User talk:SKas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Sergei Kazantsev)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helicopter in Sochi Olympic park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helicopter in Sochi Olympic park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

On the Sochi Olympic Park Circuit.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! On the Sochi Olympic Park Circuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helicopter in Sochi Olympic park1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helicopter in Sochi Olympic park1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Curling World Championship 2015.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Curling World Championship 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Victoria Moiseeva.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Moiseeva.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moiseeva Dron.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moiseeva Dron.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kitesurfing in Sochi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitesurfing in Sochi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aristolochia steupii.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aristolochia steupii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aquilegia olympica in Caucasus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aquilegia olympica in Caucasus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Colchicum speciosum in Caucasus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colchicum speciosum in Caucasus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cercis chinensis Sochi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cercis chinensis Sochi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paeonia caucasica.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paeonia caucasica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sakura in Sochi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sakura in Sochi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Orhis coriophora.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orhis coriophora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rhododendron Sochi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron Sochi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - May - Panoramas[edit]

I've removed File:Gorki Gorod panorama.JPG from the challenge as it doesn't have at least a 2:1 aspect ratio. Hope you can find another image or challenge to take part in. -- Colin (talk) 20:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

OK. The image is changed. Now a ratio more, than 2 to 1.--KSK (talk) 07:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Спасибо за правки фоток![edit]

Я не волшебник, я только учусь! Еще раз спасибо ;)--Andrey Dumchev (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

If a nominated picture is getting declined,[edit]

it will be removed by the bot automatically after two days. You don´t have to do anything. Two days, because if you or someone else disagree and will send the picture to a consensual discussion. This needs some times eventually. --Hubertl (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks.--KSK (talk) 19:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Стрижи в Сочи.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Стрижи в Сочи.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Strizhi-4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strizhi-4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Acca sellowiana in my Garden.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acca sellowiana in my Garden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Feijoa.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feijoa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Svetlana Kapanina in Sochi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svetlana Kapanina in Sochi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Вики любит Землю 2015[edit]

noframe

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваша фотография:

оказалась среди 153 из более чем 8300 загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошла в шорт-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!

Организаторы российской части Вики любит Землю 2015

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Псырцха1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Псырцха1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trolley in PandaPark.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trolley in PandaPark.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

PandaPark.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PandaPark.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Псырцха.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Псырцха.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

1Polet.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1Polet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

GAZEX at Rosa Khutor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GAZEX at Rosa Khutor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

In PandaPark at Rosa Khutor.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! In PandaPark at Rosa Khutor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

GAZEX system at Rosa Khutor.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gazex remote avalanche control system. .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Amaryllis in my garden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amaryllis in my garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Сплав по реке Мзымта.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Сплав по реке Мзымта.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

RosaKhutor2013.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rosa Khutor Alpine Resort, General view on a ski area..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

SlidingCenterSanki.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sliding Center Sanki, general view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ilori.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ilori Church, general view of a church complex..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Цветок Дурмана.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Цветок Дурмана.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mountains in Krasnaya Polyana.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains in Krasnaya Polyana.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Autumn in Caucasus2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autumn in Caucasus2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Autumn in Caucasus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autumn in Caucasus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Агава в Сочи.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Агава в Сочи.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tabunnaya.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tabunnaya.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chugush Mount and Horse.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chugush Mount and Horse.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fountain in Sochi Olympic Park.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Sochi Olympic Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Peak Sakharny Pseashkho.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peak Sakharny Pseashkho.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

3 horses.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 horses.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The top station of a cableway.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The top station of a cableway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mount Pseashkho from south.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Pseashkho from south.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fir-tree in Cuacasus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fir-tree in Cuacasus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Images from wiki.risk.ru[edit]

Dear SKas, I have noticed, that you have uploaded some images from wiki.risk.ru. Do you know if all of the images on that site is under GFDL or do you have some contact on that site? I think that this image would be quite useful for wikipedia... Could you eventually upload it?
Yours sincerely, Grtek (talk) 20:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Dear Tadeáš, on the homepage wiki.risk.ru it is written that all information on this site is available according to the license GNU (FDL). Regards, --KSK (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Allium ampeloprasum blossoming.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allium ampeloprasum blossoming.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

The Hungarian Curlers Dorottya Palancsa and Zsolt Kiss.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winners of the World Mixed Doubles Curling Championship 2015..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Armillaria mellea in Sochi 14112015.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armillaria mellea in Sochi 14112015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Biathlon Sochi 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The men's sprint medalists in Biathlon at the 2014 Winter Olympics..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Чайот.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Чайот.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

The scope of Commons:Valued image candidates/Private of Kremlin Regiment.JPG was changed[edit]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за ценное замечание. Область номинации Commons:Valued image candidates/Private of Kremlin Regiment.JPG была изменена. Если и изменённая область требует уточнений - жду Ваших комментариев на странице номинации. С уважением, Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 17:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Отлично. Последняя версия, по-моему, самая удачная. --KSK (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Мачты.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Мачты.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chrysanthemum 'Vesuvius'.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysanthemum 'Vesuvius'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Parasailing in Sochi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parasailing in Sochi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Fisht Olympic Stadium.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olympic Stadium in Sochi, general view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Excavator on the Aibga ridge.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Excavator on the Aibga ridge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Каменный столб.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Каменный столб.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

BASE jumping in Sochi.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BASE jumping, 4 phases of jump..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Lidija Skoblikova.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lidija Skoblikova in 2014..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

For VI[edit]

Hi, Instead of "growing in the wild" it would be better to place "Inforescence". Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't think so. Inflorescence it only part of the image. But there it is visible not only an inflorescence, but also leaves, branches, a bush in general, and also environment: other plants, rocks and another. Thanks for participation in discussion. --KSK (talk) 08:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kitesurfer2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitesurfer2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Рододендрон Кавказский.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhododendron caucasicum, natural stand..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chrysanthemum 'Rage Spray' in my Garden2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysanthemum 'Rage Spray' in my Garden2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chrysanthemum 'Rage Spray' in my Garden1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysanthemum 'Rage Spray' in my Garden1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Aristolochia steupii.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aristolochia steupii Flower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Crocus scharojanii.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crocus scharojanii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Campanula in mountains.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campanula aucheri growing in the wild..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Daphne glomerata Lam.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daphne glomerata inflorescences..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Fritillaria latifolia in Sochi.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fritillaria latifolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Shayba Arena.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shayba Arena..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mountain Olympic village.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountain Olympic village.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Red-White boat.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-White boat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Power line in Sochi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Power line in Sochi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Профессор Кудактин осматривает фотоловушку.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Профессор Кудактин осматривает фотоловушку.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Aquilegia olympica in Caucasus.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquilegia olympica flowers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Прострел золотистый.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulsatilla aurea..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Strizhi 2015.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strizhi 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Autumn in Caucasus.JPG[edit]

Hi, The changes you made makes it worse than the original. It was a quality image, the new one isn't one anymore. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Men'sDownhillSochi2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The men's downhil medalists in Alpine skiing at the 2014 Winter Olympics..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

First snow in Krasnaya Polyana.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! First snow in Krasnaya Polyana.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mountains near Sochi1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains near Sochi1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Peak Chugush and horse.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peak Chugush and horse.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MountainTabynnaya.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MountainTabynnaya.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2 лошади в Сочинском заказнике.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 лошади в Сочинском заказнике.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

View to Pseashkho from Tabunnaya.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View to Pseashkho from Tabunnaya.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mountain Tabunnaya3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountain Tabunnaya3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Мать-и-мачеха весной.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Мать-и-мачеха весной.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Erythronium caucasicum Woronow.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erythronium caucasicum flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View from Aibga range to Krasnaya Polyana2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Aibga range to Krasnaya Polyana2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Peak Bzerpy.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peak Bzerpy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Бзерпинский карниз3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Бзерпинский карниз3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bzerpi cornice.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bzerpi cornice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Mount Elbrus from the southeast.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Elbrus - viewed from the south-east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View to Bzerpy cornice and Pseashkho pass.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View to Bzerpy cornice and Pseashkho pass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosa Plato.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa Plato.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Lapland Biosphere Reserve[edit]

Приветствую! А почему тогда не Category:Lapland Nature Biosphere Reserve? --Insider (talk) 06:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

По следующим соображениям:
  1. Именно так называется в проекте ЮНЕСКО[4],[5]. Поэтому так лучше для взаимодействия проектов
  2. Именно так называется статья в enwiki.[6]
  3. Слово "nature" в названии IMO излишне, т.к. все биосферные заповедники являются природными заповедниками, но не все природные являются биосферными.
Поэтому так, а также исходя из обсуждения этой темы с Александром и Ярославом[7]--KSK (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Muscari dolichanthum.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Muscari dolichanthum Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Primula woronowii.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primula woronowii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

3 CATs.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 CATs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rhododendron caucasicum at Rosa Khutor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron caucasicum at Rosa Khutor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Primula woronowii.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Primula woronowii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Horses on a leash for a bridle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horses on a leash for a bridle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:NalychevoScheme1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:NalychevoScheme1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

On hunting.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! On hunting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Horses on a forest cordon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horses on a forest cordon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Horses on a forest cordon1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horses on a forest cordon1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Вики любит Землю 2016[edit]

noframe

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2016! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

вошли в лонг-лист конкурса. В ближайшие дни жюри составит шорт-лист и определит победителей, обращая особое внимание на качество изображений. Пожалуйста, проверьте, что вошедшие в лонг-лист фотографии загружены в максимально возможном разрешении – это необходимое условие для победы в конкурсе.

Также убедитесь в том, что Вы указали адрес электронной почты и разрешили приём писем от других участников – без этого мы не сможем с Вами связаться.

Кроме того, Вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида.

Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!

Организаторы российской части Вики любит Землю 2016

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beech growth rings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beech growth rings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Campanula trachelium in Sochi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula trachelium in Sochi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Sempervivum caucasicum2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sempervivum caucasicum growing in the wild..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The leaf of Loquat.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The leaf of Loquat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lilium kesselringianum in Sochi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium kesselringianum in Sochi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Campanula trachelium in Sochi.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campanula trachelium Inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Lilium kesselringianum in Sochi.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lilium kesselringianum Inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Upper lift station Gornaya Karusel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper lift station Gornaya Karusel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pedicularis atropurpurea.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedicularis atropurpurea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pulsatilla aurea fruit.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulsatilla aurea fruit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pulsatilla aurea.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulsatilla aurea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rhododendron caucasicum in Sochi1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron caucasicum in Sochi1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pulsatilla aurea fruits.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulsatilla aurea fruits.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Pedicularis atropurpurea.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pedicularis atropurpurea Inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Lilium kesselringianum in Sochi.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lilium kesselringianum in Sochi.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lilium kesselringianum in Sochi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Winter Palace Panorama 4.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Winter Palace from Palace Embankment..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Agência Brasil photos[edit]

Hi! Please use {{Agência Brasil}} for these uploads and give correct credits --> [8] + [9] + [10] (U.S. Army?) etc.. Note that Agência Brasil is also publishing content from third parties, so only photos from photographers of Agência Brasil (which are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr")) are allowed and in CC. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 07:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

OK, I will take into account.--KSK (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

tasnimnews.com photos[edit]

Hi! Could you please also tag all files uploaded from tasnimnews.com with {{subst:Tasnim/subst}}? Not ALL content published at tasnimnews.com is in CC. The code displays the license {{Tasnim}} combined with a LicenseReview-template. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 11:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Again.Please use {{subst:Tasnim/subst}}. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Flickr photos[edit]

Please urgently indicate always the direct source from Flickr (a link to an album doesn't serve), the correct license and use {{Flickrreview}} for the LicenseReview process. Example: [11] . ThxGunnex (talk) 11:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Again. Please use {{Flickrreview}} --> example. Gunnex (talk) 19:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Women's team of Germany on soccer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Women's team of Germany on soccer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Headlocker (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Olimpíadas Rio 2016 (28720432416).jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Olimpíadas Rio 2016 (28720432416).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Meeting with the Russian Olympic team of athletes in the Kremlin.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Meeting with the Russian Olympic team of athletes in the Kremlin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

@Jarekt. This file have sufficient information on its copyright status. Please, be more attentive.
Standard of the President of the Russian Federation.svg
This file comes from the website of the President of the Russian Federation and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. In short: you are free to distribute and modify the file as long as you attribute www.kremlin.ru. Note: Works published on site before April 8, 2014 are also licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

The permission letter from the Press Secretary for the President of the Russian Federation is available here.

. --KSK (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Kazakhstan at the 2016 Summer Olympics.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kazakhstan at the 2016 Summer Olympics.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sakhalinio (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: You have removed File:Kazakhstan at the 2016 Summer Olympics.jpg. The file has been taken from here: http://www.tasnimnews.com/en/media/2016/08/06/1149797/opening-ceremony-kicks-off-rio-olympics. The description of uploaded file had sufficient information on its copyright status. Its license {{{Tasnim}}}. I believe the file it is removed mistakenly. I ask to recover this file. Regards --KSK (talk) 16:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
How correct you are. Resolved and apologies for that. There is true value in using {{Tasnim}} rather than the standard cc-by-4.0. I will see if I can grab those and update.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:The gymnast from Japan at the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:The gymnast from Japan at the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teemeah (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Rio 2016 Olympic Games Boxing - Day 5 13.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rio 2016 Olympic Games Boxing - Day 5 13.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 11:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Boxer from Australia.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Boxer from Australia.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Boxer from Australia.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 11:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Boxer from Australia+.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Boxer from Australia+.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Boxer from Australia+.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rio 2016 Olympic Games Boxing - Day 5 30.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rio 2016 Olympic Games Boxing - Day 5 30.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rio 2016 Olympic Games Boxing - Day 5 30.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

  • When loading files I assumed that it is enough permission for commercial use. Then I have understood that the license with an opportunity to do derivative works is necessary. I have addressed the owner (AIBA) with a request to change the license in Flickr to CC-BY-3.0 or CC-BY-2.0.--KSK (talk) 15:58, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:The gymnast from Japan at the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The gymnast from Japan at the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Boxing Riocentro 0001 RobsonConceicao 120816 GabrielHeusi.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boxing Riocentro 0001 RobsonConceicao 120816 GabrielHeusi.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Boxing Riocentro 0001 RobsonConceicao 120816 GabrielHeusi.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gunnex (talk) 11:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

    • Considering NOT a work by brasil2016.gov.br --> taken (as indicated) from "Gabriel Heusi/Rio2016" = https://www.rio2016.com (All rights reserved). Gunnex (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Boxing Riocentro 0003 RobsonConceicao 120816 GabrielHeusi.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boxing Riocentro 0003 RobsonConceicao 120816 GabrielHeusi.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Boxing Riocentro 0003 RobsonConceicao 120816 GabrielHeusi.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gunnex (talk) 11:58, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Boxing at the 2016 Summer Olympics semi-final-49-1.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Boxing at the 2016 Summer Olympics semi-final-49-1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 12:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Boxing at the 2016 Summer Olympics semi-final-49-5.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Boxing at the 2016 Summer Olympics semi-final-49-5.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Boxing at the 2016 Summer Olympics semi-final-49-5.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 12:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

  • When loading files I assumed that it is enough permission for commercial use. Then I have understood that the license with an opportunity to do derivative works is necessary. I have addressed the owner (AIBA) with a request to change the license in Flickr to CC-BY-3.0 or CC-BY-2.0.--KSK (talk) 15:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Iranian shooter Najmeh Khedmati.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Iranian shooter Najmeh Khedmati.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 21:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Rio 2016 Olympic Games - Day 5-28795981172.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rio 2016 Olympic Games - Day 5-28795981172.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 23:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Leonid Mandelstam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leonid Mandelstam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

95.29.111.201 18:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28451890473).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28451890473).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Also affected:

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28448754234).jpg

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (29069752815).jpg

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28964234962).jpg

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28993375641).jpg

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28451889703).jpg

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28451887403).jpg

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28964232642).jpg

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (28451885623).jpg


Tm (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File:DEPORTISTAS ECUATORIANOS EN RÍO 2016 (29069753105).jpg[edit]

I have deleted that image. Agencia de Noticias ANDES hosts several low-resolution images from AFP. ANDES automatically tags them as CC-BY (as their own images), but they have no permission to do that for AFP images, hence COM:LL. We need a COM:OTRS confirmation before we can upload them. Materialscientist (talk) 07:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)