User talk:ThomasPusch

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Uploads[edit]

You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool.

 Rüdiger Wölk 15:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Correction of mistyped file names[edit]

For the correction of mistyped file names you could use the template: {{Bad name|correctly named image}} for speedy deletion instead deletion request. Axxgreazz (talk) 22:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

If the new image is the same as the old one, and just the file name is corrected, you can use {{duplicate|NAME OF OTHER FILE}} to speed up deletion process) --Deadstar 14:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deprecated language templates[edit]

Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that {{english}}, {{deutsch}}, {{polski}}, {{français}} and so on are now deprecated and should not be used any more.
You can use {{en|Your English text}}, {{de|your Deutsch text}}, {{pl|your Polish text}}, {{fr|your French text}}, etc. instead :)
Best regards,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 08:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I know and I do use the templates like {{lt|Your Lithuanian text}} in my uploaded pictures and nearly all commons pages I touch ... Just one time I did ignore the depracted templates in one single description section yesterday, though I changed something else there (being in a hurry). You may control my traces in the commons pages, if you want to be sure.
By the way: You could leave the starting line "== {{int:filedesc}} ==", which puts the header "Description" in the language you selected for communication in the commons pages... That's much nicer than seeing it always in English, I'd say.
Best regards,
ThomasPusch 18:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your answer. Actually I did not check all you edits, I just use to monitor recent changes in pages that link to the deprecated templates, so that I generally catch people who are not yet aware of the new templates :)
About the usage of int:, I think subtitles in image descriptions where the {{information}} is used are not really useful, although using int: trick would be nice in the information template itself...
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 22:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:"Helena Ivanovna Roerich".jpg[edit]

I'm afraid you've misinterpreted PD-India. The license is for photographs and films only. Everything else is copyrighted until 60 years after the death of the author. -Nard the Bard 04:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Manka kategorio[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Saluton ThomasPusch!

Koran dankon pro la alŝuto de dosieroj al la vikimedia komunejo. Bonvolu atenti, ke la dosieroj en la komunejo utilu al ĉiuj vikimediaj projektoj. Tio nur eblas, se ili ankaŭ troveblas de aliaj uzantoj. Tiucele dosieroj devas esti enordigitaj en taŭgan kategorion de la komuneja kategoria sistemo. Taŭgaj kategorioj ekzemple troveblas per la ilo CommonSense (funkcianta en la angla kaj en 19 pliaj lingvoj).

Aldone al la enordigo en almenaŭ unu kategorion vi povas enplekti dosierojn en galerio-paĝojn.

Superrigardon pri ĉiuj ĝis nun de vi alŝutitaj dosieroj eblas trovi ĉi-tie.

Bonvolu kunhelpi ne plikreskigi la bedaŭrinde grandan kvanton de senkategoriaj dosieroj! Koran dankon.

  • Atentu: Se vi ricevas tiun-ĉi mesaĝon pro antaŭe alŝutita kaj jam kategoriigita dosiero, la kategorio(j) antaŭmallonge estis forigitaj. Tio povas esti okazinta senintence aŭ pro vandalismo. Bonvolu kontroli la koncernan dosieron.


BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello dear bot,

until now I uploaded 520 images to Wikipedia Commons, and specially for you I just controlled all of them: in 2 cases of 520 I misspelled anything in placing appropriate category tags, 518 were OK. I just fixed those 2 cases.

S. y.

ThomasPusch (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 3321c40ac5f804db5632363346d22a55[edit]

Mi nun posedas vikimedian TUSC-konton!

File:Digestive system diagram eo.svg[edit]

✓ Farite --Arno Lagrange 17:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

About File:Entamoeba histolytica life cycle-eo.svg[edit]

the black blocks come from the font you are using, have a look at Help:SVG to see wich fonts you can use without problems. or convert the text to an outline so that it apears like a part of the drawing :) hope that helps.-LadyofHats (talk) 12:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Colourful green market.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg La dosiero File:Colourful_green_market.jpg estis listigita en la paĝo Commons:Petoj pri forigoj, por diskuti ĉu ĝi estu konservata aŭ forigata. Estus bone se vi partoprenus en tiu diskuto, trovebla en la subpaĝo de la forigopeto.

Se vi mem kreis tiun dosieron, vi atentu ke tiu peto pri forigo neniel signifas malaprezon de via laboro. Simple iu kredas ke povas ekzisti problemo pri la dosiero, ekzemple rilate al la licencado.
Neniel la peto pri forigo estas celata atako kontraŭ vi, kaj vi ne komprenu ĝin tiumaniere. Dankon pro via kompreno kaj kontribuo!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MGA73 (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Before you move a photo on wikipedia that came from flickr, check the flickr license. If it is licensed freely, then transfer it here and type in a {{flickrreview}} so the flickrbot or someone will mark it. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Forigita el la vikimedia komunejo la 27-an de decembro 2009 pro ne-centprocenta forigo de duboj pri komuneja licenco (la fotintino ne reagis al peto komunejo-konforme rekonfirmi la kopirajtan statuson). Tamen daŭre havebla en la esperantlingva vikipedio.

File:Royan vojmontrilo Balingen kaj Palais de Congrès.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Royan vojmontrilo Balingen kaj Palais de Congrès.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Coyau (talk) 23:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Kopiita al la franca vikipedio: Royan vojmontrilo Balingen kaj Palais de Congrès.jpg. La foto estis ankaŭ uzata en la germana kaj esperantlingva vikipedioj, do vole-nevole mi permane kopios la foton ankaŭ al ili, por daŭrigi la uzon tie. ThomasPusch (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC) ✓ Done Thomas Pusch

File:Entamoeba histolytica life cycle-eo.svg[edit]

  • Probably this mesage is reaching you a bit too late. i had been rather busy and didnt came to your mesage until now.
  • The problem with the image is the Font you are using. there is a list of fonts thatshow correctly on HELP:SVG.
  • you could also try outlining the text.

-LadyofHats (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Lázár György.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lázár_György.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lázár_György.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately I can't give more information than it's indicated in the file's page. More data could only give an administrator of the hungarian wikipedia, where the image came from, but was erased there after it was moved to wikimedia commons (not the only case information traces got lost after moving something from a wikipedia branch to wikimedia commons...). I would be sorry though if the file would have to be deleted now only because it is hard to trace its very origns in the hungarian wikipedia - the file is needed in a bunch of wikipedia branches and up to now there is no alternative in wikimedia.

ThomasPusch (talk) 09:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Ich werde in der ungarischen WP um Wiederherstellung des Bildes bitten damit es erhalten bleibt (dort ist es leider aber bis März 2011 nicht wieder aufgetaucht TP). Für Commons fällt das Bild eindeutig nicht unter COM:L#Hungary mit {{PD-old}} und auch nicht unter das derzeitige {{PD-ineligible}} mit Commons:Licensing#Simple design. Leider also auf den anderen Projekten nicht verwendbar. --Martin H. (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Forigopeto el la komunejo[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vincas_Mickevičius-Kapsukas_en_la_monumentejo_Grūto_parkas.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Bedauerlich, die überstrikte Commons-Interpretation des eigentlich liberal gedachten Gesetzes zur Panoramafreiheit in Litauen. Diskussion über den Link im Kasten einsehbar. -- ThomasPusch (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Kelkheim bistroo Esperanto[edit]

Kelkheim bistroo Esperanto.jpg

Saluton,

Se vi havas informojn pri la bistroo esperanto en Kelkheim, ĉu vi bonvolas aldoni ilin ĉe eo:Listo de ZEO-j en Germanio ? Koran dankon, NicoRay (talk) 13:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Bedaŭrinde mi ne havas plian informon. Mi fotis la ejon, kiam mi hazarde preterveturis. Laŭ [1] la adreso de la bistroo Esperanto estas "Bahnstr. 18a". Pli mi vere ne scias.

ThomasPusch (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Help for Translation[edit]

Saluton, ThomasPusch. We are looking for someone who could translate into Esperanto this page or a part of it. Can you please help us or suggest what to do ? Thanks in advance, Saluti dall'Italia--Aeron10 (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Provinz Sicilia[edit]

Hallo ThomasPusch, du hast die Datei File:Sicilia SPQR.png erstellt. Im Altertum gehörte auch die Insel Malta südlich von Sizilien zu der Provinz, könntest du die bitte noch entsprechend einfärben? Grüße --Bjs (talk) 20:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done ThomasPusch (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC) (Das Einfärben hätte eigentlich jeder schnell machen können, es ging ja nur um das Ändern weniger Pixel. Malta sieht etwas rundlicher aus als es eigentlich ist, aber bei der geringen Auflösung ist keine wirklich naturgetreue Inselsiluette hinzubekommen.)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear ThomasPusch,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Maroun04.jpg[edit]

Discussion

Your "Category:Location not applicable" removing on French military flags[edit]

Hello ThomasPusch,

I have seen that you removed the category Category:Location not applicable on French military flag files. I think this category is appropriate, because what is the location of a flag ? Can you say where exactly is a flag of France, for example ? There is no answer to this question : a flag can be placed and moved everywhere. So I revert your changes.

Sémhur (talk) 16:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boris Jelcin.png have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 13:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Danielius Dolskis.jpg have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear ThomasPusch,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Verwaltungsgliederung Deutschlands[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Verwaltungsgliederung Deutschlands has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hallo Thomas, ich wollte dich über diesen Antrag informieren, da du diese Übersicht im Oktober 2006 in Kategorien verlinkt hast. --79.197.122.32 23:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 15:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Frankfurta librofoiro 2012 Deutscher Buchpreis Ursula Krechel.JPG[edit]

Hallo ThomasPusch, falls das Foto auf dem Poster nicht auch von dir stammt, ist das aktuelle Foto eine Bearbeitung die das Urheberrecht des anderen Fotografen verletzt. Panoramafreiheit dürfte hier kaum gelten (wohl nicht dauerhaft und offenbar indoor). Am besten selbst die Löschung beantragen. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

Bedauerlich, aber laut COM:DW wird Túrelio recht haben - natürlich ist das Foto auf dem Poster nicht von mir persönlich geknippst, sondern das Bild ist einfach ein Ausschnitt aus der Portraitgalerie "Werkschau" des Deutschen Buchpreises auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2012. Ich beantrage selbst die Löschung... -- ThomasPusch (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Frankfurta librofoiro 2012 eldonejo Schirmer.JPG[edit]

Discussion

Kleiner Tipp vom "Gegner" ;-), wenn du eine Löschung für unberechtigt hältst, wie z.B. bei Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frankfurta librofoiro 2012 eldonejo Schirmer.JPG, dann ist der korrekte Baustein nicht "kontra", sondern {{vk}} (steht für vote keep, also behalten, statt löschen). Das kontra ist dort unpassend. Ändere das am besten noch. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Man sieht, dass ich im Allgemeinen nicht viel Zeit in Lösch- oder Behalte-Diskussionen investiere, und der absolut größte Teil meiner Commons-Uploads ohne irgendeine Diskussion seinen Platz in der mehrsprachigen Mediensammlung findet... --ThomasPusch (talk) 20:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Tenita en la eo-lingva vikipedio. Eblus aparta alŝuto ankaŭ al la de-lingva vikio, sed mi mem faris la foton unuavice por la eo-lingva projekto kaj tial ne mem alŝutas ĝin de-vikipedie. --ThomasPusch (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Vükiped Cifapad 2012-11-15.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vükiped Cifapad 2012-11-15.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Iketsi (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Seremban Night.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Seremban Night.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

The deletion log states:

  • 02:17, 16 Apr. 2013 INeverCry deleted File:Seremban Night.jpg (reason: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)

The file was used in the english wikipedia, was marked as a candidate to be moved to Wikimedia Commons, and seemed to me to be properly licensed. I can't check any more, because after my action moving the file to Wikimedia Commons yesterday evening, at 02:17 UTC it was deleted not only in Commons, but also in the english wikipedia, where it existed before without any problem. Yesterday, the file was the only suitable panorama of the city of Seramban in Malaysia in any wikimedia project, now there is no such file at all. Therefore I ask an administrator to check the file licence critically, and if really not suitable for Wikimedia Commons, to check if the file cannot be restored in the english wikipedia, where seemingly it didn't bother anyone before Wikimedia Commons came into action... --ThomasPusch (talk) 17:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I nominated this for speedy deletion on both projects and INeverCry (talk · contribs) later deleted the image on both projects. If I remember correctly, I found that the file appeared on Skyscrapercity a few months earlier, referencing Flickr where it was listed as "all rights reserved" with no indication that the Flickr user was the same person as the Wikipedia uploader. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Here it was: Skyscrapercity & Flickr. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

 Not done per Stefan. Sorry, the file is not suitable for Commons or Wikipedia, because there is no indication it's freely licensed. This isn't a case of Commons springing into action for the sake of being annoying –⁠moogsi (blah) 20:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the explanation and the Skyscrapercity & Flickr links. I can see the point now. --ThomasPusch (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, ThomasPusch. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Saintes arta muzeo Musée l'Échevinage.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Saintes arta muzeo Musée l'Échevinage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

82.124.52.138 21:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Darmstadt Christengemeinschaft 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Darmstadt Christengemeinschaft 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Weissbier (talk) 11:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Michelstadt kastelo Fürstenau, Laufwasserkraftwerk kaj Kavaliershaus.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michelstadt kastelo Fürstenau, Laufwasserkraftwerk kaj Kavaliershaus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 21:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

You're right. I uploaded several photos of the castle to category:Schloss Fürstenau (Michelstadt) that day, by UploadWizard, but in this one case the upload helper skipped the part

=={{int:license-header}}==

{{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

I just added it manually. Everything OK now. Thank you for your attention! --ThomasPusch (talk) 10:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 10:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 02:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Saluton! Mia frato Arno kiu redaktis la artikolon pri Tibor Sekelj deziras korespondi kun vi limakpoŝte. Ĉu vi povas retmesaĝi al mi vian poŝtadreson kiun mi sciigos al li private : rene.blag ĉe free.fr. Dankon por Arno Lagrange 11:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Landonomaj ŝablonoj[edit]

„La reguligo ke redaktanto de plena enciklopedia artikolo rajtas decidi ĉu en tiu teksto aplikiĝu la landnomaj formoj de finaĵo -ujo aŭ -io, ne signifas ke redakteto de ŝablono rajtigus ŝanĝi la artikolonomon.“ (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AVietnam&diff=114884022&oldid=103472131 and 44 aliaj ŝablonoj)

Kiun artikolonomon vi pensas? --Petrus Adamus (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Jes, mi pro hasto en tempe limigita labora paŭzo iom malklare esprimis min. Pardonu. Jen pli klare: Vi konas la interkonsenton en la e-lingva vikipedio, ke "oni povas uzi kaj la UJ-sistemon kaj la I-sistemon por landnomoj. Kiam iu kreas (=verkas) artikolon kun landnomo en la titolo, li povas mem elekti, kiun formon uzi." Simpla teknika ago kiel ekzemple alinomigo de artikola titolo de nacilingva al esperantlingva formo ne estas kreo de nova artikolo (ekzemple se vi prenus la e-vikipedian artikolon NEOS, en kies teksto estas ekzemple unuafraze "NEOS - Das Neue Österreich (tradukite: La nova Aŭstrio) estas liberala partio de Aŭstrio, fondita en 2012", vi ne rajtus simple elpensi novan artikolan nomon "NEOS - la nova Aŭstrujo" kaj alinomigi la artikolon tien, sed respekti ke la artikolo verkiĝis je uzo de la landnomo "Aŭstrio". Same la mallonga teknika aldono de e-lingva interna ligilo [[:eo:Aŭstrio|Aŭstrujo]] en multlingva ŝablono {{Austria}} ne signifas ke vi verkis novan artikolon pri la lando Aŭstrio, kaj tial rajtas devigi ĉiujn esperantoparolantojn en la vikimedia komunejo pere de la ŝablono estonte uzi nur la komunejan artikolonomon "Aŭstrujo" por artikolo vere titolata "Aŭstrio", sed la tasko estas simple sendi al la e-lingva artikolo pri la lando, en respekto de ties nomo. Se vi rigardas la ŝablonon {{Austria}}, en neniu alia lingvo estus tiel ke faranto de ŝablona redakteto en la komunejo mem elektas novan artikolon de la prilanda artikolo (ekzemple [[:de:Österreich|Oesterreich]] pro persona malŝato de litero Ö), sed simple uziĝas la artikolonomo. Tial por la e-lingva artikolo "Svislando" en la komuneja ŝablono uziĝu la nomo Svislando (ne Svisio aŭ Svisujo), por "Litovio" la nomo Litovio, por "Egiptujo" la nomo Egiptujo, por "Belorusio" la nomo Belorusio (ne Belarusio, eĉ se oni persone preferus tion) kaj por "Luksemburgo" (lando) la nomo Luksemburgo (eĉ se en la artikola diskutpaĝo multaj uzantoj pledas por akcepto de la praktike uzata formo Luksemburgio por la lando kaj Luksemburgo por ties ĉefurbo ... Luksemburgujo certe ne, ĉar tiam ĉiuj loĝantoj estus luksemburgoj). Mi tute ne volas akuzi ke vi fakte "ŝanĝis la artikolonomon" en la e-lingva vikipedio, tion vi ne faris, sed en la ŝablono vi ŝajnigis alian e-lingvan artikolonomon ol efektive estas, kaj tiu truko en tiu-ĉi komuneje centra ŝablono ne bonus. Ĉu klare? Sinceran saluton, ThomasPusch (talk) 20:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Miaopinie, miksi en la ŝablonoj (kaj ankaŭ en la artikolotitololoj de la Esperanta Vikipedio) plurajn formojn de landonomoj (kune Egiptujo, Germanio, Alĝerio, Nederlando, Svislando) nur kaŭzas absolutan konfuzon kaj ege komplikas Esperanton, ĉar necesas por ĉiu nomo parkere lerni, kio en ĝi estas radiko (tio estas reala problemo, mi renkontis multajn „spertajn“ Esperantistojn, kiuj absolute ne orientiĝis en la afero). Se iu ajn volas subteni la senutile malfacilan sistemon per argumento pri ties vasta uzo, mi devas nur atentigi, ke per la sama argumento eblas ankaŭ tute kondamni Esperanton – la Angla lingvo ja estas multe pli malfacila kaj maltaŭga, sed ĝi ja estas jam vaste uzata… Ĉar mi volis subteni uzon de la facilaj kaj por Esperanto naturaj formoj, mi volis disvastigi ilian ekziston en la interreto ankaŭ per la ŝablonoj en Vikimedio, la penon vi nun detruis – favore al la malfacilaj formoj, kiuj jam plurfoje igis min preskaŭ forlasi Esperantujon: enirante ĝin, mi mise pensis, ke ties anoj cerbumas kaj preferas (almenaŭ lingve) solvojn pli bonajn anstataŭ simple imiti la ĉirkaŭaĵon kaj elekti solvojn pli facilajn, pli disvastigitajn – tio tamen montriĝis esti tute erara ideo, la komunumo ja konsistas grandparte el stranguloj, kiuj tamen almenaŭ en la strangula grupo volas konformiĝi, ankaŭ al la uzo de senutile malfacilaj landonomoj… --Petrus Adamus (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Mi komprenas vian motivon, sed la celo de enciklopedio estas priskribi la mondon, ne reformi gxin. Kaj la celo de la multlingva vikimedia komunejo vere ne estas de-ekstere plibonigi Esperanton. Konsciu ke mi tre aprezas vian redaktadon en la e-lingva vikipedio kaj vere ne volus persone lukti kontraux vi. Sed ke ekde la komenco de praktika aplikado de la lingvo Esperanto aperis iuj (en strikta senco ne-necesaj) sinonimoj, kiel "Svisio" kaj "Svisujo" (en tiom arda lingva batalo ke Edmond Privat jam antaux preskaux jarcento proponis la "pacan kompromison" neuxtrale uzi la nomon Svislando), kiel "komencigxi" kaj "eki", kiel "hospitalo" kaj "malsanulejo", estas fakto. Jam antaux 100 jaroj estis esperantistoj, kiuj en sercxo de simpleco volis ke "-ujo" havu la signifon "ujo", tiel kiel cxiu alia afikso de Esperanto havis unu signifon (nur "-ujo" havis tri): do pomujo estu ujo de pomoj (kesto, bovlo aux simile), pomarbo estu arbo, kaj lando prefere havu propran nomon, ne estu "ujo de homoj el unu gento", cxar tiel ne estas: svisoj logxas cxie en la mondo, kaj en la alpa sxtato logxas multaj homoj de aliaj gentoj. Kiam mi kiel infano lernis Esperanton, la -uj-formoj estis preskaux malaperintaj kaj aspektis arkaikaj, nur dum la lastaj jaroj, kiam homoj ne plu tiom lernas la lingvon parole en kursoj, kongresoj kaj vojagxado, sed pli interrete, skribe kaj memlerne, cxe la hejma komputilo, la malnovaj formoj revivigxis. Sed ja "Svisio" kaj "Svisujo" same gxustas, kvankam du gxustaj solvoj anstataux unu gxenas multajn anojn de partio. Mi firme kredas ke nek la laux vidpunkto gxusta aux abomeninda uzo de "-io" kaj "-ujo" nek de "-ata" kaj "-ita" decidas pri la fina venko de Esperanto. Sed certe la multlingva vikimedia komunejo ne estas la gxusta loko devige sxangxi la praktikan lingvouzon de Esperanto laux vidpunkto tute ne dividita de cxiuj. ThomasPusch (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Ergebnisse zum Wettbewerb Bild des Jahres 2013[edit]

Das Bild des Jahres 2013. Ergebnisse ansehen »

Hallo ThomasPusch,

Der Wettbewerb zum Bild des Jahres ist beendet und wir freuen uns, die Ergebnisse verkünden zu können: Dieses Jahr haben wir den Teilnehmerrekord gebrochen – mehr Benutzer haben über das Bild des Jahres 2013 abgestimmt als jemals zuvor. In beiden Abstimmungsrunden wählten insgesamt 4070 unterschiedliche Personen ihre Lieblingsbilder. Zusätzlich gab es mehr Kandidaten (exzellente Bilder) im Wettbewerb als jemals zuvor (insgesamt 962 Bilder).

  • In der ersten Runde haben 2852 Nutzer über 962 Bilder abgestimmt.
  • In der zweiten Runde haben 2919 Nutzer über die 50 Finalisten (die 30 beliebtesten Bilder insgesamt und die zwei beliebtesten jeder Kategorie) abgestimmt.

Wir gratulieren den Gewinnern des Wettbewerbs und bedanken uns bei ihnen dafür, dass sie diese großartigen Bilder erstellt und unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht haben:

  1. 157 Nutzer stimmten für den Gewinner, ein Bild einer Glühbirne, deren Glühwendel aus Wolfram durchbrennt.
  2. Für den zweiten Platz, ein Bild des "Sviati Hory" (Heilige Berge) Nationalparks in der Oblast Donezk, Ukraine, stimmten 155 Nutzer.
  3. Für den dritten Platz, ein Bild einer im Flug trinkenden Schwalbe, stimmten 131 Nutzer.

Klicke hier um die Ergebnisse anzuzeigen »

Wir bedanken uns auch herzlich bei allen 4070 abstimmenden Nutzern für ihre Teilnahme und hoffen, dass Ihr beim nächsten Wettbewerb Anfang 2015 wieder dabei seid! Ihr seid herzlich eingeladen weiterhin in der Gemeinschaft auf Commons mitzuwirken, indem ihr eure Werke teilt.

Vielen Dank
Euer Bild-des-Jahres-Team

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo ThomasPusch,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

File:Aeroport Maya-Maya.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aeroport Maya-Maya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

82.127.154.3 16:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Arrow right.svg Kept.

Notiz für mich selbst[edit]

Das Bild Guggenbergkapelle.jpg hat einen überflüssigen Streifen am unteren Rand, der nicht zum Bild gehört. An diesem Computer kann ich das nicht selbst beseitigen, aber falls nicht zufällig jemand anderer in der Zwischenzeit den unnötigen unteren Streifen entfernt, setze ich mir selbst diese Notiz, das bei Gelegenheit am eigenen Computer zu machen. --ThomasPusch (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)