User talk:Schlurcher

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Soft redirect page
Babel user information
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-4 This user has near native speaker knowledge of English.
la-2 Hic usor media Latinitate contribuere potest.
ru-1 Этот участник владеет русским языком на начальном уровне.
Users by language

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schiffsmodell Belem2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiffsmodell Belem2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Spielwürfel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spielwürfel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alpsee Germany.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpsee Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heidelberg-Affe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidelberg-Affe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schlossbeleuchtung 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossbeleuchtung 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liebesschloss.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebesschloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Schwetzingen Schlosspark Eingangsbereich Luftbild.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schlossgarten Schwetzingen, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heidelberg Altstadt Schloss Luftbild.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidelberg Altstadt Schloss Luftbild.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Bot bug[edit]

Hello, Your bot has a bug. For example here it isn't removing the redundant \n\n. Please see COM:Regex. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I have activated the Cosmetic Changes Module within pywikibot. This will from now on take care of these instances. --Schlurcher (talk) 22:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
I doubt that will help, please do all cleanups as described at COM:Regex. Hmm. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
It is intended to add two lines before categories to separate them from the main text. Any additional lines are deleted. I verified both behaviours. As code cosmetic changes are always difficult, I will stick to the standard of pywikibot. Please make your proposal there and I will naturally incorporate it after the update through a bot softwareupdate. --Schlurcher (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You have to follow wikimedia-commons standards, not pywikibot standards. Standard for all bots is one line, i don't have to make a proposal for changing your bot because you have to follow wikimedia commons rules. And you bot is making such edits now, thus i had to block your bot for malfunction. Ich will wirklich nicht nervig oder kleinlich sein, sorry. Aber sowas war sicher nicht von deinem Bot vorgesehen. Solltest du java sprechen gibt es bereits ein ready-to-use script das man auch weiterentwickeln kann denn dann bräuchtest du nicht alles in pywikibot einbauen. Lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
In der Tat, die letzten Änderungen sollten nicht passieren. Ich schau mir das heute Abend einmal in Ruhe an. Sponstan würde ich sagen, das liegt daran, dass parallel ein anderer Bot die gleichen Seiten bearbeitet. Bei diesem Bot treten die gleichen 'Probleme' auf. Kannst du mir bitte einen Link auf die Diskussion für eine Linie schreiben? Ich war seit ca. 4 Jahren hier nicht mehr aktiv und damals war noch zwei Linien die Regel. Solche Diskussionen waren auch der Grund, warum ich generell keine kosmetischen Änderungen eingebaut hatte. --159.180.162.12 12:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Fast alle Dateien haben eine Zeile, alle neue Dateien (auch im UploadWizard und so). Das Python cleanup Script funktioniert nicht richtig auf commons, das hatte ich mal schon mal getestet. Aber immer besser nur die Kat entfernen als noch Zeilen zu ;). Bitte sag beschied wenn ich entsperren kann. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Ich habe den Bot erstmal deaktiviert, gibt ja auch genug andere die das machen. Da ich das ehr aus programmiertechnischem Interesse heraus machen schau ich mir das heute Abend einmal in Ruhe an. Falls du ihn also im Laufe das Nachmittags entsperren könntest wäre das nett. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Alte Dateien wurde mit zwei Leerzeilen [1] hochgeladen. Wenigstens trügt mich meine Erinnerung nicht ganz. Den Stilwechsel habe ich wohl verpasst. Das bringt mich ehr zum Dogma keiner Cosmetic Changes zurück. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Mass decat of Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard[edit]

Hey, are you running AWB for this? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 00:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was using pywiki framework for this task. Please note that AWB allows only a list of 25'000 pages. I normally use AWB for Bot Work Requests and to test regex'es. --Schlurcher (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

http -> https[edit]

Bitte mal prüfen warum der Bot dort das "Source" Feld in der Infobox übersehen hat. --Denniss (talk) 07:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done. Thank you. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Commons:File description page regular expressions[edit]

Regarding Special:Diff/285872503, as a patroller, I would like to let you know that common mistake is adding second "category" keyword, but without brackets, e.g. [[Category:Category:Some category]]. So you might consider changing the regexp or develop a new one. --jdx Re: 08:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

A search does not lead to any results [2] (but it times out ...). I'll have a look into this when I find a real example. --Schlurcher (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Verlinkte Jahre[edit]

Hallo Schlurcher, weil wir gerade so schön am Aufräumen sind... Was meinst du, sollte man verlinkte Jahre im Datum (Beispiel: File:Odet-Julien Leboucher (1793) Historia de la última guerra.png) rausnehmen? --Arnd (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Ich sehe zwar keinen Grund dafür die Jahre zu verlinken, aber ich sehe auch genausowenig einen Grund die Verlinkung herauszunehmen, wenn sie ein Nutzer extra gesetzt hat. Im Zweifel halte ich mich mit meinem Bot ehr zurück. --Schlurcher (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Incorrect marking as own work[edit]

SchlurcherBot make this edit, but it seems clearly wrong to me. The infobox is not filled out very well, but {{Own}} specifically says it's not for use on things like "repro from art book" and thus shouldn't be added to files that have that (or anything else SchlurcherBot doesn't recognize) in the source field.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

It's an own work from the author given on the picture, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner. Still, the bot should not do controversial edits. I stopped him for now, as actually quite some edits are like this. --Schlurcher (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I checked further on this, there are about 10'000+ cases for this. So in my opinion, this does justify a separate template: {{Repro from art book}}
Also it will make it way more easily to identify these later on. What do you think? --Schlurcher (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

User:SchlurcherBot[edit]

Congratulations! New task was approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks --Schlurcher (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)