User talk:Totodu74

Contact me / Me contacter Please leave me a message on my french talkpage ! Merci de me laisser un message sur ma page de discussion sur fr: !

Message de bienvenue

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Totodu74!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], cela donne : Image:Foo.jpg Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : {{bad name|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}} Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

Mardetanha ^talk 06:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gasteropelecus levis.jpg & Image:Gasteropelecus levis2.jpg

Salut, j'ai supprimé l'image. Je fais la demande de renommage pour l'autre.

Pas besoin d'être confus ;) (surtout que le modèle n'existe pas ici ! :-D)

Au passage, pense à bien catégoriser toutes les images que tu déposes, pour qu'elles soient plus faciles à trouver par la suite... Merci !

Bien cordialement,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 14:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Heu, finalement, ce n'est même pas la peine de renommer l'autre, vu que le nom est suffisamment explicite :) Du coup je m'en abstiens autant par fainéantise que parce que c'est un poil fastidieux (ça c'est du magnifique barbarisme).

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 14:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Merci ! Je tâcherais de faire attention dorénavant ! Encore désolé pour le dérangement... Cordialement, Totodu74 (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: problème d'affichage de image:Hermine.JPG

Salut,

effectivement, j'ai le même souci que toi... Je ne pense pas que le problème que tu me signales soit dû aux dimensions de l'image (même s'il semble que des images vraiment grandes -plus de 15 ou 20Mo- puissent parfois poser des problèmes), qui sont somme toute assez raisonnables ici.

Comme je ne sais pas trop comment résoudre cette histoire, je te suggère d'aller te renseigner sur le Bistro, d'autres utilisateurs pourront sans doute te dépanner si tu ne trouves aucune ancienne discussion sur ce sujet. Désolé de ne pas pouvoir t'aider mieux que ça !

Bien cordialement,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 08:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: import d'images de Flickr

Salut, a priori, non, car elle est marquée comme ne devant pas être exploitée commercialement...

Je suis justement en train de traduire la page d'infos sur les images en provenance de Flickr, n'hésite pas à la lire :) => Commons:Flickr_images/fr

Bien cordialement,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Encore merci pour ta disponibilité... Totodu74 (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Yapadkoi :) -- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 08:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Euphonia violacea.jpg

The problem with this image is that while you are correct in that the flickr image is suitably licenced, you forgot to add the licence tag to the image. I'll fix it for you. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

The best way is to just use the flinfo tool. Each flickr image has an id number (in the url), and you just copy-paste that into the box and it gets the info automatically. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Totodu74!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Plant cell structure svg vacuole.svg is uncategorized since 20 June 2009.
• Image:Biological cell vacuole.svg is uncategorized since 20 June 2009.
• Image:Amalgame Loup et Canis lupus...3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Hodgson's Treecreeper I IMG 3315.jpg was uncategorized on 7 October 2009.
• Image:Herpétologie test.png was uncategorized on 22 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Bestiole inconnue (1).JPG was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Bestiole inconnue (2).JPG was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Ver inconnu (2).JPG was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ver inconnu (5).JPG was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ver inconnu (3).JPG was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ver inconnu (1).JPG was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ver inconnu (4).JPG was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:TooltpRef 1-Toto.jpg was uncategorized on 31 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Semnopithecus sumatranus.jpg was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Suppression de File:Amalgame Loup et Canis lupus.jpg et File:Loup et Canis lupus.jpg

Salut,

Suite à ta demande, j'ai supprimé ces images.

Pour un traitement plus rapide, tu peux apposer ce bandeau de demande de suppression rapide : {{speedy|la raison}} sur les pages des images à supprimer, et un admin passant par là pourra s'en occuper... :)

Bien cordialement,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 10:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Avimimus2.JPG

File:Avimimus2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Totodu74, I'm very sorry for the late answer. I don't go often on Commons, indeed. I have uploaded this file under PD-old license, because this image was published circa 150 years ago. There are no restrictions on creating derivative works upon PD-old images, so feel free to make separate pictures. You should license these derivative images under the same license (PD-old). Best regards, Filip em (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 314d9c56a768cf561c79f8e9ff1013a5

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Sally lightfoot crab 2.jpg

Hi Totodu74, when you transfer images from en-wp or another project to Wikimedia Commons you should take care to transfer the high resolution variant including the original EXIF metadata. As you have a TUSC account (see above), you are free to use Magnus' Commonshelper for this task. In this case, Leoboudv was so kind to retransfer this image to File:Sally lightfoot crab 2a.jpg such I could delete the image uploaded by you as low-resolution duplicate. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

WBR

Salut mon ami,
J'ai vu que tu fais pas mal de wikicommons.
N'hésites pas à utiliser fr:Utilisateur:Liné1/WikiBioReferences qui génère de la syntax fr.wikipedia aussi bien que de la syntax wikicommons.
En éffet certains modèles existent des deux cotés mais avec des paramètres différents.
Amitié Liné1 (talk) 09:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Crapaud : un beau male!

Bonsoir mon cher confrère naturaliste, je soutiens ton crapaud, mais on risque de ce faire attaquer sur le fait que la profondeur de champ est trop faible et que la lumière est médiocre... fait des photos plus grosse et revient souvent, tu fais de bons clichés. Bien amicalement -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Crapaud commun.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for "in vivo" -- Archaeodontosaurus 18:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Image de Q

C'est pas faute d'avoir essayé! --Citron (talk) 14:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Boarf, c'est pas gravissime. Tu penses qu'on peut retenter le coup? --Citron (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Okéoké, rien ne presse! Tiens y a une de mes photos qui a été nominé, et une que j'ai nominé, va donc jeter un coup d'oeil! --Citron (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Image remarquable, mais visiblement t'as trouvé! --Citron (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Papillon

Ne voit aucune animosité contre ton travail, mais il y a un petit problème de procédure, que tu vas pouvoir vite arranger. Je suis au contraire très contant de ce type de travail ; si tu as d’autres images de ce type je t’engage vivement à les numériser et je serais le premier à les soutenir. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudimbrasia deyrollei.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Request about scope: I suggest to limit the scope to the species and to drop the mention "and also genus Pseudimbrasia…". --Myrabella (talk) 12:52, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment If the scope is changed like Myrabella suggested, I'll vote {{support}}. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment No problem, it's my first time but I've now understood that the scope I put will appear officially! So... it's  Done. Totodu74 (talk) 23:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Then  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Opposition temporary. We can not promote this very beautiful image, very didactic in this scope, we must add the word "drawing" in scope. The day we have the photograph of the specimen there is a potential conflict. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I beg to disagree. Usually, when a VIC is a photograph, we don't add the word "photograph" is the scope. VI means Valued Image, so a drawing can compete without a special mention or subscope IMO. The day we have a photograph of the specimen, we'll juste have to open a MVR to choose the most valuable image between the two pictures :-) PS: I dare support because I trust your opinion about the illustrative value of this image for this scope. --Myrabella (talk) 07:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I am convinced that this opinion wise. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Scarlet_Ibis_(2).JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Scarlet_Ibis_(2).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Scarlet_Ibis_(2).JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Lycaon (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Scarlet_Ibis_(2).JPG

File:Scarlet_Ibis_(2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

–Tryphon^☂ 06:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Niphargus.jpg

Bonjour,

Une personne se plaint sur OTRS que l'image File:Niphargus.jpg, dont tu indiques être l'auteur, est une version retravaillé d'une photo cette base. Est-ce le cas ?

Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 19:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Coucou Bapti, même si non, ça ne vient pas de ce site, l'image est cependant à supprimer car scannée depuis un support carton. C'était dans ma jeunesse wikipédienne, mais surtout une belle connerie et même si ça ne change rien, je m'en veux affreusement. Je t'envoies parallèlement un mail. Cordialement, Totodu74 (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Merci pour l'honnêteté de la réponse, mais si ton comportement est assez désolant.

Faire des erreurs quand on est nouveau n'a rien de scandaleux. Par contre, éluder sciemment le problème comme tu l'as fait est beaucoup plus problématique. Ce qui peut t'être reprocher, ce n'est pas d'avoir fait des copyvios, mais bien d'avoir rien fait pour les supprimer alors même que tu avais pris conscience du problème. Il est plus que regrettable qu'il ait fallu qu'un site se plaigne de voir son travail plagié (sans doute indirectement dans le cas présent, le livre que tu as copié ayant probablement utilisé au départ l'image du site en question) pour que tu reconnaisses que certaines de tes contributions sont des copyvios. Ton comportement est désolant, car il nuit à ton image en tant que contributeur (on peut effectivement se demander si tu n'as pas commis d'autres copyvios ou si tu n'as pas pipoté des sources), il nuit à Wikimedia Commons (qui repose sur la confiance : si tu as caché que tu avais fait des copyvios, c'est un abus manifeste qui atteint la crédibilité de ce site) et enfin et et surtout il nuit aux personnes qui ont utilisé cette image en toute bonne foi et que tu rends complice de ton copyvio (alors même que tu aurais pu l'éviter en signalant les images copyvios dès que tu as pris conscience).

Merci néanmoins de m'avoir transmis cette longue liste : je vais supprimer les fichiers en question dans la soirée en indiquant clairement "Copyvio reconnu par Totodu74". Pas besoin de te bloquer ou je ne sais quoi, par contre, il est indispensable que tu signales bien TOUS les copyvios dont tu as conscience (sur Commons ou sur Wikipédia), y compris d'ailleurs si tu n'en es pas l'auteur (wikifier un texte dont tu sais qu'il est copyvio, c'est te rendre complice de cet acte illégal). Et si tu veux une punition pour te "racheter", tu peux à l'occasion fournir un coup de main sur fr:Wikipédia:Pages soupçonnées de violation de copyright en nettoyant les copyvios et en préparant la purge de l'historique par un administrateur.--Bapti ✉ 16:15, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Voilà, j'ai supprimé les 76 images en question.--Bapti ✉ 17:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

En fait je n'ai pas voulu cacher mes copyvios, je pensais qu'ils ne porteraient sans doute pas préjudice à quiconque et comme je t'ai dit, je me sentais plus que minable pour porter mon cas en place publique. Je comprend aujourd'hui que c'était que n'en rajouter une couche malheureusement, merci d'avoir nettoyé tout ça. Pour les copyvios, je crois avoir fait le tour (leur apparence scan à deux francs est assez reconnaissable). Je crois cependant que tu as oublié ce fichier (mais il est possible que ce moi qui l'avais sauté dans la liste que je t'ai fourni ?) Pour ce qui est du copyvio sur Wikipédia, je n'ai jamais fait de plagiat de texte (quand même !), rassures toi. Merci pour ton aide et bonne soirée, Totodu74 (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

 Done supprimé.--Bapti ✉ 19:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyvio

Salut Bapti, tu te souviens probablement de mes scans copyvios, je reviens la queue entre le jambes : j'en ai oublié un paquet d'un vieux bouquin de zoologie de 1963, donc pas {{PD-scan}} du tout ! :( J'en ai fait la liste ci-dessous... Merci d'avance et désolé pour le dérangement. Totodu74 (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Fichiers incriminés 

1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Penaeus_kerathurus.JPG
2. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Squilla_mantis_illustration.JPG
3. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Talictrus_saltator.JPG
4. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mysis_vulgaris.JPG
5. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ligia_oceanica.JPG
6. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Idothea_baltica.JPG
7. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Euthemisto_bispinosa.JPG
8. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Caprella_%C5%93quilibra.JPG
9. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Lepas_anatifera.JPG
10. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cypridina_mariea.JPG
11. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Calanus_finnmarchicus.JPG
12. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Balanus_perforatus.JPG
13. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Artemia_salina_illustration.JPG
14. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Phoronis_hippocrepis.JPG
15. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Stylochus_neapolitanus.JPG
16. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sipunculus_nudus.JPG
17. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Pontobdella_muricata.JPG
18. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Leptoplana_tremellaris.JPG
19. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Convoluta_roscoffensis.JPG
20. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Carinella_annulata.JPG
21. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Spirorbis_borealis.JPG
22. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Spirographis_spallanzanii.JPG
23. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Serpula_vermicularis_illustration.JPG
24. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sabella_pavonina.JPG
25. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Nephtys_hombergii_illustration.JPG
26. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Arenicola_marina_illustration.JPG
27. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Syllis_prolifera.JPG
28. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Phyllodoce_laminosa.JPG
29. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Myrianida_pinnigera.JPG
30. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Harmothoe_impar.JPG
31. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Aphrodita_aculeata_illustration.JPG
32. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Asterina_gibbosa.JPG
33. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Solaster_papposus_illustration.JPG
34. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Echinaster_sepositus_illustration.JPG
35. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Asterias_glacialis.JPG
36. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Antedon_mediterranea_illustration.JPG
37. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cucumaria_planci.JPG
38. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Spatangus_purpureus_illustration.JPG
39. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Echinocardium_cordatum_illustration.JPG
40. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cidaris_affinis.JPG
41. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ophioderma_longicauda_illustration.JPG
42. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ophiura_lacertosa.JPG
43. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Veretillum.JPG
44. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Corallium.JPG
45. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gorgonia.JPG
46. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Alcyonium_illustration.JPG
47. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Velella.JPG
48. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Plumularia_%282%29.JPG
49. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Plumularia_%281%29.JPG
50. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sertularia_%282%29.JPG
51. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sertularia_%281%29.JPG
52. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tubularia.JPG
53. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Hydractinia_%282%29.JPG
54. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Hydractinia_%281%29.JPG
55. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cerianthus_membranaceus.JPG
56. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Beroe_ovata.JPG
57. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sagartia_parasitica.JPG
58. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cydippe_plumosa.JPG
59. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cestus_veneris.JPG
60. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Uronema_marinum.JPG
61. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tintinnopsis_campanula.JPG
62. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Lichnophora.JPG
63. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Carchesium.JPG
64. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Acineta.JPG
65. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Peridinium_pellucidum.JPG
66. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Noctiluca.JPG
67. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Globigerina.JPG
68. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ceratium_tripos.JPG
69. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ancystrum_mytili.JPG
70. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Actinophrys.JPG
71. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Acanthometron_pellucidum.JPG

Merci pour ton honnêteté, c'est supprimé.--Bapti ✉ 19:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

'fin merci à toi ! Je viens de checker ma galerie : Tu as oublié File:Bonellia.JPG et du cru précédent il restait File:Astrild cendré.JPG et File:Yoshihide Momotani.jpg (peut-être oubli de ma part). Je crois que ce sera tout bon après ça ! Bonne soirée, Totodu74 (talk) 19:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Fait à nouveau. Ces fichiers n'étaient visiblement pas lister avec les autres.--Bapti ✉ 20:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Décidément...

Salut Bapti, me voilà encore : Le fichier File:Loris paresseux retouch.jpg est une retouche du File:Loris paresseux.JPG que tu as déjà supprimé... Merci d'avance ! Totodu74 (talk) 21:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

 Done Supprimé.--Bapti ✉ 09:49, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued image

Désolé pour ce conflit qui te tombe dessus mais dont tu n'es pas la cible. Tes images sont excellentes et mérite d'avoir le label VA et ceci définitivement et non en attendant les photographies. Il doit y avoir de la place pour les photographies et pour les dessins. En fait deux philosophies s'affrontent la vision réductionniste qui à terme tuera le label, et la vision expansionniste qui elle cherche à pérenniser l’intérêt pour l’ensemble du projet. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

File:PolyplectronNapoleonisFuertes.jpg

File:PolyplectronNapoleonisFuertes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—innotata 15:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I've found the publication info finally, and I'm withdrawing the DR. I'd advise you don't upload American works without being pretty sure of the date—I think some illustrations from another volume of this book are copyright. —innotata 15:15, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Good, and yes, I'll be more careful, thanks. Totodu74 (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Recherches sur la faune de Madagascar

I don't think you should have uploaded these. As I said on my talk page, it looks like we know the engravers were a firm, we know who the authors are, but not their dates of death, which may be relevant. But the issue is that we don't know who the artist(s) were, and some illustrations have what appear to be a messy signature. You don't seem to have advanced, since you only give the names of the book authors and engravers. Perhaps the artists were the authors, and perhaps you've found that out, but this needs to be given; I can't find out much from the book since it's in French. —innotata 19:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I found nothing really useful except maybe here a signature looking at JKG lith, maybe for John Gerrard Keulemans lithography... But seriously, 1868... I think it is reasonable to believe that the plates are in the public domain, even if we don't know the author. That said it seems unlikely to have problems since the author is not particularly mentioned... It's not to be mean but it's just... tiring sometimes to contribute on Commons. Should I let drawings on fr: wikipédia and let others wikis import it if they're not too procedurial ? =/ Regards, Totodu74 (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

No, there's still a small chance these are in copyright, if the artist worked as long as, say, another animal illustrator, Pierre Jacques Smit; this sort of information should always be given. —innotata 23:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

File:MegapodiusPritchardiiBuller.jpg also is problematic: Buller was not an artist, and his books were illustrated by J. G. Keulemans, but also P. J. Smit. —innotata 23:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Damned, he was 26 to the publication and died 97 years old... good for him. What do you think of the JGK-looking signature ? Totodu74 (talk) 08:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Otherwise I'm asking that if an illustrator create a drawing for an author the copyright is still for the illustrator... Do you have something on it ? edit : I give an example : when you have a drawing of Mickey Mouse, the author isn't Walt Disney himself, but the copyright belongs to the group. Why it could be different ? Totodu74 (talk) 09:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

I think that in France and most European countries, copyright is counted from the deaths of all the authors: the author of the book/article (I'm not sure about this part), the lithographers (but here we know these were a firm), and the illustrator. (The U. S. is mostly based on publication, so Mickey Mouse is a different matter.) I'm guessing that the illustrator died over 70 years ago, and I'll keep on looking. Have you looked at every image for a signature, and in other places where the artist's name might be given (tables of contents, prefaces, etc.)? I think I'll have to look at the Internet Archive on a different computer, later, to see the signatures properly. —innotata 15:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

The list of plates is here, but doesn't give any info on illustrator. In the text, nothing more. I've put notes on File:Accipiter francesiae 1868 (2).jpg and File:Ninox superciliaris 1868.jpg were the J is more clear than on the baza picture. I keep searching. Totodu74 (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Great! I think we can be fairly sure about at least most of these being by Keulemans now, since all the signatures I can find looks similar to these, or some we know to be Keulemans's. It looks like Keulemans signed in a lot of different ways: compare File:AccipiterOvampensisKeulemans.jpg and File:AnasGibberifronsKeulemans.jpg! File:Turdus torquatus 1900.jpg also must be by Keulemans. —innotata 18:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Indeed! I add the name and the category. Thanks for your help, Totodu74 (talk) 12:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Keulemans didn't make it for v. P.W.M. Trap, though: they just engraved it. —innotata 15:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done Well, I've corrected in that way. Totodu74 (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viverricula indica (Small Indian Civet).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aviceda madagascariensis (Madagascar Baza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Your Comment on FPC Futanari

I saw your comment ("Whoa") on FPC. I know that this is pornography and i also know that not anyone is happy with such an illustration. But at least im interested to hear your thoughts about it. You commented it with "per Steven Walling". He only stated "A supremely high quality illustration that we think represents the very best of Commons educational content? Not a chance." for the reason. Could you please explain me why you exactly opposed the image? Im not worried about the fact that you opposed. Im more interested in the true reasons. --Niabot (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, that's the kind of eye-catching image. I try to detail in other words, even if I've some difficulties with english language : if I agree this is a good quality drawing, I'm not sure that's a good idea to try to put this kind of picture in display among highly interesting Commons content... I found that hentai is globaly unhealthy, and saying "that's the idea" is not really a valuable defense for me. Totodu74 (talk) 21:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

What gives you the idea that hentai is or might be unhealthy? Is there something bad about hentai in general? I'm a specialized writer for anime related topics, which of course includes hentai or ecchi related topics, but i never heard of something like that. Now im somehow interested. --Niabot (talk) 21:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ninox superciliaris (White-browed Hawk-owl).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Newtonia brunneicauda (Common Newtonia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Good caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neomixis tenella (Common Jery).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support. --MrPanyGoff 07:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cinnyris coquerellii (Mayotte Sunbird).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support.--MrPanyGoff 07:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zosterops chloronothos (Mauritius Olive White-eye).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support.--MrPanyGoff 07:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dicrurus waldenii (Mayotte Drongo).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyanolanius madagascarinus (Blue Vanga).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support awaiting a response from the wildlife photographers ;)--MrPanyGoff 15:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolia bernieri (Bernier's Vanga).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Informative. --MrPanyGoff 16:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calicalicus madagascariensis (Red-tailed Vanga).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --MrPanyGoff 16:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:52, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acrocephalus newtoni (Madagascar Swamp-warbler).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nesillas typica (Madagascar Brush-warbler).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support. --MrPanyGoff 07:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xenopirostris damii (Van Dam's Vanga).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support.--MrPanyGoff 07:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

File:EEK-500krooni-rear_without_Specimen.jpg

File:EEK-500krooni-rear_without_Specimen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dinamik (talk) 11:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philepitta castanea (Velvet Asity).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support.--MrPanyGoff 20:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philepitta schlegeli (Schlegel's Asity).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support.--MrPanyGoff 20:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Columba pollenii (Comoro Olive-pigeon).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support.--MrPanyGoff 20:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alectroenas sganzini (Comoros Blue Pigeon).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support.--MrPanyGoff 20:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glareola ocularis (Madagascar Pratincole).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canirallus kioloides (Kioloides Rail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

reticulomyxa filosa

hi Totodu74, your great picture File:Reticulomyxa filosa.jpg shows a species, first descriped (published) in 1949 and the first edition of the book was published in 1931, 4th ed. in 1954. i would love to get an explanation about "1900s" and "Richard Roksabro (1886-?)" (what does that mean?) in relation to the (claimed) PD-art-status of the file. i was wondering how that can be the case and maybe you, as the uploader, can help me to figure that out :), best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 23:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

pity for the beautiful picture, i was hoping to have overlooked something important but thx for your quick response & action (o:, all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 16:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Requests

Can you make derivatives of just the sparrows in File:Passer euchlorus, Petronia flavigula.jpg and File:Gecinus gorii, Passer yattii.jpg? And can you make a combination (like the Saxaul Sparrow image; in this order) File:PasserEuchlorus.svg, File:PasserLuteus.svg, and File:PasserEminibey.svg? Thanks! By the way, I'm a bit surprised the French Wikipedians have made fr:Moineau mélanure a good article: there's a lot more to add. —innotata 20:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm not very the most capable for this kind of job, but I tried to make a thing not too aberrant on File:Passer euchlorus.jpg. For the Passer moabiticus yattii I'd look maybe tomorrow, for this one there is the possibility of cut out the bird and its branch (with a white background) unless you find it ugly? For the three vectorial birds (I have already prepared a file but I want to be sure) you want something like File:SaxaulSparrowNominatestoliczae.svg?

For the Cape Sparrow, the good article label is not too requiring, and since the content give infos on each aspect of the animal, with good sources, presentation, etc. it's OK. Anyway it's a good thing to warn me, feel free to let me know when the article will have to be updated. Totodu74 (talk) 23:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Actually, though, I was thinking you could remove the background, like a few of your Recerches sur la faune des Madagascar images. For the vector images, yes. I'll be sure to let you know; it's the next one I want to do, so I'll work on it after a month-long trip (to Europe) soon. —innotata 23:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

In fact I was a little afraid to distort the "old" style of the image with a white background (as for Recerches sur la faune des Madagascar). I'll do it as fast as possible. For the svg, is File:PasserEuchlorusPasser luteusPasser eminibey.svg OK? No problem for the Cape Sparrow, safe journey! Totodu74 (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

• 

  Passer euchlorus

• 

  Passer yattii

• 

  Passer euchlorus, P. luteus & P. eminibey

Three proposition, feel free to tell me what's wrong. Totodu74 (talk) 13:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

They look good, except that the luteus may be too small (which looks like it is something in the original). I'll also make simple crops, but these will be better for things like a table of Passer species. —innotata 13:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, I did not pay attention thinking they were created at a scale, but in fact in this case the Chesnut Sparrow should be the smaller! I correct. ( Done)

Otherwise, Berichard has found some sparrow on Flickr, here for example, but also here ([1] ff.) a... strange one. Totodu74 (talk) 14:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I've put the euchlorus in use in the table for Passer I'm developing at en:User:Innotata/Passer. As you can see, I've got images for all the Passer except one, cordofanicus. I'll finish the table by changing a few images and adding text on distribution and appearance soon, and I'll let you know so it can be copied to fr.wikipedia. I've added the combination to en:Chestnut Sparrow to illustrate that that the three sparrows may have formerly formed a cline. So these are clearly going to improve the illustrations in the sparrow articles. For the sparrow on Flickr, it's not strange, it's just a Passer montanus that's just had a bath. —innotata 15:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

For cordofanicus, it's pretty hard to find an illustration, unless create a svg from a picture... or find a PD-old... (unsuccessful for now)... or ask to a museum...? Totodu74 (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

For sure. I haven't even found non-free images on the Internet (though it was the same for shelleyi and hemileucus). I expect an old illustration exists; it's rather similar to other rufous sparrows, which I think is why Shyamal chose not to draw it. I'll look for an image when I get around to working on the article, and will be looking for sources. It's already become quite something on my mind, every time I look at my charts of sparrow images, or Category:Passer, with the one redlink at the top. I'm guessing your suggestion of asking museums is the only possibility other than old illustrations: this is the middle of the Sudan, after all, and I doubt anybody has photos of the bird now. There are only a few skins around, though, most at Tring I believe. Pretty amazing what I've managed to find, and what other users have contributed already, though. —innotata 20:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Anyway not a lot in the original desctiption (rather special, see this addendum)... and yes, the middle of Sudan is not really the perfect place to holiday or to take photographs... We must see the good side of things : There are a potentially original description and distribution map (p. 79 or 90) to illustrate the article. :) Totodu74 (talk) 15:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Actually, I have the whole book. Nice to know that the Rufous Sparrow part is free to access—I had no idea Poyser published these samples. —innotata 19:31, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes, thanks for pointing this out. I'll link this in the articles where I can; I've been looking through the others, and there's plenty of material for Wikipedia, as well as samples that have already confirmed I want to buy one of the books if possible. —innotata 19:35, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anas querquedula 1921.jpg

I've just nominated two illustrations by G. E. Lodge for deletion here: he died in 1954, so these won't be out of copyright in their source till either 2015 or 2025. —innotata 17:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spilornis rufipectus (Sulawesi Serpent Eagle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support All criteria met for a drawing --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Request needs a gallery. พ.s. 22:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

   OK. Spilornis rufipectus. Totodu74 (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Yann (talk) 20:07, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 04:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Single Image Galleries

As a general rule, Commons Galleries with only a single image such as Hapalopsittaca amazonina are not permitted, see Commons:Galleries. I notice that you have created several of them. Do you intend to add more images?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi James. To be exact I've created four such galleries, all of those for the same reason. On Commons:Valued image candidates/SpilornisRufipectusGould.jpg, พ.s. said me that the scope needed a gallery. On previous VI proposals like Commons:Valued image candidates/Canirallus kioloides 1868.jpg, the scope was linked to the category:, not in the Main, but I did what we asked me to do :) So I created Spilornis rufipectus, and today, for four new proposals Mesitornis variegatus, Mesitornis unicolor and Hapalopsittaca amazonina. I've no objection if you want to delete it, if this is not problematic respect to the VI proposal. Best regards, Totodu74 (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Hmm. I know almost nothing about VIs, except that I like most of them that I see. If I understand you correctly, the scope of a VI is defined by a gallery. Forgive me, but it seems silly to say, as we apparently do at Commons:Valued image candidates/SpilornisRufipectusGould.jpg, that the image is the most valuable image we have in a scope that contains only that image. That's a lot like saying that you are the most valuable editor among all people on Commons with the username Totodu74 -- true, but not very meaningful.

It seems to me, therefore, that if an image cannot become a VI unless it has a gallery, and there is only one image that would fit the gallery, then we should enforce the no-single-image-gallery rule. This may prevent an image from becoming a VI in a scope of one, but that is as it should be, I think.

Rather than delete them now, I'll give you a while to discuss it further with the VI people -- the question has probably come up before.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

There are some uses for single image galleries, see Commons_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion/Archive/2011#GA1._Empty_gallery.. —innotata 23:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

That was an interesting discussion, but ultimately none of it was adopted as policy. At the moment, an empty or single image gallery is a {{speedy}}, see Commons:Galleries#When_to_create_a_gallery. It is the first entry in the delete reason dropdowns when the namespace is zero (i.e. a gallery).

• "Empty or single image gallery; please see Commons:Galleries"

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I believe that being the only picture to illustrate a species give a real value to it. I asked his advice to Slaunger, I've no one. Totodu74 (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

James, Sites like the Encyclopedia of Life still rely on galleries, and they are as useful for navigation as any. I don't think existing rules should trump these sensible considerations. If you really think rules are this important, I'll propose they get changed. —innotata 19:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Trijnstel (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Totodu74 (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Hi Totodu74, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
• Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Dereckson (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Ouf, j'ai passé le test ;) Merci, Totodu74 (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mesitornis variegatus (White-breasted Mesite).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support I think it would have to limit the scope to "illustration" or "drawing". Because the day we will have image "in vivo" this is a potential problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mesitornis unicolor (Brown Mesite).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very illustrative. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hapalopsittaca amazonina (Rusty-faced Parrot).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very illustrative. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

VI candidates

Hi, why did you remove some of the candidates in the VI list?--MrPanyGoff 11:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, Ce n'est pas nécessaire de le faire, un bot s'en charge automatiquement à intervalles réguliers. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC) (je suis aussi de Haute-Savoie ;oP ).

Hmmm didn't saw the existence of VICbot ;) Thanks, Totodu74 (talk) 16:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cacicus sclateri (Ecuadorian Cacique).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuculus rochii (Madagascar Cuckoo).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Istiophorus platypterus.jpg

Salut Bapti, j'ai retrouvé ce fichier, qui est à speedy déléter, je ne sais plus où j'avais "pêché" ça. Rogntutju moi qui croyais avoir purgé tout ce qu'il fallait. C'est le dernier àmha. Totodu74 (talk) 11:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Fait.--Bapti ✉ 15:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galbalcyrhynchus leucotis (White-eared Jacamar).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phaenicophaeus diardi (Black-bellied Malkoha).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterocles coronatus (Crowned Sandgrouse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Thamnophilus palliatus palliatus male 1841.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rallus madagascariensis (Madagascar Rail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Best in scope. I suppose that geocoding is not applicable for a drawing. Yann (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colinus leucopogon (Spot-bellied Bobwhite).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melanerpes herminieri (Guadeloupe Woodpecker).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

• ...best in scope, obviously. I like these pictures very much, and it is very useful, with a high artistical merit, for an encyclopedy. Thanks for uploads.--Jebulon (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

   Comment Thanks for your comment, but in fact we should be grateful of archive.org! :) In fact I hope that seeing this kind of images could give ideas to some people. Totodu74 (talk) 11:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phegornis mitchellii (Diademed Plover).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diglossa brunneiventris (Black-throated Flowerpiercer).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

{{Taxasource/switch}}

Salut toto,
Je me suis permis de reverter ta modif sur Taxasource/switch.
En effet, si on va jusqu'à 3, le nombre de triplet est gigantesque.
Bref dans ce cas la, mieux vaut jouer avec |source2= ou |othersourceX=
Amitiés Liné1 (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Oui, j'y ai pensé un peu en le faisant... (c'était pour Category:Hemisotidae), mais j'avais raté le paramètre source2=. Tu as très bien fait, et merci du conseil ;) Totodu74 (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phacellodomus erythrophthalmus (Orange-eyed Thornbird).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sylviorthorhynchus desmursii (Des Murs's Wiretail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campylorhynchus megalopterus (Grey-barred Wren).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tangara nigrocincta (Masked Tanager).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 Support DimiTalen (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Nyctibius leucopterus (White-winged Potoo).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Nyctibius leucopterus (White-winged Potoo).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veniliornis callonotus (Scarlet-backed Woodpecker).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ramphastos brevis (Choco Toucan).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hapalopsittaca melanotis (Black-winged Parrot).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyanoramphus zealandicus (Black-fronted Parakeet).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Channa identification

Agreed. Thanks You! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campylorhynchus capistratus (Rufous-backed Wren).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iodopleura isabellae (White-browed Purpletuft).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drymotoxeres pucheranii (Greater Scythebill).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:11, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tangara cucullata (Lesser Antillean Tanager).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:44, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nystalus chacuru (White-eared Puffbird).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:44, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monasa morphoeus (White-fronted Nunbird).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Machaeropterus regulus (Striped Manakin).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nonnula rubecula (Rusty-breasted Nunlet).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chelidoptera tenebrosa (Swallow-winged Puffbird).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tangara inornata (Plain-coloured Tanager).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calyptura cristata (Kinglet Calyptura).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support I agree, VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ramphotrigon megacephalum (Large-headed Flatbill).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myiopagis caniceps (Grey Elaenia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thamnophilus ambiguus (Sooretama Slaty Antshrike).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:55, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calothorax lucifer (Lucifer Sheartail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelecanoides urinatrix (Common Diving Petrel).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Comment And since we have a future VI egg, that's a good thing to have the bird =) Totodu74 (talk) 19:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good cooperation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Merulaxis ater (Slaty Bristlefront).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Merulaxis ater (Slaty Bristlefront).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Thamnophilus palliatus (Chestnut-backed Antshrike).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Thamnophilus palliatus (Chestnut-backed Antshrike).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Re:« MVRs are "discussed"; "portrait" for paintings »

Oh, no, no, no. You don't have to. Although efficient, you might not have to change them all. Nevertheless, it's good to change |orientation= to either increase or decrease transclusion image sizes. "Portrait" is smaller; "landscape" is bigger; "panorama" is wider. You don't have to change |status=, especially when only one from a scope is "nominated, but, if another from the same scope is nominated, ...well, let someone change it to "discussed". --George Ho (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

On the other hand, cmandler said:

"These descriptions refer not to the content of the image but to the orientation. Portrait orientation is generally a more vertical image (taller than it is wide), landscape orientation is more horizontal (wider than it is tall), and panorama is very horizontal (much wider than it is tall). See en:Page orientation. I've reverted your edit to the Yalta Conference VI nomination, but wanted to explain."

I don't know if there is right or wrong about this. --George Ho (talk) 12:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, then it's important only if width is really bigger/smaller than height I guess. I'll be more careful about it. ;) Totodu74 (talk) 12:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Cecropis senegalensis

Pourquoi veux-tu que nous en choisissions un alors que les deux peuvent être promus séparément? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hmmmmmmm par sous-espèce tu veux dire ? J'aurai sous peu le même problème pour File:Calendulauda albescens codea 1838.jpg et File:Calendulauda albescens guttata 1838.jpg... Totodu74 (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

VI of birds

Hallo Totodu 74, you have a lot of beautiful pictures of drawings of birds, which are really worth to get VIs. But but we can always have a single picture per scope as VI. So it is very difficult to nominate a photo of the same species if we have already a drawing. In addition, a photo is not the same as a drawing. So I propose to add to the scope "drawing", so that we can have both, a VI of a drawing and a VI of a photo. We have the same problem also in other scopes: Archaedontosaurus adds "mounted specimen", for there is a difference between a living and a mounted specimen (we need both pictures for a good description), ans in shells we differentiate beween recent and fossil, if a species occurs as well fossil as recent by adding "fossil" to the scope when nominating a picture of the fossil form. --Llez (talk) 08:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I have already seen this remark, and it was told that the scope could be changed if one day a photo is uploaded, or something like this... VI propositions are just a way to highlight a little the potential of old drawings, and if you also see a problem I'll put from now (drawing) in scopes. ;) Best regards, Totodu74 (talk) 08:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

I have already made ​​the same recommendation a few months ago. I am always in favor. This will facilitate fururs scopes, for images of living oriseaux that happen in the future. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Riparia cincta (Banded Martin).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Riparia chinensis (Grey-throated Martin).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hirundo aethiopica (Ethiopian Swallow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cheramoeca leucosterna (White-backed Swallow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Progne dominicensis (Caribbean Martin).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neochelidon tibialis (White-thighed Swallow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atticora melanoleuca (Black-collared Swallow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Les deux derniers en VI

Ce sont les sous espèces types on peut demander le label sans préciser qu'il existe des sous-espèces, je propose "Calendulauda africanoides (Fawn-coloured Lark), Drawing" et s'est tout...

Tiens je vais mettre des oeufs de Cisticola erythrops, c'est dommage il n'y a pas d'article pour lui en français... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Et m**** tu sais ce que c'est, les copier-coller... :) J'ai corrigé ! Je te crées Cisticole à face rousse dans la foulée ;) Totodu74 (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Phedina borbonica (Mascarene Martin).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Phedina borbonica (Mascarene Martin).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Tachycineta euchrysea (Golden Swallow).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Tachycineta euchrysea (Golden Swallow).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cecropis senegalensis senegalensis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cecropis senegalensis monteiri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petrochelidon rufigula (Red-throated Cliff Swallow) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:56, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psalidoprocne nitens (Square-tailed Saw-wing) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:57, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psalidoprocne fuliginosa (Mountain Saw-wing) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psalidoprocne albiceps (White-headed Saw-wing) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phragmacia substriata (Namaqua Warbler) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cisticola textrix (Cloud Cisticola) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cisticola natalensis (Croaking Cisticola) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirafra cheniana (Melodious Lark) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calendulauda africanoides (Fawn-coloured Lark) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calendulauda albescens codea (Subspecies of Karoo Lark) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calendulauda albescens guttata (Subspecies of Karoo Lark) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caprimulgus rufigena (Rufous-cheeked Nightjar) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caprimulgus tristigma (Freckled Nightjar) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarothrura rufa (Red-chested Flufftail) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarothrura affinis (Striped Flufftail) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarothrura elegans (Buff-spotted Flufftail) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smithornis capensis (African Broadbill) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

SI

Salut, tu pourrais passe en SI le File:Leopardus wiedii.jpg ? Dans le genre copyvio je ne l'avais pas vu dans mes imports, étant donné qu'une version moins sale avait été importée par dessus... Totodu74 (talk) 15:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done--Bapti ✉ 16:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Scope change

Commons:Valued image candidates/Shiprock.snodgrass3.jpg has had a scope change since your last comment. Hohum (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hylocitrea bonensis (Olive-flanked Whistler) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachycephala sulfuriventer (Sulphur-vented Whistler) (drawing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phylloscopus sarasinorum (Sulawesi Leaf Warbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support. All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dicaeum nehrkorni (Crimson-crowned Flowerpecker), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support. All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 16:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leptocoma sericea (Black Sunbird), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myza sarasinorum (White-eared Myza), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:19, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myza celebensis (Dark-eared Myza), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lophozosterops squamiceps (Streak-headed Ibon), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Alectrurus risora (Strange-tailed Tyrant).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Alectrurus risora (Strange-tailed Tyrant).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--MrPanyGoff 07:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceuthmochares australis (Whistling Yellowbill), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Telophorus quadricolor (Four-colored Bushshrike), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cataponera turdoides (Sulawesi Thrush), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zosterops everetti (Everett's White-eye), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilornis galeatus (Helmeted Myna), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Locustella castanea (Chestnut-backed Bush Warbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:36, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Malia grata (Malia), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thapsinillas longirostris (Golden Bulbul), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aplonis mysolensis (Moluccan Starling), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aramidopsis plateni (Snoring Rail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amaurornis isabellina (Isabelline Bush-hen), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Microcerculus philomela (Northern Nightingale-Wren), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cantorchilus thoracicus (Stripe-breasted Wren), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cantorchilus semibadius (Riverside Wren), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pheugopedius atrogularis (Black-throated Wren), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support USeful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Lobotos lobatus (Western Wattled Cuckooshrike).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Lobotos lobatus (Western Wattled Cuckooshrike).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--MrPanyGoff 07:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Coracina fimbriata (Lesser Cuckooshrike).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Coracina fimbriata (Lesser Cuckooshrike).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--MrPanyGoff 07:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oreothlypis superciliosa (Crescent-chested Warbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:07, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geothlypis chiriquensis (Chiriqui Yellowthroat), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vireo carmioli (Yellow-winged Vireo), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hylophilus flavipes (Scrub Greenlet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dacnis viguieri (Viridian Dacnis), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphonia fulvicrissa (Fulvous-vented Euphonia), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piranga lutea testacea (Subspecies of Tooth-billed Tanager), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Comment Cette sous-espèce est bien documenté tu devrais le mettre dans le scope se qui laisse la porte ouverte pour les autres sous-escèce; de plus, en dehors de Piranga lutea lutea, aucun image ne peut, à elle seule, representer l'espèce --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Je ne suis pas d'accord avec toi sur le deuxième point. L'espèce type n'est pas prise pour être représentative de tout son genre, celui-ci pas de sa famille, etc. C'est juste que c'est la première historiquement décrite. :) Maintenant pour le premier point, on n'a pas d'autres images pour l'espèce, donc pour moi avoir une image, quelque soit la sous-espèce, est forcément intéressant pour l'espèce entière, non ? Totodu74 (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

---

•  Comment Scope changed from Piranga lutea (Tooth-billed Tanager), drawing to Piranga lutea testacea (Subspecies of Tooth-billed Tanager), drawing. Totodu74 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

--

•  Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhodothraupis celaeno (Crimson-collared Grosbeak), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Junco vulcani (Volcano Junco), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful (N'oubli pas ", drawing" qui permet qu'il n'y ai pas de conflit avec une photograpie "in vivo") --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peucaea humeralis (Black-chested Sparrow), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful. (Tu ne devrais pas mettre le protonyme dans la légende, pour qu'il n'y ai pas de confusion) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment C'est juste le nom sous lequel est cité l'espèce. Étant faillible, je préfère le mettre, et puis entre guillemets la confusion est évitée, j'espère et le nom actuel (seulement au moment de l'upload, en plus) est mis du bon côté du signe égal. Totodu74 (talk) 13:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Arborophila torqueola (Hill Partridge).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Arborophila torqueola (Hill Partridge).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--MrPanyGoff 17:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carduelis atriceps (Black-capped Siskin), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psarocolius guatimozinus (Black Oropendola), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Icterus auratus (Orange Oriole), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ornithion semiflavum (Yellow-bellied Tyrannulet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Ammoperdix heyi (Sand Partridge), drawing.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Ammoperdix heyi (Sand Partridge), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--MrPanyGoff 21:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sirystes albogriseus (Western Sirystes), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Contopus ochraceus (Ochraceous Pewee), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:57, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Onychorhynchus mexicanus (Northern Royal Flycatcher), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:57, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Empidonax atriceps (Black-capped Flycatcher), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piprites griseiceps (Grey-headed Piprites), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:36, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachyramphus albogriseus (Black-and-white Becard), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:36, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sclerurus guatemalensis (Scaly-throated Leaftosser), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dysithamnus puncticeps (Spot-crowned Antvireo), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:41, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hylopezus dives (Thicket Antpitta), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lampornis amethystinus margaritae (Subspecies of Amethyst-throated Mountaingem), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Selasphorus ardens (Glow-throated Hummingbird), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lophornis adorabilis (White-crested Coquette), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:32, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eupherusa nigriventris (Black-bellied Hummingbird), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:32, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antrostomus saturatus (Dusky Nightjar), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nyctiphrynus yucatanicus (Yucatan Poorwill), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antrostomus salvini (Tawny-collared Nightjar), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colaptes auricularis (Grey-crowned Woodpecker), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melanerpes chrysauchen (Golden-naped Woodpecker), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megascops trichopsis (Whiskered Screech Owl), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Micrastur mirandollei (Slaty-backed Forest Falcon), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:23, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Micrastur semitorquatus (Collared Forest Falcon), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falco deiroleucus (Orange-breasted Falcon), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leptotila plumbeiceps (Grey-headed Dove), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ortalis wagleri (Rufous-bellied Chachalaca), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odontophorus melanotis (Black-eared Wood Quail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odontophorus leucolaemus (Black-breasted Wood Quail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Pterocles lichtensteinii.jpg

File:Pterocles lichtensteinii.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 15:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aramides axillaris (Rufous-necked Wood Rail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support criteria met --JLPC (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nothocercus bonapartei (Highland Tinamou), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support criteria met --JLPC (talk) 19:39, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glaucidium castanopterum (Javan Owlet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glaucidium minutissimum (East Brazilian Pygmy Owl), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:35, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corvus nasicus (Cuban Crow), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Streptocitta albicollis (White-necked Myna), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyanocorax cyanomelas (Purplish Jay), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temnurus temnurus (Ratchet-tailed Treepie), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus xanthonotus (Dark-throated Oriole), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enodes erythrophris (Fiery-browed Myna), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:41, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geokichla interpres (Chestnut-capped Thrush), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochoa azurea (Javan Cochoa), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ixos virescens (Sunda Bulbul), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pycnonotus squamatus (Scaly-breasted Bulbul), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Maison de Charles quint en VI

Je suggère de réduire le scope à "Porte d'entrée"... :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison Charles Quint, Bonifacio, portal..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Comment Criterion 3 states "Must illustrate its subject well". The exact limits of a "well illustrated" subject are debatable, but to illustrate well a subject all its main features must be shown. Sometimes, I have defended that one part of a building (e.g. one façade) may be representative of a whole building (e.g. being the other façades similar arrangements of similar elements, and not having a notable interior). However, this is just a portal, and I think this is far beyond the limit for a scope of a whole building, since most features of the building are not shown in the photo.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
  • In fact, this is the door who is protected by the Monument historique label (see here : “éléments protégés MH : porte” = “protected elements MH : door”. Totodu74 (talk) 09:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
    • Since the door is the protected element, it deserves a scope on its own. I suggest changing the scope to something like Maison Charles Quint, portal.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Info Scope changed : “, portal” added. Totodu74 (talk) 13:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Per above.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lalage aurea (Rufous-bellied Triller), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crocias albonotatus (Spotted Crocias), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stachyris thoracica (White-bibbed Babbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stachyris maculata (Chestnut-rumped Babbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stachyris poliocephala (Grey-headed Babbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macronous ptilosus (Fluffy-backed Tit-babbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stachyris nigricollis (Black-throated Babbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eupetes macrocerus (Rail-babbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cinclosoma ajax (Painted Quail-thrush), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ptilorrhoa caerulescens (Blue Jewel-babbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Criniger barbatus (Western Bearded Greenbul), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyroderus scutatus (Red-ruffed Fruitcrow), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dixiphia rubrocapilla (Red-headed Manakin), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piprites pileata (Black-capped Piprites), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piprites chloris (Wing-barred Piprites), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prionochilus percussus (Crimson-breasted Flowerpecker), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philentoma velata (Maroon-breasted Philentoma), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monarcha cinerascens (Island Monarch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. I would support it for mainscope (please see COM:VISC); no other illustrations or pictures exist on Commons. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

  I used to not precise it was a drawing in the scope (as you can see here), since all drawings I present for the VI are the only one for illustrate the species: I mean, I do not present a drawing of a bird if there is already a photograph, and for me that's why ther are really valued images. But several people said to me to restrict the scope, in the case of... so I took this habit. Totodu74 (talk) 17:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

  That is fine. I simply note that I would support it either way. Good work. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pericrocotus miniatus (Sunda Minivet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied, in my opinion. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyornis turcosus (Malaysian Blue Flycatcher), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:59, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philentoma pyrhoptera (Rufous-winged Philentoma), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:40, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyornis hyacinthinus (Timor Blue Flycatcher), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:40, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thamnomanes caesius (Cinereous Antshrike), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemitriccus diops (Drab-breasted Bamboo Tyrant), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phylloscartes eximius (Southern Bristle Tyrant), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phyllomyias virescens (Greenish Tyrannulet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spiloptila clamans (Cricket Warbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synallaxis rutilans (Ruddy Spinetail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synallaxis cinerascens (Grey-bellied Spinetail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sylvia sarda (Marmora's Warbler), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erithacus komadori (Ryukyu Robin), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met; Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eremophila bilopha (Temminck's Lark), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hylophilus poicilotis (Rufous-crowned Greenlet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hylophilus thoracicus (Lemon-chested Greenlet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coryphaspiza melanotis (Black-masked Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enicurus ruficapillus (Chestnut-naped Forktail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charitospiza eucosma (Coal-crested Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Indicator archipelagicus (Malaysian Honeyguide), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carpococcyx radiceus (Bornean Ground Cuckoo), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:12, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pharomachrus pavoninus (Pavonine Quetzal), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trachyphonus margaritatus (Yellow-breasted Barbet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megalaima chrysopogon (Golden-whiskered Barbet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful (but It is ugly!) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megalaima corvina (Brown-throated Barbet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful... as usual ! --JLPC (talk) 22:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megalaima faiostricta (Green-eared Barbet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megalaima henricii (Yellow-crowned Barbet), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitu mitu (Alagoas Curassow), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:00, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megapodius freycinet (Dusky Megapode), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:00, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taoniscus nanus (Dwarf Tinamou), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vanellus macropterus (Javanese Lapwing), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 06:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gallinago undulata (Giant Snipe), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 06:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laterallus exilis (Grey-breasted Crake), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 06:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phlegopsis nigromaculata (Black-spotted Bare-eye), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:20, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scelorchilus albicollis (White-throated Tapaculo), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful (le fond rose est-il lié à la page ou à la photo?)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:46, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

C'est la page qui a jauni... :) Totodu74 (talk) 23:38, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:20, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimus dorsalis (Brown-backed Mockingbird), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dacnis flaviventer (Yellow-bellied Dacnis), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spartonoica maluroides (Bay-capped Wren-Spinetail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melanopareia maximiliani (Olive-crowned Crescentchest), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melanopareia torquata (Collared Crescentchest), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cranioleuca albiceps (Light-crowned Spinetail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asthenes dorbignyi (Rusty-vented Canastero), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leptasthenura fuliginiceps (Brown-capped Tit-Spinetail), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support --Kersti (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xenospingus concolor (Slender-billed Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I don't know if it makes much sense to mark a picture as most valued as long as there is only one in the scope. Thanks to Totodu74 for searching all these pictures of birds we couldn't illustrate, until he found and uploadet them. --Kersti (talk) 11:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanio versicolor (White-winged Shrike-Tanager), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support--Kersti (talk) 11:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arremon torquatus (Stripe-headed Brush Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support--Kersti (talk) 11:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlapetes rufinucha (Rufous-naped Brush-finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support--Kersti (talk) 11:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saltator rufiventris (Rufous-bellied Saltator), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied, useful and appealing. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support--Kersti (talk) 11:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipra fasciicauda (Band-tailed Manakin), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. Useful and appealing. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

 Support--Kersti (talk) 11:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ampelion rubrocristatus (Red-crested Cotinga), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachyramphus marginatus (Black-capped Becard), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myioborus brunniceps (Brown-capped Whitestart), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stigmatura budytoides (Greater Wagtail-Tyrant), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anairetes reguloides (Pied-crested Tit-Tyrant), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ochthoeca oenanthoides (D'Orbigny's Chat-Tyrant), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Muscigralla brevicauda (Short-tailed Field Tyrant), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aeronautes montivagus (White-tipped Swift), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aeronautes andecolus (Andean Swift), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geositta maritima (Greyish Miner), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sicalis luteocephala (Citron-headed Yellow Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phrygilus carbonarius (Carbonated Sierra Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poospiza hypochondria (Rufous-sided Warbling Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diuca speculifera (White-winged Diuca Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlapetes fulviceps (Fulvous-headed Brush Finch), drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)