User talk:Tekstman

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archieven:


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Commons File mover.svg

Hi Tekstman, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

. - FitIndia Talk Mail 15:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requesting reversal of a move[edit]

Hello. A request regarding File:Railway Tavern, Bethnal Green, E2 (3350129276).jpg, which used to be at File:Railway Tavern, Globe Town, E2 (3350129276).jpg - could you move it back?

Laytar1 requested the move to "Bethnal Green" as correcting an "obvious error" on the 10th (along with a few similar renames) and you reasonably granted this in good faith on the 12th. But Laytar1 is evading a full ban on Wikipedia and some block evasion on Commons, for imposing exactly this kind of erratic opinion about an area of London. They were blocked for sockpuppetry on the 13th.

I reverted all of the user's edits and requested all moves be reversed as block evasion: all moves were, apart from this one which Mazbel rejected for not following the renaming guidelines. Would appreciate it if you could reverse the move. Thanks! --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Lord Belbury, I reversed the file rename. Thanks for your input. Tekstman (talk) 14:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ex libris Fré Cohen[edit]

Dag, Tekstman. Mooi dat je een categorie voor de ex libri hebt aangemaakt, alleen... ben je het niet met me eens dat de categorie zou moeten zijn "Ex libris by Fré Cohen"? Dan kan-ie ook in Category:Ex libris by artist. Naar mijn mening moet de categorie worden hernoemd, en de eerdere categorie kan dan weg (geen doorverwijzing). Eissink (talk) 22:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Inmiddels heb ik de categorie hernoemd. Groet, Eissink (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC).Reply[reply]
Helemaal mee eens. Bedankt voor de wijziging. Tekstman (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:To-all-the-parts-of-the-world-cunard-line.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:To-all-the-parts-of-the-world-cunard-line.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:To-all-the-parts-of-the-world-cunard-line.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Canadian Car & Foundry, in Port William, Ontario, built minesweepers for France, in WW1 -g.png[edit]

Hi, could you check this edit? Thanks --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 15:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I believe the result is OK: File:Canadian Car & Foundry, in Fort William, Ontario, built minesweepers for France, in WW1 -g.png? Tekstman (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I was not referring to the move but to the edit where the redirect has been removed and added description and move request when there is no file with that name: Canadian Car & Foundry, in Fort William, Ontario, built minesweepers for France, in WW1 -g.png File:Canadian Car & Foundry, in Port William, Ontario, built minesweepers for France, in WW1 -g.png (a script error?). --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 16:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah. I must say I do not fully comprehend what happened there (I used the script for file movers), but I noticed someone else made a correction already. Tekstman (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC) PS Thanks for the very atmospheric picture on my talk page, I'll leave it just there.Reply[reply]

Advertentie en of poster[edit]

Renault, 1925

Hoi Tekstman, ik heb de afgelopen dagen een categorieboom opgezet van posters uit Nederland per jaar, en stuitte daarbij op vele vroege auto-advertenties, die door jou blijken te zijn geupload. Nu vroeg ik mezelf af of enige van die werken in werkelijkheid zelfstandige posters zijn of dat ze uit een blad komen. Door de meerkleurendruk lijkt het om posters te kunnen gaan, maar misschien weet jij daar meer over? Mvg, en dank voor al dat mooie werk. -- Mdd (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nu is er bij de bijgevoegde afbeelding "Renault, 1925" een bron genoemd van de Revue der Sporten d.d. 14 september 1925. Als je dat tijdschrift van twee weken eerder bekijkt, zie hier, dan zie je daar geen vergelijkbaar kleurig werk!? Misschien is de poster als losse afbeelding met het nummer meegeleverd? -- Mdd (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Beste Mdd, de datum die je noemt is van de beschrijving van het dealerschap van Van Messel. Ik heb de link naar het bestand op die website gepreciseerd in de bestandsinformatie. De datum die de bron geeft voor het bestand is 13 februari 1925. Deze is afkomstig van de website, die gewoonlijk nauwkeurig en consequent is in dateren. Daar staat als bijschrift alleen "februari 1925", maar de bestandsnaam levert ook de dag (de 13e). Waar het om gaat is dat deze door Conam.info een advertentie wordt genoemd. Er wordt niet gespecificeerd waar deze advertentie heeft gestaan of vandaan komt, dus het heeft geen zin Revue der Sporten door te gaan spitten. Een advertentie kan in de vorm van een ingelegde poster zijn, het kan ook een losse brochure zijn, het lijkt me allemaal waarschijnlijker dan een kleurenadvertentie in een tijdschrift in de jaren twintig, maar het is allemaal speculeren. Als je deze als poster wilt categoriseren zie ik geen bezwaar. Tekstman (talk) 08:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bedankt voor het meedenken over het karakter van dit werk, en het categoriseren. Wat de licentie technische kwestie en het gebruik van de {{anonymous-EU}} betreft, dit vraagt erom dat je zorgvuldig gaat bekijken onder welke omstandigheden dit werk oorspronkelijk is gepubliceerd en of daar al dan niet een posterontwerper of grafische vormgever bij genoemd is. Opgave van de hedendaagse bron die het werk heeft heruitgegeven is strikt genomen niet genoeg, en daar is het afgelopen jaar hier op Commons heel wat om te doen geweest. -- Mdd (talk) 11:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De tekening is in elk geval niet gesigneerd - daar let ik altijd op - en gecombineerd met het feit dat het hier om een advertentie gaat, waarbij met aan zekerheid grenzende waarschijnlijkheid de maker in de publicatie eveneens niet vermeld zal zijn, kan je er in mijn ogen vanuit gaan dat dit als anoniem werk moet worden beschouwd. Tekstman (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pas bij het verder categoriseren blijkt me dat veel van de Nederlandse posters door jou zijn geupload hier, en hierbij nog mijn dank voor deze inzet. Wat betreft deze overwegingen in zaken het copyright, dat lijkt me heel solide. Voor het één en het ander acht ik het voor mezelf van belang om dat in ieder geval incidenteel bij de bron zelf ook na te gaan. De oorsprong van dit werk blijft me fascineren. Deze plaat uit 1925-35 enkel gevouwen, deed me realiseren dat ze wellicht als middenblad zijn meegeleverd met een tijdschrift. Andere werken zijn wellicht zelf direct van de pers in een verzameling terecht gekomen. In veel gevallen lag het copyright wellicht zelf bij de adverterende bedrijven, en dat vervalt nadien na 70 jaar. Zo lijkt dat ook te kloppen. In ieder bedankt voor de verdere toelichting. -- Mdd (talk) 19:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Scott_Bradlee_&_Postmodern_Jukebox[edit]

Category discussion warning

Scott Bradlee & Postmodern Jukebox has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Georges Pintens (1969).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Georges Pintens (1969).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jean-Pierre Berckmans (1973).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jean-Pierre Berckmans (1973).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Coins: obverse and reverse[edit]

Hello, I notice you declined a move request on a page about coins. Please check [1], and take another look. Thank you. --Ingafube (talk) 10:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That is interesting, because then [2] would need a total overhaul. I am a layman, but I would still say this is a controversial move. But in the meantime the file has been nominated for deletion and we will have to wait the outcome of that. Tekstman (talk) 08:21, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LWR Wenckebach.jpg[edit]

Hoi Tekstman, zou je de licentie van deze afbeelding nog eens willen heroverwegen? Alvast bedankt. -- Mdd (talk) 14:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dank voor de opmerking, ik heb de licentie gewijzigd naar iets wat bij nader inzien beter past. Is dat wat je bedoelde? Tekstman (talk) 05:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Inderdaad, nogmaals dank. -- Mdd (talk) 20:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fons De Wolf, Dwars door België 1988, Waregem, Maurice Terryn (collectie KOERS. Museum van de Wielersport).jpg[edit]

Hallo Tekstman zou je de filenaam kunnen wijzigen? Nogal verwarrend nu. Face-smile.svg Thanks. Lotje (talk) 06:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valt wel mee toch? Wat is precies je bezwaar? Tekstman (talk) 10:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Depicted person: Eddy Planckaert – cyclist
Filename: Fons De Wolf, Dwars door België 1988, Waregem, Maurice Terryn (collectie KOERS. Museum van de Wielersport).jpg Lotje (talk) 05:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tekstman: , zie ook File:Eddy Planckaert bedankt Fons De Wolf, Dwars door België 1988, Waregem, Maurice Terryn (collectie KOERS. Museum van de Wielersport).jpg Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 05:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ik heb de beschrijving bijgewerkt i.c. titel en afgebeelde personen. Tekstman (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ArturKappPostCardUSSR1978cropped.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ArturKappPostCardUSSR1978cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 11:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]