User talk:T137

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, T137!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, T137!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Facciata del Duomo di Gorizia.JPG[edit]

Il titolo e la descrizione della foto sono sbagliati, quello è il campanile del duomo, la facciata non si vede (confronta qui o qui) potresti provvedere a cambiarli? --Limonadis (talk) 12:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Forse ti è di aiuto Commons:Rinominare file, per cambiare la descrizione basta cliccare su modifica. --Limonadis (talk) 19:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Basta ricaricare il file con il nome desiderato e dopo chiedere la cancellazione di quello con il nome sblagliato. Dantadd 14:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Ottimo, grazie della disponibilità --Limonadis (talk) 00:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified plants[edit]

Hi T137, to identify unidentified plants it's very usefull to know were they grow. So please add data about country/botanical garden in the description and/or categorize that. Thanks. -- Ies (talk) 12:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Cyclamen - ? (1).jpg & File:Cyclamen - ? (2).jpg[edit]

Dear,

Where did you taken these pictures?
Your pictures were taken in januari. I think it is a Cyclamen persicum, which is flowering in the winter and the beginning of the spring. This species is growing in Asia Minor (from Turkey to Jordan) and is introduced on some Greek islands and locally in North Africa (Algeria and Tunisia).

Please let me know, so that I can classify these picture. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 10:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Dear T137,
Thank you for your reply. Because of the date and location I can identify them as Cyclamen purpurascens. C. repandum, a mediterranean species, is flowering in :the spring and has a more slender flower and is flowering in the spring (May-beginning of June).
Best botanic regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 11:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified plants again[edit]

Hi T137, to identify unidentified plants it's still very usefull to know were they grow. So please add data about country/botanical garden in the description and/or categorize that. Thanks. -- Ies (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosmarinus officinalis (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosmarinus officinalis (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Isonzo (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isonzo (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Castello di Gorizia at sunset (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castello di Gorizia at sunset (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Artedia squamata new versions[edit]

Hi, there is no problem I think, people may choose between the two versions. --Vassil (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC) Well, you're right, it's better to avoid this, but I didn't know if Gidip would agree to my edit. --Vassil (talk) 21:00, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stapelia lepida Flower (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stapelia lepida Flower (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Re: Mappa temporale dell'alternative rock[edit]

Ciao, scusa il (grosso) ritardo nella risposta. Come ho detto nella procedura di cancellazione, mi sembra che se si vuole citare la "crema", il "top" di un movimento artistico qualsiasi si compie inevitabilmente una scelta POV, e anche citare le fonti non servirebbe a molto (si passserebbe dal POV dell'autore dell'immagine a quello degli esperti citati come fonte, che comunque non rappresenteranno mai la totalità delle opinioni presenti). Se l'orientamento è quello di essere rigidi nell'applicazione del NPOV, credo proprio che andrebbe cancellata anche l'immagine. --Una giornata uggiosa '94 · So, what do you want to talk about? 21:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Italian_traffic_signs_-_zona_30.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Italian_traffic_signs_-_zona_30.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gigillo83 (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Ciao. Mi dispiace che tu abbia perso il tempo nel creare l'immagine, però, come ho detto anche a Luckok, la tua immagine è stata creata 2 mesi dopo la mia, mentre le altre immagini non esistevano assolutamente in formato svg e così le ho create ex novo in quanto le rispettive raster già presenti erano di qualità alquanto scarsa ( e quindi necessitavano di un lavoro di ricreazione dal nuovo, non solo una svgzzazione). Mi dispiace per le incomprensioni, spero ora di essermi chiarito. Ciau! --Gigillo83 (talk) 11:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Punica granatum fruit (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punica granatum fruit (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Punica granatum fruit (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punica granatum fruit (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa di Nostra Signora di Lourdes - Gorizia 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di san Giorgio Martire - Gorizia (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa di sant'Antonio - Gorizia (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di sant'Antonio - Gorizia (4).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa di Santo Spirito di Gorizia - Night (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di Santo Spirito di Gorizia - Night (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Isonzo a Gorizia (5).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isonzo a Gorizia (5).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa di Santi Mauro e Silvestro - Gorizia 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di san Pio X - Gorizia (7).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Barnstar[edit]

esagerato!!

--Carlomorino (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Sinagoga di Gorizia 07.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Stephanie Louise Kwolek.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stephanie Louise Kwolek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gobōnobo + c 06:08, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baby Erinaceus europaeus (14).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baby Erinaceus europaeus (14).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)