User talk:Ugo Bongarzoni

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ugo Bongarzoni!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Red cobra sign by Ugo Bongarzoni.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Red cobra sign by Ugo Bongarzoni.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Ugo Bongarzoni. You have new messages at Jarekt's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 02:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Ugo Bongarzoni. You have new messages at Jarekt's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Daniele Radini Tedeschi.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Daniele Radini Tedeschi.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 TiltEstetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 TiltEstetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 TiltEstetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 22:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Why did you revert the permission information here: [1]? Do you want to mark the permission ticket invalid and delete this file? Ankry (talk) 08:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC) (OTRS team member)

Re: Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 Tiltestetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi[edit]

If the author sends a separate permission to OTRS system, it is verified and after that a ticket number added to the file page. It generally contains the information about permission, so in most cases no other information (except choosen license and author name) is necessary. However, if you think that something else should persist, please, do not remove the OTRS ticket (number) reference. Ankry (talk) 20:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lo Sport - Il Mito.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lo Sport - Il Mito.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 TiltEstetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 TiltEstetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Daniele Radini Tedeschi.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daniele Radini Tedeschi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 23:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi LX. The photo I uploaded was sent me, by email, by the only copyright holder who is the subject in the image too. The photo was taken by one of the collaborators of Daniele Radini Tedeschi using Daniele's camera and under his request. Nobody, except Daniele Radini Tedeschi, may claim the rights about this picture in internet. Greetings--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | українська | +/−


Hello Ugo Bongarzoni,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Locandina dell'evento - TTIP non c'è niente da ridere -.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | Azərbaycanca | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Simple English | Српски / srpski | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Commons-emblem-hand.svg Hello Ugo Bongarzoni.

It has come to our attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Hasty cancellation[edit]

My dear Hedwig in Washington,are you well?, I was sending (at now in Italy is night) to <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> the emails with the permission to upload of the co-owner copyright of the two playbills and you deleted the two images togheter, just in two minutes. I have to upload them before sending the permission mail with their links.......What's now ?--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 02:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

You have cancelled all images I uploaded ! The image of my artwork Medusa too, about whitch only I own all copyrights. It seems to be a sort of malice.--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 02:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 !? All my posts are signed...--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 03:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


I can't understand[edit]

I'm the artist who create this artwork "Medusa"

Why you have cancelled this images? I can't understand...--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

For every image you cancelled I sent an email with the permission to upload it... I don't understand...--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 03:33, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Fixed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:57, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Please sign your postings[edit]

Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | українська | +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 02:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Locandina dell'evento - TTIP non c'è niente da ridere -.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Locandina dell'evento - TTIP non c'è niente da ridere -.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Arte PerOGGI - Edizione 2014 - Al di là del limite -.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arte PerOGGI - Edizione 2014 - Al di là del limite -.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:"VILLAGGIO UNRRA CASAS 2015 Sessantesimo anniversario" book's cover (IV event) at the cultural center Gabriella Ferri.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:"VILLAGGIO UNRRA CASAS 2015 Sessantesimo anniversario" book's cover (IV event) at the cultural center Gabriella Ferri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:San Basilio Villaggio UNRRA CASAS 2015 Sessantesimo anniversario.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:San Basilio Villaggio UNRRA CASAS 2015 Sessantesimo anniversario.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 Tiltestetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Esposizione Triennale di Arti Visive a Roma 2014 Tiltestetica Daniele Radini Tedeschi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Biennale premio Artemisia 2012.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Biennale premio Artemisia 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:ITINERE.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ITINERE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Mental Adventures.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mental Adventures.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:IV Festival Internazionale dell'Arte.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IV Festival Internazionale dell'Arte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Lo Sport - Il Mito.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lo Sport - Il Mito.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vituzzu (talk) 15:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


Richieste di cancellazione foto caricate[edit]

Buonasera Vituzzu. Dal tuo nickname sembri italiano (siciliano?) e ti scriverò in italiano. Ho visto tutte le tue richieste di cancellazione e riguardano tutte copertine di cataloghi di libri d'arte che ho caricato in Wikipedia inviando per email i relativi permessi di pubblicazione da parte di chi li ha creati e pubblicati. Quindi volevo capire il perché di tali richieste. Un saluto .--Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 02:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

Ciao, il problema non è il copyright ma il fatto che detto in maniera un po' spicciola quelle foto sono "inutili" per i progetti WMF. In buona sostanza non saranno mai inclusi in alcuna pagina su nessun progetto. Alla fine magari ce le teniamo perché un sacco di gente pensa che qui si debbano tenere persino tonnellate di foto sfocate di piedi, ma sempre inutili rimarranno. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Può darsi e può darsi anche no. Il fatto è che non ho caricato su Wikimedia Commons foto di piedi sfocate ma pubblicazioni di arte contemporanea con tanto di codice ISBN, presenti anche in librerie di questo paese culturalmente devastato. Magari in questo momento potranno non servire ma in un futuro prossimo si e forse sono testimonianza del fatto che siamo ancora vivi in quel settore senza dover andare indietro nel tempo di un secolo. Inoltre se il criterio di condivisione immagini in Wikimedia Commons fosse l'utilizzo immediato e non il presunto contenuto culturale almeno metà dei file dovrebbe essere proposto per la cancellazione. Ma penso di aver fatto affermazioni ovvie. Un saluto --94.160.252.93 23:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Ma niente di tutto ciò rientra fra gli scopi di commons. Il web è pieno di posti dove tenere immagini senza problemi, commons invece non è un hosting. A margine la mera copertina non ha alcun valore. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Come già ho detto sono immagini di testi di arte contemporanea associati ad eventi non proprio "minori", in altrettanti luoghi di effettiva importanza storica e politica, a Roma, nel Lazio ed all'estero come puoi vedere dalle informazioni che ho aggiunto, e non immagini personali qualsiasi di contenuto vario. Sono di interesse enciclopedico in quanto pubblicazioni di arte contemporanea. Se Wikimedia Commons non contemplasse l'arte contemporanea allora avresti ragione, ma non è così. Cito testualmente " Wikimedia Commons (chiamato anche Commons) è un archivio di immagini digitali, suoni ed altri file multimediali con licenza libera.[1] I file inviati a questo archivio possono essere usati direttamente da tutti gli altri progetti che si trovano sui server Wikimedia, inclusi Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikinews, Wikispecies, come se fossero caricati localmente su ogni singolo progetto .." . Hai notato il verbo "possono"? E non "devono"....E comunque ripeto che sono immagini di volumi di arte contemporanea, di interesse enciclopedico per chi la ama, e saranno di arte moderna fra un centinaio di anni. Posso chiederti (è una curiosità personale) che titolo di studio hai e cosa pensi dell'arte contemporanea ? --94.161.66.69 23:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Assolutamente no, sono *copertine* di cataloghi di mostre per la verità di peso abbastanza basso. Non sono arte e non danno alcuna informazione e infatti non saranno mai usate sulle wiki. Comunque puoi mettere un solo {{vk}}, i commenti relativi li lascio la i simboletti in eccesso li ho già levati due volte. Occhio inoltre a non intervenire con e senza aver effettuato l'accesso, se avessi voluto sfruttare il fatto che hai "votato" tre volte da registrato e una da non registrato non sarebbe stata una violazione banale del regolamento, non l'ho fatto perché mi rendo conto che si è trattato di un errore.
Comunque rimarranno perché qui per tradizione non si butta niente, ma mi chiedo come mai hai scelto Commons invece di Flickr o simili, io ci sono arrivato solo ed esclusivamente perché mi è capitata una delle tue richieste di autorizzazione e sono andato a rimbalzarla proprio perché non sono immagini utilizzabili da nessuna parte. --Vituzzu (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Come ti ho detto, io do all'arte contemporanea una certa valenza (non nulla come molti fanno). Quando gli eventi artistici sono ospitati non in banali gallerie, che sono oramai affitta-pareti, ma nei luoghi che ho nominato nei miei commenti, di particolare interesse storico o museale, hanno un tema importante dal punto di vista storico-sociale e vedono la partecipazione di critici, storici dell'arte, e di artisti ultraottuagenari la cui biografia è già presente nella stessa Wikipedia e che sono ben noti anche all'estero, allora, mi premuro di caricare su WIKIMEDIA le foto delle copertine, ma lo faccio sperando di dare un contributo, non certo per far pubblicità (per quello c'è Facebook che è molto efficace). Il tuo dubbio sul perché ho scelto Wikimedia e non un social dovrebbe portarti proprio a questa conclusione. Sulla valenza di questi eventi poi, ti esorto ad avere il beneficio del dubbio, soprattutto perché il contenuto di questi testi non è evidente e potrebbe stupirti. Quanto poi all'utilizzo eventuale, valuta che, forse, fra un centinaio d'anni qualcuno su Wikipedia penserà (solo perché è passato del tempo e non perché si intenda d'arte) che forse un significato questi caricamenti l'hanno avuto, magari solo quello di testimoniare che qualcuno nel 2016 ha creato arte, in un periodo di depressione economica pesante, mentre il resto d'Italia pensava solo alla pagnotta quotidiana, rischiando ogni giorno di morire di fame, e non parlo solo per me, ma anche per gente contenuta in quei libri di cui stiamo parlando che negli anni '60 aveva quotazioni di 20-30 milioni delle vecchie lire a dipinto, e che oggi, vive al limite della povertà e continua comunque a dipingere e scolpire. La condizione di Vincent oggi è comune a moltissimi artisti, quanto agli eventi che tu chiami "maggiori" (alludo, per esempio, ad una certa biennale lagunare) si presentano come "ad invito" ma hanno un costo (circa 20.000 euro a crosta), a meno di essere il mediocre pittore morto padre di un certo attore italo-americano. Queste cose che ti racconto non sono frutto di fantasie ma fanno parte della mia piccola esperienza nel campo. Quanto all'utilità amo ricordare la frase di un certo Oscar Wilde nella prefazione del suo romanzo più noto, "Il ritratto di Dorian Gray" : La diversità di opinioni intorno a un'opera d'arte dimostra che l'opera è nuova, complessa e vitale. Possiamo perdonare a un uomo l'aver fatto una cosa utile se non l'ammira. L'unica scusa per aver fatto una cosa inutile è di ammirarla intensamente. Tutta l'arte è completamente inutile.

E qui hai piena ragione, ignoravo (è la prima volta che utilizzo {{vk}}) di poter usare una sola volta il simbolo, pensavo fosse solo descrittivo del tipo di giudizio (tenere o cancellare) e non che costituisse "punteggio" ai fini della discussione ma sapevo, per esempio, che si potesse commentare anche senza aver effettuato l'accesso ( non c'è una corrispondenza diretta fra l'utente ed il numero di registro ?, il PC è lo stesso ed anche il server). Non era difficile capire comunque che ero sempre io, ho anche fatto modifiche ai vari interventi e firmato più volte, dopo aver effettuato l'accesso, a distanza di 10 minuti, comunque correttezza tua che hai capito ed agito di conseguenza. Un saluto --Ugo Bongarzoni (talk) 04:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)