User talk:Spiessens

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Mrs. Spiessens is dead[edit]

      • I got this message today: "Dear Sir, Frau Nadia Spiessens is unfortunatly dead in may 2016 aged 82. Sorry about that, she was very involved in Wikipedia." Jean-Pierre (his son)." -- Kürschner (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


-- 18:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

File:France 50 francs Le Verrier 01.jpg[edit]

Solved.

File:France 5000 francs terre et mer 01.jpg[edit]

Solved.

File:France 5000 francs terre et mer 01.jpg[edit]

Solved.

File:Denis Diderot by Jean-Baptiste Pigalle.jpg[edit]

Solved.

File:Virginius.jpg[edit]

Solved

File:Thomen 1910.JPG[edit]

Solved

File:Revillon Frères, Rue de Rivoli, Paris.jpg[edit]

Solved

Copyright status: File:LPJ 21 février 1904.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LPJ 21 février 1904.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Solved, --Spiessens (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Re;[edit]

I know, that's automatic categorization generated by flickr2commons tool. Files in the category Category:L'Espagne are being properly recategorised in the subcategory Category:Illustrations of L'Espagne by Gustave Doré. But, you know, three hundred files... it takes time. Thanks, anyway. Strakhov (talk) 09:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

I've just removed the category "Litography" from every remaining file in the by-now-not-so-properly-categorised-category "L'Espagne" with HotCat tool. It keeps needing work, anyways. :( Strakhov (talk) 09:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Spiessens. You have new messages at ww2censor's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 14:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Vichy stamps[edit]

Where do you get the idea that Vichy stamps are any different than other creative products where the designer and engraver hold the copyright per the hatnote you placed in Category:Stamps of Vichy Government. Most (I have not checked them all) are created by the same designers and engravers whose French stamps are still copyright such as File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1941-49.png by Jules Piel or File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1944-3.png by Charles Paul Dufresne. 70 years has not passed since some of these stamps were produced and I am certain most of the designers and engravers did not suddenly die in 1944. Most of these stamps, as I had previously mentioned to you are still in copyright per the talkback link just above this post. Ww2censor (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

  • I support this Ww2censor's opinion. It's absolutely premature to upload the French stamps of the 1940s due to the definite copyright issues. --Michael Romanov (talk) 11:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Actually I don't think any of these stamps were uploaded by Spiessens. Ww2censor (talk) 13:23, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Indeed Ww2censor ! I won't take any risk to upload those images. But I am still waiting for the answer of La Poste authorities which I am in contact with. Yours, --Spiessens (talk) 14:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Printer's marks vs Logos of publishing houses[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu avais créé une nouvelle catégorie : Category:Printer's marks in France.

Il existe des catégories sous la forme Logos of publishing houses from XXX et d'autres Printer's marks in XXX. Y a-t-il une différence ? Aristoi (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Br Aristoi, je me suis posé la question après avoir créé la première catégorie : historiquement, l'imprimeur est celui qui possède une presse et il applique sa marque au début du codex ; au XIXe siècle, l'éditeur se met à apposé également sa marque (on a certes des imprimeur-éditeurs comme Mame en France mais aussi de simple éditeur qui n'imprime pas), suivant cette vieille tradition de la presse à imprimer. Le logo est un terme générique très moderne, qui à mon humble avis, fait partie d'un concept disons markéting et communication. Dans les logo (inclus dans une charte graphique), on trouve rarement une devise latine, etc. Pour moi la marque c'est comme un sceau de garantie. J'espère t'aider avec cette réponse. --Spiessens (talk) 19:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
J'ai du mal à comprendre, mais si tu t'y retrouves, je te fais confiance. Merci pour ta réponse. Aristoi (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
C'est compliqué, je suis d'accord. En français, le mot éditeur par exemple est confus : c'est à la fois la personne qui publie, la maison d'édition et aussi la personne chargée de préparer un texte (ou un programme informatique, etc.) ! Je trouve l'anglais (et l'allemand) plus précis. Bon courage à vous ! --Spiessens (talk) 06:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:La Palette 1912.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La Palette 1912.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello Ta, thks for the message, I just mispelled the PD-70 template. Whatsoever, it is a Gallica Public Domain document... Yours, --Spiessens (talk) 15:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Nicolas Caron[edit]

Bonjour ! En créant Category:Nicolas Caron vous avez indiqué que ce graveur entrait dans la catégorie Category:1719 births. Or je lis sur internet que Nicolas Caron est né en 1700 [1], et non en 1719. Quelle est la source de la date que vous avez indiquée ? S'il n'y a pas de source solide, il faudrait rectifier la catégorie de l'année de naissance. Cordialement, Baronnet (talk) 11:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Baronnet, merci pour le message ! La source n'est pas très solide c'est le Bénézit (repris par Oxford Press : tome 3 page 264), souvent bourré d'erreurs. Pour l'instant je n'ai rien de mieux, si peu que je n'ai même pas pu compléter l'article idoine sur le Wiki francophone... Cdlt, --Spiessens (talk) 11:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Je vous ai fait une ébauche ici, si vous voulez vous pouvez l'améliorer, merci à vous, S.

Copyright status: File:Glasgow Institute MacNair MacKintosh.pdf[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Glasgow Institute MacNair MacKintosh.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder(d) 13:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Scoopfinder, thks but I want it to be erased, it is a mistaken import. --Spiessens (talk) 17:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Travail des enfants et résurrection des morts?[edit]

Bonjour, vous avez absolument raison avec votre remarque sur la photo Charles Brandebourg, j'en doute aussi, mais c'est ce que dit la source. D'ailleurs une autre photo, datée 1868, lui est aussi attribuée par une source plus "officielle". Disons qu'il y avait des gosses qui travaillaient dans les mines, tandis que d'autres faisaient des photos.

Deux photos lui attribuées ont été prises des années après sa mort.

Weird... --Jwh (talk) 09:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jwh, oui, très étrange... Peut-être aller sur la photothèque officielle de la Bibliothèque du Luxembourg ? --Spiessens (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Oui, la phototèque est dans mes projets.

I've so much left to do; I've so little time to fail --Jwh (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Ohhh this is magnificent (this motto shall be mine...), regards --Spiessens (talk) 04:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
évidemment pas de moi --Jwh (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Le Canard sauvage 19 Fersen.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Le Canard sauvage 19 Fersen.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I try to add {{PD-GallicaScan}} but it doesn't work well. The template is here, can you help ? Yours, --Spiessens (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
It's done ! Sorry, --Spiessens (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Marguerite Delorme La Poupée 1898.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marguerite Delorme La Poupée 1898.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Louis Borgex Les Sardinières.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Louis Borgex Les Sardinières.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Emmepici (talk) 12:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Turban Legroux Soeur - illustration Demachy janvier 1944.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Turban Legroux Soeur - illustration Demachy janvier 1944.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 01:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Delphi Fabrice Citrouillot Méricant 239.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Delphi Fabrice Citrouillot Méricant 239.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Pierre Girieud autoportrait.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pierre Girieud autoportrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Medeleine Carpentier autoportrait.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Medeleine Carpentier autoportrait.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)