User talk:Tetraktys

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tetraktys!

Contents

Apagar imagem[edit]

Oi gostaria que você apagasse a imagem Image:BrasaoSARA.jpg, não se preocupe com as consequencias, fiz uma imagem igual à ela, vou colocalas no lugar da imagem que você apagará, espero que você apague a imagem. Quero resposta imediatamente. Abraços, Daniel Carlos 11:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC).

Quanto à imagem Image:Margs fachada principal.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
Esta mídia poderá ser apagada.

Obrigado por carregar Image:Margs fachada principal.jpg. Informo que a página da imagem carregada não especifica o autor do conteúdo, logo, o direito do autor é desconhecido. Se não foi você quem criou o arquivo, então deverá especificar o autor e a licença para que tenhamos o direito de usá-lo no Wikimedia Commons (veja as tarjas de direitos do autor logo abaixo). Se você achou este arquivo em algum website, indique-o bem como os seus termos de uso do conteúdo. Se o conteúdo for derivado de um trabalho protegido por copyright, você deverá fornecer os nomes e a licença do trabalho original.

Se o arquivo não possui tarja indicativa de direitos do autor, você deverá colocar uma. Se foi você quem criou a imagem, o áudio ou o vídeo poderá usar {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} para registrá-la como Creative Commons ou usar o {{PD-self}} para registrá-la como domínio público. Veja Commons:Copyright tags para a lista completa das tarjas que você poderá usar.

Saiba que todo e qualquer arquivo sem fontes e sem tarjas serão apagados uma semana após terem sido carregados, como informam os critérios para exclusão rápida. Se você carregou outros arquivos, por favor, revise-os e veja se você especificou a autoria, a fonte e os direitos do autor. Você poderá encontrar todos os arquivos que carregou usando a ferramenta Gallery. Obrigado. Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 03:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Contribuições[edit]

Olá, primeiro de tudo gostaria de perguntar: estas imagens são mesmo de sua autoria? Segundo: use a licença {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} (adequada para imagens carregadas pelo próprio autor) no lugar de {{attribution}} (adequada para imagens liberadas por terceiros). Terceiro: não use marcações na própria imagem (como legenda, autoria, margens, bordas etc.), carregue sempre a imagem "crua". Quarto: sempre categorize as imagens para facilitar posteriores buscas. Um abraço, Dantadd 22:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Eu já modifiquei as descrições de suas últimas fotos carregadas, incluindo também as categorias. Basta copiar o modelo e deve dar certo, havendo problemas, avise. Se possível vá mudando a licença. Quanto às marcações, prefira sempre, como eu disse, as imagens cruas. Se não for possível, adicione a marcação {{watermark}} que posteriormente alguém retirará bordas ou legendas das fotos. Uma última observação: se pretende adicionar muitas fotos de um determinado lugar, pode incluí-las em galerias aqui mesmo, evitando sobrecarregar os artigos lá na Wikipédia. Abraço, Dantadd 23:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Hehehe, acontece, mas ela tá logo aqui em cima. A licença é {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}}. Dantadd 23:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
A licença tá ok, procura só pôr sempre o local (município, estado e país) das fotos, partindo sempre da idéia que a pessoa não sabe nada sobre o local. Ah...e não esquece das categorias. No caso de lugares, normalmente o nome do município já é um bom começo, exemplos:
[[Category:Torres]]
ou
[[Category:Porto Alegre]]
ou
[[Category:Olinda]]

Até, Dantadd 23:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Pictures from the Louvre[edit]

Hi! Any new picture is welcome here. You can choose any free license you wish. The recommended practice here is a dual GFDL/CC-BY-SA license. Don't worry if your descriptions are too short, I will probably be able to complete them. Don't hesitate to ask me if you've got more questions about it. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

There is no copyright issue because the Louvre doesn't have any copyright over the works it stores and exhibits. The ownership of an object does not grant you a copyright over it. Besides, I don't think the Louvre owns its collections :-) Now, the Louvre's rule states that pictures taken in the museum are for private use. It is believed this does not hold any water, precisely because the Louvre doesn't have any copyright.
If you prefer not to upload your pictures because of this reservation, tell me so and I will delete the one you just uploaded. If you choose to ignore it, welcome to the club :-) Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
The worse the Louvre could do to you is sue for monetary compensation -- that is, if it did own the works (which is not the case) and if it was not a national museum. In France, a "national museum" must by law give the largest access to its collections. All in all, I don't think you'll ever have to mortgage your house to compensate the Louvre. A French law book about these questions (Artworks, museums and the law) states that "one must admit that no authorization is required for reproducing" works that are in the public domain, which is our case here. I can elaborate on this if you want.
Concerning Image:Bouchardon-amor11b.jpg, you may have noticed I completed the description. For this I use the {{Information Louvre}} template and the Atlas database (in French), which describes almost all exhibited collections. Is that OK with you if I rename it into something like Image:Amor Bouchardon Louvre MR 1761.jpg? I and a couple of other Commons guys are trying to set guidelines for the naming of museum pictures (see Commons:WikiProject Museums. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:problemas[edit]

Para modificar os dados das imagens tem que editá-las, escrever e guardar a página. Nao é dificílimo --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 14:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Categorias[edit]

A descrição ficou boa! Na hora de pôr categorias, sempre escolha as mais precisas e evite inserir categorias demais ou redundantes (exemplo: se a imagem já está em "Museums in Brazil" não é necessário pôr "Museums" pois aquela é subcategorias desta). O mesmo vale para "Porto Alegre" e "Rio Grande do Sul", ponha só a primeira, pois já está inserida na segunda. Com o tempo foi entende o mecanismo. Dantadd 13:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Como eu te aceno aqui em cima: seja frugal e econômico com as categorias. Exemplo: para a catedral de Caxias do Sul basta
  • [[Category:Caxias do Sul]]
  • [[Category:Churches in Rio Grande do Sul]]

Evite SEMPRE categorias genéricas se você já tem categorias específicas. Um abraço, Dantadd 17:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Ricardo, até o momento estamos indo bem, mas é a terceira vez que te peço: use categoria específicas apenas. Por favor, PARE de inserir um monte de categorias genéricas nas imagens. Se uma imagem já contém a categoria "Louvre" é completamente desnecessário que contenha as categorias "Art", "Museums" e "France". Por favor, ajude! Dantadd 15:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Obrigado pela compreensão. O motivo para não sobrecategorizar é simples. Imagina se qualquer imagem relacionada à arte receber a [[Category:Art]]. De repente você tem uma categoria com cem mil imagens sem qualquer subcategorização, ou seja, é a mesma coisa que não haver categoria nenhum, pois não se acha nada lá. Por este motivo que as categorias entram numa árvore: se você tem a categoria "Louvre" não é necessário pôr "Paris" ou "France" porque o Louvre está em Paris, que esta na França, cada um em sua respectiva categoria, em cascata. Dantadd 00:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Venus d'Arles[edit]

Hi Tetraktys, would you perchance have in your archives some pictures of the Venus of Arles, a beautiful Roman statue of Aprodite holding an apple? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Photo from inside St Peter's Basilica[edit]

That's a 'really nice photo. Well done! I envy your skill at composition, and the light and sharpness is very good too. Thank you for rekindling some good memories. (Pdfpdf from English WP) 219.90.147.68 13:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Merlin-UK[edit]

Thanks for your note - please make any use of the image that will help you - I have uploaded these for that purpose - Regards Merlin-UK 11:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:HinoRepublicanoRS1935.mid[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HinoRepublicanoRS1935.mid. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Fins comerciais[edit]

Infelizmente, o Commons só aceita imagens que possam ser usadas para fins comerciais. Para fotografias de Vila-Lobos publicadas no Brasil antes de 1 de janeiro de 1937 você pode usar a licença {{PD-Brazil-media}}, pois já estão em domínio público. Dantadd 13:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Fui pesquisar e achei uma foto que era possível carregar. Está aqui: Image:Heitor Vila-Lobos (c. 1922).jpg. Dá uma olhada. Dantadd 13:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Me ajude, por favor[edit]

Faça com que desbloque meu usuário na wikipédia (Ismeni, sua amiga), por favor, para que os artigos w:Fazenda do Engenho e w:Fazenda Morro Grande não fiquem eliminados, por favor, desbloque meu usuário na wikipédia, por favor, quero resposta daqui à 10 minutos, por favor. --Ismênia Oliveira 23:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Cola dell'Amatrice[edit]

Apologize me for my little english: you must change name your picture Colla-del-Amatrice-morte&as.jpg because the artist's name is exactly Cola dell'Amatrice ( He worked Cathedral of my town). thank's --82.104.0.101 16:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

it's done. thanks for the correction!

Image:HinoRepublicanoRS1835.mid[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Euqueriasernaraleão2.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Euqueriasernaraleão2.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Euqueriasernaraleão2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

tetraktys 00:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Abapuru_Malba_Buenos_Aires_07_2005.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Abapuru_Malba_Buenos_Aires_07_2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALE! ¿…? 15:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Imagens para apagar[edit]

Tu podes abrir um pedido de eliminação e explicar motivos. Já tens a lista dessas imagens? Dantadd 14:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Solicitação[edit]

Prezado Tetraktys, Há como puxar a imagem "Image:Rathfarnham Castle.jpg" em domínio público na en-wiki para o Commons, para poder usá-la na pt-wiki? Já vi fazê-lo no passado mas não sei fazê-lo. Grato, Carlos Luis Cruz 22:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Mais uma vez, muito obrigado! Sds, Carlos Luis Cruz 00:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:29_Decarvalho.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:29_Decarvalho.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pinturas 1988-1991 - sem título 2.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 01:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates[edit]

Coloquei Image:1545VC068a.jpg na Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.--Econt 22:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

Há uma confusãozinha de conceitos: a imagem Image:João VI de Portugal por Charles Pradier.jpg não tem copyright algum, pois todos expiraram em 1917. O fato de custodiar uma obra não torna o depositário em detentor de direitos autorais. Qualquer obra feita por autor morto há mais de 70 anos (há pequenas variações nacionais) não tem mais copyright. Há abusos da parte de muitos museus e arquivos, como por exemplo, a Fundação Getúlio Vargas, que cobra pela reprodução de fotos de que é depositária mas não proprietária de copyright. É uma longa história. Dantadd 18:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

New upload form[edit]

You can disable it using the "Use the old-style upload form layout." checkbox on the Gadgets tab of Special:Preferences (it is the first checkbox). Don't forget to press save. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Autor[edit]

Neste caso: Image:Bernardelli-cristo.jpg, o autor é o Rodolfo Bernardelli e não você (mesmo sendo o fotógrafo, algo que você pode explicitar desta forma:

Author: [[:pt:Rodolfo Bernardelli|Rodolfo Bernardelli]] (1852-1931), photographic work by [[User:Tetraktys]].

É sempre bom informar o período de vida do autor, para que fique claro que os 70 anos da morte já se passaram.

No caso dos sites que você indicou, teoricamente o uso das fotografias das obras de Aleijadinho é livre, pois não se pode reclamar copyright de trabalho fotográfico que retrata obras em domínio público. A questão, porém, é um pouco controversa, já que quem conhece fotografia (um pouquinho como eu e um montão como você) sabe que muitas vezes há sim trabalho criativo do fotógrafo nesses casos, o que mereceria proteção legal. Dantadd 15:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Sem problemas... relaxa, hehehe. Dantadd 01:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Parreiras-baía-cabralia-pin.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 07:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Parreiras-ventania-pinac.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 08:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Show14birck.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Show14birck.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 00:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

E-mail[edit]

Desculpe! é .org, não .com, foi burrice minha... Patrícia msg 18:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pedro Américo - Davi e Abisag - 1879.jpg[edit]

Hi, you forgot to place a licence tag on the page, i choosed {{PD-Art}} with this edit. Please check the license and approve, that the licence is correct by answering to this information. --Martin H. (talk) 01:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

ok, i saw that you already completet your other recent uploads, thank you. --Martin H. (talk) 01:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Barocci - Madonna del Popolo.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Antonio Pareiras - Cesteiro - 1927.jpg[edit]

Hello Tetraktys, by working with the German article about Antônio Parreiras I tried to correct the small typing error in the image label Pareiras. In the German WP every user can do that by a shift-procedure (in fact only a special move-button) to the new name, but here in WP commons I didn't find any. Could you please care for this mini-problem and do the necessary step for me? Thank You --Fredou (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello Tetraktys. An Italian user, called Trixt consulted me with {{rename|New name.jpg|Misspelled}} . It seems to solve my problem. It's probably helpful for you too. I used the method already for Image:Antonio Pareiras - Cesteiro - 1927.jpg and hope, the admin and the bot will do the rest. Yours --Fredou (talk) 17:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Caetano_Coelho_da_Costa_-_Forro_da_capela-mor_da_Igreja_de_S._Francisco_da_Penitência_-_1732.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Caetano_Coelho_da_Costa_-_Forro_da_capela-mor_da_Igreja_de_S._Francisco_da_Penitência_-_1732.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

tetraktys (talk) 10:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Caetano Coelho da Costa - Forro da capela-mor da Igreja de S. Francisco da Penitência - 1732.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Porcelanas-museus_capitolinos-o_julgamento_de_páris.jpg[edit]

Hi. I'm frightfully sorry, it's a double mistake. I'm checking User:Diomede's uploads because he keeps uploading pictures of statues with PD-self or PD-Art, which is not possible. I thought you picture was one of those, hence my deletion. Plus, the deletion comment is wrong: the message should have read "no PD-Art for 3D artwork". Again, my apologies. I'll check my other deletions. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

A bot, the CommonsDelinker, delinks deleted pictures to avoid leaving red links behind. It also creates a log. I'll check for your picture and restore all pages where it was used. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Grito do Ipiranga[edit]

Realmente, acho mais importante a imagem em maior resolução, para serem perecebidos os detalhes, do que o azul do céu. Mas se lhe importa tanto isso, que seja. Cumprimentos. --Tonyjeff (talk) 11:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Caro Tetraktys, respeito sua opinião, mas não é necessário alterar a imagem do quadro "Independência ou Morte" de uma versão com uma resolução muito maior e bem mais nítida para outra completamente diversa devido somente as cores do céu. Acredito que não seja razão para carregar a imagem como uma nova. Afinal, qual ficará nos artigos? Peço para que reflita a respeito e muito obrigado pela atenção. -- Lecen (talk) 00:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Wrong church[edit]

Hi! I left a message at Image talk:Iglesia Jesuita de San Ignacio Chiquitos Santa Cruz Bolivia.jpg. La iglesia no es la de San Ignacio. Es la iglesia de Concepción. bamse (talk) 22:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: removing categories[edit]

Yeah?|

Zephynelsson Von (talk) 10:43, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah! I am in the mood to do as you command, sir.
I made a mistake because I did not correct some changes I did as part of an more extensive work. I simply forgot. So, the Weingartner´s drawings like this were removed from Drawings in Brazil. Sorry.
Concerning this picture, it is just a picture of military men. They were not exactly People from Rio Grande do Sul, they were the imperial army in 1852, in the War against Rosas and Oribe. Most of those military men came from Bahia, Minas and Rio de Janeiro. Well, two wore ponchos, maybe they were from Paraná or Santa Catarina, maybe from the Provincia de São Pedro.
Concerning the "first communion" photos, you should describe your pictures properly. The way you uploaded them, they are just pictures of people from nobody knows where and when. And some are just people photos with no further interest outside his/hers own relatives in Caxias do Sul. No historical or sociological meaning can be acquired from some of your "contributions". Following this path, in a near future maybe you also upload the picture of your nursing grandmother.
Zephynelsson Von (talk) 16:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry. I suppose you designed beautiful wedding dresses to your cousins inspired by the 1920s first communion dresses of anonymous girls from Caxias do Sul.
Zephynelsson Von (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vladimirov_-_Lenin_and_Stalin_in_summer_1917.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

tetraktys (talk) 04:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Tua fotografia[edit]

Uma fotografia tua foi usada por um site da Finlândia: File talk:Santacrocefachada.jpg. Abraços! Dantadd 23:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas Gainsborough Boy in blue.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 07:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

RE[edit]

Olá, Tetraktys. Fique à vontade para reverter às versões anteriores se considerar que estavam melhores. O objetivo não era, entretanto, "falsificar" o estilo. Especificamente no caso da obra de Almeida Júnior, sou obrigado a discordar de você. Ao menos no meu monitor, a imagem anterior (também carregada por mim) não faz juz ao brilho, às cores e sequer à varição da luz típicas dos interiores de Almeida Júnior. Aliás, todas as cores pareceram-me distorcidas, do verde azulado da toalha da mesa (que está marrom) até o vermelho da almofada (que também está marrom), e a típica "opacidade" dos interiores de Almeida Júnior nada tinha a ver com a opacidade forçosa dessa imagem. Acho que seria melhor procurar uma outra imagem para substituí-la, já que o upload de Garabombo refere-se a outra obra, e não a do MNBA.

Quanto a imagem de D. João VI, concordo com você, não reparei no efeito sobre o rosto do personagem, embora a imagem, mesmo sendo muito menor, apresente os contornos mais lineares. Abraço, Dornicke (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

PS - Talvez seja bom tentar fazer algo com a versão anterior da obra de Almeida Júnior. Acabo de ver que a imagem atual possui algumas falhas em relação à anterior no canto inferior direito. Mas os tons estão muito ruins! Mal se percebe a variação de luz, até as sombras estão opacas... tá parecendo fotografia de catálogo da década de 70, rs. Dornicke (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Vou tentar revertê-las (já consegui algumas vezes, dá um pouco de trabalho). Se consegui, te aviso, abz, Dornicke (talk) 01:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Revertidas

Também vi as três aqui em São Paulo, em uma exposição patrocinada pelo Banco Santos (e a do Almeida Júnior também na Brasil+500). De toda forma, todas foram tiradas do catálogo "Imagem e Identidade", com obras do MNBA, que traz muitas das versões reproduzidas também no catálogo Safra, mas com variações bem marcantes de tons e cores. A obra de Pedro Américo, em especial, está bastante próxima da imagem do catálogo (aliás, todas as modificações que faço visam deixar as obras mais próximas da fonte original, tentando amenizar a perda natural de brilho e contraste que ocorre com toda obra escaneada), com tons acinzentados (passa longe do vermelho) e brilho intenso (o quanto os editores do catálogo mexeram nas imagens, já não sei...) Mas confio no seu bom senso, e, de toda forma, creio que utilize essas imagens mais do que eu. Abz, Dornicke (talk) 01:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deltion for File:Reggio calabria museo nazionale della magna grecia.jpg[edit]

File:Reggio calabria museo nazionale della magna grecia.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reggio calabria museo nazionale della magna grecia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-93.144.188.53 10:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

File:To prince edward island.jpg[edit]

Hello Tetraktys. Canada applies the term of "life of the author plus 50 years from death" for release of copyrights, but Colville is still alive today. So, as the license states that "the copyright holder releases..." etc, then NeoThe1 (the original uploader) should be Colville himself, something that I really doubt. Probably it's a falsely-licensed upload from the early days of Wikipedia (2004). Howerver, if you like, I can restore the image and nominate it for deletion so that we can get more opinions. Regards, Badseed talk

I restored it, let's see:) As for the site, well, i think you should proceed with caution, because the "free use" that appears on the Library of Canada is rather generic and not always sincere. Take a look at Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, and the discussion at the mailing list (includes mail from the LIbrary). Cheers! - Badseed talk 00:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

File:US mural.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Tetraktys!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Hi, there. Thanks for cleaning up File:Vasco da Gama - 1838.png. Much appreciated. Anrie (talk) 10:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Veii Apollo[edit]

Hallo. Unfortunately we are not allowed to publish any pictures of any objects in the Museo di Villa Giulia in Rome. See the discussion here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2008Nov#Sopraintendenza_ai_Beni_Culturali_dell.27Etruria_meridionale Sorry.

Furthermore, I do not have a picture of this statue, since you are not allowed to take pictures while visising the museum.

Sorry again. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Omphalos Apollo[edit]

Hi Tetraktys. I'm quite sorry, the file had been renamed by BetacommandBot. I assumed incorrectly that the renaming had been spread to Wikipedias. I have checked CommonsDelinker's log and will restore the missing links (thress pages on pt:). Again, my apologies. I should have checked. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Done. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand correctly your remark. User:G.dallorto requested the renaming, User:BetacommandBot took care of it. I deleted what I took to be a now-duplicate with no use. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Sagrado coração de jesus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sagrado coração de jesus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Hekerui (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

congratulation for this pictures[edit]

very beautiful pictures! --prosopee (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Daudelin-odalisque.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daudelin-odalisque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Stifle (talk) 10:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

file:Apoxyomenos01 pushkin bb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for wonderful thing you did with my picture! Very charming! $)--Shakko (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Herr Kriss (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg[edit]

I understand you, but you have to have written permission. This is Commons rule. Anyways is really director copyright holder, not a photographer? Herr Kriss (talk) 21:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm not the one who created the rules, so it's don't depends on me. I trust you, but that's not enough. Herr Kriss (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Jacob de Senleches - Fuions de ci.ogg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Johannes Ciconia - O Padua, sidus praeclarum.ogg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

File:David_de_Michelangelo_2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:David_de_Michelangelo_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 09:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Tradução[edit]

Com gentileza, você poderia criar essa página? (en:Freedom of Panorama). E escrever em português brasileiro? Eduardo P (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Australian aboriginal art.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Australian aboriginal art.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Australian aboriginal art.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Quartl (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Tumba de Gregório XV - Le Gros.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Gregório XV - Le Gros.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Parabéns[edit]

Dos seus talentos de escrita já eu sabia há algum tempo, mas só agora, por acaso, descobri os fotográficos, o que é algo que (suponho) saberei identificar melhor, pois a fotografia é o meu hobbie mais antigo e persistente. Um pouco ao acaso, pois fotos excelentes é o que não falta na sua galeria, estou muito impressionado com File:Praia da cal ao crepúsculo.jpg e todas as do Museu Arqueológico Nacional de Atenas. Eu passei lá um dia inteiro vai para um ano e até estou satisfeito algumas das das fotos que lá fiz, mas babo-me de inveja (positiva :-) ao ver as suas. Um abraço. --Stegop (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

O equipamento não é nada de especial: uma Olympus E-300 já com mais de 5 anos, com o zoom de origem 14-45 e um Sigma 10-20. Sds. --Stegop (talk) 19:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Embora há muitos anos que seja um fã da Olympus, possivelmente se fosse agora não compraria Olympus, por duas razões. Uma é que o CCD é mais pequeno que o das outras, o que, além do possível maior ruído (tenho a impressão que o ISO 200 da minha, já velhinha, tem mais ruído do que ISO 400 de Canons e Nikons de baixa gama), é mau para quem, como eu usa e abusa de grandes angulares - o meu zoom 10-20mm é equivalente a um 20-40mm numa reflex de filme de 35mm, enquanto que numa Canon ou Nikon seria equivalente a 15-35mm. A outra razão é que há muito poucas lentes "3rd party" e embora acredite que as lentes Olympus teem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço, custa-me estar a dar umas mais umas quantas centenas de Euros para ter um aumento de qualidade que muito raramente se vai notar. À parte disso, estou muito satisfeito com ela. O mais provável é que as coisas tenham mudado muito, mas na altura em que a comprei lembro-me de ter lido em mais do que um sítio grandes elogios às cores, supostamente imbatíveis dos CCD's da Olympus. Não foi por isso que a comprei - foi um daqueles impulsos que podia ter corrido mal, mas tinha prometido a mim mesmo que só me passaria para o digital quando as DSLR's baixassem dos 1000 Euros e quando fui levantar as fotos e slides de uma viagem ao Egipto, não resisti, em vez de trazer só as fotos, trouxe também a máquina - estúpido! devia tê-la comprado antes da viagem! --Stegop (talk) 01:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Lamento saber da sua pouca sorte. Acontece aos melhores... Mas embora não me admire muito do ruído em interiores, é uma surpresa saber que as fotos ao sol também ficaram estragadas - sempre pensei que era nessa situação que se notava menos as diferenças entre CCD's (sensores). Lembro-me que uma das coisas que me irritou mais por não ter comprado uma câmara digital antes de ir ao Egito foi ver que as fotos tiradas pela minha irmã numa HP bem mixuruca ficaram melhores do que as digitalizações caseiras dos meus belos slides da minha fiel OM4. Se não escolher uma reflex, tente ver qual é a dimensão do CCD das que mais lhe agradam, pois quanto mais pequeno é o sensor, mais ruído será de esperar - não quer dizer que um sensor maior seja garantia de menor ruído, mas não há volta a dar à Física: para tecnologia semelhante, o ruído é inversamente proporcional à área do sensor! Há uns anos também li algures que é má ideia comprar uma câmara com muitos pixéis com um sensor pequeno, pois quanto mais pixéis tem, maior é o ruído. O problema é que como toda a gente associa nº de pixéis a qualidade, possivelmente agora não há máquinas com menos de 10M. Boa compras e boas fotos! --Stegop (talk) 03:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Beauties of the modern poets 1793.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Textura superficial - escultura de canova.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

File:MuseuCapuchinhos1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Manoel_de_Araújo_Porto-alegre[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Manoel_de_Araújo_Porto-alegre has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

186.97.64.183 21:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Madonnachild_-_Gregory_Lomayesva.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Madonnachild_-_Gregory_Lomayesva.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Madonnachild_-_Gregory_Lomayesva.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Doryphoros2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Doryphoros2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Perhelion (talk) 18:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Nascimentodesaofrancisco.jpg[edit]

Paz e bem!

Prefira sempre uma categoria mais específica à uma categoria mais genérica. Recategorizei para Category:Life of Francis of Assisi.

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 00:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:A-Federação-vitral.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Máquina de joeirar feijão (question)[edit]

Hello Tetraktys, are you the photographer of File:Museu Municipal de Caxias do Sul - Máquina de joeirar feijão.jpg?

When you uploaded the photo in 2008 you stated "Source=Trabalho próprio" (own work), but also "Author=?". So the given information is irritating and/or misleading at the moment.

Either it actually is your own photo and you know the author (yourself), then you should clearly add this bit of information – or it is not your photo and "own work" is a false claim, then the image needs explicit permission or should be deleted.

I hope you can clarify this. Regards --:bdk: 13:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks :-) --:bdk: 22:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Projeto-joão-fahrion---conv.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Projeto-joão-fahrion---conv.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mys 721tx (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. That “detail from one of the painters' works” is copyrighted, you can't upload it here and claim it is in the public domain. --Rosenzweig δ 14:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Giambologna herculesenesso.jpg[edit]

I'm not sure why this happened. I just cropped this photo and converted it to grayscale. I didn't do anything with contrast. Have you got any idea? Vearthy (talk) 20:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Pictures from NAMA[edit]

I'd like to thank you for the excellent pictures you've contributed. I've just used some of them with pleasure. Best regards --84.158.125.7 16:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

thank you! my pleasure!!tetraktys (talk) 18:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Brasilia_-_Plan.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brasilia_-_Plan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ELEKHHT 21:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Andrea Pozzo - retábulo - S Spirito - Pistoia.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 01:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Cristino 5-artistas1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cristino 5-artistas1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Tuválkin 01:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Independência ou Morte.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Independência ou Morte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lecen (talk) 02:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Independencia ou Morte - Pedro Americo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Independencia ou Morte - Pedro Americo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lecen (talk) 19:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

File:TotRY.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:TotRY.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kaldari (talk) 01:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Frederico Trebbi, retrato.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Museu do Comando Militar do Sul[edit]

Hello.

Do you have any other photos from it except the File:Canhão do Século XVIII.jpg? Ain92 (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

i'm afraid i don't, sorry!

Copyright status: File:Ação-educativa-no-margs.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ação-educativa-no-margs.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 11:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CENTRO HISTÓRICO DE ANTONIO PRADO 6 MATRIZ.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CENTRO HISTÓRICO DE ANTONIO PRADO 6 MATRIZ.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 11:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Queen Victoria Golden Jubilee.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Queen Victoria Golden Jubilee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DrKiernan (talk) 14:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Protestos em Porto Alegre 2013.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Protestos em Porto Alegre 2013.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarek Tuszynski (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Antiga Matriz de Porto Alegre[edit]

Paz e bem!
1 Possivelmente no prédio em que funciona a Cúria guardem o material que citastes.
2 O problema é que padres burrocratas são ultradesconfiados.
2.1 Me propuz a retratar as igrejas da Arquidiocese, felei com o Vigário Episcopal da Cultura e nunca tive resposta.
2.2 Ainda assim faço fotos das igrejas que consigo, mas certa feita ao pedir autorizaçao para fotografar o interior duma igreja o padre ficou indignado quando soube que eu já fotografara o exterior do templo.

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 21:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

2014-01-27[edit]

Paz e bem!
São vários problemas:
1 Chefetes que por serem chefetes são inseguros, o diferente os assustam.
2 Ignorância que faz com que trabalhos de restauro seja entregue a mãos de fato inadequadas -- o caso icônico foi a "restauração" do afresco de Cristo na Espanha.
3 Conheces: http://wp.clicrbs.com.br/sosmonumento
4 No teu caso pareces que não conheces a organização da ICAR, cada diocese é autônoma entre sí, responde apenas a Roma -- ou seja Porto Alegre não tem ingerência em Caxias do Sul.
5 Decisões administrativas e não necessariamente más decisões, exemplo hipotético:

  • Custo de restauro: 600
  • Custo de trabalho de Evangelização: 600
  • Dinheiro disponível: 700

Eu pessoalmente tenderia a investir mais em Evangelização do que em restauro.
6 Chefes tão sobrecarregados de tarefas que não conseguem responder a muitas demandas.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 08:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Tetraktys,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
AWESOME PLACE AND CITY. FJBN1958 (talk) 22:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Angel letiel.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angel letiel.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 01:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Escola de São Romédio.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escola de São Romédio.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escola de São Romédio.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Escola de São Romédio.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

DrKiernan (talk) 16:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Robert-genn-chatterbox-falls.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Robert-genn-chatterbox-falls.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Assinatura do Protocolo de Cooperação entre as Prefeituras de Porto Alegre, Viamão e as Universidades PUCRS e UFRGS.jpg[edit]

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lugusto 19:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Lugusto 19:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:0011MAN-Hermes3.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:0011MAN-Hermes3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

User:G.dallorto (talk) 00:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Hermes[edit]

I have not the slightest idea of what happened. I never wrote that warning myself, it was some new app that wrote it in my name. What I did was only adding the Italian and English captions for the image, plus moving the copyright notice from end to body of the caption. That's all. Perhaps software understood this as a proof of lack of a licence. Just ignore that stupid warning. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Carmo - teto.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Carmo - teto.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:08, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Antônio Dias - teto.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Antônio Dias - teto.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Antônio Dias - teto.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Antônio Dias - teto.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ushuaia - 2011.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ushuaia - 2011.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Enchentes de 2015 no Rio Grande do Sul 1.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Enchentes de 2015 no Rio Grande do Sul 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarek Tuszynski (talk) 13:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Antônio Dias - teto.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Antônio Dias - teto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Antônio Dias - teto.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Tetraktys,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Barão de penedo.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Barão de penedo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Barão de penedo.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Discasto talk 12:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

File:The American Indian by Fritz Scholder.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:The American Indian by Fritz Scholder.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Florn (talk) 23:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Adelino Sassi.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Adelino Sassi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 03:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)