Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bonjour Selbymay,
Je me permet de te tutoyer. Sur la page des QI candidates Tu me demandes (why there is no exif data?), tout simplement parce que si il y a une manipulation pour les faire apparaitre, je ne la connait pas.
Amicalement.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Selbmay, I like to use one of your fotos (La Reine Bérengère de Navarre - Abbaye de l'Épau - Yvré-l'Évêque, Sarthe) for a scientific publication on archaeological finds. Could you please contact me (Roth-Heege@bluewin.ch)?
Sincerely yours
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I see that you have a great success with your pictures of stained glass windows on FP and " I'm speechless" is a comment you deserve. As you have seen I also did some windows. Now, I notice you use the aperture f/16 for these pictures which are flat. What is your reasoning for using such a narrow aperture? I've been told that in digital fotography small apertures cause loss of sharpness that's why I am surprised. Best regards and congratulations --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Church window + interior -> Which technique despite HDR?
Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
Hi! You (as can easily seen by your contributions) seem to be an expert with the photography of church's windows. On QIC you said that there are other techniques (despite) HDR to photograph the interior of a church including transparent windows with non-blown out parts. Do you have the use of large flashlights in mind? A few days ago I declined a photo by Moroder and do still not know how to photograph this motive without HDR. Such large lights / flashs are IMHO not effortable. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Since I'm involved with the question I try to give an answer. In my experience its better to photograph those windows on rainy days so you have less light contrast,--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
The challenge is to photograph windows AND interior. I am not convinced at all, even of this FP by Selbymay - has burnt out windows, or the quality could have been much better for this photo by using HDR technique. My point is that HDR could be a very good tool for interior photographs of churchs. For instance this photo by me had looked VERY bad without HDR. Note the extreme difference in brightness with the wooden seeds at the very right and the very bright windows. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well, to begin I must admit it's very difficult to take good pictures in church or in dark areas. As the both of you, I do my best to find some solutions but, according to my personal taste, I don't use HDR which affects the whole picture and give an artificial texture. For the FP pic you mentioned, the windows on the sides were mostly a source of light, and the ones in the choir are too far and are just some stains of colours, I don't think we need more details. About the other one pic from the same place, I must admit my failure as I did only one take in a hurry. :-)
About the photo in QIC by Poco a poco, the window is more important for the whole composition and is barely visible. That's why I did disagree.
I have absolutely no problem with it - there are often different opionions, I wrote here because of your comment "there are other possibilites than HDR". I was interested in it to learn something from you.
About the photo by Moroder that you made me discover, it's the same issue, with bigger windows. But to be true, if we have to wait for rainy days, it could be long sometimes (even if we don't have that much sunny days this winter in France :-)
I don't use a flash neither as I don't have one (just the useless flash in my camera body). But, like in HDR technique, it's still possible to take several pics of same composition with different EV. As I said earlier, I don't like HDR result, so I just modify the windows with the cloning tool in Photoshop. To give an example, recently, I tried to take a picture of a very dark chapel : the interior is from the first take (long exposure to see something in the dark), the windows come from the second take (short exposure). It's not perfect yet and I'm sure we could find another way to improve this kind of images. As you said, it's a challenge and that's the beauty of it :-)
OK, you use Photoshop - that's the trick. I am only familar with LR, Photomatix (HDR program) and basic understanding of Hugin. Thus for me the only possibility is to use HDR to manage such high dynamic situatons. With a reasonable HDR processing you can also increase sharpness and micro contrast of the overall image. I am not a great fan of massively increasing shadows (leads ofter to ugly noise). In summary, you use two techniques: cloning tool from PS and "cloudy weather tool" --Tuxyso (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merci pour la nomination de ma photo dinannaise en QI. Je crains être trop sensible à la couleur et à la composition de mes photos pour avoir une vision « QI-compliant » de mon travail. Surtout, j'ai tendance à favoriser une photo qui m'a demandé du boulot (du style, un HDR avec objectif à bascule décentrement dans une église frigorifiée) alors que je n'accorderai guère d'attention à une photo « facile » comme ces portes.
D'ailleurs, que penses-tu de cette photo dont EdouardHue me disait qu'elle pouvait mériter un label ?
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Comme tu as pu le voir, je suis à l'origine de ces DR. Ce, n'est pas de gaieté de cœur. Mais en faisant quelques recherches sur Laurentin, je n'ai pu que constater ... Je ne sais pas si il est l'auteur d'autres bâtiments, ou s'il n'a fait que ces deux-là. Possible, vu qu'il n'avait pas que l'archi comme activité. Donc, je ne verserai que les principales. Je suppose que tu as les originales. Quand tu auras du temps, si tu le juges opportun, tu pourras faire le reste. Je te créditerai, il va de soi, en espérant faire la chose correctement. Je t'enverrai aussi un lien vers elles.
Effectivement, je suis assez nouveau dans la Wiki.
J'aimerai prendre quelqu'unes de vos photos pour faire des cartes postales.
Est-ce que vous pouvez me contacter pour que nous en discutions.
Merci
Cordialement
Marie-Pierre Rousseau
mprousseau@infonie.fr
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality.--ArildV 12:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Comment Amazing! But it needs a minimal tilt/perspective correction. May I ask what lens you used? --Moroder 12:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Done New version uploaded. Thanks for the hint. I use mostly this lens. --Selbymay08:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Je pense que j'ai vu le triangle je vais l'enlever. Mais je n'ai pas l'original et ma connexion G3 est misérable (je suis à Venise) J'essai de le charger par morceau. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hallo Selbymay, thanks a lot for the appreciation of the photo. I really don't know how to fix the 2 px halo on the building/sky interface. There is also some CA of the same size around the statues. Can I do it with hotoshop?. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just a minute afer your review of File:Yosemite from Swinging Bridge with People 2013.jpg I've uploaded an imho slightly improved version. I've increased the brightness of shadows on the rocks at the very left and moderately changed the color temperature of this shadow area. Please be so kind and take another look if it is still QI for you. Thanks, --Tuxyso (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bon jour,
je etê a Nantes au mois de août e je hai prise des fotos de les statues de Mahlknecht dans le theatre Graslin. On me á dit dans le theatre che le statue sont de Moliere a droit et Corneille a gauche mai dans le article de Wp on dit que il est Racine. Tu peut me dire la veritè svp. Salut --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016.
To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Salut, j'ai vu que tu avais mis une photo de la remise du Grand Prix, n'aurais-tu pas quelques autres photos afin d'illustrer un peu l'article consacré à l'édition 2016 ? Merci. --Milegue (talk) 10:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour, j'ai de nombreuses photos destinées à illustrer l'article et les pages de certains auteurs présents mais je ne pourrai les mettre en ligne que dans quelques jours pour des raisons pratiques. Merci. Selbymay (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Salut Selbymay ! ça fait longtemps que je voulais te remercier pour tout le boulot que tu fais sur le projet bd. La classe pour la photo de Geoffroy Monde ! Bonne continuation, VKaeru (talk) 18:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Bonjour Selbymay, Je remarque que tu a changé Category:44e festival international de la Bande Dessinée en Category:Angoulême International Comics Festival. J'avais utilisé ce nom car c'est, apparement le nom officel, de plus c'est une activité française dans le pays qui a pour langue officielle le français, si de plus l'anglais non littéraire pouvais être évité...Bref, je comprend que le plus rapide est de changer le dernier ajout de catégorie que de remettre les autres categories en français ou sous le nom officiel...En outre il y avait des liens qui utilisaient Category:44e festival international de la Bande Dessinée comme indexation ce que tu n'a pas modifié. Merci de rétablir le nom officiel. Bien cordialement Garitan (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour,
effectivement, j'ai renommé la catégorie car c'est la nomenclature utilisée depuis plusieurs années. De plus, Commons est une banque multimedia internationale, tout comme le Festival d'ailleurs. Au passage, merci pour les ajouts d'images, j'en rajouterai moi aussi, ayant "couvert" l'événement avec un microfinancement wikimédia. Cordialement, --Selbymay (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Cher Selbymay, j'avais vu que tu avais renommé et que le nom de catégorie anciennement utilisé était un choix discutable. Bien sûr que c'est une activité inernationale pour laquelle le choix a été fait par les organisatteurs de lui donner un nom en langue française 44e festival international de la Bande Dessinée. Bien sûr que Commons a des problemes et des conventions de creation de categories, si tu pouvais m'envoyer un lien qui impose l'usage de l'anglais dans les creations de categories, je me ferais un plaisir de le lire, ne l'ayant pas trouvé. Bien cordialement (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Garitan, nous sommes sur une encyclopédie collaborative, si tu souhaites remettre en cause les usages établis depuis plusieurs années (cf. Categories), libre à toi, mais je n'ai pas le temps pour ces querelles picrocholines qui ne font que décourager les bonnes volontés. Au plaisir, --Selbymay (talk) 11:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Cette œuvre de Jean Prouvé, mort en 1984, ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement de l'auteur ou de ses ayant-droits, et ce jusque 70 ans après le décès de l'auteur (pas de liberté de panorama). Sauf cas particulier, cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons en 2055. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 14:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Bonjour Marianne,
un peu surpris par tes messages relatifs à la Villa Cavrois.
En effet, c'est une oeuvre de Robert Mallet-Stevens, mort en 1945, et non de Jean Prouvé.
Il y a donc plus de 70 ans et la présence de nombreuses photos sur Commons le confirme.
--Selbymay (talk) 15:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Robert Mallet-Stevens est bien l'un des deux architectes de cette villa, mais il n'est pas le seul intervenant. Si je m'en fie à la fiche de la base Mérimée, qui me sert de références pour le concours, Jean Prouvé (mort en 1984) et André Salomon (mort en 1944) y étaient ingénieurs, et Pierre Barbe (mort en 2004) également architecte. Par le fait, les 70 ans démarrent par le fait à la mort du dernier des 4, soit 2004, et tombe dans le domaine public en 2075 ! Sauf changement législatif avant cette date. Désolée. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsComment A little bit of lens distortion, the columns curving inwards. Correction?--Peulle 10:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Thanks for noticing, I've upload a new version from original file. Please check if it's better. --Selbymay 11:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Good work.--Peulle15:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ParisENSBA 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsComment A little bit of lens distortion, the columns curving inwards. Correction?--Peulle 10:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Thanks for noticing, I've upload a new version from original file. Please check if it's better. --Selbymay 11:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Good.--Peulle15:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ParisENSBA 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Bonjour, j'espère que la sortie photo au Louvre fut agréable.
Suite à notre échange hier soir, je reviens vers toi pour t'indiquer que nous aurons une session de travail pour ré-organiser le fonctionnement du concours et préparer la nouvelle édition les 17 et 18 mars 2018 de 14h à 19h via des outils à distance.
En attendant, tu peux prendre connaissance de la page Groupes thématique Wiki Loves Monuments et t'inscrire à la liste de discussion wlm@lists.wikimedia.fr via https://lists.wikimedia.fr/info/wlm pour être au courant des échanges de la communauté. Si tu rencontres des difficultés d'inscription, n'hésite pas à contacter Sylvain sur son adresse pro Sylvain.Boissel@wikimedia.fr
merci pour ton appréciation et ton message, je me suis aperçu après l'édition 2017 que tu y étais les années précédentes, tu n'as pas pu y aller cette année ?
Je ne sais pas encore si je pourrais le faire en 2018 mais j'espère bien. Il y a beaucoup de boulot donc on ne serait pas trop de deux pour couvrir le festival. On peut demander une accréditation pour deux.
Yoho ! Si, bien sûr que si, j'y étais, mais j'avais laissé mes appareils au vestiaire quelques heures afin de profiter en tant qu'acteur/spectateur plutôt qu'en tant que "reporter" et les OS de mes PC et laptop (XP et Vista) font que je ne peux verser mes photos comme je veux ; photos faites avec un EOS qui attend depuis au moins deux ans d'aller se faire pomponner...
J'y vais tous les ans depuis 2012, habitant à 15km, je ne suis pas trop gêné ; cette année, j'avais mis le camping-car à la première place au rd-pt de la Guitare et ai pu, ainsi, profiter, sans me soucier de rentrer tous les soirs, en bécane, avec un gramme dans chaque poche...
Pour les accréd's, si tu réussis à être plus persuasif que moi les années précédentes, je te couvre de bière(s) durant trois jours !!!
Pour '18, si tu as la chance de trouver un pass (ou un billet-jour), et si tu y penses à ce moment-là, fais-moi signe, au cas où...
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Selbymay,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8313 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FIBD2015.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bonjour Selbymay, jolie photographie de N. Stouflet, elle ressort bien, même en couleur sur le papier journal de l'Union du 21 novembre 2022, page 17 de l'édition de Reims. Cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
✴ Happy Holidays, Selbymay ✴
Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bonjour Selbymay,
Merci pour tes photos de la collection Dupuytren que je viens d'aller voir, c'est impressionnant. J'ai rejoins la Sorbonne Université pour valoriser leurs collections scientifiques. J'en ai profité pour illustrer la biographie du patient Victor Leborgne, dit tan-tan. Pyb (talk) 19:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments revient en France en 2025 !
Vous recevez ce message car vous avez participé à l'édition 2021 du concours de Wiki Loves Monuments en France et nous serions ravis que vous y participiez à nouveau cette année !
Après quatre longues années d'absence, le concours est de retour en France !
Toutes les informations sont disponibles sur la page dédiée : Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 en France.
L'objectif du concours est toujours le même : photographier le patrimoine historique. Les monuments admissibles sont les monuments architecturaux (présents dans la base Mérimée) et les objets (dans la base Palissy), qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement inventoriés.
N'hésitez pas à soumettre vos photos du 15 septembre au 15 octobre inclus. Nous sommes disponibles si vous avez la moindre question.
Bonne participation !
Au nom de l'équipe d'organisation, VIGNERON (talk), 9 septembre 2025
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
Your wiki anniversary was 28 days ago, marking 14 years (as per SUL) of dedicated service! I wanted to extend a heartfelt thanks for your amazing contributions. With over 28,600 edits, your dedication is an inspiration to the community. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead!
Use this Tool to send wiki anniversary wishes to other amazing Wikimedians.
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!
First steps tutorial
Getting help
Goodies, tips and tricks
Made a mistake?
.jpg)
_-_Abbaretz.jpg)
_-_Abbaretz.jpg)
_-_Abbaretz.jpg)
LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 00:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 03:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
