User talk:Thomas.azan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Thomas.azan!

File:Portrait Karim Haggui.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Portrait Karim Haggui.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--— Habib M'HENNI [¿tell me?] 12:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

File:KH_Hanovre.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:KH_Hanovre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | Azərbaycanca | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Simple English | Српски / srpski | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Commons-emblem-hand.svg Hello Thomas.azan.

It has come to our attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Martin H. (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Permissions OTRS[edit]

Bonjour Thomas.azab,
En effet il faut bien s'assurer que les photos ont la permission d'être publiées sur Wikimedia commons avec la licence appropriée. Pour ceci il existe une procédure permettant de vérifier les permissions. Vous pouvez lire davantage cette page.
Je vous la résume ainsi : tu mets les photos sur Commons, mentionner obligatoirement l'auteur des images et ensuite, il faut s'assurer que le déteneur des droits des images envoie un email (vous pouvez utiliser le modèle suivant : Modèle de message) à l'adresse suivante : permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org. Il faut s'assurer aussi que les images sur Commons aient le bandeau {{OTRS pending}}, en attendant la confirmation d'un volontaire OTRS, qui va s'assurer de la permission envoyée.
Bref, vous avez la page qui explique en détails tout ça. Je vous souhaite un bonne continuation, et n'hésitez pas à me contacter pour d'autres informations. Cordialement — Habib M'HENNI [¿tell me?] 15:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Permission from the copyright holder of course. The file KH_Hanovre.jpg is not "Own work" and the photographer is not Thomas.azan. --Martin H. (talk) 15:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes as I said in french "le déteneur des droits", the copyright holder. — Habib M'HENNI [¿tell me?] 15:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Thomas.azan!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Audel Wiki.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Audel Wiki.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Hydriz (talk) 08:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Marc Keller.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marc Keller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo SIG strasbourg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Logo SIG strasbourg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dereckson (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Audel Wiki 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Audel Wiki 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dereckson (talk) 16:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Own work claim and Commons licensing[edit]

Good evening,

Wikimedia Commons allows to publish three kind of files:

  1. the photographies you take yourself, and you want to publish under a free license
  2. the photographies you have an explicit, written document from the photographer allowing you to publish it under a free license
  3. the illustrations in public domain, for example because the author is dead for more than 70 years

I'm really worried by File:Karim Haggui Wikipedia.jpg, which I've deleted: the image contains EXIF tags, tags asserting the photographier is Lars Kaletta, a professional sport photographer, http://www.lars-kaletta.de/.

This photographer is affiliated with Getty. Getty is known to pursue reusers of their photographies, even if they can prove their good faith showing a Wikimedia Commons buggy permission. We've already have the case. So you put in danger potential reusers of the photo you uploaded.

Please seriously take in consideration the fact we curate seriously our content and want to protect 3rd party reusers.

Now, I understand to illustrate the French Wikipedia is a reasonable and legitimate objective. There are solutions. For example, you can ask the assistance of Wikimedia France or Wikimedia CH to organize a photographies day: they can send you a photographer who will organize a photo shooting sessions. They've already done that for parliaments members and cycling, there is no real obstacle to extend the programme to football.

--Dereckson (talk) 16:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Ayant droit d'une photographie[edit]

Rebonsoir,

Je viens de voir votre question à l'époque restée sans réponse concernant les photographies représentant Karim Haggui.

L'ayant droit d'une image est le photographe, et non le sujet de l'image, sauf dans le cadre d'un autoportrait. C'est donc le photographe qui détient les droits d'auteur et peut décider ou non de la diffuser sous telle licence. Ni vous, ni le sujet de l'image, ne pouvez le faire, sauf si le photographe vous transfère l'exercice de ses droits patrimoniaux.

La bonne façon de procéder dans pareil cas est donc de contacter les photographes et leur demander à eux une autorisation. --Dereckson (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)