User talk:Shadowxfox

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, I'm a Spanish language native speaker.
You can leave your comments or suggestions here (in Spanish or English) or on my main account
Shadowxfox
in the Spanish Wikipedia
This user talk page is for discussion with user Shadowxfox.

If you ask me at this page, I will answer here. If I ask you at another page, I will answer there!

Quill-Nuvola.svg
Please sign your message: --~~~~
Add a new section at the end of page, please!
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Shadowxfox!

SieBot 06:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Clomobia location map[edit]

Hello Shadowxfox, you changed the borders of the location map how ever the corresponding relief map, File:Colombia relief location map.jpg, remained with the previous coordinate borders. This causes a problem with location map templates when you want to use relief map, because the borders are not correct. If you can update the relief map accordingly or ask the relief map creator to update it. thanks, GilCahana (talk) 11:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Banderas[edit]

Disculpa la tardanza.

No entiendo eso de cambiarle el tipo de letra, hasta donde se nunca queda a la vista en los artículos y hasta donde se WK debe estar basado en Windows NT por lo que no distingue entre Mayúsculas o minúsculas, pero si la norma así lo dice adelante.

Saludos --Sarumo74 (talk) 08:39, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Mapa A2 Fallo Litigio Nicaragua - Colombia.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mapa A2 Fallo Litigio Nicaragua - Colombia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Mapa B2 Fallo Litigio Nicaragua - Colombia.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mapa B2 Fallo Litigio Nicaragua - Colombia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Hola Shadowxfox[edit]

Hola Shadowxfox, esta tarde que estuve desocupado logré seguir modificando el mapa que ya te había mencionado y logré el siguiente resultado: El mapa del mar de Grau, me gustaría que le des un vistazo y veas si la licencia está correcta, las categorías, etc. Si crees que debe ser modificado en algo el propio mapa, tienes la total libertad para hacerlo. También te quería comentar acerca de este mapa, y es que cuando estuve colaborando el artículo sobre las fronteras de Ecuador noté que este mapa esta desactualizado, te explico la versión original del mapa fue hecho en el 21 de mayo 2011 y en esa fecha aún Ecuador reclamaba un mar territorial de 200 millas, pero en el 2012 este país se adhirió a la Convemar y declaró formalmente que reconoce las zonas marítimas que señala esta convesión, es decir que reconoce un mar territorial de 12 millas y una zona económica hasta una distancia de 200 millas, te dejo este link de la Declaración realizada por el Ecuador al momento de la Adhesión, este documento lo puedes encontrar en la propia página web de la cancillería ecuatoriana. Saludos --Edubucher (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

¡Qué útil aporte![edit]

Entre los muchos buenos que has hecho. Creeme que los habitantes los antiguos territorios del Virreinato del Río de la Plata, por más que lo estudien en la educación inicial, no siempre recuerdan que estos una vez fueron parte del Virreinato del Perú. Un abrazo.--Fixertool (talk) 22:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Escudo Episcopado de Colombia.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Escudo Episcopado de Colombia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

181.48.189.109 12:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of Santuario (Risaralda).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag of Santuario (Risaralda).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hosmich (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Location maps of India[edit]

Hello Shadowxfox. I saw you made in the past few location maps of India. Would you please prepare those missing? Carlos (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply .. I have patience, and I'm waiting .. Carlos (talk) 22:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
I saw the maps you made, You are great! Could you please prepare the remaining four? (Himachal Pradesh, Tripura, Mizoram and Lakshadweep) Carlos (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Guiana Shield Map Credit to Smithsonian[edit]

Please credit the Guiana Shield Map you make available to: Biological Diversity of the Guiana Shield Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.


See: http://botany.si.edu/bdg/ Particularly http://botany.si.edu/bdg/images/shieldlg.jpg

I helped create this map when I was a member of the Smithsonian BDG Program. We want our products to be freely available to people, but we do want the proper credit given.

Many Thanks, Tom Hollowell, NMNH Informatics

Done. --Shadowxfox (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Escudo Episcopado de Colombia.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Escudo Episcopado de Colombia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

190.242.99.162 12:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Using a modified map in a publication[edit]

Do you have any objection if your maps are used (and significantly modified) in a publication? If you would like to be cited, we would be happy to do so, but the publisher requires that it be under an actual name, not a user name. Please let me know your preferences: dolezal@american.edu

Sobre este archivo[edit]

Hola Shadowxfox, vengo a solicitarte la modificación de este artículo en lo que se refiere a inclusión de la zona en reclamación Guayana Esequiba. De facto y de iure los mismos pertenecen a Guayana y aunque la reclamación existe y en todos los mapas realizados en Venezuela aparece así, constituye un sesgo no neutral para Wikipedia. Por supuesto, esta discusión se ha llevado en varios artículos y con varios mapas que ya han sido modificados, este escapo de esa discusión en su momento. Agradecido --Oscar_. (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Evidentemente hablo de retirar la franja, no se porque se dio para malinterpretaciones mi primer mensaje, no busco cambiar todos los mapas de Commons, pero este en específico se utiliza para miles de localidades y me pareció importante mencionar el error. Saludos --Oscar_. (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

hola buena noche.[edit]

oye estuve mirando tu pagina muy buena, excelente trabajo. mira necesito uno de los mapas que tienes, (el geografico de colombia) para un trabajo de la universidad, estuve mirando y no supe como descargarlo. si me lo puedes compartir estaria muy agradecido!

RSFSR map[edit]

Dear Shadowxfox,
Would you please correct the map https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soviet_Union_-_Russian_SFSR_(before_1936_territorial_changes).svg. Turkmen SSR and Uzbek SSR (including Tajik ASSR) were separate republics since 1924. Before that, Bukhara and Khiva peoples' republics existed, which were not parts of Russian SFSR either. RSFSR has never existed in the outlines designated on this map.
Thank you in advance. — 188.162.65.7 15:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Please rectify your changes urgently![edit]

See File talk:Soviet Union - Russian SFSR (1922).svg for details as to the mess you've made, and how it's affecting all articles using the map. This is urgent. Thank you for your co-operation. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your hard work... and wishing you a Happy New Year! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

AM de Colombia[edit]

Gracias por subir archivos a commons ,pero mi observacion está en el nombre, no será mejor que solo este en el mapa el nombre de las localidades, sin el titulo ?,se ve mejor ya el nombre lo lleva el art ,ademas se vería mejor para otros idiomas sin necesidad de estar haciendo mas mapas.Category:Maps of metropolitan areas in Colombia. --EEIM (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Socotra no es Somalia[edit]

Hola, A cambiado la categoria de la mapa en occitano de Socotra a "Topographic map of Somalia" pero Socotra no es Somalia, sino Yemen. Gracias por anular el cambio. Muy atentamente. --Jfblanc (talk) 13:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Maps about Territorial changes of Russian SFSR[edit]

Hola

U make many new maps about about Territorial changes of Russian SFSR, for example: 1922, 1924, 1929, 1936, 1940.

Can u make one more map for year 1945?

p.s. here is Russian article about territorial changes.--Gaga.vaa (talk) 08:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Mapa Diócesis de Neiva[edit]

Hola buen día, estuve mirando que hace falta un mapa adicional en la Diócesis de Neiva y es sobre la jurisdicción de las Vicarías, hice un mapa borrador imitando la Arquidiócesis de Medellín y sus Vicarías, (ver aquí) pero me gustaría que tu lo editaras con tu formato para este tipo de mapas. Cualquier inquietud no dudes en hacermela saber. Gracias.--Seamless20 (talk) 09:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Propuesta[edit]

Hola Shadowxfox. Sobre este mapa, tengo una propuesta: para el caso del Protectorado de Marruecos, reducir el tamaño y limitarlo a lo que se consideraba Marruecos. Las colonias españolas del Sáhara yo las dejaría fuera para no dar a entender que ambas formaban parte, porque puede que ahora así sea, pero entonces no tenían nada que ver. Para el caso del es:África Occidental Española, yo recuperaría este mapa, ya que aclara las diferencias entre protectorados, colonias, territorios propios de España, etc (esto último lo digo por los colores empleados, pero también por el título). Un saludo.--Manuchansu (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hola Shadowxfox. Yo también considero que se deben hacer modificaciones en la imagen. El color entre el Sáhara y España es muy parecido y puede confundir. Por otra parte, también hay que colorear a Ceuta y Melilla como el mismo color que el resto del territorio español para diferenciarlas del protectorado. Tampoco creo correcto que la leyenda del mapa tenga como título Marruecos hasta 1956. Un cordial saludo.Vardulia (talk)--Vardulia 23:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
No, Ceuta y Melilla no formaron parte del Protectorado. Es cierto que en la estructura militar sí estaban unidas. Pero este es un mapa político. Ceuta y Melilla fueron en este período o parte de la provincia de Cádiz y Málaga o tuvieron una administración propia. Pero se regían por las mismas leyes que el resto de España. El mapa que muestras tiene el mismo problema con los colores. No hay diferencias entre el Protectorado y España. También debería crearse una diferenciación. Vardulia (talk)--Vardulia 13:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Greater Russia map?[edit]

On the Greater Russia wiki, it would be nice to see an additional orthographic projection combining the 1866 Russian Empire and sphere of influence with the 1945 Soviet Union and sphere of influence, but with more territorial accuracy. The first orthographic projection is misleading in that it discounts the Konigsberg / Kaliningrad area, southwestern Ukraine bordering Romania and Slovakia, and independent Tuva. The second orthographic projection is misleading in that it includes China and Cuba, which were not, repeat, not satellite states. Kjk2.1 (talk) 22:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Shadowfox, that is in fact what I'm asking: a separate file for a third orthographic projection in the Greater Russia wiki. I'm not asking you to edit your 1866 file, as that is being used in the Russian Empire wiki. Kjk2.1 (talk) 01:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Department of North Santander[edit]

Can you tell me, please -- what would you like to do with this category? I can't understand the direction you would like to follow. What do you think? What should be done? Wieralee (talk) 23:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Location map of the German Reich[edit]

Last year you did upload two location maps for the Second and the Third German Reich, but, as you know, they did not fulfill the standards required for a location map template. Now the German map workshop [1] modified these maps to meet the requirements for the location map template. So, I believe your maps should be deleted now. What do you think about that?--Antemister (talk) 18:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)