User talk:Taxiarchos228/Archive2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive:
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015

(QICpromoted pictures, edit)



Contents

Parispanorama

Erster Versuch. Default vom neuesten Hugin, ohne Farbspielereien, mit leichten mauellen keypoint-Optimierungen

Hallo, Wladyslav. Vielleicht etwas spaet, aber hier habe ich mal angefangen, an deinem paris-panorama zu arbeiten. Turm zentriert, Himmel restauriert (ganz einfach mit Gimp-resynthesizer). Oh, ich sehe gerade unten links ist noch Luft. An den Farben koennte ich noch arbeiten. Aber ansonsten sieht das stitching erstmal nicht schlecht aus. Wo ich's mir gerade nochmal bei 100% im Gimp anschaue, sehe ich, dass ich bnoch vertikale guides im rechten Bildbereich setzen muss. Ok, Du hoerst in einem Jahr nochmal von mir ;-) --Dschwen (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Es ist aber auch so schon deutlich besser als mein erster Versuch. Danke soweit. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

* * * Happy New 2012 Year! * * *

-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, for you too. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Wieden - Pfarrkirche Allerheiligen2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wieden - Pfarrkirche Allerheiligen2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wieden - Pfarrkirche Allerheiligen3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wieden - Pfarrkirche Allerheiligen3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image guidelines - downsampling

Hello. There have been many inconsistencies regarding the evaluation of images in Commons, mainly on the issue of resolution and sharpness. I think we should agree upon a uniform policy, and try to reach a consensus. I started a new discussion on the matter of downsampling, if you would like to share your view. Thank you. Gidip (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Schopfheim - Alte Stadtkirche5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schopfheim - Alte Stadtkirche5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang29.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Villa Aichele1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Villa Aichele1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rheinfelden - Josefskirche - Glockenturm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Josefskirche - Glockenturm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Rathaus Haagen3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Rathaus Haagen3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Kingston - ON - Town hall1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kingston City Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Kingston - ON - St. George's Cathedral1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. George's Cathedral (Kingston) (exterior) in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, North America, Earth, solar system, universe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Toronto - ON - Royal York Hotel.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal York Hotel, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Josefskirche - Langhaus1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Josefskirche - Langhaus1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Schloss Linderhof 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Linderhof 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schloss Linderhof 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Linderhof 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schloss Linderhof4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Linderhof4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Villa Rosenfels2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Villa Rosenfels2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach-Haagen - Alte Halle1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Alte Halle1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Villa Aichele4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Villa Aichele4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach-Haagen - Brunnen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Brunnen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wyhlen - Georgskirche2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wyhlen - Georgskirche2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Duale Hochschule BW5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Duale Hochschule BW5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Hans-Thoma-Gymnasium3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Hans-Thoma-Gymnasium3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Churches and VIs

Hi Wlady,

You may want to have a look at Commons talk:Valued image scope.

Best wishes, --Slaunger (talk) 20:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach-Haagen - Alte Halle2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Alte Halle2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-St. Peter - Ostansicht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-St. Peter - Ostansicht.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Not that I like Wikiprojects anymore...

Kitten in a helmet.jpg

but Loerrach rocks... Alles liebe für Dich Wlady. Ich könnte mich echt kaputtlachen. Da schafft ein unbeschränkt gesperrter Fotograf mehr ran als manch ein "Qualitätsautor" und Admin. Meinen herzlichen Dank für deine Leistung und die besten Grüße auch an deine Frau für Geduld und Unterstützung.

Abena (talk) 16:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Danke Dir, verspätete Glückwünsche zum Nachwuchs. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Ui, ja vielen Dank auch dafür :-) Ist schon ein echtes Fossa, der Kleine ...--Abena (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Entsperrung

Hallo Wlady, ich hatte gestern nacht mal bei Tsor, der dich vor fast zwei Jahren gesperrt hat, angefragt, welche Optionen er sieht, die Sperre deines Hauptaccounts in de wieder aufzuheben. Die aktuelle Situation ist ... doof. Allerdings bin ich auch nicht sicher, ob du daran etwas ändern möchtest. Vielleicht gibst du dazu mal einen comment? Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Lieber Achim,
ich kann Dir sehr gerne meinen Standpunkt dazu erläutern:
1. Tsor ist für die Entsperrung sicherlich der falsche Ansprechpartner. Er hätte sich zwar weigern können, die Sperre durchzuführen. Aber hätte er es getan, hätte traditionsgemäß ein anderer diese Sperre durchgeführt. Als ausführendes Organ, fühlte er sich in der Pflicht und hat die CU-Entscheidung nicht hinterfragt. Das ist Wikipedia-Tradition.
2. Aber wenn Dir wirklich daran gelegen ist denn Fall neu aufzurollen dann kann ich Dir gerne sagen, bei wem Du an der richtigen Adresse bist: BDK. Ihre Entscheidung war es schließlich, den CU überhaupt durchzuführen, obwohl gar keine relevante Sachlage vorlag. Weder habe ich, wie nach wie vor einige Spacken gerne behaupten, Abstimmungen mit mehreren Benutzeraccounts gefälscht (es ging um die Abstimmungen bei KEB) noch habe ich weitere Manipulationen vorgenommen. Besagter Account im Sperrverfahren war meine Frau. Daher auch die Übereinstimmung. Aber selbst wenn man sich auf den Standpunkt stellt, ich sei es selbst gewesen findet man keine Manipulationen gleich welcher Art.
Übrigens ganz interessant in diesem Zusammenhang ist, wie in der Wikipedia mit zweierlei Maß gemessen wird. Als Berlin-Jurist damals tatsächlich eindeutig dem SP-Missbrauch überführt wurde, gab er "nur" seine Adminrechte ab, eine indefinite Sperre: Fehlanzeige. Es ist also nicht einmal eindeutig geregelt, dass so eine Verstoß überhaupt mit einer derartigen Sperre geahndet wird. Aber wie gesagt: ich stehe nach wie vor dazu: es gab keinen Missbrauch durch irgendwelche Zweitaccount. Der wurde ebenso konstruiert wie sich BDK von einer Welle von Stimmungen hat einspannen lassen. Auch interessantes Detail: den damaligen CU-Antrag stellte eine der zahlreichen Diskussions- und Pöbelsocken. Diese wurde zwar gesperrt, aber der CU-Antrag wurde einfach mal ausgeführt weil man bereits ahnte, hier könnte eine Übereinstimmung herauskommen. Ob diese dann tatsächlich gerechtfertigt war und ein Missbrauch vorlag fragt hinterher keiner mehr nach; im Normalfall. Eine Mail mit dezidierten Fragen hat BDK übrigens nie beantwortet. Sie hat das in ihrer Selbstherrlichkeit ebenso wenig nötig wie sich für ihr Treiben bei CU zu rechtfertigen. Aufgrund ihrer ununterbrochenen und jahrelangen Tätigkeit bei CU genießt sie "höchstes Vertrauen" und wurde ja auch erst kürzlich wieder in diesem Amt bestätigt. Diese Person ist hochgradig untauglich für den Job und die Wikipedia tut sich mit ihr ebenso wenig einen Gefallen wie sie auch jemals bereit wäre zuzugeben, dass sie aus reinem Opportunismus mal so eben die CU-Richtlinien außer Kraft gesetzt hat, eine Abfrage nur in begründeten Missbrauchsfällen durchzuführen um einen Schaden oder dauerhafte Störungen von der Wikipedia abzuwenden.
3. Die Gemeinschaft der Wikipedia muss sich gut überlegen, welchen Figuren sie welche Ämter verleiht und viel kritischer nachprüfen, ob die jeweilige Person das Amt wirklich im vorgesehenen Sinne ausführt. Zu oft werden sehr oberflächliche Maßstäbe angesetzt ("hat er sich auch nie im Ton vergriffen", "war er immer zu allen hübsch freundlich"). Aber selten sieht man Benutzer ernsthaft fragen "hat er auch seinen Job einfach gut getan". Mit derartigen CU-Entscheidungen wie in 2. beschrieben tut sich die Wikipedia keinen Gefallen. Nutznießer sind einige wenige, die sich gegen mich verschworen haben und glaubten, mich so los werden zu können. Interessanterweise sind das zumeist Personen gewesen, die einen verschwindend geringen Teil zum Gelingen der WP beigetragen haben. Sicher wäre die Wiederinkraftsetzung des Accounts Taxiarchos228 angemessen; man würde einen Fehler wieder gut machen. Nichtsdestotrotz werde ich mich in keine Diskussionen einschalten, die das Thema betrifft. Dafür ist mir meine Zeit zu schade geworden. Es ist sehr angenehm mit mehreren Accounts zu arbeiten, manchmal als IP. Es kursieren bereits diverse Gerüchte, mit welchen Accounts ich unterwegs bin. Ich werde mich dazu nicht äußern, nicht weil ich was zu verbergen hätten sondern schlicht weil ich es nicht muss. Es ist meine Angelegenheit und wird es auch bleiben. Darüber hinaus bin ich mit Accounts unterwegs, die noch nie unter Verdacht standen. Ich kann nun auch sehr gut selbst steuern wie dicht man mir auf die Spur kommt oder auch nicht. Es hat den unschlagbaren Vorteil: ich kann in Ruhe und trotzdem in Kollaboration mit anderen Benutzern meine Artikel- und Bilderarbeit erledigen. Interessanterweise ohne irgendwelche Sperren weil meine viel zu breit gefächerten Interessen, die sich zudem auch noch weiter entwickeln nicht mehr ganz so nachvollziehbar sind. Mit entsprechender Verzögerung kriegt man dann schon mit welche Artikel auf meinem Mist beruhen. Aber bevor der Account von irgendwelchen Diskussionstrollen belagert wird, wird er in Frührente geschickt und längst hat ein anderer seine Arbeit begonnen. Die Wikipedia will das so. Es ist genau so wie Fossa das in seinem Vortrag in Lüneburg darstellte: Wikipedia ist ein Spiel.
Fazit: gerade mit der Arbeit der letzten beiden Jahre habe ich denke ich ziemlich klar gezeigt: mir liegt die Entwicklung der Wikipedia mit ihren Idealen am Herzen, ich habe Spaß am Schreiben und Fotografieren und mich weiter entwickelt. Ich werde dem Projekt treu bleiben. Aber ich werde mich nicht mit Pöblern auseinander setzen und entweder weiß Wikipedia das zu bewerten und kann adäquat darauf reagieren oder sie lässt es. Es gibt immer Wege und Mittel.
Viele Grüße und nochmal vielen Dank für deinen Einsatz. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Grüttpark - Winter3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grüttpark - Winter3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grüttpark - Winter2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grüttpark - Winter2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grüttpark - Winter1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grüttpark - Winter1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tüllingen - Ottilienkirche4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tüllingen - Ottilienkirche4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Herten - St. Urban - Langhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herten - St. Urban - Langhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kirchen im Landkreis Lörrach

... für anhaltende exzellente Bild- und Textarbeit, vor allem in den Bereichen Lörrach und Kanada.

Hallo Wlady,
danke für die Kuriernachricht und natürlich ncoh deutlich größeres DANKE für dieses Projekt und deine investierte Arbeit in Bild und Text. Ich denke, das sollte einen Platz in [1] finden und ich bin optimistisch, dass es auch einige Nachahmer geben wird. Ich hoffe, weiterhin von dir zu lesen - trotz bekannter Hürden.

In Anerkennung dieser Leistung habe ich dich in meinen privaten Walk of Fame aufgenommen. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Klasse, hast du es endlich geschafft :-) Daraus ließe sich doch prima ein Buch generieren? Ich habe mir grad eins über die Denkmale von Wolfsburg besorgt, das ist mein Vorhaben für 2012. In WOB weiß ich, daß ich bei dem Vorhaben alleine bin, selbst die Denkmalbehörde weiß nicht viel. --Ralf Roleček 10:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Oh, das ist aber eine nette Geste. Vielen Dank. Nicht unerwähnt darf bleiben, dass meine Frau sich hierbei tapfer geschlagen hat, die meinen Kirchentrip wacker getragen und sogar unterstützt hat. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Habe es ja im Kurier schon geschrieben - hier nochmal: Hut ab! Ich weiß auch, was du hier "durchgemacht" hast, arbeite ich doch selbst an mehreren solcher Komplettprojekte. Ich gehe mal davon aus, daß es mehr als 100 Kirchen sind? Dann wäre ein Eintrag hier absolut gerechtfertigt. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
122 Kirchen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Habe es mal eingetragen - und auch für die Zedler-Medaille vorgeschlagen. Ich liebe derartige Projekte einfach. Marcus Cyron (talk) 02:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Wow. Auch von mir herzlichen Glückwunsch! --JosFritz (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

+1. LG, --Holder (talk) 07:39, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Goetheanum im Winter von Süden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Süden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Südwesten.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Haagen - Kreisverkehr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Kreisverkehr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Steinen - Vogelpark2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinen - Vogelpark2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lizenzänderung

Hallo Wlady, mal eine Frage, die du mir bestimmt schnell beantworten kannst. Ist es möglich nachträglich Lizenzen von seinen eigenen Bildern zu ändern, auch wenn sie schon verwendet werden. Ich finde immer mehr Fotos von mir im WWW ohne entsprechnde Namensnennung und Lizenzhinweise. Ich würde gerne alle meine Bilder unter die

Licence Art Libre Copyleft: This work of art is free; you can redistribute it and/or modify it according to terms of the Free Art License. You will find a specimen of this license on the Copyleft Attitude site as well as on other sites.

Lizenz stellen. Kannst du mir kurz was darüber sagen? --Ritchyblack (talk) 11:43, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Ritchyblack,
Da hast Du dir ja den richtigen für diese Frage ausgesucht. Mein Rechtsanwalt sagt ganz klar: ja. Die Hobby-Juristen und Freizeit-Admins hier auf Commons sagen nein; wahrscheinlich nur damit sie auch mal was entscheiden wollen und nicht nur dösige Löschanträge abarbeiten. Ich habe diesbezüglich hier letztes Jahr ein ziemliches Aufhebens gemacht. Man änderte alle von mir auf FAL geänderten Lizenzen wieder zurück auf die ursprüngliche und droht mit Sperrung des Accounts sollte man diese Regel nicht befolgen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Erst mal danke für deine schnelle Antwort, hört sich ja "spannend" an. Ich denke ich werde schon mal alle ändern die keine Dateiverwendung haben, mal sehen was geschied. Schönes WE. --Ritchyblack (talk) 12:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Gempenturm1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gempenturm1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heizhaus und Glashaus am Goetheanum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heizhaus und Glashaus am Goetheanum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grüttpark - Winter5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grüttpark - Winter5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arlesheim - Burg Birseck2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arlesheim - Burg Birseck2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Südwesten2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Südwesten2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Osten4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Osten4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Images

Hello Taxiarchos228! I see that not only have you nominated lots of Quality Images, but you also often comment (positive, negative, or neutrally). I have only proposed two of my pictures (1 and 2) for promotion, but have never received any comment of any sort. I would like to know what I should do to improve matters? Is it the resolution? Image size? Subject? I must admit that I do now regret submitting the first image, as I no longer think it good enough for accolades, but I would still welcome feedback. Best regards, Mr.choppers (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mr.choppers,
my personal opinion is that both pictures are really good and worth to be chosen as quality image. If this pictures where archived without any comment than start a new candidature. Because there are many pictures in QIC the perception is different and some pictures will be badly misremembered. So good look for next time. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Wyhlen - Georgskirche1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Grenzach-Wyhlen, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Pauluskirche1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Pauluskirche1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Speisehaus1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speisehaus1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Osten2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Osten2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Basel - Bruderholz Dinosaurier5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Bruderholz Dinosaurier5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion

Grüttpark - Winter3.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Grüttpark - Winter3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grüttpark - Winter3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Gempenturm2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gempenturm2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Südwesten3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Südwesten3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Bruderholz Dinosaurier3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Bruderholz Dinosaurier3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Gempenturm3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gempenturm3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Bruderholz Dinosaurier1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Bruderholz Dinosaurier1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Arlesheim - Eremitage4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arlesheim - Eremitage4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Osten6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Osten6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skulptur am Goetheanum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skulptur am Goetheanum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Arlesheim - Eremitage3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arlesheim - Eremitage3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gempen Tower

Schwieriges Motiv: ich erlebe bei sowas immer wieder CA an den Kanten und weiß nicht so recht, wie ich dem begegnen soll. --Ralf Roleček 21:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Ich dachte immer, für CA ist in erster Linie die verwendete Linse verantwort. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Weiß ich nicht. Konnte da noch keine Gesetzmäßigkeit entdecken. --Ralf Roleček 10:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Wohl nur ein sehr gutes Festbrennweitenobjektiv wird bei sehr starken hell-dunkel Kontrasten kaum oder gar keine CA zeigen. Ich führe immer ein Beispiel auf: einmal Baumzweige gegen einen hellen bedekten Himmel knipsen. Damit kann man die Objektive gut austesten. Mit meiner Kamera und mit all meinen Objektiven sehe ich da immer CA. Eine einzige Ausnahme habe ich jedoch das Zeiss Makro-Planar T*2/100mm ZE. Ansonsten bleibt nur eines übrig: die CA muß herausgerechnet werden. Canon macht es mit DPP bei ihren eigenen Objektiven sehr gut, ohne das man noch etwas von der CA zu sehen bekommt. Ich weiß nicht ab es bei Nikon ähnliches gibt. Ich denke aber schon. Vielleicht könnt Ihr mir ja die Frage beantworten!? Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Habe keine Ahnung, ob und wo Nikon Software CA herausrechnet. Mir persönlich sind CA in meinem Bildern nie störend aufgefallen und die wurden bisher auch praktisch nie von anderen bemängelt. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Bei diesem Bild ist es ganz schlimm und ich bin hilflos, wie ich sowas beseitigen könnte. --Ralf Roleček 11:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Basel - Pauluskirche1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pauluskirche (Basel), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dornach - Goetheanum - Westtreppenhaus5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornach - Goetheanum - Westtreppenhaus5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Osten5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Osten5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grüttpark - Winter4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grüttpark - Winter4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bitte um Drüberschauen

Hallo Taxiarchos,

da du dich mit diesen Dingen imho besser auskennst: Könntest du dir vielleicht einmal kurz anschauen, ob ich hier alles richtig angegeben habe? Bin mir nicht ganz sicher, da es sich dabei nicht um das Gemälde handelt (das wäre in Farbe), sondern um eine- nun eben, wie nennt man es dann? :) Dank und Gruß,----SEM (talk) 00:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi SEM, falsch war nichts eingetragen. Ich habe noch den Künstertag und die -kategorie ergänzt. Ansonsten ist alles prima. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Besten Dank!--SEM (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niagara Falls - ON - Niagarafälle3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arlesheim - Eremitage2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arlesheim - Eremitage2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dornach - Goetheanum - Detail7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornach - Goetheanum - Detail7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wasserturm Bruderholz, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rheinfelden - Neues Wasserkraftwerk - Gesamtansicht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Neues Wasserkraftwerk - Gesamtansicht.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Pauluskirche5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Pauluskirche5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goetheanum im Winter von Osten3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goetheanum im Winter von Osten3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Speisehaus2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speisehaus2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Basel - Pauluskirche2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Pauluskirche2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion

Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz2.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Schopfheim - Wiesenbrücke1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schopfheim - Wiesenbrücke1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Pauluskirche6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Pauluskirche6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Rathaus8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Rathaus8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Hauptbahnhof3 - Fahrradparkhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Hauptbahnhof3 - Fahrradparkhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Rheinfelden - Neues Wasserkraftwerk - Gesamtansicht.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New hydroelectric power plant in Rheinfelden, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Rathaus7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Rathaus7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schopfheim - Wiesenbrücke3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schopfheim - Wiesenbrücke3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Hauptbahnhof4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Hauptbahnhof4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach-Haagen - Evangelisches Gemeindehaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Evangelisches Gemeindehaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Pauluskirche4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Pauluskirche4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossbergschule3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Restaurant (ehemaliges Turmcafe).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Restaurant (ehemaliges Turmcafe).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Granitskulptur Triade2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Granitskulptur Triade2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Hauptbahnhof2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Hauptbahnhof2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Granitskulptur Triade1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Granitskulptur Triade1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kulm - Skiflugschanze1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kulm - Skiflugschanze1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

User:Taxiarchos228/HDR

Hallo. Wäre das vielleicht was für eine Präsentation am Fotoworkshop in Nürnberg? --Leyo 13:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Habe ich schon einige male gehalten, aber wenn es allgemein gewünscht wird, mache ich es. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Oh, das wusste ich nicht. Wie viele andere interessiert wären, kann ich nicht sagen. Ev. haben etliche der Teilnehmer deine Präsentation bei früheren Fotoworkshops gesehen? Je nachdem könnte man das Thema hier vorschlagen und schauen, ob es auch diesmal auf Interesse stösst. --Leyo 21:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Rathaus9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Rathaus9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossberghalle2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Schlossberghalle2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Kulm - Skiflugschanze2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skiflugschanze Kulm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hallstatt - Gesamtansicht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallstatt - Gesamtansicht.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Speisehaus3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speisehaus3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Eiffelturm

Habe die von Dir gewünschten Bilder hochgeladen. Grüße--Muesse (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Danke Dir. Das ein oder andere wird garantiert eine tolle Bereicherung für den angestrebten neuen Artikel sein. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Hallo wladyslaw
I am for thé moment in Wien for short holidays, with hard difficulties for connecting with Internet. When I'll back in Paris, I'll try to anwer your question. Funny: I thought of you when flying over Lörrach between Paris and Wien !--Jebulon (talk) 08:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Fine, have nice days in Vienna. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Here is the answer and the first option was good : 41 tv, and 32 radios. ("TDF" means "Télédiffusion de France", and is the national official broadcasting (technically speaking) institution). I hope it will help you. Cheers (Vienna was nice and interesting, thanks).--Jebulon (talk) 00:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
It is partially helpful. Sadly the programs are only listed by their logo and not by their name. The list on the bottom of the 1st page is only facing the TV programs, but where are the radio programs? It would be also very helpful to know at least all the frequencies and effective radiated power given by kW. The flayer is nice but there are not so much technical details for the programs itself. I am sure that this information had to be public. Sadly my french is so bad that I am not able to search myself. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
ok I understand. Your french is bad, my english and german too, and I'm not a specialist (in fact, I don't know anything about), but I'll try to continue to search and give you a more professional answer asap. Cheers.--Jebulon (talk) 12:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I found this list [2]. Do you know which of theme are radio and wich are TV progarmms? --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Paris - Eiffelturm - Aufzug6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Eiffelturm - Aufzug6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Rathaus6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Rathaus6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hinweisschilder am Goetheanum2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinweisschilder am Goetheanum2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Paris - Eiffelturm15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Eiffelturm15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Thal - Sankt Jakob1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thal - Sankt Jakob1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Blick auf Thal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick auf Thal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thal - Sankt Jakob2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thal - Sankt Jakob2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Salzburg - Panorama (nachts)2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg - Panorama (nachts)2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Thal - Sankt Jakob3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thal - Sankt Jakob3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Hauptfriedhof7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Hauptfriedhof7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Salzburg - Panorama (nachts).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg - Panorama (nachts).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Hallstatt - Gesamtansicht.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hallstatt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Tumringen1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - S-Bahn-Haltestelle Schwarzwaldstraße.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - S-Bahn-Haltestelle Schwarzwaldstraße.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Renault Estafette1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renault Estafette1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Röttelnweiler - Hinweisschild Röttler Kirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Röttelnweiler - Hinweisschild Röttler Kirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thal - Ruine Unterthal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thal - Ruine Unterthal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Röttelnweiler1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Röttelnweiler1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Röttelnweiler5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Röttelnweiler5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Röttelnweiler4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Röttelnweiler4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Renault Estafette2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renault Estafette2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen - Brunnen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Brunnen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kulm - Skiflugschanze4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kulm - Skiflugschanze4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arlesheim - Domkirche3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arlesheim - Domkirche3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel - Wasserturm Bruderholz3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Frage

File:Industry park Höchst - waste-to-energy plant - Industriepark Höchst - Müllverbrennungsanlage - 04.jpg
Gerne kannst Du dich an der HDR-Erstellung versuchen. Wenn es besser wird, wüsste ich aber gerne, wie Du es gemacht hast :-). Ich habe 10-11 nef-Dateien mit jeweils ca. 17MB, die ich Dir zusenden kann (Lichtwert-Unterschied bei den überbelichteten Aufnahmen 2, bei den unterbelichteten 1). Ich kann die Dateien bei Bedarf auch vorher umwandeln (DNG, TIFF). Mein HDR ist mit Photoshop CS5 entstanden. Mit Picturenaut war das Ergebnis schlechter. Auf welchem Weg möchtest Du die Dateien haben ? -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Grüttpark2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Grüttpark2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Grüttpark1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Grüttpark1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Rathaus Haagen2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Rathaus Haagen2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Quality Image Promotion

Urban wildlife - squirrel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urban wildlife - squirrel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Toronto - ON - King's Landing Condominium.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto - ON - King's Landing Condominium.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arlesheim - Domkirche4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arlesheim - Domkirche4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Truck with trailer in Toronto.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Truck with trailer in Toronto.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Ötlingen - Dorfstraße.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ötlingen - Dorfstraße.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang30.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Schloss Linderhof1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Linderhof1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dornach - Goetheanum2a small.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornach - Goetheanum2a small.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Tumringen7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Tumringen - Schule2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Schule2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen - Schule1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Schule1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Lörrach - Tumringen - Schule2.jpg

IMHO this image would look better in vertical style, with the full door and without left window. Maybe you may add such a photo? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Grüttpark3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Grüttpark3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris - Eiffelturm - Büste Gustave Eiffels2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Eiffelturm - Büste Gustave Eiffels2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Grüttpark4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Grüttpark4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hauingen - Festhalle1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauingen - Festhalle1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hauingen - Metzgerei.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauingen - Metzgerei.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hauingen - Astrid-Lindgren-Schule2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauingen - Astrid-Lindgren-Schule2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach-Brombach - Reiss Mühle1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Reiss Mühle1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hauingen - Festhalle2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauingen - Festhalle2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Quality images of Landkreis Reutlingen

Hallo Taxiarchos, ich weiß nicht was in der o.g. Kategorie passiert ist, aber das sind bis auf eines alles Bilder aus dem Landkreis Ludwigsburg. Vielleicht magst du es ja korrigieren? Viele Grüße --Pilettes (talk) 08:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Pilettes, aufgrund der Menge an Qualitätsbildern in Baden-Württemberg habe ich zur feineren Kategorisiereung entsprechende Landkreis-Kategorien angelegt. Dabei sind diese Bilder von mir wohl falsch einsortiert worden. Ist nun korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis und Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok, super :-) --Pilettes (talk) 06:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Kriterien Qualitätsbilder

Hallo Wladyslaw!

Um nicht den Rahmen der Bewertungsseite zusprengen, möchte ich die Diskussion über die fogenden Bilder gerne hier fortführen. Da unsere Meinungen scheinbar erhelich auseinandergehen möchte ich Dir kurz erklären, warum ich diese nicht für QI-geeignet halte:

Mein ehemaliger Photo-Prof hat für Aufnahmen wie diese das Wort "Versicherungsphotographie" geprägt: Sie zeigen den Gegenstand des Interesses, mehr aber auch nicht. Damit konnte man schon im ersten Semester Photographie keinen Blumentopf mehr gewinnen ;)

Es ist mir bewusst, dass auch solche Bilder ihre Daseinsbereichtigung in der Wikipedia-Welt haben. Mache Gegenstände lassen sich eben nicht anders photographieren, manchmal steht eben alles mögliche im Weg, das Licht ist bescheiden und man hat keine Zeit auf besseres zu warten. Da macht auch der beste Photograph mal ein mäßiges Bild (eines, dass eben kein Qualitätsbild ist).

Technische Qualität ist eben nicht gleichbedeutend mit photographischer! Ein sauberes, scharfes und hochauflösendes Photo ist nicht automatisch ein gutes Photo (sowas kann irgendwann jeder Roboter erfüllen )! Ein gutes Bild zeichnet sich zudem durch seine ästhetische Qualität aus! Da Du ja auch schon viele tolle Bilder hier eingestellt hast, ist Dir dieser Unterschied sicher bewusst?!

Umgekehrt bedeutet das aber, dass kompositorische und ästhetische Mängel nicht erst bei den hervoragenden Bildern, sondern auch bei den Qualitätsbildern ein Ausschlusskriterium sind. Nicht umsonst steht in Kriterien für Qualitätsbilder unter »Bildaufbau und Beleuchtung« »Die Anordnung des Hauptgegenstandes sollte zum Inhalt des Bildes beitragen. Der Vordergrund und Hintergrund des Bildes sollte nicht ablenken.« und auch die Images guidelines sind da relativ eindeutig!

Stellst Du eigentlich (fast) jedes Bild, das Du hochlädst automatisch als Kandidat bei den Qualitätsbildern ein? In der letzten Woche zähle ich dort jedenfalls 16 Neueinträge von Dir (darunter etliche bei denen ich selbst niemals auf diese Idee gekommen wäre). Falls ja würde ich Dich bitten dieses Vorgehen zu überdenken! QI ist eine Auszeichnung und es widerspricht schlich tdem Sinn einer Auszeichnung, wenn sie für alles vergeben würde, was die Mindestanforderungen erfüllt. Die Kandiatenlisten mit bestenfalls durchschnittlichen Bildern zu fluten, verwässert IMHO die Qualitätskriterien und schadet so letztlich der Qualität des gesamten Projekts --Martin Kraft (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Du scheinst Commons und QI falsch zu interpretieren. Wir machen hier nicht primär Kunst sondern Dokumetationsfotografie. --Ralf Roleček 19:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Martin, deine Ausführungen passen eher zu den Exzellenten Bildern auf Commons. Die Anforderungen dort unterscheiden sich nämlich von denen bei Qualitätsbildern in erster Linie dadurch, dass es i.d.R. nicht ausreicht, dass das Bild von solider technischer Qualität ist, sondern dass es auch gewissen ästhetischen Ansprüchen genügen soll (was manchmal freilich durch einen hohen enzyklopädischen Wert, Einzigartigkeit / Nicht-Wiederholbarkeit des Motivs u.ä., ganz oder teilweise ausgeglichen werden kann). Was meinst du sonst, warum es sich unter den neuen FP's so viele Makrobilder von Schmetterlingen, Insekten, Blumen etc. befinden, eher selten jedoch von Alltagsmotiven oder auch von Personen? Außerdem ack Ralf. - A.Savin 20:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Ich spreche hier nicht über Kunst (für die gelten nämlich wieder ganz andere Regeln: nämlich keine ;)) sondern über den Grundregeln der Bildgestaltung, die jeder Gebrauchs- und Pressephotograph in seiner Ausbildung lernt und die im übrigen auch in den Image guidelines und in den Kriterien für Qualitätsbilder aufgeführt sind. Oder wie sonst soll man den folgenden Abschnitt interpretieren?
»Die Anordnung des Hauptgegenstandes sollte zum Inhalt des Bildes beitragen. Der Vordergrund und Hintergrund des Bildes sollte nicht ablenken.«
@A.Savin & Ralf Rolecek Seid ihr tatsächlich der Meinung, dass die oben aufgeführten Bilder Qualitätsbilder sind? --Martin Kraft (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Ja. --Ralf Roleček 20:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Dann versteh ich Deine Vorstellung von BildQualität nicht. Bei der Bewertung der QI-Kandidaten haben andere Gott sei Dank einen etwas höheren Anspruch. Fragt sich nur wie lange der durchzuhalten ist, wenn diese Liste permanent mit Unmengen solcher Bilder geflutet wird. --Martin Kraft (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Die Antworten auf Deine Fragen wurden bereits von Ralf und A.Savin gegeben. Deine Umdeutung der Kriterien von QI zeugt lediglich davon, dass Du das Konzept, was dahinter steht, nicht verstanden hast. Dafür hast Du Bilder kandidieren lassen, die im Gegenzug tatsächlich den Anforderungen der QIC nicht gewachsen sind. In diesem Fall würde ich mich einfach nochmal mit den Regeln vertraut machen. Mehr gibt es hier nicht zu sagen. Im übrigen werde ich das Gefühl nicht los, dass Du deine wenigen Kommentare, die du erst in den letzten Tagen bei QIC begonnen hast, auffällig auf Bilder von mir konzentrierst. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Es fällt mir schwer zu erkennen, wo ich hier etwas umdeuten soll? Ich halte mich mit meiner Bewertung lediglich an die schriftlich niedergelegten Kriterien (und habe dabei einmal ein formales Kriterium übersehen). Bisher hat mir jedoch niemand erklären können, wie sich die beiden Bilder und Eure Argumente mit diesem Qualitäts-Kriterium vertragen:»Die Anordnung des Hauptgegenstandes sollte zum Inhalt des Bildes beitragen. Der Vordergrund und Hintergrund des Bildes sollte nicht ablenken.«'
Ja, ich bin hier erst seit kurzem aktiv. Dass ich (im übrigen genau zweimal) Bilder von Dir negativ bewertet habe, war reiner Zufall, nur den Bilder selbst geschuldet und ist mir ehrlichgesagt erst aufgefallen, als Du beide Male dasselbe, die oben genannten Kriterien leugnende Gegenargument vorgebracht hast.
Und sei mal ehrlich: Denkst Du wirklich, dass es im Sinne der Auszeichnung »Qualitätsbild« ist, wenn dort irgendwer automatisch alle (oder den Großteil) seine(r) neu eingestellen Bilder kandidieren lässt? --Martin Kraft (talk) 22:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Lieber Martin. Vielleicht solltest Du erst ein wenig Erfahrung sammeln bevor Du hier den großen Maxe heraushängen lässt. Leider kommt Deine Anfrage bei mir in einer Mischung aus vorwitzig-unverschämter Unterstellung (Die Kandiatenlisten mit bestenfalls durchschnittlichen Bildern zu fluten, verwässert IMHO die Qualitätskriterien und schadet so letztlich der Qualität des gesamten Projekts.), moralisierendem Appell mit entrüsteter Fassungslosigkeit (Stellst Du eigentlich (fast) jedes Bild, das Du hochlädst automatisch als Kandidat bei den Qualitätsbildern ein?) und fadenscheiniger Schmeichelei (Da Du ja auch schon viele tolle Bilder hier eingestellt hast ...) an. Insofern ist meine Lust ziemlich gering, mit Dir überhaupt zu kommunizieren. Bitte akzeptiere, dass wir hier eine grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Auffassung vertreten. In beiden Fällen lenkt mich der Hintergrund vom Hauptmotiv des Bildes nicht ab. Das ist und bleibt auch eine subjektive Auffassung und es ist nicht wirklich nötig den Untergang des Abendlandes zu predigen (schadet so letztlich der Qualität des gesamten Projekts). Im Gegenzug kann ich nämlich Deine Beurteilungen ebenfalls nicht teilen und muss auch damit leben, dass Du Maßstäbe, die Du bei mir ansetzt bei anderen Bildern offenbar nicht verfolgst. Es gehört zum gegenseitigen Respekt, solche sagen wir mal Merkwürdigkeiten hinzunehmen. Bitte respektiere ebenfalls, dass ich keinen weiteren Dialog mit Dir führen möchte, weil die Sinnlosigkeit leider durch deine mir äußerst unangenehme Art vorhersehbar ist. Und ja: ich verfolge tatsächlich das Ziel, dass ein möglichst großer Prozentsatz meiner Bilder "Qualitätsbilder" sind. Etwas verwerfliches kann ich daran aber nicht erkennen. So wenig wie zwar Masse automatisch Klasse bedeutet, so wenig gibt gilt die Umkehrung, dass viel Masse zwangsläufig miese Klasse ist. --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Danke, das mit der "äußerst ungenehmen Art" gebe ich gerne zurück. Eigentlich wollte ich Dich nur freundlich darauf hinweisen, warum ich (und andere) der Meinung sind, dass solche Bilder aus genannten Gründen keine Qualitätsbilder sind, und sie in ihrer Masse dieser Auszeichnung schaden. Statt auf diese Argumente einzugehen, hast Du es geschafft auf keine einzige meiner (nicht rethorisch gemeinten) Fragen zu anworten und versuchst stattdessen mich vom hohen Ross herab als Frischling zu diskreditieren.
Nun ja, ich hätte gewarnt sein können, dass es nicht sonderlich fruchtbar ist, mit Dir zu diskutieren.
Ich werde deshalb darauf verzichten, Dir jetzt zu erklären, dass dieses Verhalten nicht wirklich souverän wirkt und es ein Fehler ist, neuen Nutzern Inkompetenz zu unterstellen, und stattdessen in Zukunft einen Bogen um weitere Diskussionen mit Dir machen.
Gut finde ich Dein QI-Gespamme trotzdem nicht --Martin Kraft (talk)
Ich glaube wirklich nicht, dass jemand der hier pampig aufschlägt, in Ermangelung an sachlichen Argumenten ins persönliche driftet, dazu noch Regeln falsch versteht wie Dir mittlerweile drei Personen mitteilen (Dschwen ist übrigens einer der Initiatoren der QI) die richtige Person ist, mir einen Mangel an Souveränität zu unterstellen und mir irgendetwas erklären sollte. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Martin, wenn Du denkst, dass QI primaer eine "Auszeichnung" ist, dann bist du leide schief gewickelt. Dein Kommentar "und es widerspricht schlicht dem Sinn einer Auszeichnung, wenn sie für alles vergeben würde, was die Mindestanforderungen erfüllt" laesst mir die Fussnaegel hochrollen. Es ist genau das Ziel von QIC alles mit dem Bapperl zu versehen, was die Mindestanforderungen erfüllt! QI soll eben keine Trophaehe sein mit der man seinen digitalen Penis verlaengern kan, sondern ein Service fuer die Nutzer. Wir versuchen eine moeglichst Umfangreiche Untermenge der Commonsbilder zu klassifizieren, und einen moeglichst grossen Pool an Bildern, die den Mindestanforderungen entsprechen zusammenzustellen. Die Mentalitaet QI als Pokal zu betrachten fuehrt genau zu diesen laechelichen neidbeladenen Diskussionen und vergiftet die Arbeitsatmosphaere. Bitte lass das!!! --Dschwen (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Wenn QI nichts mehr mit photographischer 'Qualität' zu tun hat, kann man sich diese 'Auszeichnung' (oder wie auch immer Du das nennen willst) auch schenken?!
Worauf bitte soll ich eigentlich neidisch sein? Auf die beiden Bilder sicher nicht und bei QI werden sie z.Z. auch mehrheitlich abgelehnt...
Ich hatte diese Diskussion hier nur eröffnet, um Taxiarchos228 freundlich darauf hinzuweisen, dass es IMHO nicht sinnvoll ist solche Bilder als QI-Kandidaten einzustellen und dann bis auf die Zähne zu verteidigen. Und bis jetzt hat mir hier niemand erklären können, ob und warum entweder das schon mehrfach zitierte Kriterium falsch ist, oder aber die Bilder diesem Kriterium entsprechen?!
Das war jetzt aber wirklich mein letzter Beitrag zum Thema ;) --Martin Kraft (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Gut, denn solche rhetorischen Winkelzuege wie Wenn QI nichts mehr mit photographischer 'Qualität' zu tun hat, kann man sich diese 'Auszeichnung' (oder wie auch immer Du das nennen willst) auch schenken?! sind einfach nur ermuedend, unproduktiv und ueberfluessig. Qualitaet ist definiert als den Mindestanforderungen entsprechend. Was ist denn daran so schwer zu verstehen?! --Dschwen (talk) 23:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach-Brombach - Germanuskirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Germanuskirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hauingen - St. Nikolaus4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauingen - St. Nikolaus4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris - Eiffelturm17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Eiffelturm17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris - Eiffelturm14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Eiffelturm14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Brombach - Scheurerbrunnen1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Scheurerbrunnen1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FPC and AN/U

I would just like to make it clear to you here, it is not acceptable to claim people are revenge-voting against you simply because they had some disagreement with you some months back. I do not believe this is the first time this has been brought up, so please, stop it, stop it now. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Please look well! I never do this. In those cases I expressed the assumption of a revenge-voting the disagreement was either in the same day or just a few days back. Your unilateral belittlement just shows that you are overstrained to judge in this case. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Lörrach - Tumringen3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weiblicher Akt2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weiblicher Akt2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

ARD Karte

Hallo Taxiarchos228, ich habe gesehen, dass du eine Komromissversion ARD Karte hochgeladen hast. Ich habe das revertiert, da wir beschlossen haben, unsere Kompromissversionen auf folgender Seite: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:ARD_Karte.svg vorzustellen und danach abzustimmen, welche am besten ist und welche dann auch verwendet wird. Mach das bitte, da mir deine Version sehr gefällt. Trotzdem vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit. Liebe Grüße,--Ben774 (talk) 16:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Brombach - Lörracher Straße2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Lörracher Straße2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brombach - Rosswangweg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Rosswangweg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brombach - Wohnblock2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Wohnblock2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Brombach - Blick auf Brombach und Hauingen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Blick auf Brombach und Hauingen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brombach - Brunnen2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Brunnen2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Friedhofskapelle Brombach1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedhofskapelle Brombach1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brombach - Wohnblock1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Wohnblock1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Brombach - Bahnübergang.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Bahnübergang.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Herten - St. Josef - Marienstatue.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herten - St. Josef - Marienstatue.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brombach - Bühl2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Bühl2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - ZOB1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - ZOB1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach-Tumringen - Friedhof.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach-Tumringen - Friedhof.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kanadagans3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graugans3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kongresshalle Nürnberg1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongresshalle Nürnberg1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kongresshalle Nürnberg3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongresshalle Nürnberg3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kongresshalle Nürnberg5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongresshalle Nürnberg5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: Continuing to impugn people's motives at FPC/QIC after warnings. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Nürnberg - Marientor Zwinger.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nürnberg - Marientor Zwinger.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kanadagans1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graugans1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nürnberg - Dutzendteich1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nürnberg - Dutzendteich1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kongresshalle Nürnberg7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongresshalle Nürnberg7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion

Schwörstadt - Katholische Kirche5.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schwörstadt - Katholische Kirche5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwörstadt - Katholische Kirche5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Nürnberg - Lorenzkirche1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Lorenz, Nuremberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Teneriffa Gesteinsschichten.JPG

This depicted structure is known as "La Tarta" for it remembers to a sliced cake. The picture shows only a small part of the whole "Tarta", another view of the same place which shows more layers is here [3]. I added your picture to the category "La Tarta de Tenerife". Greetings --Llez (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Teneriffa Gesteinsschichten.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Teneriffa Gesteinsschichten.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teneriffa Gesteinsschichten.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Ich finde es gut, dass du weiterhin Artikel einstellst, obwohl man dich gesperrt hat. -- Elendsredder (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Rheinfelden - Schloss Beuggen - Torhaus6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Schloss Beuggen - Torhaus6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rheinfelden - Schloss Beuggen - Torhaus1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Schloss Beuggen - Torhaus1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rheinfelden - Schlosskirche Beuggen11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Schlosskirche Beuggen11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weil am Rhein - Stadtbibliothek3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weil am Rhein - Stadtbibliothek3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weil am Rhein - Friedensbrücke1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weil am Rhein - Friedensbrücke1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weil am Rhein - Friedensbrücke6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weil am Rhein - Friedensbrücke6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hauingen - Astrid-Lindgren-Schule3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauingen - Astrid-Lindgren-Schule3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brombach - Feuerwehr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brombach - Feuerwehr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kongresshalle Nürnberg4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongresshalle Nürnberg4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kongresshalle Nürnberg2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongresshalle Nürnberg2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Zur Kenntnis

Ich Gratuliere zum Titelbild im Haushaltsplan des Landkreis Lörrach 2012, zufällig gerade gesehen, ansonsten scheinst du auch ein wirklicher Qualitätsfotograf. Zum Eigentlichen: Das Wappen Lörrach würde ich jedoch nach den heraldischen Geflogenheiten anpassen, ein Schild ohne Rahmen gibt es nicht, die Tingierung sollte eigentlich auch einheitlich sein, wenn möglich nach Vorgaben des Bundeslandes. -- πϵρήλιο 21:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Perhelion,
darauf hatte mich Rauenstein bereits hingewiesen. Ich wollte das nachprüfen und habe dazu die offizielle Stadtchronik aus dem Jahr 1983 hervorgekramt. Dort wird das Wappen sowohl in der bildlichen wie auch textlichen Beschreibung ohne Rahmen angezeigt bzw. beschrieben. Nun kann das durchaus falsch sein, da es kein amtliches Dokument ist obwohl von der Stadt Lörrach selbst herausgegeben, aber das muss nichts heißen. Ich bin heraldisch nicht sonderlich bewandert und wenn es falsch ist darfst Du es gerne korrigieren. Wenn Du mir bestätigen kannst, dass der Rahmen da wirklich hingehört und es selbst nicht machen willst, dann kann ich mir auch gerne die Mühe machen, wird dann aber ein paar Tage dauern weil ich derzeit andere Dinge in höherer Priorität habe. Was die Tingierung angeht gehe ich davon aus, dass die so korrekt ist. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Taxiarchos, ich habe mich nochmal genauer Fachkundig gemacht, vieler Orts werden die Wappen zu Logos umfunktioniert was nicht im eigentlichen Sinne der Hoheitszeichen ist. Ich habe mir von einem Heraldiker konkret bestätigen lassen, dass das Wappen sogar in zweierlei Hinsicht nicht heraldischen Gepflogenheiten entspricht. Eine korrigierte Version ist bereits über die alternative SVG hochgeladen. Als konkrete Fachliteratur empfiehlt er: "Walter Leonhard: Das große Buch der Wappenkunst, Weltbild-Verlag, 2003" auf das ich mich auch beziehe. Viele Grüße -- πϵρήλιο 17:12, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Nein das ist Absicht, wie gesagt ist dies die zweite Geflogenheit, eine heraldische de:Gemeine Figur muss immer raumausfüllend sein, dass kannst du in jedem guten Heradlikbuch nachlesen (wie gesagt hat mich auch konkret ein Heraldiker auf diesen Fall hingwiesen, sogar etwas drastischer). Immer häufiger verändern die Orte ihre Wappen entweder zum Logo oder zu einem unheraldischen Bürgerwappen, wohl meist aus Unwissenheit oder absichtlicher Ignorierung der Heraldik. S.a. altes Wappen -- πϵρήλιο 21:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Klingt für mich etwas abwegig. Ich weiß nicht, ob das hier: Harald Huber: Wappenbuch Landkreis Lörrach, Südkurier GmbH Konstanz, 1984, ISBN 3-87799-046-0. als "gutes Heraldikbuch" durchgeht aber auch dort finde ich die Behauptungen nicht gestützt und ich finde es auch merkwürdig, dass das angeblich korrekte Wappen auf keiner offiziellen Publikation der Stadt Lörrach bisher zu Gesicht bekam. Sollte es denn stimmen, was Du sagst hätte ich gerne eine entsprechende Quelle hierfür explizit angegeben und dann sollte es auch im Artikel zur Stadt vermerkt werden. Denn ein Logo hat bereits die Stadt Lörrach, nämlich dieses hier Lörrach Logo.svg. Meine persönliche Vermutung ist, dass deine Version eine uralt Version des Wappens ist, die im Laufe der Zeit angepasst wurde. Sollte Deine Antwort nichts erhellendes bringen werde ich die Stadt mal selber anschreiben. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Rheinfelden - Schlosskirche Beuggen1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Schlosskirche Beuggen1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dokumentationszentrum Reichsparteitagsgelände1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dokumentationszentrum Reichsparteitagsgelände1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Lörrach - Stettener Schlösschen.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stettener Schlösschen (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rheinfelden - Christuskirche3.jpg