice but would require quite many edits, this would be that ? These are mechanical edits, but there are quite a few of them :

no problem
  • replace russian name/English name by {{creator:English name}}
bit tricky, as the middle names must be removed
  • replace the content of permission by {{User:Leningradartist/Permission}} and delete any use of this template outside the artwork template
no problem
  • replace source = Blabla http://www.leningradschool.com/XXX.jpg by {{from leningradschool|XXX.jpg}}
no problem
  • Replace description= {{ru|1=Painting "English text within quotes" by XX}} {{ru|1=blalbla "Russian text within quote" "other Russian text}} by {{title|Russian blabla within quotes|lang=ru|English blabla within quotes}}
If all pictures follow the convention. This should not be a problem.

It would be needed for all images in Category:Images by Leningradartist that are subcategories of Category:Paintings and do not have {{artwork}} yet -I could correct some files afterwards. If this is possible, let me know: I would need to create creator templates beforehand. Regards, --Zolo (talk) 14:08, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I will have a closer look on your request at the weekend. --Schlurcher (talk) 16:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
If your done creating suitable creator templates, I will process your request. --Schlurcher (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Ok great. Actually I had not realized there were 80 creator template, which is a bit long to do manually. I have made a request for batch upload of these templates and I'll let you know when it is done.--Zolo (talk) 10:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, it was a bit long but I made all creator templates by hand if you are still interested.--Zolo (talk) 08:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have still 6000 other edits in queue, but afterwards will do this task. --Schlurcher (talk) 17:25, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done --Schlurcher (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Very good thanks.--Zolo (talk) 02:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Oh just one thing actually. The parameter where the title is displayed should be called "title" not "description".--Zolo (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC) If you change it, you can also replace "author=" by "artist=" at the same time, I think it is a bit less ambiguous.--Zolo (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Nordiska[edit]

Hi Schlurcher,

Maybe you want to run your bot through Category:Images from Nordiska museet per my suggestion at Commons_talk:Nordiska_museet#Improvements. --  Docu  at 08:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. --Schlurcher (talk) 08:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. Looks like there was no room for improvement. --  Docu  at 11:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liebesschloss.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebesschloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Original upload log[edit]

Hi Schlurcher,

According to Template talk:Original upload log, the usual internationalization would be {{original upload log}}, not {{int:wm-license-original-upload-log}}. --  Docu  at 15:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

About File:Kampfläufer.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm still sure that this file has wrong id. Correct species is Tringa totanus, not Philomachus pugnax. I'm about to move the image to the correct name. If you still think its a Philomachus pugnax, can you send the picture to the zoo curator etc where did you take this image? I think that he or she can verify the species. Best regards –Makele-90 (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I have no objections, when you want to move/rename the picture. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, I moved it now. –Makele-90 (talk) 11:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Frankfurt Skyline von Deutschherrnbrücke.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt Skyline von Deutschherrnbrücke.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Frankfurt Skyline von Deutschherrnbrücke 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt Skyline von Deutschherrnbrücke 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bot edit rates exceed approval[edit]

Graph indicating your bot was running at 30 edits/minute today.

Hi Schlurcher,

Triggered by a discussion about bot edit rates I initiated some data analysis today to see what kind of load Commons is experiencing (measured in edits/minute) and the distribution of the load between normal user edits and bots by just looking through some recent changes data for this evening. In the graph I noticed that your bot was running at x5 the default maximum edit rate of 10 seconds for each edit (or max 6 edits per minute), namely at about 30 edits / sec. However, the bot is approved to run at a maximum of five edits/minute. Now, the 30 edits/minute may not be a problem in most circumstances (perhaps though if several such bots run concurrently in "rush hours", I do not know), but maybe you should get approval to run as this higher rate or lower the speed of the bot, such that there is consistency between the actual bot edit rate and the approval. Best wishes from Denmark --Slaunger (talk) 23:25, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, nobody ever pointed out to me that this is really a problem. I will follow the discussion on the talk page for more insight. Concerning my case, the view of the picture is very biased. My bot does not run on any server, but on my personal pc. Therefore, it is just active from time to time. To use my personal pc time efficiently I saw no reason to throttle the bot. --Schlurcher (talk) 18:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Ильин Николай Александрович.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ильин Николай Александрович.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:59, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Convert all interlaced JPGs[edit]

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the note. --Schlurcher (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Schwetzingen Schlosspark Eingangsbereich Luftbild.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schlossgarten Schwetzingen, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heidelberg Altstadt Schloss Luftbild.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidelberg Altstadt Schloss Luftbild.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)