User talk:Túrelio/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Archives of older messages from my talkpage[edit]

The first ever message[edit]

Hi Túrelio; may I ask your souce for poisonous plants? You added that category to Thuja plicata and I was not able to verify that information. Best wishes, Wsiegmund 18:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Wsiegmund, my primary source was this website: [1] (search for: Lebensbaum). While this site may not be of the highest standard, I assumed toxicity for T. plicata because the other species T. orientalis and T. occidentalis are without doubt toxic, were even used for abortions in former times.[2], [3], [4]. Sorry, but all pages are in German; but with your name you might have German ancestry ;-) . Well, after your hint, I looked for T. plicata in the USDA database and found "toxicity none". So if you prefer to remove the cat, that's fully okay for me. Thanks for your attention. --Túrelio 21:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear Túrelio; thank you for your kind reply. It is a common species in my area and Pojar and McKinnon said that its wood was used for drying fish by our indigenous peoples. I removed the cat. It is generous of you to think that I might know German, but while I can read a little French and Spanish, I never studied German. But it is true that my great grandparents' first language was German. Best wishes on adding the poisonous plant categories to the species pages. It sounds like a worthwhile project. --Wsiegmund 21:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

from 2007[edit]

see: User talk:Túrelio/Archive2

from 2008[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive3

from 2009[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive4

from 2010[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive5

from 2011[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive6

from 2012[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive7

from 2013[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive8

from 2014[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive9

from 2015[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive10

from 2016[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive11

from 2017[edit]

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive12

from 2018[edit]

Thanks and copyvios[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for removing two versions from https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ADewi-persik.jpg

I was searching where and how to notice that there are COM:NETCOPYRIGHT problems: [5][6]

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Foto webcam Baustelle Seilbahn Zugspitze[edit]

Hallo Turelio,

die Begründung deiner Löschung der Bilder von der Foto webcam https://www.foto-webcam.eu/impressum/ bezieht sich auf das allgemeine Impressum und wären insofern gerechtfertigt. Es gibt jedoch für jede einzelne webcam spezifische Nutzungsbedingungen. In diesem Fall für https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/bzb-gipfel/ und https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/bzb-tal. Darin ist die Verwendung für jeden Zweck explizit erlaubt, wenn die als Quelle ein Link zu webseite der webcam angegeben wird. Konkret steht dort folgender Text unter dem Info Button: Webcam-Infos: "Verlinkung, Einbindung und Nutzung des Webcambildes: Das Setzen von Links auf diese Webcam ist ausdrücklich erlaubt, wenn als Linkziel die Adresse https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/bzb-gipfel/ genutzt wird. ... Die Nutzung und Veröffentlichung der Bilder in TV-, Druck- oder Internetmedien ist erlaubt, wenn als Bildquelle deutlich lesbar die Adresse www.foto-webcam.eu angegeben wird. Bei Internetmedien ist diese Quellenangabe als klickbarer Link zu realisieren."

Deshalb habe ich einen Antrag auf Wiederherstellung der Dateien gestellt. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Baustelle_Seilbahn_Zugspitze_-_Gipfel_webcam_2017_12_26_10_50_lm.jpg MfG--HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 14:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Hallo HeinrichStuerzl,
das ist völlig in Ordnung. Ich habe die Fotos übrigens weder nominiert noch gelöscht. Als ich die zur Schnelllöschung markierten Dateien durchgegangen bin, ist mir aufgefallen, dass der LA-Steller dich garnicht informiert hatte. Das habe ich dann nachgeholt. Ich hatte mir die Quell-Website durchaus angeschaut und war danach aber nicht viel schlauer als vorher. --Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Danke fürs Informieren und die Klarstellung! --HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

Hi ElVengado,
my above warning and the deletions of some of your uploads, are not a punishment. They are necessary to prevent legal actions by the copyright-holders against you and against re-users of your uploads. So, this is for your own protection.
If you want your other uploads have deleted, please request deletion directly on the image page(s). --Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Not a punishment, you're right, my english isn't too good and I can't find the correct word. Anyway, I saw that one of my own photos had already been deleted before I made the request. Well, thanks again for the information.

ElVengador (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Use of Image[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I'd like to use your image of Mother Teresa in our quarterly published church flyer. Thank you so much.Merica1978 (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 14/01/2018

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Personal conflict moved from uk.wiki to Commons[edit]

Hello, I'm admin at uk.wiki. I blocked User:Yuriy Urban in uk.wiki on Jan, 12 during the conflict with User:Dgho. Now Yuriy Urban tries to retaliate here putting Dgho's files under deletion. I can suggest speedy closure of all recent nominations at User_talk:Dgho page.--Brunei (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@Brunei: These nominations meet project rules. Soon I will check your photos --Yuriy Urban (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
You can check his or mine any time, but not with nomination of obviously normal files. Here's an example of user attacking, nothing more, unfortunately.--Brunei (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
@Brunei: Зара гляну, рівно як і продовжуватиму супроти вас нерусів боротися опісля повернення. Гадаю більш тонко. --Yuriy Urban (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Giorgi Danibegashvili.jpg[edit]

I'm confused by your removal of the copyvio deletion request on File:Giorgi Danibegashvili.jpg with the comment "website says "courtesy of artist" and as uploader's name suggests to be the artist himself". The uploader's name suggests he's the guy in front of the camera (the subject), not the guy behind the camera (the copyright owner). Cabayi (talk) 13:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, the cited credit suggests that the artist has authorized at least the use of this image on the website, which allows the conclusion that he owns or has acquired the copyright. Evaluating the image scene it seems not unlikely that he even has shot it by himself, for example by using a en:Self timer. As already stated, the account-name of the uploader User:Giorgi Danibegashvili suggests that he may be the depicted artist. Anyway, I wouldn't have completely removed your speedy, if there weren't a regular DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giorgi Danibegashvili.jpg anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Help[edit]

It was first time I try to upload a file here. How I can know about the license of the file or image before I upload it here? Please explain and help me, thanks before.--Rachael Adrino (talk) 14:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Rachael,
I am aware that this is not easy for a new user. In general, Wikia is not reliable in regard to ownership claims. People upload images and claim them as "own work", whether it is true or they have just stolen it from elsewhere. Therefore, I would not recommend to upload any image, which you have found on Wikia, to Commons. A far more reliable source for freely license images is Flickr.com. Remember: Images can only be uploaded to Commons if they are either very old and thereby out of copyright, or if they have been released by theier creator under a free license, such as CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-0 (but not: CC_BY-NC, CC-BY-ND), GFDL or similar. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Velliapura stone inscription[edit]

To Túrelio

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 18:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Dear Sir thanking you for directing me in the right direction source of all my pics or photos is the Velliapura palace , Velim, Goa Velliapura Place is the residence of modern day descendants of Kadambas thanking you

Decan.reporter

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 18:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Decan.reporter,
your upload File:Velliapura Stone Inscriptions.jpg looks like a copy from a book or a paper-print.
At [7] you wrote: Velliapura pics are given to me by Velliapura Family, Velim Goa, India Decan.Reporter
But, who created the original book/print/whatever?
--Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Austroboletus eburneus 424753.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have a bit of time, please consider marking this image. Commons has only 2 species of this mushroom--and I uploaded the second image now. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Leoboudv, what do you mean by "marking", reviewing the license status? --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for your time Turelio. May I wish you a good day from Vancouver, Canada. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Fotos Heinz_Nigg und Opernhaus-Krawall[edit]

Lieber Turelio, ich habe für beide Fotos um Permission eingegeben an: permission-de@wikimedia.org

Foto Zürich_Opernhaus-Krawall.tif: 23. Januar, 22:39 Uhr Sehr geehrtes Support-Team, ich, Heinz Nigg, erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild »Zürich_Opernhaus-Krawall.tif«, dass ich dessen Urheber/in bin. Der Künstler des Werkes, dem das Bild »Zürich_Opernhaus-Krawall.tif« zugrunde liegt, bin ich selbst. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz »Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung – Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 international“«. Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch kommerziell oder gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die freie Lizenzierung nur auf das Urheberrecht sowie verwandte Rechte bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund anderer Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft in Wikipedia oder einem ihrer Schwesterprojekte eingestellt wird. Vorgangs-Nummer: 1550-c2ec1006f359e515. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Heinz Nigg

Foto Heinz_Nigg.jpg: 25. Januar, 12:22 Uhr Anbei das Bestätigungsmail von Urs Jaudas, das er Ihne gestern direkt zukommen liess. Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Heinz Nigg Ich, Urs Jaudas, gebe das Foto Heinz_Nigg.jpg frei für die Veröffentlichung in Wikimedia Commons. Ich als Urheberrechtsinhaber erlaube es jedem, dieses Werk für jeglichen Zweck, inklusive uneingeschränkter Weiterveröffentlichung, kommerziellem Gebrauch und Modifizierung, zu nutzen. Freundliche Grüsse, Urs Jaudas

<censored>

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Visualstudies (talk • contribs) 11:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Prima. --Túrelio (talk) 13:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hi, how do I add a license to my upload? --Neriman2003 (talk) 14:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Neriman2003, when you upload an image to Commons you are given several choices of licenses. However, at first you need to have a license. A license is a permission which only the creator/author can give. So, when you are not the author, but take an image from elsewhere, you first need to ensure yourself, that the creator/author of that image did put it really under one of the free licenses, which are accepted at Commons (COM:L). --Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Senator photos[edit]

Well if you actually payed attention you would notice I already listed the source as the Congressional Pictorial Directory 110th Congress.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonstopmaximum (talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
That's not sufficient! We need to be able to verify your claim about the license. US gov websites are known to use also non-gov-created material, which do not fall under US-gov-PD. So, the mere claim "it's on their website" is not accepted. As you likely didn't get these images as a print, but took them from a website, why can't you give the proper URL? --Túrelio (talk) 11:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Queue of Visitors Take the Shuttle Buses in THSR Taichung Station 20161126.jpg[edit]

I looked at your edits. I don't understand what it means to "Commons:Categories#Over-categorization".--Kai3952 (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I had explained that already on COM:ANV. Anyway,
--Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Why didn't he say to me? when I don't know that he has added Category:2016 in Taichung to Category:2016 Ching Chuang Kang Air Force Base Open Day, he will be seen as a vandalism by doing so. In particular, I saw he has massively removed cat, and I have not been notified by User:玄史生. At that time, I can't see anything wrong with my edits. But I'm bothered by he has his own thinking of editing the Wikimedia.Commons, and what is worse, I was "denounced" by him during my discussion with him. You can see: [11], [12], and [13]. So I can't ask him this question: "Why didn't he say to me?" This is why I don't know that he has added Category:2016 in Taichung to Category:2016 Ching Chuang Kang Air Force Base Open Day.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

question[edit]

Hello Sir,

You sent me last warning for not adding more personal photos because of violation otherwise you will block me.

Please let me know how it considered to be violation?

It's me Dr. Nihad Ibrahim the one who's in the photo. I mean I 'm the photo owner and the copyright is mine.

I uploaded my personal photo to add it to my page on Arabic Wikipedia. I marked the choice of "my own work" not a violation.

All what happened that I uploaded my photo previously following all your steps, but I wrote the file name in a wrong way. For my bad luck this fault repeated unwillingly because of wrong copy/paste process. That's why I asked "Wikimedia Commons" to delete all what I did by mistake, and tried from the beginning.

That's all what happened.

Sorry if I bother you that much.

If you have any clarification, notes or questions you are most welcome.


All my target is adding my personal photo to my page on Arabic Wikipedia.

       Thanks for your long patience  

Dr. Nihad Ibrahim

— Preceding unsigned comment added by غاوى فن (talk • contribs) 14:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Nihad,
first, we cannot know who is behind the account غاوى فن. And we usually do not ask, as every user is granted the anonymity he/she wants. So, you will not be forced to publicly identify your account-name with your real name.
Therefore, when غاوى فن uploaded File:Nihad Ibrahim.jpg as own work, and we found it at https://www.facebook.com/nihad.ibrahim.52, we simply had to assume, that he had copied it from Facebook and thereby violated copyright, because images on Facebook are not free and you can never know whether the owner of the page, where an image is shown, has really the copyright over that image.
The threat to block you was necessary as you had already uploaded some images, which were considered to violate copyright, and you even re-uploaded one.
So, if you are the copyright-holder of File:Nihad Ibrahim.jpg, I would recommend you, to send per email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org a statement of your ownership/copyright-holdership in this image and your intent to release it under the choosen license. In this mail you need also provide your name and at least email-address. Your email will not be made public and will be processed only by our COM:OTRS-volunteers. Thereafter or shortly before, your can re-upload your image and add {{OTRS pending}}. --Túrelio (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of my photos[edit]

Hello. Yesterday you chose to delete two photos which I had uploaded. In my opinion, these photos were under the protection of fair use. Even though Getty Images was selling the photographs, they fall under the public domain, as they were photographs of the President of the United States. Under US Federal law, photos containing elected officials (like the President of the United States) are automatically in the public domain. Therefore, I am requesting you to please undelete these images. Thank you for your time. Firstclass306 (talk) 15:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Firstclass306,
it's good that you mention fair-use. I assume you work mainly on :en, right? US copyright law allows fair-use. However, it's bound to certain conditions, which mean that Commons cannot host fair-use images (see Commons:Fair use). They need to be uploaded locally. Also, your 2 now-deleted uploads were images from Getty-Images agency, which is quite known worldwide to sue everybody who uses their material without a proper license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

File talk:Comercio de peluches en Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 47.JPG[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, ich bin mir nicht sicher wieso du gerade bei dieser Datei angefangen hast die Seite die dokumentieren, die die Datei benutzt haben. Ich habe mir über Google Images zum Spass angeschaut wo sonst die Datei (low profile da kein exzellentes Bild und damit nicht in der Hauptseite gewesen) alles benutzt wurde und ich habe es dokumentiert. Der eine ist so frech, dass behauptet, es sei sein Bild, unglaublich... Viele Grüsse, Poco2 16:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Diego,
du meinst jetzt, warum bei achgut.com? Weil die regelmäßig Fotos von Commons verwenden und sauber kennzeichnen. Den copyfraud bzw. die Schutzrechtsberühmung auf https://steemit.com würde ich nicht so lassen. Ich habe zwar noch kein DMCA-Link auf der Seite gefunden, du solltest die URV aber m.E. der Geschäftsführung melden. Du kannst ja einfach auf dein Veröffentlichungsdatum auf Commons verweisen. --Túrelio (talk) 17:30, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Deleted files with swastikas in the name[edit]

Can you protect the titles of the deleted files with swastikas in the name? --109.40.2.30 10:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I can try. However, if I remember right from the past with other files, this isn't fail-proof. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Robi pe uranus, franceza.png[edit]

Hello,

You deleted this file due to "Copyright violation: Copyrighted book cover". I am uploading this picture as asked by the author of the book. He has no copyright claims over the picture and wishes to have the photo published on his Wiki page. What should I do to adhere to the copyright rules? Can you please help me?

Thanks, Vali. 30.01.2018 Valy3D (talk) 11:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vali,
both deleted cover-images show not only text, but also a photo or a graphic. While mere text (small portion) may not be a problem, graphic material always comes with copyright. So, you should ask the author whether he really has copyright over the graphic on his book's cover. If he has, then you should ask him to email a statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which he states his copyright-ownership of the complete book-cover and his intent to release the photographic reproduction of his cover (your upload) under the choosen free license. If he does not have copyright over the graphic on the book-cover, then he first must try to obtain permission from the creator of the graphic. --Túrelio (talk) 11:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion̞[edit]

Hi Túrelio. It was a special request from his family. For the very first time I ask this. Not a big deal. Thank you for your job. Well doneǃ --Regions (talk) 14:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Maja Nikolić singer.jpg[edit]

Hi. Can you answer me on the talk page of that file? --ΝικόλαςΜπ. (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Leon Bunn mit Ulli Wegner.jpg[edit]

Thanks a lot - vielen Dank für deine Hilfe, ich leite diese email nun an die von dir angegebenen E-Mail Adresse weiter --Eazy262 (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Julien Sansonnens[edit]

Hello, pascal Cottin has granted rights on Julien Sansonnens image, that you removed from commons.

How can I write that this image has been declared by its author to be part of the public domain? Thanks for your help.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranma~frwiki (talk • contribs) 12:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
I Ranma~frwiki,
we need a written statement from Pascal Cottin that confirms the release of the uploaded image under a free license (not required to be PD, can also be CC-BY or CC-BY-SA) to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Danish Caribbean banknotes vandalised by INeverCry[edit]

I just saw that INeverCry vandalised some PD-scans of Danish West-Indian banknotes I had uploaded yesterday, may I know how they vandalised the images (e.g. Personal attacks, or using the middle finger image)? As I were to propose blacklisting some images that could be used for vandalism (in the same way that images of genitalia are "blacklisted" and can only be used in a wiki at request). --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 13:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Ähem, honestly, I've no idea what you are talking about. What I know is that yesterday late evening, when I was working on files requested for SD, I had one, which IMO wasn't qualified for SD as there was no evidence for the claimed copyvio, when I then clicked on the nominator's edits, I thought, oh, this might be INC, as the edit-summaries of a number of his latest edits consisted in an insulting slander against you. I then blocked him and began to revert and hide the insulting statements. I didn't even look at the files itself, just worked down the edit-list. He then added the same "statement" to his talkpage, so that I had to remove talkpage-access too. If you want them completely removed, you need to ask our Commons:Oversighters. --Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Aloha Browser Screenshot.jpg[edit]

Hi, you have deleted Aloha Browser screenshot.jpg with a reason - "non free app screenshot" which is not true, Aloha Browser IS a free app and have no in-app purchases. Plus, we as developers want to make screenshot public and free for all.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pozzi2 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
@Pozzi2: Just because an app is free does not change the fact that it's still copyrighted, as you can see right on the bottom the home page here. If you are really the developer of this app, please send permission to OTRS to have the image restored. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Pozzi2,
if you belong to the developers who own the rights in this browser, please send a confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . However, the now deleted screenshot did not only contain your likely own artwork (upper part), but also a photo of Putin and many icons of Ebay, Amazon, Twitter etc. which are likely not under your own copyright. You should either remove them completely or create a screenshot that does not show alien content. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Smólnik[edit]

OK. Zrobione. Pozdrawiam. MOs810 (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Fredrik Karlström.jpg[edit]

I see this file deleted on a page User:Colin/Norden. I am aware that Norden changed their licence terms to -NC last year but at the time I created that page, and Fae uploaded those files, all their images were just -SA. Can you check this deletion is valid. -- Colin (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Colin, I've undeleted the image for now. However, that's a general problem. While for Flickr we have records from Flickreview-bot, we don't have that for many other sources. Archive.org doesn't have site-capture for 2010, when the image was uploaded. The earliest capture of their copyright-page (June 2011) shows that "attribution" was the li.[14]. But, the earliest capture of the page with that image (April 2016) shows already the NC restriction.[15] So, we have positive record for the image itself. I think, I will open a regular DR to allow for public discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fredrik Karlström.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have the time, please review these 2 images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for your help Turelio. Goodnight from Canada where its 2:30 AM in Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Leaving Wikipedia forever.[edit]

Fk u..fk wikipedia..every time u guys r keep deleting my upload. RakibRik (talk) 12:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Thats your own doing. You uploaded material which isn't your work and claimed it to be free. Later re-users might be sued for that. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Postcard of the Blackstone of Miami Beach Florida.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Postcard of the Blackstone of Miami Beach Florida.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Postcard of the Blackstone of Miami Beach Florida.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 12:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Logo Les Grandes Heures Automobiles.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai ajouté l'image "File:Logo Les Grandes Heures Automobiles.jpg" qui m'a été envoyée par monsieur Arnaud Bachelard, service communication L.G.H.A SAS.

Ce logo est peut être déposé, mais fournit par son propriétaire

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Y.Leclercq (talk • contribs) 14:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
@Y.Leclercq:, if you got it from Mr. Arnaud Bachelard, you should ask him to confirm towards permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org that he is the copyright-holder and that he releases the uploaded image File:Logo Les Grandes Heures Automobiles.jpg under the choosen free license (cc-by-sa-4.0). --Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

2 images?[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you mark these 2 high resolution images of a mushroom that Commons has no image of?

Thank You for your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help. Have a good day, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Van der Trip[edit]

Hi Why did you delete my Van der Trip page on Wiki Commons? That's not fair! Any particular reason?

Please put it back! It's open source.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dambi12 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, because is was requested for deletion with valid rationale "Commons galleries are for collections of images, articles belong Wikipedia". --Túrelio (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Velliapura stone inscriptions[edit]

Dec. 21st 2013 out bust [1] of a group of people claiming to be members of the coterie were denied access to Velliapura compound, palace officials charged them of looting or disappearance of historical stone inscription from the compound. Later November 2014 meet between the representatives of Coterie, Velliapura palace and Good will of royal States concluded by recognizing the surnames as coterie descendants recorded in the payrolls 6 months prior to the Nov ,1855 confiscation of the Haliyal timber yard by Governor George Harris of Madras presidency.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 17:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
  1. controversy by Kadamba coterie. Retrieved on 10 Jan 2018.
I have no idea what you want to tell me. --Túrelio (talk) 17:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

8 final images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you please mark these 8 final images that I uploaded today from M. Observer. I have no more images for review.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Statue of the Duke of Wellington[edit]

Hi Túrelio, why did you delete File:Statue_of_the_Duke_of_Wellington,_outside_the_Royal_Exchange,_London_(20577335756).jpg? I've been trying to upload the same image from Flickr as I was hoping to use it in an article. The existing images of that statue on Commons aren't that good. Ham II (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ham II,
because the uploader requested it 1 day after upload, which is a legitimate speedy-rationale. So, there was no problem with the file or its copyright. Feel free to reupload it.[16] --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

________________

Review images[edit]

Dear Turelio, when you have the time, please review these images below.

Thanking you for your help earlier

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 21:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Decan.reporter,
I've commented in the DR discussions. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your deletion of a video from You Tube[edit]

Hi. I note that you deleted this video from Commons. Did you request that the licence be changed from 'Standard You Tube Licence' to the 'Creative Commons Licence' option? That would have been the positive way of ensuring that we could continue to use it. I do this all time, and is much better than just deletion. Can you do that? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 09:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Llywelyn2000:, you are talking about File:Biurrun-garbiñe-etb1.jpg, right? You are correct that this is an approach which sometimes leads to success, and in rare cases I do this. However, our workload as admins and upload-patrolers is far too high for such work. This is a job for either the uploader or those interested in this image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
'or those interested in this image.' - that includes all wikipedias (wps) which used this video? We were not informed; I suggest a little note be left for communities on such wps as ours, so that they can upload onto their own wps, under fair use licence. Thanks. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

5 images for review[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please mark or review these high quality images of 2 mushroom species

Best Regards and Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help Turelio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

"Verunreinigte Bilder"[edit]

Hi,

Danke fürs Korrigieren. Was war denn an den Dateien falsch (verstehe da leider wenig von) bzw. wie kann ich es selber wegmachen, damit Du weniger Arbeit hast? PS: 4 Todesdrohungen? Krass...

VG -- Jonaes02 (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, was da eigentlich los ist, weiß ich auch nicht. Ich denke, dass das irgendein Bot untersucht, der die "betroffenen" Dateien dann in ein SLA-Verzeichnis einsortiert. jpg-Dateien öffne ich einfach in der Freeware Irfanview, die ich auch sonst für einfache Graphik-Operationen nutze, drücke Shift-J, setze ein Häkchen bei Transformation:Keine und klicke auf Starten. Dann lade ich die "bereinigte" Datei wieder hoch und fertig. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! -- Jonaes02/Diskussion->deWP 14:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Noch 'ne Frage: Darf ich den SLA danach selbst entfernen? Oder wird das als Vandalismus gewertet? -- Jonaes02/Diskussion->deWP 15:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
(2 Fragen) Ja. Nein. Es ist ja keine URV oder so. --Túrelio (talk) 15:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

About the copyrights violation[edit]

Dear,

Kindly note that all uploads are done with the agreement with the owner (Arab telemedia Group) which represented by this account.... highlighting that this account is for accurate information purposes.

Thank you

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiba Falah (talk • contribs) 15:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Hiba Falah:, if that is the case, then you should either identify this account towards permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as a company-account and declare that all uploads fall under the company's copyright or send a permission for individual uploads (1 permission can included a number of uploads). --Túrelio (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
In addition to the question of permission, it is a bit confusing for us and for re-user that these images, such as File:بوستر أخر ايام التوت.jpg, contain a caption/watermark saying "All rights reserved", but are under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


Hello Túrelio, user @Hiba Falah: works at Arab Telemedia Group. We already got an OTRS confirmation, but Hiba is new and didn't realize she needs to post the ticket number with each upload. An MoU between Wikimedia Levant and Arab Telemedia Group was reached last year in which Arab Telemedia Group releases some of the the posters and videos under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license into commons, conditioned that the files to be uploaded only by user Hiba Falah. She should have added the template User:Hiba Falah/MyTag which was created for this . If I may, I will restore the files, and add the missing tags. I will give Arab Telemedia Group a visit this week and talk to them again :) . Thanks. --Tarawneh (talk) 09:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Tarawneh:, sure. That's great. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Dear . Att @EugeneZelenko: --Tarawneh (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Deus 3.jpg[edit]

hey, did you say that my picture with Frank Mugisha belongs to you?

File:Deus 3.jpg[edit]

Image obviously copied from Facebook (see EXIF data). Depicted can hardly be the photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deusdedit Kiriisa (talk • contribs) 21:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, no. I did state exactly what you copied above by yourself, 1) that the image was copied from Facebook, and 2) that it's unlikely that the person in front of the camera is also behind the camera (to take the photo). Anyway, if you have any comment, you should make it at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deus 3.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Final images for review[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If theses images haven't been market or reviewed, could you review these final images for me please? I don't have any more Mushroom photos.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

  • I always appreciate any help which you can give. Kind Regards from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
✓  Done . You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your help Turelio. I have been adding Mushroom Observer templates to pictures which lack this template...and it is a lot of photos I see. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

I have question[edit]

(talk) 22:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC) I wonder why did you delete all images I uploaded. My english is not the best, so could you explain why you deleted my files? --THE PRIME CRONUS

Hi THE PRIME CRONUS,
sure, though you find this information already on your own talkpage.
File:The prime cronus.png was sourced by you to Google-images, but actually copied from Facebook. Material on Facebook is not free per se.
File:한동근.jpg was sourced by you to Google-images, but actually copied from https://www.nautiljon.com/images/galerie/10/77/han_dong_geun_860977.jpg, which states "Copyright © 2005-2018 Nautiljon.com". So, both images were not free and the CC license, which you had added to these images was invalid. The mere fact that an image is somewhere on the web on somebodys website, where everybody can see it, does NOT mean that it is under a free license, as required by our policy COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

5 images? for review[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Thanks for marking some of the mushroom images I uploaded earlier today. Is it possible if you could just review these 5 images please?

It would help a lot. Many Mushroom Observer contributors vote them as good pictures at the source...but WikiCommons has no image of these mushrooms. Best Regards from Metro Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You. The default license at Mushroom Observer is CC BY SA 3.0 The only other option is CC BY NC SA 3.0. The professional photographers use the NC version of the license but other contributors still use CC BY SA 3.0. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

photos[edit]

Why did you remvove pictures that I've ulpoaded ? I see many images on wikipedia that I can't go to the source of it , and they don't get deleted . I wonder how I make similar , but I put the sources !

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Filósofo Lusófono (talk • contribs) 12:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Filósofo Lusófono,
o.k. Let's see:
So, despite in all these images the source either claimed own copyright or the author was unknown, you claim them to be under a free license! Only the author can release an image under a free license, if it is still copyrighted, which is the case until 70 years after the death of the author. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

10 images for review[edit]

Dear Turelio, Can you review these images of mushrooms which don't exist on Commons?

If you need me to review an image which you uploaded, you can contact me on my talkpage. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for all your help. I would have asked Lymantria but he is on a short break starting today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Zwei Löschbitten[edit]

Bei Bedarf kann ich dir den Schriftwechsel zukommen lassen. Besten Dank --ST 16:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Danke dir. --ST 23:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

4 images for review?[edit]

Dear Admin Turelio,

Could you just mark these 4 images that I uploaded below.

Commons also does not have this mushroom species. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . Have a nice 1st Sunday of Lent. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You. Germany is doing very well in the Winter Olympics. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

5 final images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you review these final images. I know you are a busy person and I will not ask you to review any more images.


Thank You for all your help from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks again for everything Turelio. I have been marking images and I am happy that you marked mine too. Have a good day, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

A peaceful thank you[edit]

Peace Barnstar 6.png The Barnstar of Peace
Thank you for using your wiki skills to find a way to remove and re-upload the A+F files without breaking the links. Theredproject (talk) 03:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Backwards deletion File:P041715PS-0021 (20282064634).jpg[edit]

I think you may have deleted the opposite file from what you meant to delete: File:P041715PS-0021 (20282064634).jpg was deleted as an identical or scaled-down version of File:Barack Obama's Personal Aide Ferial Govashiri.jpg, but the second file is 1500×1000, smaller than the source at https://www.flickr.com/photos/obamawhitehouse/24129409992/ (2800×1867). --Closeapple (talk) 04:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Closeapple,
hmm, the above linked Flickr page (as well as https://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/20282064634/) shows max resolution 1500 x 1000 to me. The log of the deleted File:P041715PS-0021 (20282064634).jpg also shows 1.500 × 1.000 (211.411 Bytes) for the file. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

User:TyesonR2005[edit]

Hi Túrelio, this user ignores your "last warning" and keeps on uploading copyrighted stuff. To me it looks as if he asks to be blocked. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 15:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Hat mein Kollege EugeneZelenko inzwischen schon gemacht. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

useless[edit]

all admins at wikipedia are useless, they cant even understand simple things and simple changes, what is the use of wikipedia when a person cant even edit his/her own content as he/she wants, i uploaded few files but you guys are deleting it with different different reason all time.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpeshpandey09 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Well @Pushpeshpandey09:, eventually it is you who does not "understand simple things". 1) here is not Wikipedia, but Commons; 2) all your uploads were unfree images, though you claimed them to be free. But, being visible on Twitter does not mean it is under a free license, as required by our policy. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

i understand things very well @Túrelio, and regarding copyright thing i have already sended email with the person written note but still there is no response from you people then who is at fault?. its really useless policy and all when the person whose biography is shown wants to edit but she cant do that coz of such peoples here.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpeshpandey09 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Are you aware that all the people doing the "janitory" work here, are unpaid volunteers, who have a real-life? Besides, those processing permissions are not necessary the same people as those doing recent-upload patrolling (such as me). --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

1 image[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you mark just this single image please?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . Nice image. --Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio for your help on this image. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Images for review[edit]

I am not taking any copyright images instead these images from public domain. Let me know whether it need to send to you for review. Imansoorshaikh (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Imansoorshaikh,
the problem-messages on your talkpage have all the information to show that these images are not in the public domain. Being published on a webseite does not mean it's "public domain". Only the creator or the copyright-law (for very old images) can out a work into the "public domain". --Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Real Life Barnstar.jpg The Real Life Barnstar
You are a real life Barnstar. Imansoorshaikh (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

regarding deletion of file KL_Gangster.jpg poster image[edit]

Good day Túrelio, im new to wiki. would look forward to friendly comments and guidance from you in future. regarding multiple uploads for the poster image, I was trying to select back the right licence for the image. apparently since the image has been used multiple times by various resources, i was in difficult situation to select the original image source to fit the article. problem in wiki is that i cannot find and edit 'release rights' once i have uploaded the file, and had to wait for someone to delete it before I can try another copyright options.

from now on I will select the last option in the release rights Option Wizard - "I believe this work is freely licensed or legally in the public domain. I understand that if I do not add the necessary licensing information in a timely fashion, the file may be deleted." as i cannot figure out the original source for the poster. Please do not ban me. I intend to bring good, honest, concise and neutral contents related to my home country to the wiki community for the benefit of global mankind.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Afifi N. (talk • contribs)
Hi Afifi N.,
o.k. Commons allows only uploads that are under a license/permission, which allows any kind of use, including commercial use. Only the creator/author of an image can release it under such a free license. Being published on a website for everybody to see, does not equal a free license. Movie posters are normally not under a free license, as the movie company has a commerial interest. --Túrelio (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

HI[edit]

Hi Why delete the photos you uploaded There is an error in the name of the license to be changed and not delete the file There are a lot of files that used the same command as

Nelly Karim.jpg

,

أبرار سبت 2.jpg
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maumed al sarif (talk • contribs) 18:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Maumed al sarif ,
I do not fully understand what you are saying. Eventually, you see that still-images from movies/videos on Youtube are treated differently on Commons. That comes from the fact that some movies/videos on Youtube are under a free license (which is compatible to our policy), while other are under the Youtube "Standard license", which is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, can you please close Commons:Deletion requests/File:مرام البلوشي (cropped).jpg. Maumed al sarif clearly does not fully understand the difference between a free license and Standard license.--Mojackjutaily (talk) 06:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, as it's less than 7 days, I've not closed, but commented for keeping. --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

What I said at the end is an Arabic translation of what I said --Maumed al sarif (talk) 00:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Persiflage on the Tulipomania[edit]

Hallo! Die Category:Allegory of the Tulipomania und die von dir gelöschte Category:Persiflage on the Tulipomania sind eigentlich für zwei verschiedene Gemälde bestimmt. Es sind zwei sehr ähnliche Bilder vom selben Maler zum selben Thema. Jetzt lässt sich weder vom Werksartikel Allegorie der Tulipomanie noch vom Wikidata-Item sinnvoll nach Commons verlinken. Grüße lewenstein (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, der Hintergrund war mir nicht bekannt. Ich kann die Kat. gern wieder herstellen, wenn das sinnvoll wäre. --Túrelio (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Ja, das wäre sinnvoll. Zusätzlich könnte ich die beiden Kategorien eindeutiger benennen, damit es nicht mehr zu solchen Verwechslungen kommt. lewenstein (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

3 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you review these 3 images please if you are free?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks a lot for your kind help. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

7 Final Images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Mushroom Observer calls these images good/great images at the source but Commons does not have this mushroom species. Could you review them please?

Thank You. By the Way, Germany is certainly having an excellent Winter Olympic Games and taking many medals. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:41, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Seen this and this? ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the twitter messages. I saw the German twitter messages on Canadian TV News.

PS: I hope you can mark these other 4 images too:

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

stop deleting celebrity Traci Kochendorfer photos last warning[edit]

Please do not hack or sabotage our files we upload on known persons ....we own the copyrights to these photos cause we represent her and have her permission stop deleting this celebrities profile and such. thank you

do not threaten us please thank you .

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrybear86 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
@Terrybear86:
1) You are the one threatening and slandering me! If you go one with this behavior, you may find yourself blocked from Commons.
2) If you (Terrybear86) think you "own the copyrights" of celebrity shots from Getty Images agency, nice, then provide the evidence to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ! --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

again above you just threatened us stop hacking and sabotoging other editors work please ...we did not threaten you cease and desist your threats please and hacking of other editors owned work. we have seen this who is authorizing you to do that please stop it. you have no right in vandalizing other editors contributions. be kind and move on thanks.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrybear86 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Cateory:Blue Lakes[edit]

Can you restore this category? I created this category to add photos there. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Tournasol7 (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I made an error in name: cateory. In addition it exist others Blue Lakes in the world, so I changed name to Blue Lakes, New Zealand. I think you can delete the redirect. Sorry for the trouble Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Niparko Photo[edit]

I was "playing" in my sandbox. I don't have permission for the image. Please let me know if that is an issue in the future and I will stop. I just wanted to see what a possible edit to the existing stub would look like.

Thanks for any advice you might have.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregorybarry (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, in such cases it's helpful to clearly add "test" oder "test upload" to the description and to put the file into Category:Test uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Picture Ronan_Le_Gleut.jpg[edit]

Hi ! I see you deleted a picture (Ronan_Le_Gleut.jpg) because of copyright violation (linking to the Facebook version of this picture) but I can confirm (and prove if needed) that the author has given all rights to use it. Can you please explain how to upload it and use it ? Thanks ! --Maxib (talk) 10:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@Maxib:, sure. You need to ask the author (Frédéric REGLAIN ?) to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which he confirms that he is the photographer or rightsholder and that he agrees to release this image under the choosen {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} license[17], which allows anybody to use this image, provided the terms of the license are met. Don't forget to include the filename. See here for a permission template. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@Túrelio: It's done, thank you ! --Maxib (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Sylvain_Maillard.jpg[edit]

Why do you delete my picture ? I'm the deputy and i want this picture for my wikipedia

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Smaillard (talk • contribs) 13:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Smaillard:, the image had been tagged as "(c) Assemblee nationale" by the nominator, probably as it has been found on http://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA717379. Commons accepts only media (images etc.) which are evidently released under a free license according to our policy. Only the photographer or the rightsholder, to whom the photographer has transferred his copyright, can release an image under a free license. So, if your portrait-photo is wasn't created by the Assemblee nationale, but by yourself or by a photographer whom you comissioned, please send an email from your email address to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org (can be in French), confirming either your authorship (if you are the photographer) or the rightholdership (if copyrighted transferred by photographer) and your will to release it under the choosen cc-by-sa-4.0 license. And don't forget to mention the filename Sylvain_Maillard.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

You Deleted our bands official record photo.[edit]

Dark Archive is band and we had our Ep photo what is taken by me and the model is my girlfriend. So what is the problem?

Darkarchive cultivate our blood in aeon ep photo.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Quincea (talk • contribs)
Hi Quincea, both images were the professional-quality reproductions of an album cover with copyrighted artwork. Album covers are usually copyrighted by the record company or the band. Anybody here can open an account and claim anything. Therefore, we require in such cases an credible permission from the rightsholder. If you are the author of all copyrighted elements of the cover artwork or represent the rightsholder send or ask him to send a confirmation from their official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Don't forget to mention the (currently deleted) filenames.--Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Aspidella hesleri 643359.jpg & File:Aspidella hesleri 798192.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

As an Admin, can you please rename these two files as Amanita hesleri instead of Aspidella hesleri. You can see the files history as well as this comment for why Amanita is actually the right name and not Aspidella. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio. Next time, I will be careful and not make a file rename request to avoid this messsy situation until I am 100% sure on a rename. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:35, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Löschung der Bilder Bruno Stane Grill und Anna Maria Grill-R.[edit]

Wie kann ich die löschungen der Bilder rückgängig machen? Ich bin die Tochter der Künstlerin Anna Maria Grill-R. und des verstorbenen Künstlers Bruno Stane Grill. Die Bilder und Kunstwerke habe ich geerbt, bzw. teilweise nach dem Tod des Vaters archiviert.

Was ist zu tun? Ich komme hier nicht weiter, finde alles höchst kompliziert!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by NicNic Grill (talk • contribs) 16:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
@NicNic Grill:. So, versuchen wir es einmal. Ich gehe die Bilder einzeln durch, weil teils unterschiedliche Dinge zu klären sind. Ich setze dabei gemäß deiner obigen Angabe voraus, dass du das alleinige Copyright an den Werken deines Vaters Bruno Stane Grill hältst (bzw. die Genehmigung deiner Mutter hast).

Wenn das alles geklärt ist, solltest du in Bezug auf die Werke deines Vaters eine Mail an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org schicken, in der du dein geerbtes Copyright (vorher klären, allein geerbt oder zusammen mit Mutter/Geschwistern?) an seinen Werken bestätigen musst. Für das o.g. Werk deiner Mutter könntest du ggf. die hier vorhandene Vorlage etwas modifizieren, wobei zwischen den beiden Urheberrechten am Werk selbst und am Foto klar unterschieden werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Ok, viele Dank für die Erklärung, ich werde nun alles neu angeben. Vielen Dank nochmals!!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by NicNic Grill (talk • contribs) 16:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

9 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you please kindly review these images below please? I would appreciate your help.

Thank You kindly, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your kind help Turelio. Its 1:53 AM in Vancouver, Canada, so I will be signing out soon. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you review these 7 images below please? It would help a lot.

I thank you for your time. Unfortunately, I am reviewing other people's image uploads right now...but I cannot review my own. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio. I appreciate your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Ttp logo deletion (File:Ttp logo for WP.jpg)[edit]

Hi Turelio, Regarding your deletion of the Ttp logo for WP.jpg file I uploaded to the Commons: Can you help me understand where I went afoul of the rules in uploading it? The Ttp logo is an out-of-use logo created by my business partner who gave me permission to upload it so that I could test the logo upload process. (I am preparing to upload an organizational logo to a Wikipedia article.) I uploaded it to Flickr and selected the Attribution ShareAlike option as recommended by the Commons. Do I need some further form or permission from her? She is fine with free licensing it for any and all uses. Thanks in advance for any guidance you can offer! DanDavidCook (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi DanDavidCook,
in general: uploading logos, which are not created by yourself, is a difficult business, see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Trademarks, because the threshold of originality (condition for copyrightability) differs from country to country (US: high, UK: low). In countries with a usable freedom-of-panorama exception one may use that exception, provided the targeted logo is installed somewhere permanently in the public. On the other hand, most companies do no want to release their business logo under a free license, because that would allow others to use it for their own business. Though logos might be additionally be protected as Trademark, we don't know whether Trademark would trump over free license or the other way round. That's a question for the lawyer. And you should make aware your business partner of that problem, to avoid nasty surprises.
in your case: you simply sourced your upload to www.tothepointpublications.com, which was proper. However, the source-site states "© All rights reserved 2017. To The Point Collaborative". So, there was no visible permission, which resulted in deletion.
what now? 1) whether a logo is "out-of-use" or not doesn't matter. 2) you wrote that you uploaded the logo to Flickr; but, your upload at Commons was not sourced to Flick. 3) if the creator of the logo gave you permission (according to COM:L), please forward said permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and mention the filename (even though currently deleted). --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Portrait of Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf.jpg[edit]

Thanks for deleting this copy-vio, but you merely redirected to another copy-vio that I also nominated for speedy. Cheers, --SVTCobra (talk) 08:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

12 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

When you find time today, please review these 18 images. Most of these photos are rated as good or great photos at the Mushroom Observer source.

Thank You for your time. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your kind help Turelio. Have a good day. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

File:FC Bayern München Logo 2017.png[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, wo siehst du bei dem Logo denn bitte Schöpfungshöhe? Das besteht nur aus wirklich simplen geometrischen Formen. Deine Löschung kann ich daher nicht nachvollziehen (es gab auch keine LD dazu, weshalb ich sie auch als regelwidrig ansehe). Chaddy (talk) 17:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@Chaddy:, es war ein SLA/speedy (da gibts keine LD), begründet mit "https://fcbayern.com/es/terms-and-conditions" (gemeint wohl: "8.2 All of the logos, photographs and other images on FC Bayern’s internet presence are protected by trademark/copyright. Any use thereof without consent of FC Bayern, in particular the unauthorised downloading of images, is prohibited and FC Bayern will pursue violators under civil law/criminal law.") und Verweis auf previous deletion request". Hochgeladen worden war die Datei als "eigenes Werk". --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Achso, ein SLA, ok.
Die damalige Entscheidung bei der svg war bereits eine Fehlentscheidung. Der Rechtshinweis auf der Website des FB Bayern spielt da keine große Rolle. Das Logo besteht wie gesagt nur aus simplen geometrischen Formen und enthält nichts, was nicht bereits vorbekannt war. Somit erreicht es selbst nach den besonders strengen Commons-Maßstäben keine SH. Auch Ping an @User:Natuur12. Chaddy (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
+1 selbst bei strengster Auslegung ist hier keine SH zu sehen. Nur Text, Kreise und gedrehtes Karomuster der bayerischen Staatsflagge aus dem 13. Jahrhundert. --Ralf Roleček 01:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Nun gut, wenn ihr diese Diskussion führen wollt, dann entlösche ich die Datei und überführe sie sofort in einen regulären LA, weil der m.E. die geeignetste Diskussionplattform bietet. Aussichtsreicher wäre vermutlich aber ein lokaler (:de) Upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

@Ralf Roletschek:, @Chaddy:, so die Herrschaften, zur Diskussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:FC Bayern München Logo 2017.png. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Danke für den kleinen Dienstweg. --Ralf Roleček 11:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Danke Chaddy (talk) 12:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

16 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please try to review these images below. Most of them are considered high quality images. Mushroom Observer is doing a scheduled maintenance for 1 hour today but hopefully not at your time of review.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

✓  Done . --Túrelio (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help, Turelio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2018 (UTC)