User talk:Tuvalkin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Two-colored BSicons with ~ in name[edit]

This section has been moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming
15:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

And our favourite quasi-vandal is at it again, creating hundreds of implausible and problematic icons that are likely to never be used. Useddenim (talk) 19:42, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(I wish I had file deletion privileges. Useddenim (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC))Reply[reply]
You can open a Deletion Request… but that might attract unwated attention from deletionists keep on deleting all BSicons that are not in use… Yikes! -- Tuválkin 21:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hehe, I can see myself making use of   (vKRZo-v-), for one, but cannot say that about   (xveSHI1lKRZv black)… -- Tuválkin 21:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily Express[edit]

Hello! I'm the author of this upload. Can you, please, review it and keep it, since I has updated the license? --Yeeeep nooope (talk) 09:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Better talk about this file in its talk page or in the DR about it. -- Tuválkin 10:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Unicode_4000-47FF_CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Mohr.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robert Mohr.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rosenzweig τ 20:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No qualm. I just cropped off the background once. -- Tuválkin 20:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:417_written_on_nude_people has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Adsci8 (talk) 18:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New icons[edit]

I'm not sure I named these correctly:   (kv-KRZv-2+ro) &   (kvKRZ-kvc3o). Useddenim (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]