User talk:ToSter

English: Welcome to the Commons, ToSter!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 22:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 791c8d5bcb6ebb386c4547457c7b98f2

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Commonist licenses

Dear ToSter,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 8000 files (started with about 1,8M files) . Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt?

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}

{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, Multichill (talk) 12:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

I think I got the images changed now :-) --MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, ToSter!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Pietra roslinnosci.png was uncategorized on 26 October 2009.

File:07 Stara Lesna, stacja meteorologiczna.jpg

Hello,

I'm trying to classfy File:07 Stara Lesna, stacja meteorologiczna.jpg. Since the description was in Polish, I assumed that it should be in category:Weather stations in Poland but I'm not sure. Could you help me? Pierre cb (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I will correct the category in that case. Pierre cb (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Could you please geocode your geographic images, thanks? --99of9 04:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC) The candidate images done, I will proceed with all the others --ToSter 08:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC) Nice scene. The sky is very close to overexposed, but IMO it's just inside the limit. --99of9 10:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolina Starolesna, Ostry Szczyt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beskid Slaski, Skalite i Kotlina Zywiecka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good photo Fale 21:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalisz, bazylika kolegiacka 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I'd like to see the corner of the house on right being cropped away or the perspective to be corrected. --MattiPaavola 17:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Cropped. --ToSter 19:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC) ok for me. --MattiPaavola 01:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gory Swietokrzyskie, Kakonin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I noticed that I have uploaded the photo in a relatively small resolution. Sorry, please wait, tomorrow I will upload a bigger version. --ToSter 22:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC). Done. --ToSter 09:24, 25 December 2009 (UTC)  Support now is ok --Pudelek 22:17, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Koszysta z Hali Gasienicowej.jpg

Mała Koszysta nie jest z tej strony w ogóle widoczna. Pozdrawiam--83.12.91.242 14:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Dlatego też po konsultacjach z Rafikiem k zmieniłem podpis, który wskazuje cały odcinek grani, a nie żaden konkretny punkt. ToSter (talk) 14:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Mł. Koszysta to odcinek grani czy pojedyncza kulminacja?--83.12.91.242 23:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

W sumie racja, wyrzucę ten podpis w ogóle lepiej. ToSter (talk) 00:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Nie, nie, to nie było pytanie retoryczne :-). Ja nie mam specjalnie dostępu do literatury tarzańskiej, swoją wiedzę opieram na tym, co samemu udało mi się wygrzebać z czeluści internetu. A Mł. Koszyta, jako odcinek grani, świta mi przy okazji map WiG-u.--83.12.91.242 18:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

:) wg wszystkiego co mam, to jednak kulminacja. Nic się chyba bez tego podpisu nie stanie :) ToSter (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

http://www.e-gory.pl/index.php/Mapy-online/Tatry-czesc-polska-WIG/Tatry-czesc-polska-WIG/drukuj.html Takie coś mam w ulubionych, z tym że raczej już "troszkę" zdezaktualizowana :) Najlepszego w Nowym Roku tak przy okazji.--83.12.91.242 12:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Mapa fajna, choć faktycznie zdezaktualizowana - ale widać np., że rzeczywiście w Wołoszynie były Przedni i Zadni Garb :) Coby nie mylić, zostawię jednak Małą Koszystą bez podpisu. Również najlepszego! ToSter (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolina Zadnich Koperszadow, Muranskie Czubki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przelecz pod Kopa Kondracka, Giewont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 16:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 19:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pruszkow, Durchgangslager Pruszkow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grzes, Dlugi Uplaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 20:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

---

Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:

• osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia

Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości

• fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
• zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców

Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.

E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.

Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf

Pozdrowienia,

Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010

Codziennie jak sprawdzam moja "watchlist" widze kupe twoich zmian kategorii w zdjeciach starej Warszawy, ktore ja tez kiedys pozadkowalem. Ciesze sie ze ktos kontynuje ta prace. --Jarekt (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Pozdrowienia

Codziennie jak sprawdzam moja "watchlist" widze kupe twoich zmian kategorii w zdjeciach starej Warszawy, ktore ja tez kiedys pozadkowalem. Ciesze sie ze ktos kontynuje ta prace. Chetnie pomoge jesli potrzebujesz pomocy od adninistratora albo bota (user:JarektBot) --Jarekt (talk) 12:50, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Category:Wayside shrines in Pruszków county

Witaj, jako że zostało ustalone, że nie mamy w Polsce 'counties' wszystkie tego typu kategorie są do przeniesienia do Category:Wayside shrines in Powiat prószkowski, itd. Po prostu trzeba te wszystkie kategorie zebrać i wrzucić do CommonsDelinkera (kiedyś się za to wezmę). Także prosiłbym o wzięcie to pod uwagę na przyszłość :). Yarl ✉ 12:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

No właśnie... To jest trochę zagwozdka, z punktu widzenia j. polskiego to niezbyt pasuje. Z drugiej strony dla osób pl-0 jest to bardziej konsekwentne.

Commons i enWiki różnią się między sobą, to jedna z tych różnic. Dużą autonomię nazw posiadają np. Niemcy (patrz kazwy kategorii dworców, kościół - wszytko po niemiecku). To pokazuje, że Commons raczej nie da się zunifikować. Yarl ✉ 12:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Taak, spis wezwań kościołów trzeba zrobić koniecznie :). W ogóle to chyba zaspamuję CDelinkera nowymi nazwami kategorii dla kościołów: Category:Saint Catherine of Alexandria church (Krokowa). Jest odrobinę krótsze i bardziej spójne (patrz nadkategorie). Yarl ✉ 13:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Immaculate Conception churches in Poland :)

:re, Ohrid

cześć, I noticed your work, and i look that you have finished а great work. I just want to inform you that the categories for villages and churches аre completely correct. Villages in Ohrid covers not just the Villages of the municipality of Ohrid, but villages in Debarca Municipality to. Category Villages in Ohrid has a broader meaning and means all the villages that gravitate to Ohrid. Such is the division of Macedonia. (i will try in polnish: Ochrydski wsi and wsi w gminie Ochryda ) The Category Churches in Ohrid covers the churches of Ohrid Municipality and other municipalities that gravitate to Ohrid. And these are the churches of the Municipality Debarca. The same thing with the capital Skopje. Skopje's villages are all villages of 15 municipalities of Skopje. I hope that you understand me. --R ašo 16:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm happy that you was in Macedonia. I hope that you the next time will stay longer and see the other beauties. Otherwise I am from Tetovo. Abouth the categories, only to inform you that I have gathered here all those related with Macedonia and should not be any errors. If you have questions, feel free to address me. However, the Macedonians and the Poles are still people from the same origin. ;))))

Pozdrav - Pozdrowienie--R ašo 17:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

re:Pomnik - kotwica

Niestety, nie pamietam gdzie to bylo :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 20:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Chocim,_pomnik_Konaszewicza-Sahajdacznego.jpg

File:Chocim,_pomnik_Konaszewicza-Sahajdacznego.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

195.110.6.202 09:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Alba_Iulia,_obelisk.jpg

File:Alba_Iulia,_obelisk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Korce, Qemali Square 2.jpg

File:Korce, Qemali Square 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cluj-Napoca, Avram Iancu Square.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Chocim, pomnik Armii Czerwonej.jpg

File:Chocim, pomnik Armii Czerwonej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cezarika1 (talk) 04:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Non-christian_wayside_shrines_in_Lower_Silesian_Voivodeship

Category:Non-christian_wayside_shrines_in_Lower_Silesian_Voivodeship has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 06:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Targu Mures, revolution statue.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)