User talk:Themightyquill

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Themightyquill!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Can-pacific-banff.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Can-pacific-banff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GeorgHH 17:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:12_pont.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 02:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Save_Sacco_and_Vanzetti.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 00:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Your photos[edit]

Hi, thank you for your compliments. Your photos are also awesome! --Nikater 09:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: .gif > .jpg[edit]

Should be fixed now. Unfortunately you'll have to redo the relevant uploads. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 5767f8ace32f38cf0fd3232081c99ca9[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Chermoula tagine.jpg[edit]

Hello,
If you change the description, I have no problem to add the category. Regards Moumou82 (talk) 07:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Your uploads from Flickr[edit]

Could you please tell me what you where thinking by uploading e.g. Image:Leffler - WomensLib1970 WashingtonDC.jpg and Image:Leffler -1968 WashingtonDC MLK riots.jpg with the FlickrUploadBot. Did you believe that the bot can read the image description and thus will know that this image is not by the Flickr-user and not under the licence the flickr-user selected. For your information: a bot can't read that kind of information. For that you need a thinking human, one who uploads this image with the correct attribution and licence. -- Cecil (talk) 03:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 27e9f02e54bbcd965fc867cb95e38374[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Wooly_Mammoth-RBC.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Wooly_Mammoth-RBC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

jonny-mt 02:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Kofola bottle.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Vantey (talk) 01:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Louise Fréchette.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Louise Fréchette.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token c5344fbde81d2e0184914e97aa4db8f1[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

transferring source info?[edit]

hi, I have been transfering them with s bot. I f there is missing info I need to stop! Which image in particular? (Off2riorob (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC))

Ok quill, what can I say I have transfered about 1000 files and these two, I can only suggest they never had any source info and perhaps I was mistaken to transfer them, these two files have no links to any page. I need to know what if anything I did wrong as I intend to move more files, so if you can explain I would be grateful. thanks (Off2riorob (talk) 18:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC))

I will not transfer any more files until this is cleared up, best regards. (Off2riorob (talk) 18:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC))

did you see the comment on my talk page regarding these files by Quadell? (Off2riorob (talk) 10:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC))

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Themightyquill!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 03:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit]

Dear Mightyquill, thanks for your work, but I don't quite understand why you removed the categories that I found for my picture File:Libélo-Valence.jpg: it is about bike sharing, therefore belongs in Category:Bicycles and Category:Transport in my humble opinion. SInce this service is provided by a firm, it belongs as well in the Category:Industry, don't you think so? If you don't give me elements against it, I will put these categories back.

Thanks, regards, Christian.Mercat (talk) 15:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

CC[edit]

Hi Themightyquill, I noticed you started using Commons Commander. As I use it regularly, if you need help with it or have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me. The alpha-version still has a few bugs and sometimes gets stuck, but overall I think it's quite useful. -- User:Docu at 22:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

FYI, I started a page about it at Commons:Tools/cc. -- User:Docu at 10:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

RE: Map[edit]

Look, I could care less to be honest, but are you oblivious to the fact that the blue doesn't make it clear who annexed it? Mnmazur (talk)

Just because you made the image does not give you the sole right to edit it. And please, mind the attitude, you're not being very civil. Mnmazur (talk)

I don't quite get it[edit]

Could you provide an explanation for why you removed all these categories? Thanks, cheers, --Edelseider (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Aww, shucks. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

NHSC[edit]

Hi. Sorry for the delay in responding. Patriotic pride wasn't my intent -- I just used the symbol I thought logically could be used as a marker (the stylized beaver used by Parks Canada is presumably copyrighted). But I'm not trying to be jingoistic -- I appreciate you letting me know you know that's how it came across. Any suggestions? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

No worries - the question was fine, and I am glad you raised it. Someone when one does something, one doesn't notice all the implications until someone else points them out. I agree that I should replace the maple leaf, because I don't want to create a precedent for patriotic icons on various categories. I kind of think a marker is helpful (although maybe it should like to Wikipedia articles, using LangSwitch, rather than simply to the parent category), and a marker been used for the French monuments historiques for some time (see, for example, Category:Château de Brest). Other heritage designations, like the Dutch Rijksmonument or World Heritage Sites have full templates with designation numbers - since NHSC aren't assigned numbers, and the designation categories aren't well known, I thought a full template here was a bit overblown. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

People of / People from[edit]

Hello. I do think that the current category tree is a bit of a mess, because there is no rhyme or reason whether it is "of" or "from". As you know, it's consistent for Canada, except for Vancouver (all provinces → "of", all cities → "from"), but not across the board (e.g. People of Ontario, but People from Wisconsin; People from Toronto, but People of London). Are you interested in making changes just to the Canadian cats, or to the whole category tree? If just Cdn., I wouldn't oppose a switch of everything to "from" (except perhaps for "People of Canada", as then there would be a consistency problem with other countries). If across the board, there are several possible solutions, which could include:

  • People from [country, region/subnational entity, city, neighbourhood] (standard format for everyone)
  • People of [country, region/subnational entity, city, neighbourhood] (same approach)
  • People of [country], People from [region/subnational entity, city, neighbourhood] ("of" for countries, "from" for everything else)
  • People of [country], People of [region/subnational entity], People from [city/neighbourhood] ("of" for countries and provinces, "from" for municipalities, etc.)

There are other variations, of course, but those seem to make most sense. I may be worth raising at COM:CAT. What do you think? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Interestingly, note this discussion. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for initiating all the necessary moves. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:13, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Ah, I see you're using the {{move}} tag - I might have been less cautious and just listed them at User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands, but your approach is probably the right one. When I get the chance I will help you tag 'em. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Did you mean to do this? I didn't want to revert it, because maybe I am missing something. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Furrier in Wurzen Bennewitz 01 Album Seite 01.jpg[edit]

Hatmaking. If you do not want it under "hats", you should find a better category, not only delete hats?! --Kürschner (talk) 18:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I see, it's ok. --Kürschner (talk) 18:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Could you please explain...[edit]

Could you please explain this edit?

Category:Wm. Lyon Mackenzie is the category for this fireboat. Geo Swan (talk) 19:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Macko_Sajt.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Macko_Sajt.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Simonxag (talk) 02:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Art of/Art in[edit]

Hello. As is so often the case, the art categories are inconsistent across the board. Having been categorizing so many monuments and memorials this past year, I've found most categories are "Art of". It didn't occur to me that there should be a different convention for cities, although maybe that should be the case. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 03:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified?[edit]

In what sense are File:Rainier Beer - filling bottles - 1900.jpg and File:Rainier Beer - bottle storage - 1900.jpg "Unidentified beverage bottles"? They are beer bottles, and already categorized as such. Even the brand is not in doubt. - Jmabel ! talk 01:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Similarly File:Rainier Beer - washing bottles - 1900.jpg and File:Rainier Beer - tinfoiling - 1900.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 01:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I understand what you're saying, and it's a matter of my poor wording. See my response on the CFD. - Themightyquill (talk) 01:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Tesco juice.jpg[edit]

Can you explain this edit? I don't see any problem.--Sevela.p 15:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Could you kindly hold off on the speedies?[edit]

At least let Commons:Deletion requests/File:A 4 Litre Cask of Australian White Wine.jpg run through to see if there is consensus to overturn the Foundation lawyer's opinion on the matter. If this good faith request is not workable then please AfD them rather than speedy. Agne27 (talk) 20:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Sure thing, as long as you put back the copyvio tags you removed if that deletion goes ahead. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Blank map of Europe in 1920[edit]

Hi, Thanks for leaving a message on my talk page about File:Blank map of Europe in 1920.svg, unforunately I just don't have the skills to work with vector graphic images and have screwed up one way or another every time I have tried to alter them. If I were to give you an accurate version in png format could you translate it into svg? If you can't can you direct me to someone who can? Thanks, Maps & Lucy (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Why deleted ?[edit]

Hello. You deleted Cécémel_assortiment.jpg. This is a picture I took myself at the request of the contributor Avatar (here's the proof!) representing different bricks, cup and glassware of Cécémel in possession of the inn of the en:Gourmet Museum and Library where I free work.

I don't understand why you deleted it. And why pictures in Coca-Cola or Category:Lipton (tea) or Category:Jupiler_beer can stay...

The picture shows packagings of Cécémel as sold by supermarkets and grocery stores in French-speaking Belgium and typical cup and glassware used for this product in the coffeehouses of Belgium to serve this drink. There are therefore objects of common utilities and packaging just as common...

So I thank you to restore this picture.

Sorry for my bad English, --Égoïté (talk) 12:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Wine images & fair use uploading[edit]

Hello "quill", in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gewürztraminer SGN 1989 label.jpg you suggested that I upload the image in question as "fair use" instead. Thanks for the encouraging suggestion, but since I'm a contributor to several language versions (as Tomas_e), I usually don't bother with uploading to English Wikipedia only. Regards, Tomas er (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Venuswein.jpg[edit]

Hi, I answered here, thank you --Marinelli (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

American Indian vs. "Native Americans in the United States"[edit]

Why did you do this? I am American Indian and I do not like the term "Native American" to describe us. Anyone born in the Americas (For example: someone named Schultz born in Argentine is a "Native American") is a Native American. Are you an official of Wikipedia? Was there a discussion at Wikipedia about this change? Has Wikipedia decided that this is the official opinion of Wikipedia?

When I enter my photos (many of which had their category changed due to your apparent efforts) as American Indian in their category, I mean it. If someone wants to ALSO ADD it to another category, that is up to them.

Philkon (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC) Phil

Category:American Indian (Difference between revisions) Revision as of 17:56, 6 June 2011 (edit)


Latest revision as of 14:39, 12 June 2011 (edit) (undo) Themightyquill (talk | contribs) (Native Americans in the United States)

- Category:American indian "categoryredirect|Native Americans in the United States" Latest revision as of 14:39, 12 June 2011


Category:People by colour[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:People by colour has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ZH2010 (talk) 13:31, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Hello. Would you be interested in helping organize a potential Canadian component of the 2012 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments? I am compiling a list of people that have varying degrees of interest in pursuing this. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Great! We'll talk early in the new year. Have a good holiday. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in responding. If you are still interested, please visit Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Canada. Cheers, Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:09, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


Copyright Norway vs USA[edit]

Thanks for your feedback regarding Vigeland pictures. Do you know if the US 95 year rule really applies to pictures objects in Norway? Regards --Erik den yngre (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Ethiopia pics[edit]

Dear Themightyquill, thank you very much for taking the time to evaluate these pics, I appreciate that. I recall that some were already deleted for the very same reason, since these are batch uploaded and I did not mean to break any rules but evidently we must have missed some. You might also ask for speedy deletion because they were not meant to be uploaded, of course, citing that criterion and this message, if you will. Also feel free to skip notifications if this helps :) --Elitre (talk) 18:48, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Szalasi at people's court.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Szalasi at people's court.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 21:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:CBC-radio-intl.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CBC-radio-intl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 12:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Doukhobors at outdoor meeting.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Doukhobors at outdoor meeting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 12:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Boysenberry-gate.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boysenberry-gate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Thermal baths[edit]

Why do you think this removal is correct? Orrlingtalk 20:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for asking. I removed it for two reasons. One, it was redlinked. Two, I don't think of human-constructed thermal baths as being nature. I just checked and Category:Thermal baths is not a subcategory of Category:Nature (nor is Category:Hot springs, for that matter), and Category:Thermal baths in Germany is not a sub-cat of Category:Nature in Germany (nor are other similar thermal baths by country x categories). I hope that makes sense. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Actually, neither is a reason. :/ First and foremost, hotsprings/thermal baths and about anything that has to do with geological phenomenae is hard for me to think of as not directly related to nature; that equivalent categories other than Budapest haven't yet been aligned to this obviousity is clearly not warranting that those very-famous thermal baths of Budapest be off-derivation of the city's nature... And no, red links as parent cats are not omitted because they are red. Eventually there'll be enough content and Category:Nature of Budapest will be created. Cheers. Orrlingtalk 21:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Actually, they're both reasons, but I see you don't agree. Again, it's not just equivalent categories for other cities: Category:Thermal baths is not a subcategory of Category:Nature and neither is Category:Hot springs. It doesn't make sense to just add it in this one case. However, all the other equivalent categories AND Category:Thermal baths are categorized under Category:Geothermal features so I've added Hungary and Budapest's thermal baths to that category. Good compromise? - Themightyquill (talk) 21:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Of course Category:Hot springs and Category:Thermal baths are subcategories of Category:Nature. Where do you think they both go uptree? Category:Springs >>> Category:Bodies of water >>> Category:Landforms >>> Category:Nature. This would be so unbelievably strange if "Hot springs" weren't related to "Nature", don't you think? The problem now, as I see it, is that you've apparently created a category – Category:Geothermal features in Budapest – whose sole cause was to contain that one single item we're talking about, and, unlike "Nature of Budapest", it has quite obviously nil growth prospect... which makes it rather useless. If you know how the categorization principle works, you may know that this is a less helpful solution, not to say odd (there is no "Category:Geothermal features by city" while there is Category:Nature by city) and even if it does exist, it can't evade the "Nature of"-parent, itself... I'll appreciate if you undo yourself and discard the uncustomary, unnecessary "Category:Geothermal features in Budapest" replacing it with Category:Nature of Budapest, which will soon after be a blue link for at least that one concern. Thanks. Orrlingtalk 21:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I think it's far stranger to have a bunch of photos of buildings in a subcategory of the category nature. Yes, they have a connection to nature, but they are hardly photos of nature, any more than a drinking fountain or a wooden desk is a photo of nature. I've created the reasonable sub-categories including Category:Nature of Budapest. If you want to propose deletion of Geothermal features of Budapest, go right ahead. Thanks for your help on this matter. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
It isn't the buildings that are the nature, it's the encyclopedic fact that these are primarily related to an ever-throbbing subterranean natural activity. I wouldn't bother to categorize Swimming pools as subset of Nature, would I? And finally, when it comes to nature-in-cities, most elements are man-modified/processed which doesn't efface the nature kernel of them i.e. parks. Cheerz Orrlingtalk 16:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. I'm glad it worked out though. By the way, are you sure there aren't any geothermal features in Budapest that haven't been turned into thermal baths? - Themightyquill (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Budapest boasts of its nature just for these baths, so I don't see where the disagreement is. Advise you to have a look at contents of random city's nature categories so you fetch an idea on the wide range of things that qualify as urban nature. To your last question, I assume with most probability that "geothermal features in Budapest" has no value other than embracing the one cat you created it for. This makes that parent as odd enough to be unwelcome, and we generally avoid constructing categories unless we know they potentially have more than one child. Orrlingtalk 16:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I can't understand why you won't accept that my view has at least some validity. There's a difference between "things that use nature" and "nature." Category:Painters from Hungary back be tracked through Category:Colours to Category:Nature. Painters use colours, and colours are a natural phenomenon. I have no problem with that line of categories, but that doesn't mean I think Category:Painters from Hungary belongs in Category:Nature of Hungary. For a less extreme example, Category:Windmills in Amsterdam isn't listed under Category:Nature of Amsterdam. I understand your point of view, and I've found a solution that seems to suit us both, but your instance that you are 100% right is starting to look like bullying. I'd appreciate if you'd let the conversation end here.- Themightyquill (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Changes to the Category of a photo for the Pausilipo[edit]

Hi,

I do not understand why you change a perfectly valid category ("Monuments of Los Santos Province") to a description (Finca "Pausílipo" del Doctor Belisario Porras) which does not constitute a category, but the name of the monument... If you want to create "El Pausilipo" as category, it is clearly a sub-category of the previous one. Changing the category by a specific name of the monument does not make sense to me... specially since is done only for this monument. The name of the photo clearly specifies already it as "El Pausilipo" and there is no need to change a useful general category. So I will undo it until you explain the change..

use of your picture Pinot Blanc grapes[edit]

Hello, I would like to make you aware of the placement of your photo (a section of, rotatetd) on my website:

http://www.rhc-weinkontor.de/Seite-/-Kategorie/Weissburgunder

Hope you like that. Thanks + best regards --Holger Casselmann (talk) 09:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Bathroom v Toilet[edit]

You have created a lot of new categories that just don't make sense. A Bathroom should have a bath, but you seem to be applying the term to Toilets. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

El Pausilipo[edit]

You mentioned in my talk page:

Hi Vsanchez,

I'm not sure I understand the problem. There were a great many photos in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Los Santos Province. Some of them were clearly named and categorized, some were not. So I created sub-categories for many (five in total) of the specific monuments in that category and made them subcategories of Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Los Santos Province. See Category:Iglesia_de_San_Atanasio_(Los_Santos) for example. I also created Category:Finca "Pausílipo" del Doctor Belisario Porras‎ for that specific monument, and placed images of that monument in that category. The category is a sub-category of Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Los Santos Province. You have removed some but not all of the images of that monument from that category. Because Category:Finca "Pausílipo" del Doctor Belisario Porras‎ is a subcategory of Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Los Santos Province, no image should be in both categories. Commons now has 8 images of that monument, so I don't see the problem with the monument having its own category. I'll wait to hear from you again before I add them back into their category. Thanks. Themightyquill (talk) 14:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

My answer:

What I do not understand is why you ELIMINATED the category "Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Los Santos Province" completely. I am not against creating sub-categories, and I agree with you if that is what you are doing. However, eliminating the "Los Santos Province" category limits a more general search. So, it is ok to add the new category without eliminating the old one. That is my opinion.

El Pausilipo[edit]

My apologies Themightyquill, i did not understand wikimedia category system.

File tagging File:Monitor National Marine Sanctuary .jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Monitor National Marine Sanctuary .jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

1989 11:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Renaming[edit]

You'd marked some files to rename. But I think the new names are not correct. Why "ErkelSandor-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg", not "Erkel-Sandor-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg" or "Erkel Sandor tomb Kerepesi.jpg"? The new names should be possible to find them in the search machine, isn't it? Wieralee (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

I made administrative descissions about these renaming requests. Themightyquill, you have undo them. You don't have the right to to this. You can talk to me, to an other Sysop or you can request my descission. So there are many ways. You made the only step that is impossible. So you will undo this. Your request was not valid. You gave no valid reason and the new names are terrible. If you don't do it by yourself, I will do it and I have to treat you as a vandal. Marcus Cyron (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

@Marcus Cyron: - I've made 38k file edits on commons, successfully requested many file moves, and I've never been treated with such condescension and threatened by an administrator. Could you tell me where to complain about your behaviour, your interpretation of COM:FR and your comments above? Thank you. - Themightyquill (talk) 12:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm not interested in how much you've done - only in what you have done here. And you don't have to undo administrative descisions. Administrators are elected for those descisions! Can you imagine, what happens here, if everybody acts in this way? This is called anarchy! There are a lot of ways you could react. But you chose the only imposible - and this for not only one image. Maybe you should think about, that you maybe made mistakes? And you did not show any respect! Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to chime in, but I would have to agree that Themightyquill does not appear to have done anything to merit the above comment by Marcus Cyron. I've only looked at the one cited above, File:Erkel Sandor-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg, but TMQ did have the right to make the request, provided a rationale, and the proposed move seems logical. Maybe there is a language issue here, caused largely by my inability to speak German, but if there are other cases where the move did not seem appropriate, then I would have thought one would civilly have a discussion on the merits. I'm perplexed as to why TMQ would be treated as a vandal. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
@Marcus Cyron: - hello? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The request were not executable, as far I have ssen it. I can be wrong. But then we have to talk about it. Themightyquill simply undo my descision. And this is impossible. In this manor we can't work together in such a project. Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

I accept your right to refuse my original request (although I think you are incorrect in your reading of COM:FR), but that doesn't address your behaviour afterwards. I have every right to make another request for a move while providing further rationale (that's what I thought you were asking for, since I hadn't originally filled out the optional field). As an editor, I am not required to accept the decision of one administrator as totally final. As an administrator, you are still obliged to assume good faith and treat others with at least basic respect instead of condescension. You do not have the right to order editors to do something. You do not have the right to threaten to treat an editor as a vandal for edits that were quite obviously done in good faith. You don't have the right to scold other users with renaming rights for responding to a move requests without checking the whole edit history of the image. It's that kind of behaviour prevents us from working together on a project. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

@Marcus Cyron:, thank you for responding. I have a few comments:
  1. You were entitled to decide that insufficient rationale had been provided for the proposed moves. Themightyquill was entitled to respond by providing additional rationale. That's how this project is supposed to work - collaboratively. @Wieralee: was subsequently entitled to review and implement the proposed moves.
  2. Themightyquill did not "undo" your decision. You identified what you believed to be an inadequacy with the proposal, and he responded to your comment with additional details. He was entitled to do so.
  3. Your messages to Themightyquill and Wieralee on their respective talk pages were inappropriate. In particular, threatening to treat Themightyquill as a vandal, when he had done nothing wrong, was offside.
  4. It is unclear why you seem to think that you and Themightyquill cannot work together.
I don't want to make a mountain of a molehill, but I can fully understand why Themightyquill found it troubling. I will be proposing a minor change to Commons:File renaming to provide additional clarification for situations such as this. Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Gottermayer-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Gundel-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Salga-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Schöffer-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Hoffmann-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Kamermayer Karoly-tomb-Kerepesi .jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Schenk-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Lotz Karoly-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Blaha Lujza-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Kilian-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Eisele-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:WatterichOdon-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Egyedi Arthur-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Martinovics Elek-familytomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Treichlinger Jozsef-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:Vasarhelyi Pal-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen Deine Bearbeitung an der Seite File:FesteticsGéza-tomb-Kerepsi.jpg wurde von Themightyquill rückgängig gemacht. (Änderungen zeigen) vor 5 Tagen -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

So? You said there was missing rationale. He provided additional rationale. His actions were appropriate. Your subsequent response to him was not. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)