User talk:Sporti

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Narodna Galerija[edit]

Imam problem če dam oznako da je slika iz Galerije, tole me moti. "This image is available from the National Gallery of Slovenia website..." Problem je da je slika moja, stvar pa je iz muzeja, ne pa slika. Tole bi se moralo popraviti. --Mile (talk) 09:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Pa res. Sem zamenjal predlogo za link do muzeja. Mislim, da se ne splača popravljati predloge. --Sporti (talk) 10:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Vidim da si dal zgoraj in da ime avtorja ostane, kar je bolje kot prej. Sem jo dal na glasovanje na Commonsu. --Mile (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Skrij besedilo[edit]

Živ, ali bi vedel kakšna je oznaka da spraviš en tekst v folder, imam preveč teksta na glasovanju o sliki, s tem folderjem pa umakneš tekst na eno mesto. Tam ostane samo oznaka da se nahaja še tekst. --Mile (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Misliš nekaj takega {{Read more}}?--Sporti (talk) 09:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Samo bi rabila bit kaka oznaka da se nekaj nahaja, za tole govorim link --Mile (talk) 09:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


Mislim da deluje, čeprav se spomnim da so imeli tudi drugačno. Včasih je boljše tole, ker če se začne spamat naj vsaj tole umakne od glasovanja. --Mile (talk) 09:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

@PetarM:: Kateri denar si fotografiral? Če si jugoslovanski, je v javni lasti kot npr. File:50000000-Dinara-1993.jpg?--Sporti (talk) 11:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

[1], tukaj gre za De minimis pravilo. Na Help desku je nekdo potrdil da gre za De minimis, poglej kdo bi rad brisal - Colin seveda. Več potrdil čakam na [2]. Tukaj je stran kjer odločajo o brisanju.

Tukaj je z Help deska: In my opinion Commons:De minimis applies and the image can be kept. Only a small part of the banknote is visible, and more importantly the subject of the image is the printing process pattern. MKFI (talk) 07:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC) --Mile (talk) 11:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Se pravi stvar kot komplet je Copyvio, ampak De minis ene stvari dovoli.

Mislim, da tu ne gre za De minimis in je bil prvi komentar napačen. De minimis je, ko neka zaščitena stvar zaseda manjši oz. nebistven del fotografije. Lahko bi bilo kvečjemu npr {{PD-shape}}, toda v tem primeru tudi to ni. --Sporti (talk) 11:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Ni problem umaknit, če tako potrdijo na Copyright forumu, imam še eno podobno fotko kjer je frej licenca. Forinti. --Mile (talk) 12:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Morbegna[edit]

Sporti, bi lahko ti pogledal malo po netu, če obstaja kakšna prosta slika Morbegne (Google Slike -> Morbegna). Za v članek w:sl:Triglavska vojašnica Viktorja Emanuela III. bi bila. Cilj je čim starejša slika (magari črnobela), na kateri je še celotna zgradba. --Janezdrilc (talk) 13:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Janezdrilc: Težko bi bila katerakoli slika prosta zaradi FOP glede na leto izgradnje 1934. --Sporti (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Ja, sem mislil, če bi bila kakšna slika "brez avtorja", da velja potem 70 let po zakoniti objavi. A drugače bi šlo na slwiki naložit katero pod pošteno uporabo? --Janezdrilc (talk) 13:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Janezdrilc:: Problem so pravice arhitekta stavbe, ki bi moral umreti leta 1946 ali prej, da bi bila fotografija vojašnice lahko v javni lasti. Zaradi tega bi bila poštena uporaba po moje OK. --Sporti (talk) 13:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok, potem bom eno poljubno kar k nam naložil. Hvala. --Janezdrilc (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ukanc-59110.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ukanc-59110.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Backheads[edit]

Hi Sporti, do you really think it is a good idea to add pictures to a person's category when the face is not visible, the person is completely in the background or seen from behind?--Ailura (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

@Ailura:: I don't see why not, photo from the rear or side can be used to illustrate player's technique and especially for people with no other photos (like Category:Igor Kokoškov). --Sporti (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't see Igor Kokoskov on that picture. And there is no way to use this picture for that person. This is a picture of two persons. --Ailura (talk) 09:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:Media requiring renaming without the related template[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your uploads, but I don't understand why you have been adding Category:Media requiring renaming without the related template to them, Please use {{rename}} with the appropriate parameters instead.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: It wasn't me - see [3]. --Sporti (talk) 06:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I see, it was 1989. Do either of you have any info that might help with renaming?   — Jeff G. ツ 06:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I added the category so the main one would be less crowded. I placed the category there per rename criterion 2. -- 1989 06:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
@1989: Where is it written that you should add Category:Media requiring renaming without the related template to any file directly?   — Jeff G. ツ 10:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Where is it written that I shouldn't do it? -- 1989 16:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

New Creator templates[edit]

Sporti, when creating new creator templates, it would be great if you can add Commons Creator page (P1472) and Commons category (P373) properties to the Wikidata item. Commons Creator page (P1472) can be added by clicking Commons to Wikidata QuickStatements.svg. Commons category (P373) can be added either manually or by adding "homecat" field to the creator template and then clicking Commons to Wikidata QuickStatements.svg if it is there. I am planning to expand documentation about it and add warning boxes if those 2 fields are missing but at the moment I add them myself. --Jarekt (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Sporti (talk) 17:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

File Premissions[edit]

Hello Sporti, I see that you have marked images of Adamir Jerkovic for deletion but all the images have been released. Owner of the images has sent and decleration of release to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with over 20+ images and i wrote the ticket number i file summary. Could you please help me by telling what else i need to do? Regards, Momanovic (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Joze Plecnik[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tivoli-Park,_Ljubljana.jpg You removed the Plecnik-Category from my picture. That structure is from Plecnik. Obviously. Why? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

I assumed Category:Jakopič Promenade is already in it, added it to Category:Structures by Jože Plečnik in Slovenia now. --Sporti (talk) 09:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
I guess it's ok now --Thomas Ledl (talk) 10:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Postcard of Triglav 1910s.jpg[edit]

Dear Sporti,

Do you know the Purger & Co number of this postcard?

Usually it is printed on the rear side of the postcard.

I would very much appreciate your information

Actia Nicopolis (talk) 07:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

@Actia Nicopolis:: No. Maybe it was on the ebay page, but it doesn't exsist any more. --Sporti (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
@Sporti:: OK. Fine. I will compine two files that are the same postcard, if you do not mind.

File:Bistrica Purger 12846.jpg and File:Krain Purger 12846.jpg

@Actia Nicopolis:: I think you can leave both in such cases. They are different versions even though it is the same postcard. --Sporti (talk) 08:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, this was incorrectly marked for deletion, as the majority of the bulk-imported images in that category were mislabelled; this one wasn't, and I've updated the discussion to make clear it's no longer under nomination. Ubcule (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
No problem. --Sporti (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Pirnat[edit]

Zdravo, Sporti.

Najprej, srečno in zdravo 2019!

Lahko prosim tole pogledaš: rdeči napis 'Pirnat' v kategoriji Category:Nikolaj Pirnat? To je očitno nekje v Wikidata ... --Eleassar (t/p) 12:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Enako. Očitno je nekaj z infopoljem in nagradami, Borštnar ima 3x. Sem prašal na Template_talk:Wikidata_Infobox#Awards_bug. --Sporti (talk) 12:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Imaš prav. Hvala! --Eleassar (t/p) 13:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Andy & Kim out for a stroll (19210773656).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Andy & Kim out for a stroll (19210773656).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Amishai GG (talk) 20:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Andy & Kim out for a stroll (19210810326).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Andy & Kim out for a stroll (19210810326).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 03:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Joseph Heike[edit]

Du hast die Kategorien von Joseph Heike und Joseph-Heike-Weg auf Joseph Heicke verschoben, das ist aber falsch. Der Maler Joseph Heike hat im 20. Jahrhundert gelebt und hat mit dem Joseph Heicke nicht zu tun. Könntest Du die entsprechenden Änderungen wieder rückgängig machen.--79.214er (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

OK. --Sporti (talk) 09:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Paintings from Dorotheum[edit]

Hi Sporti. You have made some very good uploads from the Dorotheum. When I go there, I only find paintings in 400px jpg, so is there a technique for getting better images from their site? In other sites one can see (behind) how they have scaled down photos, but not here. Hope you have time for this. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 06:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

@Rsteen: Unfortunately they remove the hires images after the auction takes place, before there is a link to fullsize picture (like here). --Sporti (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay. Well, it was worth a try. Thanks for your time. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 07:39, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
@Rsteen: With the new updated site that has changed at least for some [4]. --Sporti (talk) 09:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Sporti. This is super, because it gives a hint of the codes connecting the 400px and the full-size pictures. Thanks again for your help. --Rsteen (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Lake Bled-3925998.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lake Bled-3925998.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)