User talk:Tuvalkin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Fotos de Lisboa de 1957[edit]

Olá Tuvalkin,
espero que estejas bem. Recentemente, a biblioteca da ETH de Zurique publicou muitas fotos baixo de Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0. Entre outras, também algumas centenas de Lisboa e de Portugal em geral. Já subi uma duzena dessas aos Commons, encontrá-las aqui. Simplesmente, como és Lisboeta ou pelo menos sabes mais de Lisboa do que eu ;-) , queria perguntar se me podes ajudar em categorizar as fotos. Obrigado. Saludos, --Jcornelius (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Excelente, e muito obrigado! Já comecei — venham mais! -- Tuválkin 20:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Subi mais umas. --Jcornelius (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Tuvalkin, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 23:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Cool! -- Tuválkin 00:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Welcome and thanks for volunteering! :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | +/−

Hello Tuvalkin,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:


The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Hedwig in Washington, I understand that the above is boilerplate, but what now? The same minute you posted it, saying that this image will be deleted and asking (supposedly?) for some input on my part, you also did delete it. Now it is redlinked and you and your fellow admins can see it but and I cannot. Want me to do anything? I have no idea what this image is about, and I dout that I really uploaded it: Maybe I uploaded and improved version, a crop, anything like that?
Feel free to skip this kind of warnings in the future, though, as they serve no purpose. Or, conversely, if my input is in any way necessary, make a DR instead.
-- Tuválkin 11:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Argh, you got this message because you did the last upload (a small crop). By the way: You tagged the file for deletion yourself. Face-smile.svg Don't get too mad, pretty please. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Not mad at all, of course! Did I file the speedy DR myself?, heh, I didn’t remember. Sorry about that! These warnings could surely be a bit less punitive, and the redlink file pages could contain a bit more of info, though… -- Tuválkin 23:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


Much appreciated for the apologies. While I haven't figured out a logical explanation behind that reaction I certainly don't have any need to know about your "context" for it. Let's move on and make useful contributions to this project, whatever those are. Best regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 12:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion request[edit]

Your really did not need to start a deletion nomination for File:Casablanca Tramway.jpg but, as you later did, just add the proper source page and author and as you also did added a {{flickrreview}} template which triggered the bot review and passed it without any more human intervention. you should try to avoid the deletion nominations if you can resolve the issues in an easier way. we are all volunteers ao reducing the workload is at all possible is a great help. Right now the human review process is out of hand, so when you have enough experience you may want to become a reviewer. They are useful for unclear and unresolvable issues. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 11:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Yep I know, and I have no excuse — I’m already a reviewer! And it was as a reviewer that I spotted this image. (Funnily enough, there were 2 photos of Casablanca trams, this one was okay, the other was a copyvio.) I’ll be more careful in the future. -- Tuválkin 13:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment ←コメントをありがとうございます[edit]

If it's good,please also see this page once. ←trans.cute007←もしよろしければこちらも一度ご覧になってください。

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


And also:

Yours sincerely, Rudolph Buch (talk) 03:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)