User talk:Songsblame

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

User:Songsblame/Archive 1

Blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely
This user has been blocked indefinitely. See block log.

العربية | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Kurdî | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The only intention of this account is to only upload stolen files. Likely a sockpuppet of this LouisPhilippeCharles who also contributed nothing good here. --Martin H. (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Just to not forget this: The last IPs abused by this Vandal for vandalising in pl and fr wiki with unfree files
--Martin H. (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

{{unblock|I do not understand? What files have I stolen and how. Any file I have ever upoloaded has been given the correct licence and I have not caused a problem. Nor did I intend to do so. I have no reason to be blocked. I am so confused. I dont even know what a sockpuppet is :\ Songsblame (talk) 16:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)}}

  • Also, I have been on the commons for at least a year and not ever had a problem with anything =S Songsblame (talk) 16:06, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
In short:
  • en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LouisPhilippeCharles/Archive identifies the IPs I found out above, independently from my writing here and BEFORE I wrote it here.
  • I have more evidences from Checkuser
  • Same topics like banned user LouisPhilippeCharles
  • Many problems on Wikipedia, on Commons there is slothfulness in providing source and author information, for author information: many false claims such as "unknown" or "anonymous" even if the painter/author is written in the source
  • suddenly starting with batch uploads of stolen files as we can see above, intentionally damaging our projects
  • No one describes "google.com.uk" as a source link. Except one person: you (LouisPhilippeCharles and the abusive sockpuppet zoo).
Besides that I never realy blocked User:LouisPhilippeCharles in good faith and hope. I wrote this at one of the sockpuppet account talkpages and documented it in the Checkuser wiki. This attempt of good faith is now over. The sudden upload of this new batch of stolen files realy did it, there is nothing good with you, only bad intentions. --Martin H. (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "I have done nothing wrong. I have done a lot of work and not caused any problems in the Commons. That can not be denied by anybody. I have created at least 100 categories, uploaded countless images (with correct licenses) and created almost 20 galleries. Why should I be punished for making a genuine mistake :\ they were free images so it was in good faith. That is in no way fair. I am a good editor and contributor. That alone should help my case considerably Songsblame (talk) 19:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "Saying "I have done nothing wrong" does not instil trust that you are planning to correct you clearly disruptive behavior. Unblock declined. Tiptoety talk 06:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

Is anyone going to even acknowledge my unblock? Songsblame (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely. And not as long as you not provide us with any true information. The problem is not that you accidentially copied some unfree files and thought that copyright expired. The problem is that you claimed that files your own work. The problem is that you are an editor with many thousand edits and that you suddenly started vandalizing our project with false own work claims. That was not in good faith. In my eyes this behaviour is a risk for the project, therefore blocked.
And from experience the tons of multiple accounts (even a non-checkuser can see that, its DUCK) I know, that it is not the first time. This sockpuppet account will not receive unblock. And the original account is now blocked for this. --Martin H. (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Crown of Austrian Grand Dukes of Tuscany.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Crown of Austrian Grand Dukes of Tuscany.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Katepanomegas (talk) 04:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File:The Palais Royal in 1680 by a member of the Perelle family.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The Palais Royal in 1680 by a member of the Perelle family.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hausratte (talk) 23:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Black and white photo of the Palacio Real de Riofrío.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Black and white photo of the Palacio Real de Riofrío.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Black and white photo of the Palacio Real de Riofrío.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 19:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Christine of France as Dowager Duchess of Savoy by an unknown.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Christine of France as Dowager Duchess of Savoy by an unknown.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Drongou (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Painting of a princess of the House of Farnese (Elisabeth Farnese, circa 1700) by an unknown artist.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Painting of a princess of the House of Farnese (Elisabeth Farnese, circa 1700) by an unknown artist.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

(talk) 12:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)