User talk:ShakataGaNai/Archives/2008/September

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

blank section

random blank section. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I said to Patrícia sorry and I asked if she can forgive me.--Sdrtirs (talk) 19:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


Image deletion warning Image:2008_Air_Races_-_06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− 05:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

blank section

flush! --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

OTRS check

Hello ShakataGaNai. Since you have access to OTRS database, could you please do me a favor and check these pending requests:

  1. Image:Goztepe bus.jpg
  2. Commons:Deletion requests/Template:ITTF - this one has been pending since June. There are about 50 images using this template, so if the permission is not there, I'd like to delete them. Please also see archived discussion for more info.

Thanks for your help. --Kimsə (talk) 07:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Real Madrid vs Bayern Munich.jpg

Hi Shakata! I think it was an error cause you didn't checked that this image was "reviewed and confirmed to be licensed under creative commons", the fact it's that later the creator changed the license ¿should the creator's regret be binding for us?
-It was already discussed and restored, here: User_talk:Polarlys/Archiv3#Image:Real_Madrid_vs_Bayern_Munich.jpg Serg!o (talk) 13:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

✓ sigh... for some reason another user changed the flickr review to a fail after it was passed. restored.

My real name

I used my real name to try and get a picture back up. I was successful, but wouldn't mind having my name deleted now. I know we shouldn't edit archived threads, but can I remove the "real" names in one?LedRush (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

It will probably get reverted. I'd suggest, if you try, to replace it with something like "REDACTED" and put a note in the edit summary as to why you are doing it. Do remember though, that it will always be in the page history. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 19:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice.LedRush (talk) 19:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Block on (talk · contribs)

Though I know this user's behavior was not acceptable I think that one year is a severe punishment. Especially as this IP is a dynamic one that's going to be reassigned by the ISP. What do you think ? →Christian 13:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Better safe than sorry. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 18:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
That's a possible point of view. What would you think of shortening the block down to a month? Regards, →Christian 19:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Well there is no host name for this Italian IP, which could mean it is static. In that off chance I'm going to leave him banned. After all he made a point of coming to harass me in IRC also. This isn't just a vandal, this IP was seriously out to get someone. They stay blocked. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 23:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Host-Name: --Kanonkas(talk) 23:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Ok, so tthere is a dynamic host name. Oh well. It stays. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 23:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I suppose harassment by users is OK now? Fuck that. If you want to go unblock them, go do it and stop fucking bothering me. IF you ask me 100 times I'll tell you 100 more times to leave them blocked. I will not accept being harassed - not for something I don't get paid for. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 23:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Dude, take it easy. I don't know why you're getting so worked up over this. Feel free to ban this IP from IRC... →Christian 07:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I did, on 3 different channels. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
He really did. And I am sorry, but I agreed to that bann as well, because that user really was harrassing Shakata and me hard. Anyway, I will leave (and I also agree to) your month-block existent, but if this IP beginns harassing anyone afterwords I will re-install the one-year-block. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 15:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
What's the point in putting a year block on a dynamic ip afterwards? --Kanonkas(talk) 16:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


Can you nuke this? Not only is it a copyvio, but it is photoshopped in an offensive way (star of david on forehead). No less than 3 ips have slapped deletion tags on it but it's been over twelve hours and hasn't been deleted. Amazingly, the photo is still in use on the arabic wikipedia. (article seems to be locked for some reason) Thanks :) -Nard the Bard 00:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done. The photoshopping was removed - but still copyvio. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 00:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Look closer, it's a very faint watermark. Thanks for the quick response. -Nard the Bard 01:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


You tagged NASA as not having copyright information, yet it clearly states on the page that 'This file is in the public domain because it was created by NASA. NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright. (NASA copyright policy page or JPL Image Use Policy).' You also says it lacks author information. I can see myself it says author:NASA on the page, therefore putting it into the public domain. Why therefore did you tag it for deletion? The Odd Git (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

No idea what you are talking about. Include a link. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 20:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Scientology images

I hope you have seen this discussion: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Attention#Deletion_of_Scientology_images. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I have. The rest of the crew has that handled. I don't need to repeat them. Thanks. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 21:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your help. --David Shankbone (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
    Welcome. We've been running down some of his other deletions also. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 21:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Anna Samuil 01.jpg

You deleted my picture because of copyrights violations, but I can't understand why. This is my picture and i have all copyrights. What's wrong there? --Die Rose und die Nachtigall (talk) 08:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Die Rose und die Nachtigall

Honestly, because I doubted that "your" image was made by you. It looks like a professionally done shot and there is no metadata. "Your" image has also been deleted twice previously for the same reason. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 15:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

That's me on the photo and I took this picture together with a friend of mine (a photograph) in Moscow - I have all copyrights on it. So please allow me to take this picture on my wikipedia-site! Thank you very much! --Die Rose und die Nachtigall (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Die Rose und die Nachtigall

I suggest you try e-mailing OTRS. Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 18:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Please explain me why you delete my picture! You didn't answered me ... I HAVE ALL COPYRIGHTS ... it is MY picture ...where is the problem? --Die Rose und die Nachtigall (talk) 20:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Die Rose und die Nachtigall

As I suggested above, please calm down & try to send us the permission through OTRS. --Kanonkas(talk) 20:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Kanonkas has answered sufficiently. Please visit COM:OTRS for instructions on how to provide permission. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 20:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I just sent an permission-email (in german) ... Can I now use my picture?

You should wait for an OTRS agent to reply back. --Kanonkas(talk) 21:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)