User talk:Siren-Com

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Bienvenue!

Bonjour, Siren-Com, et bienvenue sur Wikimedia Commons. Merci pour vos contributions. J'espère ue vous allez vous plaire ici et que vous déciderez d'y rester. Voici quelques liens utiles aux nouveaux utilisateurs:

J'espère que vous apprécierez d'éditer ici et d'être un Wikipédien! Si vous ne l'avez pas déjà fait, vous pourriez vouloir vous faire un compte utilisateur sur le Wikipédia de votre langue préférée, ou sur l'un des autres projets. Incidemment, n'oubliez pas de signer vos commentaires sur les pages de discussions à l'aide de quatre tildes (~~~~), ce qui donnera automatiquement votre pseudonyme et la date, ou de trois tildes pour votre nom seul. Si vous avez avez des questions, laissez un commentaire sur le puit du village, ou posez-les moi sur ma page de discussion. Et encore bienvenue !

Avec toutes mes excuses pour se chaleureux accueil ! ~ bayo or talk 10:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

Image:594px-MaskeAgamemnon-MOD.jpg[edit]

Hi, since you used Image:MaskeAgamemnon.JPG, licensed under GFDL, to create your image, your image will also be GFDL. You can not, I'm afraid, license your image as public domain. I've changed the tag accordingly. Thuresson 00:13, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Cain Deux lionnes attaquant un Taureau.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cain Deux lionnes attaquant un Taureau.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 06:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Venus de villetaneuse.jpg[edit]

Image:Venus de villetaneuse.jpg a été listé dans les demandes de suppression pour que la communauté puisse discuter afin d'établir si ce fichier peut être conservé ou non. Nous aimerions que vous participiez à cette discussion, qui se déroule dans le paragraphe consacré à cette question.

Si vous êtes la personne qui a créé ce fichier, prenez bien note que le fait qu'il soit soumis à cette procédure ne signifie pas nécessairement que nous n'accordons pas de valeur à votre travail. Cela veut simplement dire qu'une personne croit qu'un problème précis se pose au sujet de ce fichier, comme par exemple un problème de copyright. Si le fichier est listé ainsi en raison de la mise en ligne d'une meilleure version disponible, considérez que bien que le fichier puisse être supprimé, votre travail (que nous apprécions à sa juste valeur) continue d'exister au travers de la nouvelle version.

Dans tous les cas, ne prenez pas cette procédure comme une attaque personnelle. Merci !
Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
File deletion icon.svg

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Star_Alliance_747.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Star_Alliance_747.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

125.63.132.180 09:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Jardin des Félibres[edit]

Merci, c'est toujours agréable que ses photos soient utilisées. Croquant (talk) 19:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 8e26164375528aa069123417acce86ea[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 8e26164375528aa069123417acce86ea (understanding nothing !!!) Siren-Com (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

File:UnfinishedStatueOfAmarnaPrincess2.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 13:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Thaksin-affiche.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Thaksin-affiche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--- Zil (d) 19:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Siren-Com!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Némo_graphe_Paris_20.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Némo_graphe_Paris_20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Némo_Rue_du_Retrait.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Némo_Rue_du_Retrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Némo_rue_de_la_Duée.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Némo_rue_de_la_Duée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Mesnager_Belleville_Pelleport.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mesnager_Belleville_Pelleport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

d029bc8fe01c5e4d9eb5305ac873ea6a[edit]

d029bc8fe01c5e4d9eb5305ac873ea6a

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Le temps - ivoire.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le temps - ivoire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vercingétorix Alésia.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vercingétorix Alésia.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chat 3 N et B.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chat 3 N et B.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

creator[edit]

Bonjour, et bonne année aussi. Je veux bien vous expliquer le modèle Creator. Que voulez vous savoir ? Frédéric (talk) 13:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour, que de questions.. Non, ce n'est pas tout a fait nouveau. On peut, depuis assez longtemps, créer un modele Creator pour chaque artiste. Par exemple, pour Barrias, j'ai crée le modele Creator:Louis-Ernest Barrias. Pour cela, (je prend comme exemple d'artiste Paul Chabas), il suffit de mettre, sur la page d'une des oeuvres de Paul Chabas le texte {{Creator:Paul Chabas}} à la place du texte simple Paul Chabas. Ceci cree un lien rouge. En cliquant sur ce lien rouge, on va pouvoir créer la page Creator:Paul Chabas. Il suffit d'y copier-coller le contenu de la page Creator d'un autre artiste, par exemple Creator:Louis-Ernest Barrias, puis de faire les modifications necessaires. La syntaxe du modele est assez facile : noms, dates, lieux, portrait, etc. On laisse vide les cases inconnues.

Pour utiliser ca au moment du chargement d'un fichier, le plus simple est d'ecrire{{Creator:nom d'artiste}} au lieu de nom d'artiste. On peut ensuite s'occuper de creer le modele, ou bien laisser en rouge..

Voila, c'est un debut d'explication. Frédéric (talk) 13:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

PS J'ai fait quelques modif au Creator de Barrias, notamment la modif en sculpteur. Si vous voulez changer d'autres choses, il suffit d'editer Creator:Louis-Ernest Barrias.

Pour la modif de File:Rousseau Bateau dans la Tempête.jpg, ca ne marche pas. Il faut mettre Creator:Henri Rousseau ! Il faut effectivement faire attention un nom de l'artiste dans le creator. Ce n'est pas systematiqument la meme chose que la catégorie, malheureusement.. Frédéric (talk) 13:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Je ne sais pas si il a une procedure standard. Personnellement, je mettrais plutot ca dans le cadre, avec "photo by". En principe, pour le peinture il faudrait utiliser {{painting}}, ou il y a une case pour l'artiste.. Comme d'habitude, c'est un peu le bazar, ici.. Chacun fait comme il veut. Smile Frédéric (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
En principe, quand on met {{painting}}, on enleve {{information}}, histoire de pas trop remplir la page, justement. Du moins, il me semble que c'est l'usage. Frédéric (talk) 15:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:594px-MaskeAgamemnon-MOD.jpg a été listé dans les demandes de suppression pour que la communauté puisse discuter afin d'établir si ce fichier devrait être conservé ou non. Nous aimerions que vous participiez à cette discussion, qui se déroule dans le paragraphe consacré à cette question.

Si vous êtes la personne qui a créé ce fichier, prenez bien note que le fait qu'il soit soumis à cette procédure ne signifie pas nécessairement que nous n'accordons pas de valeur à votre travail. Cela veut simplement dire qu'une personne croit qu'un problème précis se pose au sujet de ce fichier, comme par exemple un problème de copyright.
Dans tous les cas, ne prenez pas cette procédure comme une attaque personnelle. Merci !


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--KTo288 (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

MG BUFFET et LOUIS QUATORZE[edit]

Bonjour,
Politiquement rigolo, ces deux images côte à côte en QI !! Vous auriez peut-être aussi dû changer le titre de votre proposition concernant le royal gamin et sa maman. Pour les "reviewers", il reste le Dauphin. Pas très grave à mon avis. J'ai changé mon vote, mais je voudrais bien que d'autres donnent leur avis sur le fond bleu clair. Je trouve votre MG BUFFET absolument remarquable, vous devriez peut-être la proposer en Image de Valeur, elle présente à mon avis toutes les caractéristiques et je la soutiendrais le cas échéant. Elle est selon moi la meilleure de la catégorie. Cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 21:52, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Marie-George Buffet 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marie-George Buffet 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anne d'Autriche et le Dauphin C des M.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anne d'Autriche et le Dauphin C des M.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Amanda Lear 2010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Amanda Lear 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Ankara (talk) 18:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Dauphin François II.jpg[edit]

hi, maybe you're right, but the problem is, that "portrait miniature" is more question of technique than size. Portrait miniature usually is the portrait on the hard ground (not canvas or paper) made in enamel or under lacquer or even glass. This is for taking the portrait in travel - like family photos now. So they can be enough big - f.g. this one is 25 sm high. And analyzing the style of your file - it is definitely the "portrait miniature" (I was studying portraiture in Art history, so I'm quite sure). Shakko (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Sucellus[edit]

Thanks for spotting that, I wished I had checked more carefully, it is clearly not the same. There seem to be only three Sucelli in Joconde, so that's not even because I copied a wrong link. If you want to add Joconde templates, you're welcome, but it's not always easy to find things on the database. If you have the inventory number, you can copy it in the "recherche simple", and you should find it, otherwise, it can be a little more complex. Morevoer, there are many things that are not on Joconde, and there is no real way to know what there is and what there insn't. (For example, I think there is most of the tens of thousands of drawings from the Louvre but virtually nothing from its Egyptian or Greek collections). Thanks anyway for your checking.--Zolo (talk) 14:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Austerlitz[edit]

Bonjour Siren-Com.
Je suis désolé d'avoir été amené à envoyer en "consensual review" votre très intéressante vue du bas-relief de la bataille d'Austerlitz sur l'Arc de Triomphe, mais il y a des erreurs de suture particulièrement visibles entre vos trois photos, notamment au niveau du casque du cuirassier russe (son cimier est presque double) et sur le profil du grenadier de la Garde Impériale que Napoléon retient d'un geste de la main (sa jambe notamment). J'ai souligné ce que j'ai constaté par des annotations. J'ignore si c'est réparable ou améliorable, mais je tenais à vous dire qu'il n'y a ici que le point de vue d'un spectateur: le médiocre photographe que je suis serait bien incapable de réussir un tel panneau. Cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 13:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ange en pierre cimetière de Passy.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ange en pierre cimetière de Passy.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Vincennes Donjon 01-2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vincennes Donjon 01-2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pégase Opéra 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pégase Opéra 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Etienne-Jules Ramey Thésée et le Minotaure Tuileries Paris.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etienne-Jules Ramey Thésée et le Minotaure Tuileries Paris.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Saisset 23 mars 1871.jpg et la Commune[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai vu la recatégorisation que tu as faite pour File:Saisset 23 mars 1871.jpg. Tu as remplacé son appartenance aux deux catégories Category:Paris Commune et Category:Political posters of France par la catégorie Category:Posters from the Paris Commune ; mais cette dernière catégorie groupe les affiches de la Commune, avec en-tête de la Commune ; or l'affiche de Saisset est à en-tête de la République française, c'est le résultat d'une tentative de médiation entre le gouvernement de Versailles et la Commune. Il me semble que c'est une affiche de l'époque de la Commune, mais pas une affiche de la Commune (not from the Paris Commune). Cordialement, Kertraon (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

OK. Cordialement, Kertraon (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

“Author” when it comes to reproductions of old works[edit]

Hi Siren-Com! Thank you for sharing your photos and scans with us. They enrich our projects. Please note, that you simple reproductions of old works are not protected by copyright in almost every country and thus you should choose PD-old instead of a more restrictive license. Please also name the author first instead of the one who reproduced it. We should keep our content as free as possible :-) Thank you, --Polarlys (talk) 09:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Effel_Tower_in_smogy_january_evening.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Effel_Tower_in_smogy_january_evening.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 04:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bataille de Jemmape Arc de Triomphe coté Est.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bataille de Jemmape Arc de Triomphe coté Est.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:La_Défense_Nord.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:La_Défense_Nord.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 16:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Elephant de la Bastille aquarelle de Jean Alavoine.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Éléphant de la Bastille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

I have not nominated the image but download it. - Siren-Com (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Fondation E Napoléon Paris 12e.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Triomphe de la République détail 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triomphe de la République détail 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Syracuse 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Syracuse 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wang Xiaoshuai 2012 b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wang Xiaoshuai 2012 b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pont Saint-Michel Napoléon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Saint-Michel Napoléon.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Siège du château d'amour.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siège du château d'amour.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ecole militaire horloge 2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecole militaire horloge 2012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

About File:Koh Poda 16.jpg[edit]

I answered on my discussion page. -- Aisano (talk) 20:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cavalier Gaulois Pont D'Iena RG am.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cavalier Gaulois Pont D'Iena RG am.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cavalier gaulois pont d'iena RG am face.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cavalier gaulois pont d'iena RG am face.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cavalier arabe pont d'Iena RD am.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cavalier arabe pont d'Iena RD am.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Horloge justice avant restauration.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horloge justice avant restauration.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fontaine hotel Cail Paris 8 detail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine hotel Cail Paris 8 detail.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Fontaine de la Paix[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai créé Category:Fontaine du Marché-Saint-Germain (Paris) d'après la dénommination dans la Base Mérimée (PA00088518). Je me suis rendue compte après qu'il ya la Category:Fontaine de la Paix. Pourquoi avez-vous changé le nom de Category:Fontaine du Marché-Saint-Germain qui existait avant en Category:Fontaine de la Paix?--GFreihalter (talk) 16:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Comme j'ai créé l'article W:fr du même nom, j'ai créé la catégorie Commons sur le même modèle. Dans l'historique de la fontaine, on voit qu'elle n'a pas été construite pour le Marché St-Germain. Sur de nombreux livres, elle est nommée de la Paix et n'a plus rien à voir avec le marché (cela induirait le lecteur en erreur ?) J'ai remarqué que les notices Mérimée n'étaient pas du tout fiable, elles sont rédigées par des fonctionnaires non spécialistes qui ne font pas de recherches bien longues et s'appuient sur des sources non vérifiées et non remise à jour (voir Fontaine du jardin Vuillemin qui selon eux serait encore dans le square Saint-Laurent ! je leur ai écrit, aucune réponse.). De nombreuses fontaines ont plusieurs noms et je l'avoue, je ne sais pas qui détient la vérité. Dans ce cas je crois pourtant que de la Paix est meilleur que du marché. Cependant, si d'autres personnes ont un autre avis, je suis prèt à étudier leurs arguments. Bien cordialement. - Siren-Com (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Jackson Michael 2.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jackson Michael.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Art-top (talk) 17:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Siren-Com,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 08:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Coyau (talk) 18:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

PD 2013[edit]

See File talk:J E Blanche Marcel Proust 01-01-2013.jpg --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Cours Albert 1er Paris.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cours Albert 1er Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Delft plat décors floral.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft plat décors floral.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Delft armes de Frédéric Ier de prusse.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft armes de Frédéric Ier de prusse.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Louis XIV par Varin C des M.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louis XIV par Varin C des M.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Yann Queféllec 2013 b.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yann Queféllec 2013 b.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Andy Dingley (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Verlaine par Wegener Otto.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Verlaine par Wegener Otto.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Postcards of Rouen by Charles Pinet[edit]

Bonjour,

Rouen n° 1 - La Cathédrale

Rouen n° 5 - Rue Saint-Romain

Rouen n° 11 - Hôtel du Bourgtheroule (du et non de)

se trouvent déjà sur Wikimedia Commons Postcards of Rouen by Charles Pinet, ordonnées avec les 9 autres cartes postales de Rouen ainsi que la pochette

En consultant cette catégorie, vous paraît-il indispensable de conserver les doubles avec une dénomination différente ?

Cordialement,

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Julie or Vipsania ?[edit]

[1], [2], [3], [4] Cathy Richards (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

From [5] Cathy Richards (talk) 20:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Cute grey kitten.jpg


Pro patria semper (talk) 15:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - February - Curves and spirals/Winners[edit]

Saint-Germain en Laye escalier.jpg Photo Challenge Winner
Camera2 mgx gold.svg
Congratulations!

Your picture Saint-Germain en Laye escalier.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Curves and spirals, in February 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Commons:Photo challenge[edit]

Hello Siren-Com,
we decided some months ago to ask the challenge winners if they could help to decide the themes for the next month needing themes - in this case May.
If you are ready to help us, just start a section on commons talk:Photo challenge (e.g. May themes), where you post your suggestion / decide which of the posted suggestions (e.g. from the other winner) you like best. If you are looking for ideas, here's a list of suggestions that are waiting to be chosen - but you are welcome to propose another theme.
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 07:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Henri IV et M de Médicis médaille PP.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henri IV et M de Médicis médaille PP.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Francesco IV Gonzaga médaille PP.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Francesco IV Gonzaga médaille PP.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Verlaine par Bac 1887.jpg[edit]

and other files in Category:Ferdinand Bac are requested for deletion as copyright violation. Please, comment here if you disagree. Ankry (talk) 20:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC)