User talk:TFerenczy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, TFerenczy!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flag of Sloup.svg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Sloup.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.


Ahoj, TFerenczy! Thank you for your remarks, but I never used Wikidatas, so it is troublesome to learn it among my other tasks. However I try to do it, but give me some time. My first problem is to find out how to add a new item to the database. If your real name is Ferenczy, I am sad that we can not correspond in Hungarian. Kaboldy (talk) 08:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

A Barnstar for You![edit]

Graphic Designer Barnstar Hires.png Insigne Cechicum.svg The Graphic Designer's Barnstar with Czech Ensign
For creating plenty of high-quality vector municipality coat of armses with focusing on the Czech Republix. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

ThePlanetDefinition cs.svg[edit]

Dobrý den, měl na vás bych jednu prosbu. Pokusil jsem se přeložit do češtiny některé nápisy v souboru File:ThePlanetDefinition.svg, použil jsem k tomu Inkscape a u mě v počítači to vypadalo dobře, ale když jsem to nahrál na Commons, tak to dopadlo takto: File:ThePlanetDefinition cs.svg. Netušíte prosím, co je tam špatně? Díky moc, --Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Původní anglický soubor má text rešen pomocí křivek; vkládal jste nové textboxy ručně? Pokud ano, tak když nejdříve vytvoříte rámeček a potom začnete psát, Inkscape vytvoří jakýsi „FlowRoot“ element, který ale prohlížeče nepodporují. Správný postup je po výběru nástroje pro text jen kliknout, začít psát a přesunout až výsledný rámeček. Pro odstranění stačí vybrat všechny problematické textové objekty a v kartě Text nahoře použít „Převést na text“ (convert to text) a pak text buď zarovnat doleva nebo přesunout zpět ručně (rozhodí se umístění.)--TFerenczy (talk) 15:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Velmi vám děkuji za radu! --Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Mohl bych ještě jednou zneužít vaší ochoty a poprosit vás, jestli byste uměl převést obrázek File:ThePlanetDefinition3.png do svg? Také bych ho rád přeložil do češtiny, ale ten png soubor má dost malé rozlišení, a navíc je tam přímo šablona vyzývající k převodu do svg, což ovšem neumím. Zkoušel jsem nějaké online convertery, ale s mizernými výsledky. Velmi Vám děkuji. --Jan Kameníček

Hotovo. Překlad jsem vyřešil přepínatelným kódem přímo v jednom souboru, v článku se pak použije u obrázku parametr |lang=cs|. Nejsem zběhlý v astrohantýrce, takže jsem rovnou použil váš překlad z File:The Planets Definition 2 cs.svg.--TFerenczy (talk) 06:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Skvělé! Hlavně ta vychytávka s přepínatelným kódem je parádní, to jsem ještě neviděl. Díky moc! --Jan Kameníček (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


And also:

Yours sincerely, please check the deletion request page for your image(s) uploaded per PD-VietnamGov minhhuy (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Sobre la licencia de las Banderas de la Paz[edit]

Hola TFerennczy; veo que solicitó el borrado de varias imágenes de "Banderas de la Paz" por duda con sus licencias. Este es un proyecto colaborativo internacional donde todos los participantes donaron su trabajo y liberaron las licencias de uso. De hecho las fotografías en la exposición en Holanda, las tomé de Facebook ( y las edité para darles mayor claridad. De paso por Costa Rica el autor me regaló una copia de la bandera de ese país, la cual fotografíe para subirla. De antemano le agradezco su comprensión y colaboración para cumplir con lo conveniente. --Axxis10 (talk) 02:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Archeological site?[edit]

Hi. Regarding this change: some years ago I removed the code from the image to prevent robots from adding it to the list because the picture shows a house, not an archeological site so I assumed the photographer made a mistake. Is there something I missed? Are you sure the image is at the correct monument? Thanks.--Strainu (talk) 16:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Strainu: It does sound a bit odd, Thank you for your feedback! I trust your judgment in this matter, as I trusted @Acquario51's – the edit wasn't made with any knowledge of the location – I Googled the description to help me to pick a fitting category and the rowiki article came up. Hopefully Acquario51 will recall if the description was a mistake or confirm that the regular-looking house is indeed an archeological site. Until then feel free to revert my edit on rowiki.--TFerenczy (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)