User talk:Uajith

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Uajith!

File source is not properly indicated: File:SriNimbarkacarya.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SriNimbarkacarya.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:SriNimbarkacarya.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

太刻薄 (talk) 13:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Categories and please avoid "over-categorization"[edit]

Hi, some categories have been tagged as {categorize}, therefore p.e. that edit has been fixed. Please also check Commons:categories and avoid so-called "over-categorization", among them categories of countries, cities etc. Best regards, Roland zh (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Common Three Ring-SavanDurga Bangalore rural.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Three Ring-SavanDurga Bangalore rural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Denoised by me. Please give some comments when new people arrived/introduced here. :) Jkadavoor 04:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC) The sharpening / denoising is ok but the DoF is small and a big part of the image is out of focus and IMO is unuseful here, I can support a cropped version (see note) --Christian Ferrer 18:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I too will support cropped version. Charlesjsharp 23:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Christian Ferrer and Charlesjsharp. Cropped as suggested. Sorry for the late response; I was away for a week. Jkadavoor 06:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Symbol support vote.svg Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Malabar Raven Mollem Goa.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Open wing position of Parthenos sylvia Cramer, 1775 – Clipper-Chamakkav-DSC 8418-A.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open wing position of Parthenos sylvia Cramer, 1775 – Clipper-Chamakkav-DSC 8418-A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:47, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Banded Lineblue KarawaniDSC 5747.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Banded Lineblue KarawaniDSC 5747.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LamBoet (talk) 18:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)