User talk:V-wolf/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, V-wolf!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Fortsättning på diskussion från COM:VP

Hej!

Jag skulle precis posta ett svar till ditt inlägg på COM:VP när jag hamnade i redigeringskonflikt med MiszaBot (talk · contribs), som arkiverade diskussionen. Dålig tajming! :) Här är det jag hade tänkt skriva:

I would advise against ignoring any such sign, not just specifically the one I linked to. I did not mean to imply that older signs are invalid. The statute governing protected areas doesn't contain any limitation on the duration of the designation of a protected area or any explicit mechanism for repealing such a designation. My reading of the law is that as long as you're outside the protected area itself, you should be fine, but that doesn't mean you won't get in some kind of trouble if, for example, you were to take photos of security checkpoints at an airport from just behind the sign. Not being guilty is not the same as not being suspected on reasonable enough grounds to be arrested, and that's probably inconvenient enough to avoid testing the limits. LX (talk, contribs) 19:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Aha. Men en bild på håll på ett svenskt vattenkraftverk borde väl vara okej? V-wolf (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Ja, spontant tycker jag att det låter orimligt att förbjuda fotografering från ett avstånd där inga förbudsskyltar är synliga. LX (talk, contribs) 05:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Hedemora

Hej V-wolf! Jag ser att du skapat en ny kategori Category:Hedemora city som en underkategori till Category:Hedemora. Ett förslag från min sida är att i döpa om den nuvarande Category:Hedemora till Category:Hedemora Municipality och den nuvarande Category:Hedemora city till Category:Hedemora. På så sätt följer man någon sorts standard som har utvecklats för svenska kommuner. Se t ex Category:Eskilstuna Municipality som står för Eskilstuna kommun, och Category:Eskilstuna som avser tätorten. Hälsningar --Zejo (talk) 18:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Hur funkar det då med Category:Cities in Sweden, som vill ha kommunlänkar med de historiska städernas namn "rena"? V-wolf (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Nej, nu såg jag att jag tolkat alldeles galet. Det ska tydligen inte vara några kommunkategorier alls i den kategorin. Hmmm...hur tänkte de där? V-wolf (talk) 20:40, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Hedemora från ovan.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hedemora, Sweden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Thank you! V-wolf (talk) 06:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Nicrophorus vespilloides in dead rodent.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicrophorus vespilloides in dead rodent.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Erinaceus europaeus in Avesta 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erinaceus europaeus in Avesta 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oh. Thank you! V-wolf (talk) 14:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Erinaceus europaeus in Avesta 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erinaceus europaeus in Avesta 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you very much! V-wolf (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Storbergets gruvor 14.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Storbergets gruvor 13.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Storbergets gruvor 12.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Silvbergs kyrka 05.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Hosjö kyrka 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hosjö kyrka 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you very much! V-wolf (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Hosjö kyrka 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hosjö kyrka 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hosjö kyrka 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! V-wolf (talk) 06:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

sv translation

Thank you.[1] Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome! This is, indeed, a fantastic multilingual project! V-wolf (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Tips

Jag vet inte om du sett det men det finns några kategorier för utvalda Sverigebilder på Commons; Category:Featured pictures of Sweden och category: Quality images of Sweden. Jag har lagt in Hosjö kyrka (grattis till FP förresten!) men du har ju fler äldre QI.--Ankara (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Aha! Jag säger som Hasse Alfredsson: "Det hade jag ingen aaaning om". V-wolf (talk) 15:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Mushroom photo

I afraid not. Lately the FPC bar (especially for macro shots) is very high, and it is made harder by the fact that you don't have a dedicated macro lens. Not all the mushrooms in your picture are in focus. For larger DOF, use small f-stops (but don't go above f/16, images tend to have a 'smudged' look) and get further back. And I wouldn't call this an "amateur" picture (I haven't actually taken any FPs yet), and don't worry about bugging me - I quite enjoy responding to questions such as this. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

That's about what I expected. Thank you for all the advice, "I suck them in like a mushroom" (again, I don't know if you have that idiom in English). The church image was quite a lucky shot, I would say, I hadn't have my SLR for more than a couple of days when I shot it. Thanks for all the help! V-wolf (talk) 05:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
"Suck them in like a mushroom"? I don't think we have that one. You're welcome, though! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Good to know that it's a Swedish idiom simile (or perhaps in all Scandinavic languages) to suck in [advice, knowledge, water, alcohol] as/like a mushroom (or sponge, it's the same word in Swedish), so I don't confuse more people :) V-wolf (talk) 22:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bispbergs klack.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bispbergs klack.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Samburo front.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samburo front.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you very much! V-wolf (talk) 12:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Flisning av träskrot.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flisning av träskrot.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xi'an bell tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xi'an bell tower.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Old gear Smältarmossgruvan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old gear Smältarmossgruvan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Långshyttan från ovan.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Långshyttan, Sweden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Bispbergs klack.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bispbergs klack, Sweden..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Chimney Verket.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chimney Verket.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dopfunten, Västervåla kyrka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dopfunten, Västervåla kyrka.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Brandbil i Hofors.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brandbil i Hofors.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dynapac CA152 RV70 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dynapac CA152 RV70 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Excavators RV68 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Excavators RV68 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FPCs of ordinary subjects

Hi V-wolf, I didn't want to spam the FPC nomination further with comments about what in principle can become FP. I agree with you that most images, which are promoted are aesthetic depicting something "nice" and often extraordinary. Does that leave no room for more ordinary and valuable subjects? There are several examples in our FP archives that it is possible. Here are some I found quite fast

Dead baby bird.jpg
Avocado with cross section edit.jpg
Red Apple.jpg
Australian cart.jpg
Japanese car accident.jpg
Latvian beehive trailer II.jpg
FEVE Valencia 15.jpg
Shipwreck Batumi Georgia R Bartz.jpg
Estuaire de la Gironde - pêche au carrelet 02.jpg

To get these subjects to FP status one "just" has to consider very carefully how to capture them in an interesting way with a good composition, good light, no distracting elements, and a careful consideration of the camera position. It is not easy, but a challenge. Don't give up trying. I bet a woodchopper machine in action could also be featured, and that you can do it, if you are persistent! --Slaunger (talk) 21:50, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the inspiration and "energy boost"! I'm (as you might have noticed) just a novice, so I take in and process all good advice I can get. Like a Swedish simile says: "I suck it in like a mushroom/sponge" (the same word for both in Swedish). --V-wolf (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Hej igen. Hvis min kommentar gav dig et energiboost har jeg opnået præcis det jeg ville! Hilsen fra Danmark. --Slaunger (talk) 07:22, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Stora tullhuset

Hej, Du har nog en poäng. Jag gjorde ett försök med auto-funktionen för white balance i Gimp men vet inte om det blev tillräckligt bra. Vet du om det går att göra manuellt på något bra sätt? --Ankara (talk) 07:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, jag är inte så bra på Gimp, använder en halvgammal version av Photoshop själv (CS2), men i den finns det olika reglage för RGB-balans, som man dock bör vara försiktig med, eftersom det lätt blir för mycket åt andra hållet. Det kanske finns någon bra tutorial på Youtube? V-wolf (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Roadworks RV70 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roadworks RV70 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Apoteksparken 16 nov 2010.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Phragmites australis Vikmanshyttesjön.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phragmites australis Vikmanshyttesjön.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Roadworks RV70 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roadworks RV70 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dieselpump Preem Avesta.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dieselpump Preem Avesta.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Trädgårdsföreningen 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trädgårdsföreningen 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Dynapac CA 151.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dynapac CA 151.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Dynapac CA152 RV70 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dynapac CA 152.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Vikmanshyttans bruksmuseum 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vikmanshyttans bruksmuseum 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Diesel Pump by night

Congratulations for the FP promotion, It desreves it ! I'm personaly happy of the perspective correction you made when this picture was a "QI" candidate !--Jebulon (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, and thanks a lot for the pinpointing of the perspective errors!. --V-wolf (talk) 16:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Congratz from me also. It is truly a great photo. I knew you could get an FP of an everyday subject like this with persistence. Can't wait for a woodchopper FP. Smile--Slaunger (talk) 21:09, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! We'll see what we can do about that Clin --V-wolf (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Dieselpump Preem Avesta.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dieselpump Preem Avesta.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dieselpump Preem Avesta.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Volvo BM L120C Vikmanshyttan 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo BM L120C Vikmanshyttan 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your firefighting car

with denoised background

I'm currently involved with bluring the noisy background. Looks much better so far as I am. I think I will complete the derivative work tomorrow. Regards --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I'm honoured! Thank you for caring! --V-wolf (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
There's my result :-) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Really nice! --V-wolf (talk) 17:26, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Dalatrafik Sprinter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalatrafik Sprinter.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Källa nya kyrka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Källa nya kyrka.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Scar Symmetry in Avesta april 2010 32-Jonas Kjellgren, Lars Palmqvist, Per Nilsson.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scar Symmetry in Avesta april 2010 32-Jonas Kjellgren, Lars Palmqvist, Per Nilsson.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Signature

Hi V-wolf.
Did you support the Slaunger's tires with snow in QIC ? If yes, you forgot to sign...--Jebulon (talk) 17:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Jebulon! --V-wolf (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Glowballs in roundabout, Avesta.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glowballs in roundabout, Avesta.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Fortune wheel stall, Hedemora julskyltning.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortune wheel stall, Hedemora julskyltning.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Maserfrakt Volvo FL 280.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maserfrakt Volvo FL 280.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kuhnegården Hedemora 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuhnegården Hedemora 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dynapac CA 151.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dynapac CA 151.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Gammelgården 4 december 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gammelgården 4 december 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Smedjan och bastun Hedemora gammelgård vinter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smedjan och bastun Hedemora gammelgård vinter.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hamm 3307.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamm 3307.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

ST1 Hedemora 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST1 Hedemora 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Anas platyrhynchos Vikmanshyttan 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Vikmanshyttan 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Volvo BM L60F Avesta.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo BM L60F Avesta.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora rådhus 1 jan 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora rådhus 1 jan 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brunna reningsverk 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunna reningsverk 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kvarteret Uttern 4 Hedemora.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarteret Uttern 4 Hedemora.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Firemen and journalist in Västerby.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firemen and journalist in Västerby.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Karlsbodavägen december 2010.jpg

Godmorgon, Jag är inte helt säker på att jag förstod exakt vad du menade och hur husen lutar? Allt gott--Ankara (talk) 08:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Hej Ankara! Det ser ut som att husen lutar ut från varandra i en v-form, men det kan ju se ut så från den positionen, jag har har inte varit i Ulvsunda alls (vad jag vet). Allt gott --V-wolf (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Jag förstår fortfarande inte helt är jag räddFace-smile.svg. Menar du att utrymmet mellan husen är svagt v-format (det verkar rimligt med tanke på att att husen har raka fasader och ligger där vägen gör en skarp sväng) eller att de lodräta linjerna inte är raka utan lutande. I så fall ser jag inte var nånstans. Ursäkta om jag ställer dumma frågor, men försöker bara förstå vad du menade så jag eventuellt kan åtgärda det.
Ägna inte mer tid åt saken än du har lust med, verkligen inte speciellt viktigt huruvida det blir QI eller inte.--Ankara (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Ursäkta min bristande didaktiska förmåga. :-) Jag tycker att det ser ut som att det vänstra orange-vita husparet lutar svagt åt vänster och det högra husparet svagt åt höger, men terräng kan ju upplevas så under vissa vinklar och omständigheter (det kan också vara inbillning eller något med min skärm). --V-wolf (talk) 10:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Kvarteret Uttern 4 Hedemora.jpg

Hi, I don't think that running QI procedure is required. Could you just let me move the file using my admin buttons? --sfu (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Absolutely! I wasn't sure about whether that was possible to do. Thanks! --V-wolf (talk) 17:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Alfvéngården 01.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Quality Image Promotion

Åls kyrka 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Åls kyrka 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your church of Söderbärke in QIC

Hello
After your three attempts, I've tried a fourth one to correct the distortion in the church. I've done the same thing to the picture of the organ. I've uploaded both over yours, but if you disagree, please feel free to revert to your own version, it is only a little gift for you from Paris !
Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 00:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Oh, BTW, once again, I like your diesel pump very much !!
Ooh, merci beaucoup! That was very nice! Thanks also for the flattering. Smile --V-wolf (talk) 06:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

LIF-VIK block.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LIF-VIK block.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Koret Söderbärke kyrka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koret Söderbärke kyrka.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Orgelläktaren Söderbärke kyrka 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orgelläktaren Söderbärke kyrka 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bohus-centrifug 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bohus-centrifug 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Wahlmanska huset 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlmanska huset 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Interiör Söderbärke kyrka 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interiör Söderbärke kyrka 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sorry

(Poor english) Sorry (File:Smältarmosslaven by night.jpg). I don't like the image: Rare moon, perhaps whit chromatic aberrations; I don't like the balance of colors; to me a little chromatic aberration; I don't like the distortion... too tight crop...

But it's only my opinion. Sorry--Miguel Bugallo 19:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I got a little confused when you only stated that you didn't like it, now I see why. I also noticed that one of the sides of the building was very unsharp, when I used it as my desktop wallpaper. I didn't take too much harm of the cutoff, but I'm glad you took your time to come and write on my user talk. The climate on Commons can often be quite cold and rough. --V-wolf (talk) 07:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Kaja (Corvus monedula).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaja (Corvus monedula).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Södra laven Garpenberg, by night.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra laven Garpenberg, by night.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

1949 Ford Coupe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1949 Ford Coupe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Sundeck MS Romantika 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sundeck MS Romantika 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Voting for POTY 2010 is not open yet

Your vote has been removed by me, as voting for POTY 2010 is not open yet. Check back soon and we'll let you know when Round 2 will open. Thank You --Srikant Kedia 18:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Grattis

till det nya objektivet. Jag har själv använt ett fast 50mm objektiv på Nikon D80 med mycket gott resultat. Mycket skarpt och i princip ingen disortion. --Ankara (talk) 08:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Tack! Jag har inte laddat upp några bilder tagna med det än dock. Har börjat fota för en tidskrift, och jag känner mig nöjd med de bilder jag tagit med nya objektivet. Det blir ett bra komplement till 17-24-vidvinkeln och 55-250-telen. Nästa inköp blir ett makro, men det lär nog få vänta. V-wolf (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Trafikolycka Dammsjön 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trafikolycka Dammsjön 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Police officers Riga.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Police officers Riga.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Mellansjön 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mellansjön 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mellansjön 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mellansjön 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Good Friday Procession Riga 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Good Friday Procession Riga 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Walla Turkey 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walla Turkey 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Mörten Gussarvsg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mörten Gussarvsg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Stora hundkullen höskörd 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora hundkullen höskörd 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Böösgården 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Böösgården 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bra kategori

Localities of Hedemora Municipality var en mycket bra kategorityp för oss kategorinördar. Tack för den! --Zejo (talk) 09:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Tack! Jag tyckte huvudkategorin började bli lite rörig. Det kanske går att tillämpa på fler kommunkategorier också, man kan ju skapa sådana allteftersom det behövs. V-wolf (talk) 17:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear V-wolf,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Gussarvsrondellen 2011-11-08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gussarvsrondellen 2011-11-08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

SJ train Dalabanan Hedemora 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SJ train Dalabanan Hedemora 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Spårvagnen

God morgon, Jag roterade bilden en aning motsols som du föreslog. Apropå en annan sak, vet du hur det fungerar med Commons:Picture of the day? Blir alla FP det automatiskt eller måste man föreslå bilden någonstans?--ArildV (talk) 08:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Hej! Då ska jag ila till QIC. Picture of the Day måste läggas till manuellt, och görs efter djärvhetsprincipen på ett ledigt datum. Min ena FP blev dagsbild, den andra inte (å andra sidan har jag haft en dagsbild lokalt på frwp :-)). V-wolf (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Jag förstår, tack! Nån gång i framtiden kanske jag också får nöjet att tala om mina FP i plural=)!--ArildV (talk) 20:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Grattis, får jag väl säga. Snyggt panorama! V-wolf (talk) 21:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Källfallet Grängesberg 20111029 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Källfallet Grängesberg 20111029 (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Volvo BM L120C Vikmanshyttan 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volvo L120C.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

MS Nordlandia Tallinn 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Nordlandia Tallinn 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moriska gården

Hej!

I kategorin Protected buildings in Dalarna County finns ett antal bilder som uppges föreställa byggnadsminnet "MORISKA GÅRDEN OCH LUSTGÅRDEN I GRAND HOTELL" (BBR 21300000014162). Jag tvivlar dock på att alla bilderna verkligen föreställer den skyddade delen av Grand Hotell i Falun. Eftersom du verkar ha benkoll på det mesta i denna del av landet, undrar jag bara om du har en aning om vilka av bilderna som verkligen hör dit? --Zejo (talk) 20:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Nja, men syrran har jobbat på Grand. Jag ska fråga henne, så återkommer jag så fort jag kan. V-wolf (talk) 04:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hon visste inte, men jag ska höra av mig till Grand. V-wolf (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Jag har åtminstone skapat en kategori, så får vi flytta ut de bilder som inte ska vara där sen. V-wolf (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Nu har jag fått svar.
“On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:17:28 +0100

Stenmark Johan wrote:

Hej!

Jodå, det är Mohriska gården, Lustgården och Silversalongen.

Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards,

Johan Stenmark

First Hotel Grand”
V-wolf (talk) 06:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Jaha, ser man på, då hade jag fel. Silversalongen ingår dock inte i byggnadsminnet vad jag förstår.--Zejo (talk) 08:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Jo, som jag fattat det är Guld- och Silversalongerna (möjligen även Blå salongen, ska kolla upp det) övervåningen på Moriska gården. Se exempelvis bilder från renoveringen av Silversalongen. V-wolf (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

BVC väntrum Hedemora vårdcentral.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BVC väntrum Hedemora vårdcentral.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2008 Volvo V70, Avesta.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008 Volvo V70, Avesta.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hians mot forsen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hians mot forsen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tack! Hade du nominerat min bild till Quality image?

Catasa, 2 april 2012 kl. 21.05 (CEST)
Ja, jag tyckte (liksom WLM-juryn i höstas, och user:ArildV som "promotade" den) att den var fin. Grattis! V-wolf (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Tack! Jag är nyfiken, vad innebär ramarna i dom olika färgerna på sidan Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 2012 ?Catasa, 3 april 2012 kl. 22.23 (CEST)
Grön är när någon har skrivit in parametern "promotion" (alltså att den personen anser den vara en kvalitetsbild), och tycker ingen annorlunda inom cirka två dygn (boten körs tidig eftermiddag svensk tid) blir bilden en QI. Röd är "decline", alltså motsatsen. Tycker man annorlunda än den första som granskat bilden skriver man in "discuss", då blir ramen gul och bilden flyttas ner till diskussionen längst ner. Den grå ramen kommer när man drar tillbaka en bild med parametern "withdrawn". V-wolf (talk) 06:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Ok, Tack! Catasa, 4 april 2012 kl. 10.20 (CEST)

Quality Image Promotion

Volvo Carrus B10M Dalatrafik Bussgods.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo Carrus B10M Dalatrafik Bussgods.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Mark Hurtubise 2012-03-31 03.jpg

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

BV206 Hedemora Energi 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BV206 Hedemora Energi 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Credit Images

Hi V-wolf, Could you please tell me what images are wrongly credited? THere are more then 14000 images i else have to go trough. Could it be a mistake from the BOT that was running or did i made it? Thanks and regards. Alf

Hi Alf! I don't know how many images that are affected, I stumbled upon one single picture (because it was on my watchlist), and it might just be that one. V-wolf (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

BV206 Hedemora Energi 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BV206 Hedemora Energi 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Mitsubishi i-Miev Hedemora Energi 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitsubishi i-Miev Hedemora Energi 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tack!

Tack för hjälpen med gruvbilderna som hamnat fel! Hoppas ni fick en fin avslutning på safarin efter att vi åkt hem.--ArildV (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Så lite så. Vi såg rätt mycket av Söderfors, men sen stannade jag bara som hastigast för ett par drive-by:s. Vi började känna av solen och det dåliga vattenintaget. V-wolf (talk) 10:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bergslagssafari Uppland 2012 13 Söderfors bruk 27b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergslagssafari Uppland 2012 13 Söderfors bruk 27b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bergslagssafari Uppland 2012 12 Tierps järnvägsstation.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergslagssafari Uppland 2012 12 Tierps järnvägsstation.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bergslagssafari Uppland 2012 13 Söderfors kyrka 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergslagssafari Uppland 2012 13 Söderfors kyrka 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Stellaria media Hedemora.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellaria media Hedemora.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rubus arcticus Orsa Finnmark.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium bohemicum 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bison bonasus Avesta.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bison bonasus Avesta.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tack för hjälpen

med Utögruvorna. Är det inte märkligt att de inte finns med på listan över fasta fornminnen i Haninge kommun?--ArildV (talk) 05:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem (eller jo, jag skrev en siffra fel först i ID:t). Alla gruvhål finns med i Fornsök (och jag har även sett ett gruvhål där som inte finns i verkligheten). V-wolf (talk) 05:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Püha Siimeoni kirik Tallinn 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Püha Siimeoni kirik Tallinn 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Industriskolan Borlänge 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Industriskolan Borlänge 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Volvo L90E Hamre återvinningscentral.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo L90E Hamre återvinningscentral.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bergslagssafari 120915 Bro Garpenberg 19-1 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergslagssafari 120915 Bro Garpenberg 19-1 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear V-wolf,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Light Painting 1 - Booyeembara Park.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Light Painting 1 - Booyeembara Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Light Painting 1 - Booyeembara Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:07, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Faktoriholmarna Eskilstuna solnedgång.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faktoriholmarna Eskilstuna solnedgång.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Mathias Tjärnqvist 2012-03-31 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mathias Tjärnqvist 2012-03-31 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Johan Svedberg 2012-03-31 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Svedberg 2012-03-31 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Vika kyrka 121118 05a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vika kyrka 121118 05a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-12-29 Bobby Ryan 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-12-29 Bobby Ryan 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-12-29 Gabriel Karlsson 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-12-29 Gabriel Karlsson 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-12-29 Kevin Kapstad 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-12-29 Kevin Kapstad 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-12-29 skott 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-12-29 skott 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-12-29 Hersley, Svedberg 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-12-29 Hersley, Svedberg 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Wrangelska graven Aspö 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wrangelska graven Aspö 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-12-29 Erik Hanses 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-12-29 Erik Hanses 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Eskilstuna HIF vs Nacka HI 2013-01-27 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eskilstuna HIF vs Nacka HI 2013-01-27 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fiat 880 DT tractor.jpg

Toys which are scale models are not generally considered copyright violations, I've taken this to DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC) OK, thanks. V-wolf (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Maratonskridskor 2013 funktionärer 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maratonskridskor 2013 funktionärer 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

SM 2013 skidsprint herrar kvartsfinal 1 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SM 2013 skidsprint herrar kvartsfinal 1 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rommetravets spelkassor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rommetravets spelkassor.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aspeboda skola

Hej Calle, jag har märkt Annelie Petterssons bilder på rivningen av Aspeboda skola med korrekt OTRS-tagg. Dock står det "Eget arbete" under "Source" och det är väl inte helt korrekt med tanke på att det är du som laddat upp dem. Kanske kan du märka bilderna med rätt källa? Riggwelter (talk) 19:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Hej, vad bra! Jag har antagligen glömt att ändra något standardvärde, tar en titt på det. V-wolf (talk) 09:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Nisserska huset Falun 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nisserska huset Falun 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.



català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear V-wolf,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,
the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Wiki Loves Public Art logo
Message delivered by odderBot on 14:26, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Svedjenävan är åkerbär!

Hejsan!

Jag hoppas du tar bort din bild som du lagt upp som svedjenäva eftersom det är fel art!

Jag kan lägga upp en ny, har massor:)

Mvh

Oj, vad pinsamt. Jag har aldrig sett åkerbär blomma, bara som blad och bär. Då ska jag flytta filen till ett bättre namn. Jag ser fram emot en näve nävebilder! V-wolf (talk) 20:43, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora marknad 2013-05-12 David Suvanto 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora marknad 2013-05-12 David Suvanto 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hedemora marknad 2013-05-12 Patrik Norén 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora marknad 2013-05-12 Patrik Norén 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Ankunge 2013-06-09.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ankunge 2013-06-09.jpg. Do you know the breed? --PigeonIP (talk) 14:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing! According to the owner it's a cross-breed, so it's "just a duck". However, she has promised me to photograph her Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), which are pure in breed, later this summer. I'll send a notice when those pics are up. V-wolf (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. --PigeonIP (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Strömsbergs bruk 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Strömsbergs hytta 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strömsbergs hytta 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Strömsbergs hammarsmedja 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strömsbergs hammarsmedja 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Strömsbergs bruk 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Strömsberg

Hej!

Har du läst något om att det skulle finnas ett kapell i Strömsberg, det här ser ut som ett men det står inte utmärkt på brukskartan och det finns ingen information på hemsidan.--ArildV (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Det ser onekligen ut som en nykterhetsloge eller kapell/frikyrka. Kan höra med Lotta om hon vet. V-wolf (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Enligt Lotta har det varit en nykterhetsloge, men nu är det Brukslokalen, byns stora samlingslokal. Denna byggnad har även varit bio, lokal för skolan m.m. V-wolf (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Tack för att du frågade!--ArildV (talk) 07:43, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Strömsbergs hammarsmedja 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strömsbergs hammarsmedja 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Strömsbergs bruk 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Karlholms bruk 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlholms bruk 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Karlholms bruk 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlholms bruk 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Karlholms bruk 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlholms bruk 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Karlholms bruk 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlholms bruk 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Västlands bruk 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Västlands bruk 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Västlands bruk 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Västlands bruk 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QIC Crop of File:Marma läger 01.jpg

ca. 2:1 for composition reason

Hi! I don't believe an image needs to fit in a given format like 3:4 oder 16:9 or 3:2 or any else. I'm cropping my photos in a way so it looks (in my eyes) somehow harmonic. Cutting off empty or disturbing or unnecessary parts will do. Except for panoramics anything between 1:1 and 16:9 should be ok in most cases. But sometimes other relations can be useful, see right. -- Smial (talk) 13:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

You're right, however a "standard value" makes it easier in many ways, e.g. for the browser to interpret correctly. V-wolf (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Looks better now ;-) -- Smial (talk) 14:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bagarstugan 2013-07-09 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagarstugan 2013-07-09 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Marma läger 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Marma läger 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Marma läger 21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 21.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dopfunten Hedemora kyrka fs.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dopfunten Hedemora kyrka fs.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Swedish police command vehicle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swedish police command vehicle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marma läger 18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 18.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Marma läger 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marma läger 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Säters kyrka 2013-08-01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Säters kyrka 2013-08-01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Anstalten Kolmården 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anstalten Kolmården 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Me The Tiger Hoforsrocken 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Me The Tiger Hoforsrocken 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Vist kyrka Sturefors.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vist kyrka Sturefors.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gamla posthuset Katrineholm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gamla posthuset Katrineholm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rommehed 2013-07-28 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rommehed 2013-07-28 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rommehed 2013-07-28 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rommehed 2013-07-28 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rommehed 2013-07-28 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rommehed 2013-07-28 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Gamla posthuset Katrineholm.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gamla posthuset, Katrineholm (Former postal building, Katrineholm, Sweden).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Wahlmanska huset 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wahlmanska huset ("The Wahlman house", Hedemora, Sweden).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2013-10-05 Linus Ullmark 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-05 Linus Ullmark 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-10-05 Nick Plastino 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-05 Nick Plastino 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Corrosive Carcass Hoforsrocken 01.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Corrosive Carcass Hoforsrocken 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed V-wolf (talk) 19:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2013-10-05 Daniel Sondell 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-05 Daniel Sondell 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bjurfors mansion autumn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bjurfors mansion autumn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI

Dear V-wolf! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos time to time accumulates on this page... --Bff (talk) 08:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2013-10-05 Action 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-05 Action 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora gammelgård Kulturarvsdagen 2013 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion

Bjurfors mansion autumn.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bjurfors mansion autumn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bjurfors mansion autumn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Säter 10-1.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Säter 10-1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, YiFeiBot (talk) 15:34, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear V-wolf,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear V-wolf,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion

2013-12-30 Patrik Hersley 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-12-30 Patrik Hersley 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Hedemora stadsbibliotek 2014-02-11.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hedemora stadsbibliotek 2014-02-11.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora stadsbibliotek 2014-02-11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora stadsbibliotek 2014-02-11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wiki Loves Monuments är på gång igen!

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

This is an invitation to participate in the Swedish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. You are getting it since you participated in 2013. The message below is in Swedish, should this be an issue you can get more information in English here or drop a message on my talk page.

Hej V-wolf,
I september genomför vi fototävlingen Wiki Loves Monuments igen.

I år har vi till den svenska deltävlingen lagt till ytterligare en kategori med objekt du kan fotografera, nämligen arbetslivsmuseum. Vi har även passat på att förtydliga instruktionerna för hur man deltar. För mer information se tävlingens hemsida.

Det finns gott om fina priser och tio av bilderna går vidare till den internationella finalen. Så varför inte delta i år igen!

Vänliga hälsningar,
Arrangörerna av Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige

Message delivered by L PBot (talk) 14:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC).


TUSC token e3f79a1726f20eaeeaf39e3e3071a7b7

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags

V-wolf, 2 of your images are in Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags due to 2 different coordinate tags in the same image. Can you fix?--Jarekt (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed Thanks. The WLM upload wizard adds coordinates by default. V-wolf (talk) 14:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Please see Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_upload#WLM_upload_wizard_adds_camera_coordinates.3F --Jarekt (talk) 16:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Ah. Thanks again. V-wolf (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Västerås

Hej,

Jag och User:Einarspetz planerar en fotorunda i Västerås den 13 september. Jag tänkte höra om du ville vara med?--ArildV (talk) 19:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hej! Tack för erbjudandet. Dock ska jag bort då. Vill ni däremot med till Tyfors dagen efter får ni gärna hänga på. :) V-wolf (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Lyckades visst röra till det med olika versioner när jag försökte svara. Tack för erbjudandet, men det verkar väldigt svårt att hitta vettiga förbindelser till Ludvika på söndagen tyvärr.--ArildV (talk) 09:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Attans. Nåväl, det finns säkert fler spännande saker på Kulturarvsdagen som kan passa :) V-wolf (talk) 09:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Tack för länken! Tror det blir sv:Siaröfortet.--ArildV (talk) 09:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora MC-museum 2014 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora MC-museum 2014 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hedemora MC-museum 2014 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora MC-museum 2014 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Missionshuset i Söderås 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Missionshuset i Söderås 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tånggården Sjurberg 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tånggården Sjurberg 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tånggården Sjurberg 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tånggården Sjurberg 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rättviksparkens entré.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rättviksparkens entré.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2013-10-05 Samuel Påhlsson 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-05 Samuel Påhlsson 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-10-05 Richie Regehr 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-05 Richie Regehr 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2013-10-05 Gustav Possler 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-05 Gustav Possler 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora MC-museum 2014 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora MC-museum 2014 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hedemora MC-museum 2014 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora MC-museum 2014 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hedemora MC-museum 2014 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora MC-museum 2014 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Falu gruva 2014-12-06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falu gruva 2014-12-06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bertil Norman 2015-01-01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bertil Norman 2015-01-01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

IVPA-bil Hedemora.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IVPA-bil Hedemora.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Global account

Hi V-wolf! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks DerHexer! Unfortunatly is there already a User:Vivo (my SUL), even though that user seems to have been inactive for many years. If I adopt that name, is there a bot who can change the user name in my file descriptions? Cheers, --V-wolf (talk) 20:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Until April 2015, all accounts will become completed global ones. Then, stewards will be able to merge two or more global account upon their request. Afterwards, we can use scripts like Help:VisualFileChange.js or bots that could fix your attribution. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
@DerHexer: If I could adopt the user name Vivo I'd be grateful. It was so long ago I did that on enwp though, so I've forgotten how it's done. Cheers, --V-wolf (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The usurpation of local accounts needs no intervention by you, it will be automatically done by the Wikimedia Foundation in order to make all user accounts completed global ones. As soon as both your accounts are like that (which can happen even before April 2015 as long as the local accounts requests a rename action before), you can drop me a message and I merge your accounts. Usurpation of local accounts is still possible till then, but usually be done following to m:Usurpation policy which does not apply for the commonswiki Vivo account (nor for the two remaining clashing Vivo accounts on dewiki and jawiki). Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, DerHexer. That would be great. I'm pretty sure dewp is also mine, according to the contribs, but it seems I've forgotten both the password and what e-mail address I've used. --V-wolf (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stora Spånsan.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stora Spånsan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nordsvenska brukshästar på Hedemora gammelgård.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nordsvenska brukshästar på Hedemora gammelgård.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Nordsvenska brukshästar på Hedemora gammelgård.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordsvenska brukshästar på Hedemora gammelgård.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Stora Spånsan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora Spånsan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bertil Norman's silver medal from Swedish National Orienteering Championship for veterans 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bertil Norman's silver medal from Swedish National Orienteering Championship for veterans 2014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dalahästen Avesta 2015-02-26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalahästen Avesta 2015-02-26.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Garpenberg blue hour.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg blue hour.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Volvo Carrus B10M Dalatrafik Bussgods.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carrus Star 502 on Volvo B10M.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2015-03-21 Leksands IF–Malmö Redhawks David Liffiton 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-03-21 Leksands IF–Malmö Redhawks David Liffiton 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2015-03-21 Leksands IF–Malmö Redhawks Martin Grönberg 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-03-21 Leksands IF–Malmö Redhawks Martin Grönberg 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tanka Hedemora in evening.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanka Hedemora in evening.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.