User talk:TCY

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, TCY!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Archives 2007-2017 - Talk records 2007-2017

Vous pouvez me laisser un message ci-dessous en français ou en anglais / You can leave your message below in French or in English.

Photos Terre Adélie[edit]

Bonjour,

Nous avons été surpris ici de voir que la Terre Adélie, ou les ZSPA n'apparaissent pas dans la liste. Il s'agit quand même d'un espace protégé, et ceux par différents traités ou accord.

De plus, sur l'une des affiches du concours, la photo est tout simplement des manchots Empereurs sur la banquise. Dire que la Terre Adélie ne fait pas partie de la liste, mais la mettre en affiche, il faut avouer que c'est un comble.

La DISTA a été contacté par un ancien DISTA, le même d'ailleurs, du nom de Maxime si mes souvenirs sont bons, en nous demandant si nous participions à ce concours.

Après, oui, la TA n'est qu'une revendication territoriale, mais la France participe tout de même à sa protection.

Concernant la photo avec la chasse-neige. En fait, ce sont des rubans que l'on peut deviner sur la banquise. La chasse-neige se forme lorsque le vent est fort, et chasse tout simplement la neige. Parfois au raz du sol, parfois il s'agit carrément d'un mur de neige. Mais il ne neige pas. C'est juste la neige au sol qui est soufflée.

Pour le Fulmar, ce n'est pas le bon modèle. ici, il s'agit de Fulmars Antarctique ou fulmarus glacialoide. Le fulmarus glacialis est l'espèce qui au nord, et qui est un Fulmar Boréal. C'est comme les aurores, boréales au nord, et australes au sud.

Les photos sont faites pour être utilisées, et comme ça, cela permet de faire connaitre un peu plus les espèces qui vivent ici.

Bonne journée. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TESSIER Ewan (talk • contribs) 01:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Carte de déporté résistant de Jacques Laurent.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:35, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Serment du Jeu de Paume - Jacques-Louis David.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Serment du Jeu de Paume - Jacques-Louis David.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.167.198.124 07:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pont suspendu de Vichy en 1865.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pont suspendu de Vichy en 1865.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 04:59, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Castillo blanco, I do not well understand your message. All the informations are well given in the description box. This photo is a 1865 one from a unknown photographer but in public domain as the photographer is dead before 1950 (more than 70 yeard old, if he took this picture at 20 or older and do not survived 105 with is a very likely hypothesis) and/or the photo was published before 1923. And the picture I've taken is a simple reproduction of a 2 dimensions artwork. TCY (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You completed the information right away after my message back in October. So there is no problem now. Castillo blanco (talk) 14:00, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please upgrade your Mobile App[edit]

You are still using 2.11, and it has bugs in the way it works with dates. Please upgrade to the latest version. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 18:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Précision[edit]

Bonjour, je connais cette article et au paragraphe commençant par: En 2008... je veux remplacer les 2 mots "seulement" par respectivement les mots "surtout" et "principalement" car cela serait plus ce que c'était, mais je ne peux le faire car il faut un compte. Pourriez-vous le faire pour moi? Merci d'avance.--2605:B100:50E:3AA2:A1C3:30B8:20A2:FEF 18:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pour information, j’ai bloqué les deux IP parce que fr:Wikipédia:Faux-nez/Distribution aux Consommateurs. Otourly (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Otourly: Merci de l'info. Je ne comprends pas l'intervention de cette IP sur Commons a propos d'un article de Wikipédia et sur lequel en plus je ne suis pas intervenu. Curieux. TCY (talk) 21:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
C’est une personne qui s’est fait bannir de WP. Et pour continuer à contribuer sur WP, elle cherche des pigeons hors WP (car les pages sont semi-protégées). En supprimant ses messages, elle espère passer sous les radars. Otourly (talk) 05:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Catégorisation des signaux routiers par commune[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai en liste de suivi toutes les sous-catégories de Category:Road signs of France by number, et j'ai vu que tu ajoutes et catégorises des photos de panneau. Tu as notamment créé les catégories spécialisées comme Category:Road signs in Vichy - B30‎, probablement sur le modèle de Category:Road signs in Paris - B30‎. Malheureusement, le système de catégorie de Commons ne permet pas de consulter facilement les photos d'une catégorie et de ses sous-catégorie. Il en découle que la catégorisation par commune gène mon travail. Plus généralement, je ne vois pas de pertinence à catégoriser chaque code de signal routier par commune. Pour la localisation, les catégories de type Category:Road signs in Vichy me semblent suffisantes, et même plus utiles. Marc Mongenet (talk) 09:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Marc Mongenet: , bonsoir,
J'ai catégorisé, et vais sans doute en créer d'autres sur d'autres communes, les panneaux sur la commune de Vichy car cela me permet (pour moi et j'espère pour d'autres) de trouver plus facilement tout ce qui concerne les infrastructures cyclables et piétonnes sur cette commune donc également les panneaux de signalisation, ce qui m'est utile pour le travail que je mène sur les infrastructures cyclables de l'agglomération de Vichy et que j'espère (en motivant d'autres contributeurs) étendre sur d'autres communes françaises. Si suffisamment de photos sur plusieurs communes sur un même département, je pensais même créer la sous-catégorie département par panneau. En quoi cela gène t-il ton travail ? TCY (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bonsoir, de mon côté, j'essaie d'illustrer chaque signal avec la meilleure photo. Tu peux voir les liens sur les pages d'illustration dans ma page. Il y a énormément de signaux réglementaires, la catégorie Road signs of France by number en compte 765 et ce n'est pas fini. Certains signaux sont extrêmement rares, voire inexistants (B9e et M4t). J'essaie aussi d'illustrer toutes les variantes réglementaires, comme avec le signal A7 (A7 seul, A7 + J10, A7 + M9z signal automatique, A7 + J10 + M9z signal automatique, A7 + M9a). Je pense d'ailleurs créer à l'occasion des sous-catégories pour les variantes d'usage réglementaire. Pour cela, j'ai besoin de consulter facilement l'ensemble des signaux d'une catégorie. La dispersion dans des catégories communales, si elle était menée à terme, causerait la création de dizaines de milliers de catégories supplémentaires et rendrait infernale la maintenance, et la consultation des signaux d'un code donné.
Heureusement, il existe une hiérarchie parallèle de catégories de signaux qui pourrait t'être très utile, sans fractionner les Road signs of France by number. Je la met en place, tu me diras si elle te convient. Marc Mongenet (talk) 21:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voilà, j'ai ajouté des catégories de signaux par thème dans Category:Road signs in Vichy : category:Cycling-related road signs in Vichy‎, category:Directional road signs in Vichy‎, category:Pedestrian-related road signs in Vichy‎, etc. Comme tu peux voir, cela s'insère dans une hiérarchie de catégories de signaux qui recouvre tous les pays, et qui est en cours de construction (j'ai directement relié Vichy à la France, mais à terme il y aura sûrement un étage départemental). Marc Mongenet (talk) 22:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Marc Mongenet: , bonsoir, désolé de ma réponse tardive, un peu surchargé actuellement. Cela me convient sinon je t'aurais proposé de double catégoriser en laissant la catégorie mère et en rajoutant la catégorie fille avec la commune. TCY (talk) 17:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK. Je n'ai pas prévu de double catégoriser (sur-catégoriser en l'occurrence) car les surcatégorisations sont mal vues (Commons:Categories#Why_over-categorization_is_a_problem). Marc Mongenet (talk) 19:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Affiche Londres Vichy Pullman.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Affiche Londres Vichy Pullman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY 00:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 13:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 15:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 15:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lincoln Family.in Abraham Lincoln Museum.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lincoln Family.in Abraham Lincoln Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hammersoft (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Freight_stations[edit]

Category discussion warning

Freight stations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Enhancing999 (talk) 19:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]