User talk:Txllxt TxllxT

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Txllxt TxllxT!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 06:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your photos. Please notice that Wikimedia Commons (as well as other Wikimedia projects) uses a structured categorization, not hashtags or simple keywords. Please read Commons:Categories and take a look at the structure of commons category tree to understand it better. Thank You. --ŠJů (talk) 21:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi. As I can see, you made more uploads without any answer here. Please have respect for the categorization structure. E.g. when you categorize a photo of any building to the category of the building, you need not to categorize the photo by the street or by the architectural style, because the whole category of the building should be categorized so. When you categorize a photo of any city square, don't categorize the photo paralelly to the category of the city, because the whole category of the square is categorized by city. Useless overcategorization make the main categories chaotic and overcrowded, and other users are forced to spend their time cleaning them. Some questions, or problems? --ŠJů (talk) 20:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I just use the categories that are already available on Wikimedia Commons. I find it important to name the city/village/landscape and the street where the photo was taken. There is also geolocation added. I also want to describe architectural styles (for example Renaissance, Sgrafitto, Antoni Gaudi). So what am I doing wrong, when for example I find 'Mikulov', 'Mikulov Castle Park' and 'Mikulov Castle' available in the pull down list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Txllxt TxllxT (talk • contribs) 2017-07-26T21:28:26‎ (UTC)

I will try to explain it again. Read please again my previous explanations too. Categories at wiki projects are not keywords nor hashtags but structured categories. A category "Prague" which would contain millions of unsorted files would be unusable. That's why all images should be sorted as precisely as possible. If a file is put in any more specific category, it should not remain in the more general parent category because the parent category would be chaotic and overcrowded. Exactly so with the architectural styles. Subjects of certain architectural styles are sorted by type, by country, by city etc. and every more important building or structure has its own category within the structure. When you tag files with general terms only, you caused that these main categories become overcrowded with masses of unsorted and unsortable content. If a photo of the Mikulov Castle Park is categorized into the category of the Mikulov Castle Park, it is redundant and unwanted to categorize the image simultaneously to the higher category of Mikulov. The whole category of the park is categorized under Mikulov.
Btw., when you use any category, do not use it blind, but take a look into the category and its content and description to assure you its the right category. The Bulgarian city of "Devin" is not the Prague hill of "Děvín", and the political term of "Secession" is not identical with the architectural style of Secession, which is called Art Nouveau in English. At the same time you can notice how the content of the category is organized. If you don't visit categories and don't go through the category tree, you cannot understand how categories works. --ŠJů (talk) 22:00, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

OK thanks for your elaborate answer. I will not click on 'Devin' anymore, which leaves only the big basket of 'Prague' over for photos that are taken in this gorgeous nature reserve, south of the city centre. In Czech language and in the study of architecture 'Secession' refers to the Vienna & Hapsburg empire kind of Jugendstil/Art Nouveau: never thought a homonymous political item would exist! Czech people do not (like to) use 'Jugendstil' because of its German origin. (this is still very sensitive matter). Art Nouveau doesn't exist as a category yet in Wikimedia Commons and is not common in the Czech Republic. I do like to keep the right diversity. I must say that this whole catogory-structure-tree thinking is not intuitive enough and quite lacking in user-friendliness. How do I know, whether a specific category down the tree exists? I just type 'Sgrafitto', and I see lots of 'Sgrafitto in ..[country]..', but not: 'Sgrafitto in the Czech Republic'. So I'm glad, there exists at least 'Sgrafitto' as such. But you blame me for writing & clicking such bigger basket items... This whole way of structuring is collapsing because so many people do the same as I do, but it means the category-structure-system is not able to cope with a bigger influx of media. Perhaps you could use colours: red for overcrowded categories, green for OK categories...

photo competion[edit]

Hi Txllxt TxllxT, I've seen your images about Austria, like Schloss Schönbrunn, or Belvedere. Nice images, unconventional views. May I invite you to nominate your images / some of your images for the WMAT 2017 photo competition. It's called WikiDaheim and the scope is as wide as possible. Find hints on how to nominate your images, if you like, on de:Wikipedia:Österreich/Fotowettbewerbe 2017 (in German only). If you need help with translation, I will help you. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Herzi Pinki, thanks for your appreciation. I'm busy with re-uploading my photos from the soon defunct Panoramio website to Wikimedia. I'll have a look at the photo competition, but soon we'll be on holiday... My intentions with all these photos on Wikimedia are not competitive, but just for adding quality to the huge collection. Greetings from Holland!

if there are still thousands left on panoramio, and you want to save them all (almost all) to Commons, you may ask user:Panoramio upload bot whether he can do the job for you. As a precondition you will need to send a statement to COM:OTRS, that allows your images on panoramio (there under an unsuitable license for Commons: CC-by-nc-nd) to be uploaded here under a free license (CC-by-sa-4.0). --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

I've tried the same thing with Mapillary, but that didn't work out. My work on Panoramio is there (http://www.panoramio.com/user/2011723) under a free license, but somehow all the EXIF data (with the geolocation) did not copy well to Mapillary. I had to copy all manually. So I will see, whether the Wikimedia team does better than Mapillary on this. It concerns about 71.000 files (103 Gb). Thanks anyway!

Grenzbilder Ifta[edit]

Ich habe mal Deine Grenzbilder bei Ifta in eine separate Kategorie verschoben und diese dann weiteren vorhandenen Kats. zugeornet. Ich hoffe, Du bist damit einverstanden.--79.214er (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

OK, vielen Dank!

Salo or Salò[edit]

Hello there. When categorizing, please not that there is a fifference between cities of Salo and Salò (about 2500 kilometres).--Htm (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Htm, I realise that there is a difference. But when such a mix up might occur, it is better to add the country name in brackets behind the name of the place, just to get/keep things right. If I got the name wrong, I'm sorry.

File:Brighton - Esplanade down King's Road - View NE I.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Brighton - Esplanade down King's Road - View NE I.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work of a copyrighted photography or painting
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Raymond 13:05, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Amiens - Rue Saint-Maurice - Cimetière de la Madeleine - View East on the Grave of Jules Verne (1828-1905) - Sculpture 1907 by Albert Roze.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Amiens - Rue Saint-Maurice - Cimetière de la Madeleine - View East on the Grave of Jules Verne (1828-1905) - Sculpture 1907 by Albert Roze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.204.246.57 19:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Mikulov - Pavlovská - View SW to Zámek.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mikulov - Pavlovská - View SW to Zámek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GeXeS (talk) 07:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Praha St.Vitus Cathedral Great West Window.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Praha St.Vitus Cathedral Great West Window.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Antibes - Avenue du Général Maizière - View East - Picasso - Night Fishing of Antibes.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Antibes - Avenue du Général Maizière - View East - Picasso - Night Fishing of Antibes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Overcategorisatie Kasteel Groeneveld[edit]

Beste Txllxt TxllxT, Geweldig dat u ruim 30 foto's van Kasteel Groeneveld in Baarn hebt ge-upload, èn met de juiste categorie: Category:Kasteel Groeneveld (Baarn). Alleen, als u het daarbij had gelaten, dan was dat prima geweest en had ik u nu niet lastig gevallen. Maar u heeft bij elk van die foto's nog één of twee andere categorieën toegevoegd, die ook al bovenliggende categorieën van Category:Kasteel Groeneveld (Baarn) zijn (of dáár weer van): Category:Baarn en/of Category:Estates in the Netherlands. Dat is echt teveel van het goede, dat vervuilt die andere categorieën en geeft vrijwilligers als ik weer extra werk, die tijd kunnen we beter besteden. Zie Over-categorization voor een toelichting. Ik hoop dat u deze overbodige categorieën zelf weer wilt verwijderen (SVP Category:Kasteel Groeneveld (Baarn) laten staan!) en met dit principe rekening wilt houden bij volgende uploads. JopkeB (talk) 05:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Best JopkeB, het is niet mijn bedoeling om andere Wiki-vrijwilligers onnodig werk te bezorgen en ik zal nu mij houden aan uw advies. Maar... een 'estate' is een landgoed in het Nederlands en niet een 'kasteel'. Er bestaan ook 'estates' zonder kasteel. Volgens mij is uw categorie 'Kasteel Groeneveld' niet voldoende om de lading te dekken. In Google Maps wordt onderscheid gemaakt tussen 'Castle Groeneveld' en 'Landgoed Groeneveld'. Het liefst zou ik foto's met een glimp van Kasteel Groeneveld onder die categorie brengen en de rest (zonder kasteel) onder Landgoed Groeneveld. Vandaar mijn click naar 'Estates in the Netherlands'. Maar vanaf nu blijf ik bij 'Kasteel Groeneveld'. Groet, TxllxT

Beste TxllxT, Goed punt. Om dingen simpel te houden (en de gebruikelijke manier te volgen), heb ik een nieuwe subcategorie gemaakt: Category:Gardens and parks of Kasteel Groeneveld (Baarn). Category:Kasteel Groeneveld (Baarn) blijft de hoofdcategorie. Deze nieuwe categorie kunt u gebruiken voor uw foto's van het landgoed zonder het kasteel erop. Ik zal de andere foto's uit Category:Kasteel Groeneveld (Baarn) die hier horen verplaatsen. JopkeB (talk) 15:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)