User talk:Uwe Gille

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Uwe Gille!

Yann 20:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Uwe, hoffe, Du bist mir nicht böse, habe Dein Bild für de:Blockierung (Manuelle Medizin) "etwas verunstaltet" - Viele Grüße Redlinux 21:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC) PS.: Sollte es Dir aus irgendeinem Grund tatsächlich wider allen Erwartens nicht passen, dann bau ich das natürlich um!
... nö, hast es ja schon gesehen. Also nochmals viele Grüße Redlinux 20:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
GFDL-Bilder dürfen doch frei verändert werden. --Uwe Gille 08:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
... ja schon, aber trotzdem wäre es in meinen Augen unhöflich gewesen nicht mal ein Wort zu verlieren darüber - schließlich schaut das Bild "nach richtig viel Arbeit aus". Viele Grüße Redlinux 11:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello Uwe Gille!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry...[edit]

I accidentally created a new version of your File:Pumori-fromKalaPattar2.jpg when trying to upload a derivative with buehler/steck's 2001 westface route. I don't know how to remove that version and don't want to create any more mess. If you can tell me how to sort this out, I'll certainly do. Wonderful pictures you've taken! Regards, --Papphase (talk) 01:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Äj, ja und auf Deutsch hätt' ich Dir natürlich auch schreiben können... Ist wohl besseer jetzt ins Bett zu gehen... --Papphase (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Ich hae es zurückgesetzt, bitte unter neuem Dateinamen wieder hochladen. --Uwe Gille (talk) 10:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu Ihrem spektakulären Bild eines Berges, auf Antrag die Erlaubnis, eine Facebook-Seite zu kopieren. Vielen Dank. Chris.

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 11:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Thomas Willis.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Thomas Willis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Friedrich K. (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Celiac ganglion.jpg[edit]

Hello, regarding the liver on this image, is the structure between "9" and "10" from the original photograph or an artefact created while adding the numbers? The repeating pattern looks very regular to me. Other than that, a really nice image :-) --Rubik-wuerfel (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Maybe that I have removed a reflection spot, but it is really the caudal lobe of the liver. --Uwe Gille (talk) 06:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I did not want to sound distrustful. --Rubik-wuerfel (talk) 09:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Gray's Anatomy plates with help[edit]

Hi Uwe,

I am writing on behalf of my friend, which would be interested in getting more Gray's Anatomy plates of muscles, which have the muscles highlighted by red color. He would be willing to modify more Gray's Anatomy plates, but he would prefer to be instructed before on how you coloured the muscles and other know-how about the process. Will you be kind and share the process of turning Gray's Anatomy plates of muscles to the version with one highlighted muscle? What software do you use? What tools and settings do you use? Can you provide more tips and beginner mistakes to avoid?

Thank you for answering. --Wesalius (talk) 06:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

I did it with Paintshop Pro, but any picture editor that enables overlays like Photshop or the freeware gimp is suitable. --Uwe Gille (talk) 07:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Karakorum k2.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karakorum k2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Karakorum k2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jcb (talk) 18:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Airsacs-bird.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Airsacs-bird.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Upcoming Wiki Science Competition[edit]

Hi, I am contacting all active commons users I can find more interested in the management of pictures related to scientific or technical topics. If you have time, could you take a look in Commons:Village_pump#Upcoming_Wiki_Science_Competition. Thank you. If were already informed, sorry to bother you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Feather scheme.png[edit]

Hi Uwe, do you know the approximate magnifying factor of the detailed drawing within the box next to the feather? Feather scheme.png

Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SimplyScience (talk • contribs) 12:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--SimplyScience (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

No, I don't, I just drew it without thinking about magnification. --Uwe Gille (talk) 12:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I found an electron microscopy image that looks similar to your drawing, so I would assume the magnification is in the same range (744x): https://pixnio.com/science/microscopy-images/moderately-high-magnification-of-744x-depicted-the-strut-like-configuration-of-an-unidentified-bird-feather --SimplyScience (talk) 12:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)