User talk:Shyamal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

archive 1 archive 2 archive 3 archive 4

File:ThrushUpperWing.jpg text[edit]

The image is very nice, but the text is so small as to be virtually illegible. Would you consider redoing the image with larger text? Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 19:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Pair mantodea Bangalore.jpg[edit]

You are claiming to be the author of this (and several other) image on Commons for which you do not provide any EXIF data and have only a small image size. This makes me wonder if you yourself actually took the picture. If so, would you consider providing appropriate EXIF data and a larger image size? If not, would you care to explain your decision? If you are not the original author, then the image needs to have the correct author and source added or it will be at risk of being nominated for deletion. Thanks!! KDS4444 (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

EXIF is not a must on Commons. In my case, the lack of EXIF is due to the lack of a good CR2/RW2 raw to JPG converter. Shyamal (talk) 05:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Pictures from the British Library flickr collection.[edit]

It looks like you've been finding some great images in the BL Flickr collection. Many thanks for taking the time to look through it, and for finding such good things!

One little request: when you're uploading such images, could you use the ingestion template described here, which sets up some appropriate image templates and categories).

You can see the effect on the description pages for c:Category:Mysore: a gazetteer compiled for Government. One advantage is that it puts the images in page-number order in the category (and also if they are used in another category, like c:Category:Maps of Mysore District.

It also re-writes the description pages to use an {{Artwork}} template, with a link back to the original image on Flickr, and with a facility also to add a link to the BL georeferenced version of the map, once it becomes available; and it adds a source category, to make it easy to find the descriptions of all images uploaded from the BL stream.

So if you could copy and use this script for your recent uploads from the BL collection, I'd be very grateful.

Thanks, Jheald (talk) 22:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Will try with future uploads. Shyamal (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Wrong license for File:Dictyopharidae WG.jpg[edit]

Hi there! I certainly hope you haven't been dead for over 70 years: If you took the photo File:Dictyopharidae WG.jpg please update the license to a more appropriate one (e.g. CC or GFDL)). Cheers, and thanks for all you do! Animalparty (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

:) done Shyamal (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Jacobin cuckoo or Red-whiskered bulbul[edit]

Could you identify the species File:Red-whiskered_Bulbul_(Immature)_by_N.A._Nazeer.jpg? Advance thanks :-)--Praveen:talk 13:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Corrected! Shyamal (talk) 04:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
:-)--Praveen:talk 05:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Large Hawk-Cuckoo.jpg[edit]

Is this a Large Hawk-Cuckoo, or this is Common Hawk-Cuckoo, too? Hunu (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

This is definitely a subadult H. sparverioides - note the black chin and the streaks on the breast. Shyamal (talk) 15:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Shyamal! Species identification is a big problem in Wiki Commons. Did you discuss these wrong identified photos is some forum or just corrected? I am asking because I know some mistakes in mammal identification here and I don't know what to do. Hunu (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
I am familiar with both the species. Have been observing birds for 30 years now. Shyamal (talk) 10:42, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't doubt your knowledge. I was asking about procedure. For example, I am sure that File:Marmota sibirica - (Russia, Mongolia) - Rochers-de-Naye, Switzerland, 2009.JPG is not Marmota sibirica, but Marmota camtschatica. The Author weite me that she doesn't know the species, but it was written on the cage. Or File:Ochotona dauurica, Tariat sum, Arkhangai province, Mongolia.JPG is not Ochotona dauurica, but it is Ochotona alpina. And so on. Hunu (talk) 17:59, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Editing the metadata is a simple step that does not require any process, especially if the author has no objection. You can also write some reasoning on the talk page and put in a {{rename}} tag on the image. You can also post on the village pump for administrative assistance. If you stick around long enough on Commons, you might be granted permission to rename files on your own (which is what I did). Shyamal (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
You see that my name is still red here, though I'm here for three years. It's may be because I did not upload my own photographs, mainly old pictures of members of first Russian parliament. So I will wait, let wrong marmots and wrong pikas be in Wiki. By the way, could you tell me what is additional species on the File:Common Hawk Cuckoo.ogg. Some partridge? Hunu (talk) 08:47, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
The others calls at the start are a couple of white-cheeked barbets ( Megalaima viridis ). I would strongly encourage you to fix the captions of the incorrect identifications if you are sure. We get the quality we deserve on systems like this. Shyamal (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I have another question. This bird has black bill File:Cuculus varius India.jpg, but this one gas yellow bill File:Common Hawk Cuckoo I2 IMG 0801.jpg. What does it mean? Hunu (talk) 14:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
The one with yellow bill is a young bird. That matches very well with their host, the Turdoides babblers. See this for some pictures. Shyamal (talk) 04:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, Shyamal. So, is the one with black bill one year old? Hunu (talk) 10:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes mature adults show nice barring and they merge into a diffuse brown on the breast (almost like shikra Accipiter badius plumage changes with age) Shyamal (talk) 10:50, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Is it a red phase of female of Common hawk cuckoo? File:Common hawk cuckoo at Irpala Midnapur India.jpg. Hunu (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
There is no hepatic or red phase known in the common hawk cuckoo. The subadult plumage is more rufous and the throat and breast have streaks. Here is the description from Rasmussen & Anderton 2005 - "Subadult has paler brownish upperparts than immature Large[ie. sparverioides], with dull rufous bars, paler grey head, and narrow buff (not white) bars on tail; breast is streaked and belly marked with brown chevrons, bars or spots, less boldly than in immature Large." Shyamal (talk) 04:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for answer. Hunu (talk) 18:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Videoconvert from wmflabs is nice![edit]

I found this(https://tools.wmflabs.org/videoconvert) to be a nice tool for uploading videos. It does the conversion and upload into commons in a single pass. The only thing to check before you upload is to go to settings and ensure that license is latest and also ensure the file name is correct. I could upload the video that i showed today (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Technomyrmex_albipes_seen_carrying_a_bee.webm) Have a nice week ahead :) Forestowlet (talk) 11:51, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

@Forestowlet: thanks a lot. I should check it out. Shyamal (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Banded racer picture[edit]

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia editor , I don't know some rules of it , just I want to say is , is that your clicked picture of Banded racer , if yes then want to say that , ... that's not Banded racer ..that's a Himalayan keelback (Amphiesma platyceps). If possible, pls change it because many people study wrong information. @Vaishnav Khushal Vaishnav khushal (talk) 13:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

@Vaishnav khushal: - many thanks, will make the correction. I was going by someone else's identification, will check with some specialists. Shyamal (talk) 02:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Flycatcher Map not correct[edit]

Bird books (e.g. 'Birds of East Asia' by Mark Brazil) say that Ficedula narcissina winters in Borneo (and maybe in Phillipines). Neither of these is in the 'wintering range' for this bird on this map, so the map isn't correct. In addition, the three species are said to have differing wintering ranges, so just one range is not adequate, either. Maybe it would be better to delete this map?

This was made mainly to illustrate F. zanthopyga - for the others only the breeding area was supposed to be indicated - the wintering area is for zanthopyga - maybe the caption needs correction. It is unfortunate that it is in use for F. narcissina articles. You can correct the map - that is the idea behind SVG format. Shyamal (talk) 06:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

File:PericrocotusFlammeus.svg[edit]

Hi Shyamal - this pic is out of date, as Pericrocotus speciosus is now split off as a separate species. Could you split the top bird out to a new file, please? Can't do it myself as I don't have svg-editing ability on my computer. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

I had made this illustration to show the difference in colour and wingslash pattern. The caption correctly notes this. Shyamal (talk) 01:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The caption notes it because I updated it :-) but the filename doesn't! Maybe renaming might be better? - MPF (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for making the notes, I have made it a bit clearer now I hope and have moved the file - feel free to rename it as you see fit. Shyamal (talk) 04:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Another svg edit :-)[edit]

Hi Shyamal - File:SpanishSparrowMap.svg needs a small update; the birds in the western half of Turkey are P. h. hispaniolensis, with P. h. transcaspicus in Cyprus and eastern Turkey eastwards (ref.: Summers-Smith in HBW 14, 2009). Also Malta is missing on the map. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

@MPF: I have extended it east and have extended the hybrids from the heel of italy into Malta but I am not sure. Let me know if it needs further correction. A snapshot of the HBW map would be useful if further correction is needed. Shyamal (talk) 00:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks! I'll recheck against HBW later today - MPF (talk) 01:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
A bit more refining, please! Should include eastern Portugal, but not most of Catalonia. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Please see if it is ok, I am keeping the borders rounded - it is essentially meant to be quite rough. Shyamal L. (talk) 03:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! I think it maybe goes a little bit further west in Portugal, but probably not worth doing another edit for it ;-) MPF (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Another ornithological question[edit]

Do you know how eggs of en:Emberiza stewarti look like? I'm asking because the File:Emberiza leucocephalos MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.219 Fergana Uzbekistan.jpg is probably wrong. There is no any sign that Emberiza leucocephalos could breed in Fergana (or Ferghana), Uzbekistan. So if the label is correct, species definition is wrong. I beleve that it could be en:Emberiza stewarti, it has English name the same as Emberiza leucocephalos in Russian. Hunu (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Hunu: - sincere apologies for the delay, I am not sure how I missed seeing and responding to your message earlier. I am not familiar with the regional status of the bird and my quick searches do not either rule out or confirm their breeding in Uzbekistan but that is because I am mainly looking at English language content on the web. I am afraid I do not know enough to tell whether this is right or if it is likely to be in error. Eggs of most buntings, I presume do look alike which leaves little that we can do. Shyamal (talk) 05:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for answer. May be you know ornithologists in English wiki better then I. And you could advise good person to direct this question. `Hunu (talk) 05:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
I think egg identification is now quite an extinct art, and little chance of finding anyone with the resources for this region on the En wikipedia - all serious identification from eggs these days is done with molecular methods. Shyamal (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Identification help[edit]

Can you identify File:Bat @ Kanjirappally.jpg. Photographed near Kanjirappally, Kottayam District, Kerala "N+76°47'06.3"E/@9.5117503,76.7829083. Assume it could be Cynopterus brachyotis or Rousettus leschenaultii. Advance thanks and regards.--Praveen:talk 15:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Cynopterus sphinx - per Rohit Chakravarty, a bat specialist. Shyamal L. (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Shyamal, I've changed the file descriptions accordingly :-)--Praveen:talk 05:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikiprojects on commons[edit]

Hi Shyamal, wanted to check with you how Wikiproject works on Commons. If a user would like to get more and more of his biologist friends/colleagues to upload images on Commons, and if they'd like to do it systematically and in a collaborative way among themselves, is that logic enough to start off a Wikiproject? I ask because they may be interested in implementing it institution-wide so perhaps volume will be large and the people contributing may need a collaborative space to discuss the uploaded images. But, I see Wikiproject scene on commons is not as active as on English Wikipedia....or am I mistaken? Let me know what you think. Is there scope for example for Wikiprojects exclusively for getting images owned by people of a particular organisation onto Commons? Any other means perhaps? Prashanthns (talk) 10:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

On second thought, all of them just joining Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life by all of the individual uploader? That allows for more system-wide collaboration no? They can then have a user-category to pool their images though. Prashanthns (talk) 12:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Depends on the nature of collaboration and medium of discussion. By and large Commons does not have much of a subject specific focus. The language wikis do better for subject focus. Shyamal L. (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Identification Help[edit]

Could you help identify File:DeceivingLength.jpg, File:DeceivingLengthv2.0.jpg. Kind of like Ring-necked snake? --Praveen:talk 17:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Apparently a young Calliophis - have sent it to some experts (Whitaker) for opinion. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
=b--Praveen:talk 15:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
According to information I received from Janaki Lenin it is most probably Calliophis nigrescens but cannot be totally sure without close ups of key regions (head, mid-body etc). Shyamal L. (talk) 03:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
=b, Info added to file description :-)--Praveen:talk 15:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ~ Rob13Talk 16:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Question from Russia[edit]

Hello! We are not communicate for long time. Now I have a question not about ornithology but from my another field of interest, recent Russian History. I uploaded to files File:Letter Koteln Prisoner2.jpg and File:GULAG letter.jpg, this are letters from Gulag prisoners which were found recently in buildings which were build by prisoners. Form my point of view both of them obviously correspond to PD-trivial. But some gays would like to delete them. Do you where I could read information on Licence plate (PD-trivial, for example) and so on? Hunu (talk) 07:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Greetings! I can see that this is a bit annoying but that really is the nature of Copyright law! I think the first can be argued under a presumptive public domain after 70 years after death of the author but the second seems tougher to defend. To top it all the law for "public domain" of works from the Soviet Union seem to have been much debated - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:PD-USSR - hope this helps but I usually tend not to care too much, a few files are always deleted now and then here like the bunch above due to silly Italian laws that even Italians would not defend! Shyamal L. (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Shyamal Hunu (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for corrections https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikibooks-logo-hi.svg -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Do you still make distribution maps?[edit]

Pseudonigrita arnaudi Amboseli gate 1.jpg

Hi, I'm working on the article about the Grey-capped social weaver. I saw you made the distribution map that is in the article on the common stork (years ago). Perhaps you could be willing to create a distribution map for the Grey-capped social weaver. You could make use of the map on this page. Thank you in advance. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I do but I am currently travelling. Give me a few days. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
@Dwergenpaartje: - please see if this works for you. File:Nigrita_arnaudi_map.svg Shyamal L. (talk) 07:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
This works for me. I've included it in the taxobox. Thank you so much! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Improved distribution map for Quelea quelea needed[edit]

Red-billed Quelea

Thank you again for creating a distribution map for the grey-capped social weaver. I've recently nominated the article on the red-billed quelea as Good Article, see the review talk page. One of the suggested improvements is to include a source for the distribution map. However, the description says it is "own work". It seems to me rather imprecise, given the written descriptions of the distribution of this species. I am wondering if the overlay of two maps which are already on the web (HBW Alive and BBC) would not be more precise, and the result could then be sourced. If you agree, and are willing to give it a go, I would very much appreciate it. Kind regards, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Please see if this is an improvement - File:Red_billed_quelea_map.svg Shyamal L. (talk) 03:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
It certainly is! I've replaced the map by your improvement. Thanks you so much! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 21:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Distribution map for nelicourvi weaver[edit]

Hi Shyamal. Thank you again for the nice distribution maps you made before. This time, I would like to ask you again for a favour. The Nelicourvi weaver article lacks a distribution map. Handbook of Birds of the World Alive provides a simple map, BirdLife International has another simple map. A real detailed map can be found in The Birds of Africa: Volume VIII: The Malagasy Region: Madagascar, Seychelles, Comoros, Mascarenes - Volume 8 van The Birds of Africa, Roger Stafford on page 869 here. Could you again create something. Kind regards and thank you in advance! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Hope this works for you File:Ploceus_nelicourvi_map.svg Shyamal L. (talk) 15:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
@Dwergenpaartje: have added it to the article. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Great, thank you so much for this speedy response. I really like the result. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 08:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Code2000_Devanagari_va%2Bi.svg[edit]

Please Help in correction of this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Code2000_Devanagari_va%2Bi.svg -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

I have fixed the page area problem but there is still a preview issue which may be related to the fonts supported by the SVG to PNG renderer - User:Gilles and others must be aware of this based on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57462 Shyamal L. (talk) 02:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Have tried to raise a bug notice here - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T169072 Shyamal L. (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I had not checked the usage of that file earlier but it seems like it may actually have to be incorrect as originally made by User:Waldir as it is used to document a former design of the Wikipedia puzzle globe. Shyamal L. (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I've edited the description of that file to make it clear that the error is intentional. Thanks for pinging me. --Waldir talk 16:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

iNaturalist?[edit]

Hi Shyamal :) I remember your many great pictures from when I was more active on Commons. I just saw your pictures of Formiscurra, and while the pictures are available to iNaturalist, you seem to never have uploaded your observations there. I was wondering why, as you do have an account there :)

Cheers! --Sarefo (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Oh, too many of these sites and I am not even sure I know my login and password for these. I am glad they could at least make use of the contents on Commons! Shyamal L. (talk) 01:49, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
@Sarefo: - have just rechecked iNaturalist and I must say it has become a very nice and mature project - quite unlike the very distasteful structure of eBird. Shyamal L. (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Distribution map for Felicia wanted[edit]

Felicia amoena subsp. latifolia dark disc front.jpg

Dear Shyamal, I am currently working on a large expansion of the wikipedia article Felicia (genus). There is no distribution map available on wiki commons, and I am hoping you would be able and willing to create one. You could make use of this map. Thank you in advance! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

@Dwergenpaartje: Hope this works - File:Felicia_distribution.svg - I have simplified some patches with elliptical outlines. Cheers. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
@Shyamal:Thank you for this quick action. I really appreciate it. I do have one request though. The two isolated outposts should be in Cameroon and Nigeria close to the border with Cameroon, and both are now in Nigeria. Could you please have another look and adjust those please. Thank you again in advance! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 09:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
@Dwergenpaartje: I have made some slight adjustments but with an overlay of the original map (there is some distortion and I cannot warp it exactly to match the SVG outline map) and I believe it is now close to the original - is there a chance that the historical boundaries were different? - are you using the descriptions in the text? Shyamal L. (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
@Shyamal:Thank you again. It is possible that the borders were different in 1957, and I can look into that. For now I will quote the two locations:
  • Nigeria; Jos, Naraguta Forest Reserve (1957)
  • Kamerun; Adama Div., Vogel Peak area Dakemi, 920m (1957), Adama Div., Vogel Peak area, Dawo 1160m (1957);

Dwergenpaartje (talk) 09:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, it looks like Adama is now in Nigeria as is Vogel peak. Shyamal L. (talk) 09:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Great, than we have established that your distribution map is adequate, and that the location previously in Cameroon is now in Nigeria. I am glad we work together so well! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 12:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Salt and Leprosy - II. Wellcome L0038519.jpg[edit]

Hi, please check the result after doing an edit. Your edit caused the file to fall into the Category:Images without source problem category. Jcb (talk) 10:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

It becomes possible to fix if edit messages point out the problem. I believe the plan is to get rid of all categories anyway as things move to wikidata. Shyamal L. (talk) 10:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Leucospermum maps[edit]

Leucospermum calligerum Potberg 01.jpg

Hi Shyamal, Thank you again for the useful maps you have created in the past. I would ones more like ask you to create a few more.

Perhaps I could again tempt you to create some of these maps. Thank you in advance and kind regards, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

I have some real life travel and work that will make these a little longer to make. Shyamal L. (talk) 11:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
However, here is a map for Felicia echinata - File:Felicia_echinata.svg. Shyamal L. (talk) 12:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Wow, that is real quick. No problem, it will take me two or three weeks before I will have made these articles. Travel safe! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 13:27, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@Dwergenpaartje: - I think you missed the link for the Leucospermum reference map. Let me know when you need it. Shyamal L. (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

@Shyamal: Thank you for the alert and yes I missed it if you made anything for Leucospermum or any of its species. I would much appreciate any maps you may want to make for sp. of this genus, because I intend to create all of them, but I would not presume to ask you to do all 48. You may use this article and for the genus and for the species I have already expanded the wikipedia articles, I have indicate the page number. Leucospermum (p.269 ✓), L. saxosum (p.30 ✓ ), L. cuneiforme (p.37 ✓), L. conocarpodendron (p.54), L. truncatum (p.76), L. lineare (p.111 ✓), L. cordifolium (p.117 ✓), L. hypophyllocarpodendron (p.158 ✓), L. calligerum (p.184), L. prostratum (p.208 ✓), L. oleifolium (p.241 ✓). I am glad with any of these and particularly one of the genus as a whole. Thank you in advance! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

This seems to need more geographic familiarity - and with altitude contours it becomes harder to guide - I have been working with QGIS to try and generate a SVG contour map from open-source DEM files but so far my computer has let me down and I am still trying to reduce the data so that it can work without producing files that are more than a GB. I am still struggling with simplifying rasters but I found that Commons does not even have good physical maps. Added File:Africa-landcover.jpg and File:Africa_contours.svg as by-products. Shyamal L. (talk) 11:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Whew, generating the altitudes contour base map took a lot longer than I had expected - File:Southern_Africa_altitudes.svg - will do the maps soon. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
@Dwergenpaartje: Have added maps based on pre-existing maps (my unfamiliarity with place names does not let me produce any from descriptions) File:Leucospermum_distribution.svg, File:Leucospermum oleaefolium distribution.svg, File:Leucospermum hypophyllocarpodendron distribution.svg, File:Leucospermum_saxosum_distribution.svg, File:Leucospermum lineare distribution.svg, File:Leucospermum cordifolium distribution.svg, File:Leucospermum_prostratum_distribution.svg and File:Leucospermum cuneiforme distribution.svg. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
This is wonderful. I'm gonna put them in immediately. By the way, I notice there is a template with the hypophyllocarpodendron map questioning its copyright status. Thank you so much! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 08:15, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

IanthiaGoodfellowiGronvold.jpg[edit]

Dear Shyamal, the illustration IanthiaGoodfellowiGronvold.jpg (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vauriella_goodfellowi) is according to me misplaced as Vauriella goodfellowi. I think this bird must be Brachypteryx goodfellowi or Tarsiger indicus formosanus (most likely). Vauriella goodfellowii does not have a thin but long and clear white supercillium. Greeting, Henrik de Nie, --HWN 08:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hwdenie (talk • contribs) 08:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

It certainly is misplaced, looking at the history, I see that I had left it uncategorized. Strangely if you look at the descriptions in the text a few pages after the plate - there is a proper description of Brachypteryx goodfellowi - https://archive.org/stream/ibis961912190712brit#page/652/mode/1up - and I cannot find any mention of the genus Ianthia (or Janthia ) in any synonymy .... Tarsiger certainly does look like a possibility. Shyamal L. (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes! About genus Ianthia (in 1953): "According to the modern classification Ianthia, Tarsiger and Pogonocichla are all united to Erithacus" (https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40590985#page/59/mode/1up). Thanks for your quick reply, --HWN 22:06, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for that find! Shyamal L. (talk) 03:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictures from Journal für Ornithologie 1902[edit]

Dear Shyamal, are pictures from Journal für Ornithologie just like these: Rhipidura matthiae free from copyright? Is it possible to upload these illustrations without knowing who is the author? Can I use screendumps? Thanks for your reaction. --HWN 11:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hwdenie (talk • contribs) 11:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

@Hwdenie: I believe this would be eligible for the tag {{PD-1923}} - public domain, published outside the US prior to 1923 - see this. It would be good to figure out the artist nevertheless. Shyamal L. (talk) 13:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
@Shyamal:I failed to find the artist's name.--HWN 09:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hwdenie (talk • contribs) 09:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

File:LaniusSchachMap.svg[edit]

Hello.

Can you add South Sudan in File:LaniusSchachMap.svg?

I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files on 1 March 2018, now it is reduced to less than 580 maps, but there is a long way to go.

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps, that is why I asked you.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 14:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

I would really like to use an apolitical base map for animal distribution maps. The country boundaries here are really unfortunate and if I have time, I would use a base map that has no country boundaries, unfortunately these are hard to find on Commons in svg format. Shyamal L. (talk) 14:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2018[edit]

Hi, @Shyamal, as we discussed during Wikimania, we would love to have you as one of our honored judges for the upcoming Wiki Loves Monuments, India 2018. We really hope you would accept this and help us with your expertise. Please do let us know if you have any particular ideas or anything else you think we should know. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

@Bodhisattwa: - reluctantly yes, but as I discussed earlier - the policy needs to allow judgement primarily on the basis of effort put into selecting image for a specific instructional purpose - ie the intent with which the image is taken, the article where it adds value, and the metadata are more important than mere photographic merit. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 India[edit]

Hi Shyamal, this is to inform you that the after the upload process ended last night, the team is now going through the initial steps of sorting out irrelevant images, images with watermark, bad filename etc. We will take few days to sort these initial steps and would present to you and other members of the jury with the final set of images to judge on. We would also give the access to the Montage tool then and help you with it, if you need. We are planning to complete the initial steps within 7-10 October. --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 India - Jury Round[edit]

Hi Shyamal, we have set up the Jury round for you and other juries to decide on. We will be going for two rounds. In the first from among 446 images you need to eliminate those which according to you does not meet the minimum quality criteria. The images which will remain will go to the second round, where you would be able to rank them as per your choice. I would be sending all details via email. Please let me know if you have any queries or face any issues. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 11:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Will check and let you know. Shyamal L. (talk) 16:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Shyamal, we have created the 2nd round. Unfortunately, as we found out that Montage is showing only 100 images in the ranking round, we had to divide it into 2 rounds. There would be this 2nd round of rating, where you would be able to rate the images from 1 to 5 and the last round of ranking with the best 100. The good news is by dividing it into 2 rounds the number of images to be judged by each jury would be much lesser. Please do let me know if you have any queries or face any issues. Thanks, --Sumit Surai (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
Hi Shyamal, we are so grateful for taking the trouble to spend your precious time and energy to judge the photographs of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in India and select the Winners. This is a small token of appreciation for you from the organizing team. You are awesome! Bodhisattwa (talk) 05:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Bodhi! :) Shyamal L. (talk) 05:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hi Shyamal, how can i determine my own "image used" stats that is on your user page? Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

@Aschroet: - Hi Arnd, you can find the instructions at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:UploadStatsBot - PS- I see that you already have that - maybe you are talking about usage statistics - that can be found using https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/glamorous.php Shyamal L. (talk) 01:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, i meant the usage indeed. --Arnd (talk) 10:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Identification help[edit]

Hi Shyamal, could you id the species?

Photographed near Kanjirappally, Kerala. Advance thanks :-)--Praveen:talk 05:55, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, looks like Polypedates pseudocruciger Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes, Christian is correct. Sorry, have been away from internet access for a week. Shyamal L. (talk) 23:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Christian Ferrer and Shyamal. File info updated :-)--Praveen:talk 11:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Butting in on this thread Any chances of getting an ID on this one from a while back on our old OT window in BR Hills File:Tree_frog_in_hospital_window_BR_Hills.jpg Prashanthns (talk) 15:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
@Prashanthns: The above one is identified by the hourglass mark on the back - also a core W. Ghats species. Yours seems to be P. maculatus. Shyamal L. (talk) 15:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Wiki loves monuments 2018 (India), Winner 8, information incorrect[edit]

Please correct the wiki loves monument India 2018. The photo says its Queens Bath @Hampi which is incorrect. The correct information is, Its called as Pushkarani or Stepped well.

Complete description can be found at my submission of the same monument below.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pushkarni_,_the_water_storing_unit,_Hampi.jpg

Please do the needful.

Thank you. Vinayak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinayak wiki (talk • contribs) 13:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@Bodhisattwa: please see. Shyamal L. (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
@Vinayak wiki:, file renamed. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Guys, issue is not with filename, its about the description, why not validate these as part of winner selection?

Picture and info should match and to be correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinayak wiki (talk • contribs) 05:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments, unfortunately it is a bit too late to use this very useful input. Can you please tell me where the text is currently incorrect? Ideally it would be good for you to directly edit and correct what you find as wrong. The contest is a rather large and complex one with several organizers, three jury members - of whom I was one. Obviously we have not been able to incorporate community commentary and judgement into the system, which would have allowed the identification of incorrect metadata at an early enough stage. We will definitely take these points for improvement of the system in the future. Shyamal L. (talk) 08:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
@Bodhisattwa: @Sumitsurai: Here are some of my thoughts for any future WLMs in India, their organizers and jury members. Just placing them here lest I forget. Please feel free to use any amended forms if you are creating any learning pattern/anti-pattern. Shyamal L. (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  • I had suggested that the judgement rules be altered to give emphasis on metadata accuracy, value addition to relevant articles, intent and thought process behind creating the images. - Judging these parameters it seems cannot be done by one or two jury members, it really needs to be done by a knowledgeable community process and this might need a lot of time.
  • It may be good to provide sufficient time - a first round where the community goes through the images - reviews them for accuracy of metadata, naming, spots any copyvios etc, makes use of good images in articles across languages and implicitly makes a vote. Perhaps some encouragement on this front in terms of community vetting prizes could be considered. I really think this would be a big and welcome step in democratizing what is otherwise a very suspect venture involving jury members making rather private decisions, not perhaps very well justified, and entirely without options for debate or discussion.
  • The idea that monuments should be restricted to ASI listed ones appears to be rather limiting - but I suspect that opening it up will again throw up challenges in recognizing what is claimed as above.
  • Judgement on photographic merit and judgements on other parameters (such as usability, usage, metadata accuracy etc) cannot be averaged.
  • Software such as Montage, while doing well on isolating jury members and encouraging independent rating may also need to do the reverse - open up communications, commentary and feedback especially in what ought to be a last round.
  • Montage would do well to provide convenient tools - such as links to Tineye/google image search, usage stats, and EXIF info

Thanks friends the information is updated Also appreciate you guys are taken my feedback positively for WLM 2019, keep it up.

ThanQ Vinayak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinayak wiki (talk • contribs) 14:37, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Award star-gold-3d.svg[edit]

When you "removed rasters", you also changed the appearance of the shadows quite a bit.... AnonMoos (talk) 01:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

@AnonMoos: Feel free to revert the changes. Shyamal L. (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Letter A Devanagari.svg[edit]

Sorry, overreacted to the activity – the first your upload (vectorization of a raster image) was legitimate. Blanking, of course, was not. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Suyash Dwivedi - are you the same as User:Suyash94 ? - hope you are ok with my conversion from raster embedded (fake SVG) to pure SVG. Shyamal L. (talk) 13:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Shyamal L., No it's someone else Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 14:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Argemone[edit]

I use your pic "A.mexicana" as A.subfusiformis If you can inform the locality of the plant could be of much service --Penarc (talk) 13:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

These are from India where they are introduced. I am glad you have been able to correct the identification of it. I have made changes to the description at File:Argemone.jpg - @Penarc: Shyamal L. (talk) 13:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
PS: Could you tell me how to differentiate the two species? I am not able to make out from the key at http://efloraindia.nic.in/efloraindia/taxonList.action?id=1862&type=3 although it clearly does indicate the occurrence of three species in India. Shyamal L. (talk) 13:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Fusiform or ellipsoid capsule with 2-18 prikles each valve. Sepal with corniculate apendixes 10 15 mm A subfusiformis

Oblong fruit with 12-20 prikles each carpel. Sepal apendixes 5-10 mm A mexicana http://www.chlorischile.cl/ 5(2) in Spanish --Penarc (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Shyamal L. (talk) 10:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Heinroths.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Heinroths.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 11:28, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Re. File:DorylusQueen.jpg[edit]

Dear Shyamal, after having read the Army ant article and specifically the "Morphology of the Queen" (para. 1.4), where it states that: The queens of army ants are unique in that they do not have wings, have an enlarged gaster size and an extended cylindrical abdomen., futhermore, the relevant citation states: ...Because queens are flightless and never leave their colony... I'm puzzled, and would like to ask you: Are you certain that this is a Dorylus Queen?
With kindest regards! --Aristo Class (talk) 14:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

@Aristo Class: I have just had a look at en:Army ant, and frankly that article is a mess. I suspect that the original editor started with Eciton (a New World group member) and then someone added other groups into it. I am quite certain that this looks good for a Dorylus. What I am not entirely sure now is whether it is a queen or a male. I thought it was a queen because I saw what looked like a median ocellus. Alex Wild has this image and he is sure his winged specimen is a male https://www.alexanderwild.com/Ants/Taxonomic-List-of-Ant-Genera/Dorylus/i-skh6kbh/A - a male would have a 13 segmented antenna and I can imagine 12 or 13 in this image. So it could be a male. Let me recheck this with my ant specialist friend Dr Musthak Ali. Shyamal L. (talk) 15:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Frankly speaking I also think that is most probably a male. However, I have serious doubts whether it's a Dorylus. Thanks for your prompt response! --Aristo Class (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@Aristo Class: You are right, it is definitely a male - have a look at https://archive.org/details/hymenoptera02bing/page/2 PS: Thank you for being alert, critical, and letting me know. Shyamal L. (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your wonderful photos - Take care! --Aristo Class (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

File:ClamatorJacobinusMap.svg[edit]

Dear Shyamal, Send me, please? indexes on this map. It help me to made correct legend for the range map in the article ru:Сорочья хохлатая кукушка. I would be glad more questions about Russian ornithologist too. With best regards, Hunu (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

@Hunu: - I have added it to the file info - here it is as well - Надеюсь, я вас правильно понял Shyamal L. (talk) 11:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   summer
  •   resident
  •   passage
  •   winter
@Shyamal:! Yes, Вы поняли меня абсолютно правильно. Sorry for rusty English. Please pay attention that there is fifth color on the map in Myanmar. Hunu (talk) 12:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
@Hunu: - not sure why I had put that in a different color - I have simplified it now and made it summer as given on HBW and IUCN - maybe it breeds in the south of that region but I am unable to find sources for that at the moment. Shyamal L. (talk) 12:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for correction. By the way, I like range maps on this site, for example [1]. Hunu (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
@Hunu: I think those are based on shapefiles from the IUCN - I think someone has been importing them to WikiCommons. There are now several new ways of displaying maps and I think in future it will probably based on GeoJSON files on Commons See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Maplink Shyamal L. (talk) 03:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
@Shyamal: Thank you for answer. It sounds very good. Hunu (talk) 07:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

File:KoelMap.svg[edit]

Hi, Shyamal!

The same problem. Hunu (talk) 05:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

@Hunu: updated Shyamal L. (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
@Shyamal: Thanks. Hunu (talk) 12:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Max Hilzheimer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Max Hilzheimer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:ZorotypusHubbardi.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ZorotypusHubbardi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

ID help[edit]

Hi Shyamal could you help identifying this insect - [2] [3]. Photographed near Kanjirappally, Kerala.--Praveen:talk 02:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

It is a Cicadellidae, Ledrinae. Possibly Ledra sp. Shyamal L. (talk) 02:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Files uploaded with this info :-)(1, 2)--Praveen:talk 10:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2019[edit]

Hi Shyamal, Hope you are doing well. Like last year, we would love to have you as one of our honoured judges for the upcoming Wiki Loves Monuments, India 2019. We really hope you would accept this and help us with your expertise. We have in mind the points you mentioned after last year's contest. If you have other ideas, please do let us know. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry Sumit. Given the difficulties in actually implementing any changes, I would like to stay out of any judgement role but you are welcome to use the suggestions from my experience. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Learning_patterns/Being_a_judge Shyamal L. (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Really sorry to hear that Shyamal. We are really thankful for the suggestions you gave and would definitely try our best to implement them as much as possible. Best --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Map edit request[edit]

Hi Shyamal - in File:AlectorisChristensen.svg, could you amend the map to show that A. rufa does not occur naturally in Great Britain, please; it is a non-native invasive species there. Also, the range for A. chukar is too extensive; it is absent from the drier desert areas of Iraq, Iran, etc. (compare File:Alectoris chukar map.svg). Thanks! - MPF (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Ah. Will try - any reliable sources to use? Need a bit of time. Shyamal L. (talk) 09:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@MPF: - have made some changes, removed Britain range. Shyamal L. (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Unfortunately, also the deserts of Iraq, eastern Syria, eastern Jordan, etc., please :-) MPF (talk) 21:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Trimmed further. Shyamal L. (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Disfaking barnstar.svg Hi Shyamal, for your many conversions of Fake SVG to true SVG, you are awarded as a disfaker with that barnstar. -- sarang사랑 13:09, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list


Social media: Twitter Logo Mini.svg Science&Wiki Facebook icon.svg Science&Wiki Linkedin icon.svg Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--01:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Chemical structures[edit]

Please, do not overwrite existing structures with worse equivalents. If you need to use different structure, upload it as a new file. E.g. you file [4] here is in fact incorrect due to using different font style. Wostr (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC) PS Refer to [iupac.org/publications/pac/pdf/2008/pdf/8002x0277.pdf] and/or English/German MoS and use a valid chemical software for structure depiction. Even a file with some SVG problems that is drawn correctly is better than incorrectly drawn structure, but without SVG problems. Wostr (talk) 14:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

I have never heard of an IUPAC font specification - those are just print suggestions! The original file is not an SVG, that was the problem that was being fixed. Of course you are free to revert to the original. Shyamal L. (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Turns out to be a minor issue - that can be fixed with text to path - the png thumbnailer is altering the appearance. The original raster file does not follow most of the recommendations in the document you have linked either- and does not follow any SVG recommendations on Commons either. Shyamal L. (talk) 14:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
You should either upload new files and propose a deletion of the invalid SVG files, or prepare files that are as similar as possible to those you're replacing – that was not the case, because your new structures had different style from the original. I don't think that replacing structure with one that has different style, different margins etc. is the proper way to handle problems with these images. BTW this file for example was very similar in style (mixing different fonts, serif and sans-serif, not centered bonds, not centered labels) to a bunch of files we're currently trying to get rid off, because of one editor who was impervious to any standards of chemical structure representation and managed to upload hundreds of such files. Sorry, this is not the proper way to draw a chemical structure. You could also ask in WikiProject Chemistry on Commons about this issue and I think someone would create proper structures. Wostr (talk) 18:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
I have just had a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Chemistry/Structure_drawing and have been unable to find a similar project on Commons that you suggest - I fully understand the quest for standards but I think this is going to be near impossible (at the SVG level, for instance with or without transforms, metadata and other possibilities) without generating them via a standard toolserver project - perhaps something that does InChI or SMILES to SVG diagram using some canonicalization to produce any standard forms and even the best system will not be without problematic cases (speaking from experience gained with chemoinformatics software development from several decades ago). In any case I am happy to see that there is some effort to clean up the structure diagram files on Commons. Shyamal L. (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

1856 Treaty Map original file?[edit]

Hello, I am looking for a high-resolution/uncompressed version of the 1856 Treaty Map that you uploaded here. Where's that picture from originally? I tried searching in British Library but didn't find anything with Treaty Map/Rock and Payne/Thomas Onwhyn/1856. Appreciate any pointer to original material, thanks :-) --A —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.172.171.115 (talk) 07:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Not sure how "original", but that was probably colour corrected from here - https://howtospendit.ft.com/art-philanthropy/201051-collectable-and-quirky-cartography-at-the-london-map-fair Shyamal L. (talk) 02:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

File lacking evidence of permission[edit]

Hi Shyamal - File:Dendrocopos nanus.jpg needs evidence (an OTRS ticket) of the photographer granting you permission to upload it. Could you add it please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

This is from a time before OTRS had been established. Best to delete the file if there are issues with non-formal permissions obtained in the past. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! I'd rather not delete it as it is in use on a lot of pages (48!). I could put a deletion request out for it, to let others decide, though; possible the old non-formal permission might be acceptable. Or I could just let sleeping dogs lie (i.e. ignore the potential problem). - MPF (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I rechecked, Commons OTRS system began in September 2006 according to this - in the past I remember reading that there was a cutoff date on the OTRS requirement but I am unable to find that text. Shyamal L. (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Error in GrusNigricollisMap.svg[edit]

There is an error on this map - three small areas on right side should be blue (non-breeding sites), not green. As a reference see HBW. Can you please correct this map? Pikador (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

@Pikador: done. Shyamal L. (talk) 05:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Some south Indian insects[edit]

Hello. There's a problem with illustrations from this book. Thomas Bainbrigge Fletcher died in 1950, his works are not in public domain yet. Mithril (talk) 10:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

@Mithril: what about pd on the basis of Government publication India pre-1947? Shyamal L. (talk) 10:45, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
I don't think we have evidence for it being government work only because it was printed by goverment, however the template {{PD-India}} says PD limitation is 60 years since death for Indian-first published works, it's OK then, thank you. AFAIK it's also better to put {{PD-US}} for such works due to dual nature of the Commons space (: Mithril (talk) 11:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
@Mithril: I will add the pd US tag but it is definitely government work as indicated on the copyright notice page. Shyamal L. (talk) 11:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

File:SyrphidLefroy.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:SyrphidLefroy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Kersti (talk) 08:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Gnome-x-office-drawing.svg
File:Vena spuria of Eristalis gatesi.svg is a vector version of this file.

Error: No SVG image by that name exists. Please make sure to use the correct format: {{Vector version available|new image name}}.



For more information, see Help:SVG.

In other languages

Alemannisch  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  italiano  sicilianu  eesti  română  Esperanto  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  Scots  Tiếng Việt  euskara  English  português  magyar  vèneto  Nederlands  português do Brasil  Türkçe  slovenščina  polski  русский  galego  Ελληνικά  lietuvių  slovenčina  македонски  español  norsk bokmål  norsk  svenska  hrvatski  Frysk  français  български  suomi  нохчийн  Plattdüütsch  occitan  norsk nynorsk  српски / srpski  татарча/tatarça  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  தமிழ்  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)  中文(台灣)  中文(新加坡)  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(马来西亚)  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

I cant look up File:Vena spuria of Eristalis gatesi.svg, but I thought, that it is the same picture, as it was called "vector version" in the template. If it is not the same pictures the reason doesn't apply, but the template should be deleted. --Kersti (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
I am not sure about the history, but I am not sure what you want me to do here. As far as the file I uploaded - File:SyrphidLefroy.jpg goes, it seems to fit PD-US and PD-1923. That non-existent SVG and the reason for deleting linking to some alleni.jpg is not something I seem to understand. Shyamal L. (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Image for an Imaginary serpent[edit]

Hi Shyamal, could you draw a representative image for a mythical western ghat serpent karinkoli (Crowing crested cobra)? It is imagined as big as areca nut palm, with dark blue/black body. It has a crest on it's head like a rooster. It is also believed that there is a triangle like pattern which appears as the head of an arrow on its hood. In reality those are probably misidentified cases of King cobras with half shed skins. Some images can be seen here: [5], [6]--Praveen:talk 09:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Praveen, sorry but I dont feel motivated to reinforce the idea of an imaginary animal. You could however check with Seshadri KS who is a commons and en wiki user and herpetologist who may have a moulting king cobra image. Shyamal L. (talk) 12:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Thumbs-up-icon.svg okay :-)--Praveen:talk 19:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your Facebook message on elliptic fourier curve applet[edit]

Hi Shyamal,

Thanks for your message on FB. Great to hear from you again! Hope you're well and don't mind my replying here as I've stopped using FB after the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

The http://wiki.tcl-lang.org/page/Drawing+with+epicycles+and+the+Fourier+transform applet is really impressive: amazing that they can approximate a pretty complex scene with just 200 points. Each point having an amplitude, frequency and perhaps phase, that's only 600 degrees of freedom. I doubt I could make that scene with a polyline with 300 vertices.

Good to see you're still uploading images of birds and insects. Have you found that JPEG are now preferable to SVG?

I've returned to making SVG animations after finding a way to smoothly chain them, as in the Fourier transform animations, File:Epicyclic_gearing_animation.svg and File:Coin_rotation_paradox.svg. I also discovered that using the focus CSS selector lets a teacher select one group to highlight in addition to another on hover, as in en:user:cmglee#historical_trigonometric_functions_graph.svg_☎_4_Jul_2020. I'm still finding out new things about SVG as I go along!

See you around,
cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 22:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Gordon! SVGs have their place, I wish I could do more with them. Shyamal L. (talk) 09:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Venn Diagram color error[edit]

In your rendition of File:VennInfo3Var.svg, the central lower portion I(x;y|z) is incorrectly colored (please see history, the original is correctly colored. Could you fix this? Thanks. PAR (talk) 00:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@PAR: sorry about that oversight, wish we had noticed it earlier. Shyamal L. (talk) 02:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! PAR (talk) 02:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Vizag take off.webm[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  မြန်မာဘာသာ  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vizag take off.webm, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 09:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, not sure why this is considered a derivative? This is my own video uploaded via the Video2commons uploader. I only missed removing some of the templates as I had indicated license within the information tag. Shyamal L. (talk) [Edited]

File:ToeNailInjury.jpg[edit]

Hello Shyamal,

Do I have your permission to use this image in a new first aid book and also in a blog article? Can you tell me the circumstances that caused the injury. I am happy to give credit if desired in both. Thanks.J — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbonespodcast (talk • contribs) 20:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Naturally, you are welcome to use it. Was arranging wooden rafter beams and one rolled down onto my foot. Not a creditworthy accident! Shyamal L. (talk) 01:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Ouch! Glad you recovered from that accident! Thanks so much! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:582:C200:3BB0:157D:5635:2542:3CE7 (talk) 19:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

SVG[edit]

Hi Shyamal, IN regards to File:Eldorado_Reno_2019_logo.svg what's been changed and I'm seeing no difference between both versions, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 10:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Davey2010: Yes, no visible change. A very minor internal code change to make it W3C SVG specification compliant. Some old SVG editor software produced problematic code (also perhaps due to SVG specification defects). Shyamal L. (talk) 11:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Ah I see, Thank you for noticing this and fixing it :), Take care and stay safe, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Compare - this and this Shyamal L. (talk) 11:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, User:Shyamal. This seems to have broken File:GPLv3_Logo.svg. I've checked both with Firefox and Chrome on Linux. Could you please confirm? Thanks --Diegodlh (talk) 19:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
@Diegodlh: thank you, yes had broken with rsvg - now hopefully fixed, checked with rsvg renderer. Shyamal L. (talk) 02:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for checking! Looks OK now. Cheers! --Diegodlh (talk) 23:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

validating svgs[edit]

You seem to understand SVGs quite well, however validating is often not desired, see Help:SVG_guidelines#Why_validation_is_generally_not_desired.

Source-code-edits without visual changes might not be desired, see Help:SVG_guidelines#SVG_sourcecode_edits_without_visual_change for explanation.

Some edits are controversial, and imho should not be done to foreign files:

some of them are explained at Help:SVG_guidelines#Invalid_elements_that_should_be_kept

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

I think the human editors/creators of the images or their derivatives will themselves not find any issue to complain about - as the software editors will work just as before - but the human editors are naturally welcome to revert changes if they think it has been too greatly altered. I fixed a bunch because the derivatives spawned by some of these with needless clip regions, rasters, repeated layers etc are quite an eyesore that could be avoided. My plan was originally only to fix only those of high usage but I also emptied some invalid categories. I will not be doing any more of these for now.
Most of the extended tags can never be used by editor software - for instance text conversion to paths leaves "aria-labels" as in the library owl above but they are not going to be usable for reversal of paths into text. I can imagine a search-engine functionality but that seems rather distant. (I am aware of the accessibility/assistive technology functionality of the feature but then MW+rsvg only delivers rendered bitmaps most of the time.) Shyamal L. (talk) 01:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)