User talk:Uoaei1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives[edit]

POTD Notification[edit]

St. Wolfgang kath. Pfarrkirche Pacher-Altar Taufe 01.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:St. Wolfgang kath. Pfarrkirche Pacher-Altar Taufe 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ötscher Rauer Kamm 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ötscher Rauer Kamm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Juglans regia Herbstlaub 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juglans regia Herbstlaub 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abtei Seckau Basilika Achteckpfeiler 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abtei Seckau Basilika Achteckpfeiler 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Ankogel 20200720 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20200720 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Granada 06:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Stappitzer See Bootshaus 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitzer See Bootshaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Granada 06:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abtei Seckau Basilika Achteckpfeiler 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abtei Seckau Basilika Achteckpfeiler 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Ankogel 20200720 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20200720 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall A 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall A 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Argynnis adippe auf Centaurea jacea 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis adippe auf Centaurea jacea 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[]
Argynnis aglaja Mariazell 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis aglaja Mariazell 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[]
Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helianthemum nummularium Mitterbach 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthemum nummularium Mitterbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[]
Horn Pfarrkirche St. Georg 20200727 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horn Pfarrkirche St. Georg 20200727 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[]
Ciconia ciconia Horn 20200727 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia Horn 20200727 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[]
Göller vom Herrenboden 20200904.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göller vom Herrenboden 20200904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Horn Pfarrkirche St. Georg 20200727 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horn Pfarrkirche St. Georg 20200727 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[]
Ciconia ciconia Horn 20200727 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia Horn 20200727 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[]
Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[]

POTD Notification[edit]

St. Wolfgang kath. Pfarrkirche Pacher-Altar Versuchung 01.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:St. Wolfgang kath. Pfarrkirche Pacher-Altar Versuchung 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hepatica nobilis 20210226.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hepatica nobilis 20210226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality and beautiful. --Aristeas 08:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Viola odorata 20210226.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viola odorata 20210226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. --Nefronus 08:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]

FP Promotion[edit]

Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]

POTD Notification[edit]

Gampern Kirche Flügelaltar Werktagsseite 01.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Gampern Kirche Flügelaltar Werktagsseite 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[]

FP Promotion[edit]

Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[]

POTD Notification[edit]

Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Verkündigung 02.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Verkündigung 02.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[]

POTD Notification[edit]

Hallstatt kath. Kirche Knappenaltar Kreuzigung 01.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Hallstatt kath. Kirche Knappenaltar Kreuzigung 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[]

Sorry[edit]

Hallo! Dein Bild ist wohl versehentlich falsch zurückgesetzt worden: Revision of 553626783. Der Grund ist die fehlende Einordnung in die Kategorie Quality images. Der Baustein {{Quality image}} fehlt. --XRay 💬 10:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[]

Da ist der Fehler entstanden: Revision of 542643751 --XRay 💬 10:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Araburg Glockenturm 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg Glockenturm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[]
Araburg Glocke 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg Glocke 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Araburg Glocke 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg Glocke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[]
Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Araburg 20210504 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg 20210504 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[]
Araburg 20210504 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg 20210504 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Markersdorf Laurenzikirche 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markersdorf Laurenzikirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Markersdorf Laurenzikirche 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markersdorf Laurenzikirche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[]

FP Promotion[edit]

Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Bistorta officinalis 01.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bistorta officinalis (European bistort), florescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Bistorta officinalis 01.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bistorta officinalis (European bistort), florescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seckau Maria Schnee 20201031 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seckau Maria Schnee 20201031 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Prunus avium Herbstlaub 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prunus avium Herbstlaub 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Geum montanum Ankogel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Seckau Maria Schnee 20201031 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seckau Maria Schnee 20201031 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Araburg Glockenturm 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg Glockenturm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Araburg 20210423 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg 20210423 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Araburg 20210423 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg 20210423 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St. Pölten Traisen-Au 20210504.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Pölten Traisen-Au 20210504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Araburg 20210423 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araburg 20210423 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ficaria verna 20210410.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficaria verna 20210410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question These flowers aren't that sharp, but how big are they? -- Ikan Kekek 07:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info The flower diameter is usually ca. 2 to 3 cm. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. In that case, I think it's sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 20:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seckau Maria Schnee Panorama 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seckau Maria Schnee Panorama 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Hainfeld Wegkreuz-Linde 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hainfeld Wegkreuz-Linde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Hainfeld Wegkreuz-Linde 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hainfeld Wegkreuz-Linde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[]

POTD Notification[edit]

Lilium martagon Tauerntal 01.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Lilium martagon Tauerntal 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[]

POTD Notification[edit]

Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 03.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 03.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cornus mas Blüte 20210301.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cornus mas Blüte 20210301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Geum montanum Ankogel 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nefronus 12:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Geum montanum Ankogel 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Geum montanum Ankogel 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Leucanthemopsis alpina Ankogel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leucanthemopsis alpina Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Saxifraga aizoides Tauerntal 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxifraga aizoides Tauerntal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Saxifraga aizoides Tauerntal 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxifraga aizoides Tauerntal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg-2017.jpg

Hallo Uoaei1,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]

FP Promotion[edit]

Abtei Seckau Basilika Kreuzigungsgruppe 02.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Kreuzigungsgruppe 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Kreuzigungsgruppe 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mallnitz Seebachtal Stonebeach 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Stonebeach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Waldpfad 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Waldpfad 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Saponaria pumila Ankogel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saponaria pumila Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Geum montanum Ankogel verblüht 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel verblüht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Geranium pratense Obervellach 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium pratense Obervellach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 07:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Saponaria pumila Ankogel 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saponaria pumila Ankogel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Böckstein Anlaufbach Furkationszone 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böckstein Anlaufbach Furkationszone 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Please add to Wikipedia --Charlesjsharp 11:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Soldanella pusilla Ankogel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soldanella pusilla Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Parnassia palustris Tauerntal 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parnassia palustris Tauerntal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 07:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Böckstein Ankogel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böckstein Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Formica Bau 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Formica Bau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Böckstein Radeck-Alm 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böckstein Radeck-Alm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[]