User talk:Velopilger

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Velopilger!


File:Werden2.jpg[edit]

Hallo Velopilger, da ich hierzu rund 50 weitere Fotos hochladen will, habe ich das Durcheinander im Category:Kloster Werden schon mal etwas aufgeräumt. Mit diesem einen Bild komme ich allerdings nicht weiter. Wo ist dieses Fresco? In der Basilika? Die Farbe ist mir auch nicht geheuer, ist das wirklich so orange? Ich kann mich nicht erinnern, sowas im Kloster gesehen zu haben. Gruß -- Ies (talk) 06:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo les! Fresko ist in der Basilika. In Vorhalle. Ja, orange, aber nicht so. --Velopilger (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Denis Menschov.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Denis Menschov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--TarzanASG (talk) 01:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Доброе утро. Я, собственно говоря в сомнении насчёт этого файла. С одной стороны я его снял фотоаппаратом с экрана телевизора. То есть это как бы моя фоторабота. Это копирайт? А если я сделаю этот файл, включив в него и сам телевизор? это антиправно? Прошу растолковать. С уважением, --Velopilger (talk) 05:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Waldklassenzimmer22.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Waldklassenzimmer22.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Dodo (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Waldklassenzimmer16.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Waldklassenzimmer16.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Dodo (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Velopilger!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 07:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ufimskaya.jpg[edit]

Не грузите, пожалуйста, такие вещи, если вы не сфотографировали их сами: икона это pd-art, а вот оклад иконы - 3d объект и его фото принадлежит автору, а не кому угодно. Боюсь, начнут удалять иконы в окладах, и труд ваш пропадет зря. --Shakko (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо. Да уже я практически прекратил грузить то, что не фотографирую. Спасибо за предупреждение. С уважением, --Velopilger (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soest-Dom-IMG 5254-Patroklus.png[edit]

Bitte die Falschschreibung in Deiner neuen Cat korrigieren. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Velopilger, wär schön, wenn du bei File:St. Elisabeth Bergkamen 3.jpg noch eine Information über den Bildhauer und das Entstehungsdatum (Jahr) hinzufügen könntest. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt neu Information.--Velopilger (talk) 19:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weststrasse Benrath Karte.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hinweis[edit]

[1] Die Bilder in diesem Ordner sind nicht alle aus 2011. In diesem Fall kannst du die neuen Bilder je mit "2011 in Benrath" kategorisieren, da du ja bereits den Ordner angelegt hast. Gruß, --BlackIceNRW (talk) 06:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tipp zum Kategorisieren[edit]

Hallo Velopilger. Um mir und anderen zeitaufwändige Korrektur-Arbeiten bezüglich deiner Fotos zu ersparen, ein Tipp: Wenn du so umfangreiche Fotoserien, wie die vom Aachener Platz, hochlädst, dann solltest du einen eigenen Ordner - möglichst mit Jahresangabe - anlegen. Das habe ich hier nachgeholt. Denn sonst lassen sich die übrigen Fotos in den Hauptordnern (in diesem Fall der Ordner "Aachener Platz (Düsseldorf)") für den Suchenden nur sehr schwer auffinden. Zudem erspart es dir Arbeit, wenn du je die einzelnen Fotos kategorisierst, da du die Anzahl der Kategorien auf ein Minimum beschränken kannst. Viel Spaß beim Fotografieren und Gruß, --BlackIceNRW (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ähh - und bitte englischsprachige Lemmatas. --BlackIceNRW (talk) 10:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hier, hier, hier und hier dasselbe. --BlackIceNRW (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ohne Worte --BlackIceNRW (talk) 11:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
und nochmals ... (überflüssig und falsche Sprache) --BlackIceNRW (talk) 12:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unzulässige Kategoriebezeichnungen[edit]

Hallo Velopilger, erstelle bitte keine unzulässigen Kategorien wie etwa Category:Die Buchgeschäfte in Benrath und Category:Der Handel in Benrath. Wegen des internationalen Publikums sind hier bei Commons nur Kategoriebezeichnungen in englischer Sprache zulässig. Ausnahmen bilden lediglich Eigennamen und einige wenige Dinge, für die es keine englischen Bezeichnungen gibt. Nähere Hinweise findest Du bei Commons:Categories. Auf diese Seite bist Du übrigens schon mehrfach hingewiesen worden. Berücksichtige doch bitte, was dort steht und für alle Benutzer gilt . -- Ies (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jakobspilgrim_book.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jakobspilgrim_book.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 17:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bierbörse 2011 in Benrath[edit]

Hallo Velopilger, weitere Bilder bitte dort hinein: Category:Bierbörse 2011 in Benrath. Ich war übrigens auf der 1. Hückeswagener Bierbörse. Den einen oder anderen Stand wirst Du wiedererkennen. Gruß -- Ies (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ies, Ich erkenne das wieder! Gruß --Velopilger (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Das-Forstrevier-Sued.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Das-Forstrevier-Sued.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 ■ MMXX  talk 18:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Teiche[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Category:Teiche has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Potupin.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Potupin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Potupin.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lambertus 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lambertus 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Januar 2017 in Düsseldorf[edit]

Hallo Velopilger, können wir uns darauf verständigen, dass wir es es bei de Kategorie 2017 in Düsseldorf belassen? So viele Bilder sind es in der Regel nicht, es gibt zudem diverse Unterkategorien nach Themen- und Sachgebieten. Wenn man sie in Monate verpackt, findet man sie kaum mehr wieder. Das wäre ganz prima! -- Kürschner (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Kirschner, Ich liquidierte die Kategorie "Januar 2017 in Düsseldorf". Aber die übrigen Themen wenn auch bleiben, da ich denke, etwas Tausende Fotografien Düsseldof in diesem Jahr zu schaffen und es ist die strenge Ordnung nötig. Danke für das Verständnis. --Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 07:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wunderbar. Alles andere sehe ich auch so. Gutes Schaffen und danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

???

File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Alinea (talk) 09:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I ask to specify a source from which I have copied. --84.63.172.185 10:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC) (Velopilger)/[reply]
The church of Dortmund has to send permission to the publication to what address: wash or Wikipedias?
Permission in a free form or in a certain form? Velopilger, 14:04, 5 April 2017/ Охренеть, как строго и буквоедски. А оно мне надо? За деньги работаем, или бесплатно, как я сам это много лет делаю? Чус.

File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an OTRS editor[edit]

Velopilger: I have deleted the email you sent me without reading it as it may contain personal information. I am not a COM:OTRS editor, and cannot read/accept what you sent. Please follow the instructions at the page COM:OTRS. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia's fund has got all necessary permissions. The photo is kept.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanau (V-1007-2017).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hanau (V-1007-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanau (V-1000-2017).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hanau (V-1000-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanau (V-0999-2017).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hanau (V-0999-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanau (V-1002-2017).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hanau (V-1002-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0394).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0394).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Till (talk) 07:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0387).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0387).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Till (talk) 07:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour 1903 5.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tour 1903 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Курмухская Георгиевская церковь. Географ.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Курмухская Георгиевская церковь. Географ.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Курмухская Георгиевская церковь. Географ.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:User:Velopilger-Tram[edit]

Hallo, was ist der Zweck dieser Kategorie und ihrer Unterkategorien? Wir haben bereits sinnvoller benannte Unterkategorien von Category:Tram transport by year. Tokfo (talk) 06:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, Sie haben recht, Sie müssen meine Kategorien entfernen und Bilder nach Jahren und Ländern zerlegen. Entschuldigung.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 08:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, werde sie zur Schnelllöschung vorschlagen. Tokfo (talk) 07:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monheim am Rhein ist nicht in Düsseldorf[edit]

Hallo Velopilger, bei einigen Deiner Bilder ist die Kategorisierung falsch. Z.B. kann File:Monheim am Rhein, 14. Februar 2019. The Geographer-4.jpg nicht gleichzeitig in Category:Monheim am Rhein und Category:Februar 2019 bicycle in Düsseldorf und Category:2019 in Düsseldorf Februar sein, denn Monheim am Rhein liegt nicht in Düsseldorf.

  • Was bezweckst Du mit der seltsamen Category:Februar 2019 bicycle in Düsseldorf? Es gibt keine andere Kategorie vom Typ [[:Category:Monat Jahr bicycle in Ort]]. Warum dann von Düsseldorf?
  • Was bezweckst Du mit der seltsamen Category:2019 in Düsseldorf Februar? Es gibt keine andere Kategorie vom Typ [[:Category:Jahr in Ort Monat]]. Warum dann von Düsseldorf?
  • Warum stellst Du "Februar" einmal nach vorne und einmal nach hinten im Kategorienamen? Und warum das deutsche Wort "Februar"? Du weißt doch, dass Kategorienamen (mit Ausnahme von Eigennamen) in englischer Sprache zu erstellen sind. Warum der Singular "bicycle"? Du weißt doch, dass Kategorienamen im Plural zu erstellen sind.

Warum also so ein nicht nachvollziehbares Kategorisierungschaos? -- Ies (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Denn der Radfahrer kommt aus Düsseldorf und vertritt die Düsseldorfer Radfahrer.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 16:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Герасим Болдинский. Чтец.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Герасим Болдинский. Чтец.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Герасим Болдинский. Чтец.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hilden photographs taken on navbox[edit]

I see that you created Template:Hilden photographs taken on navbox but it seems like the template itself is for photographs by year. Please recheck it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Maerz[edit]

Category discussion warning

2019 in Benrath Maerz has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ies (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Februar[edit]

Category discussion warning

2019 in Benrath Februar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ies (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pflanzen_und_Blumen_in_Benrath[edit]

Category discussion warning

Pflanzen und Blumen in Benrath has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ies (talk) 20:58, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Mai[edit]

Category discussion warning

2019 in Benrath Mai has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ies (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019_Januar_in_Benrath[edit]

Category discussion warning

2019 Januar in Benrath has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ies (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bilderwunsch, 2 x Garath[edit]

Hallo Velopilger, die beiden letzten Objekte habe ich vorhin verpasst. Kannst du das übernehmen?

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Baudenkm%C3%A4ler_in_Garath
Schönen Tag! -- Kürschner (talk) 11:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Maxinvestigator (talk) 12:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:20200207 Tram line "V" (Benrath-Hilden-Haan-Vohwinkel) 14.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello Velopilger, it appears that the version of File:20200207 Tram line "V" (Benrath-Hilden-Haan-Vohwinkel) 14.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-07T22:40:40Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 18:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Name of place / Ortsname[edit]

Hi, Velopilger. Browsing your uploads it strikes me that the names you give to the files often include a streetname but not the name of city or the village the street is to be found, so I have to open the file page to find out. May I suggest that, in future uploads, you add the place name also? I think it will add to the convenience and to the quality. It's your game, of course, but I thought I'd just suggest it. Best greetings, Eissink (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

File:Edelstein. Reader.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Edelstein. Reader.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

+ File:Geoclub named after Jacob Edelstein in Dusseldorf. Reader.jpg. Maxinvestigator (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1866 The construction of the Second Jerusalem Temple.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1866 The construction of the Second Jerusalem Temple.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnar (💬) 13:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wanderung 4 Maerz 2017 Duesseldorf (V-0859-2017).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wanderung 4 Maerz 2017 Duesseldorf (V-0859-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-9.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-10.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-10.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 07:32, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church of St. Anthony the Great September 29, 2019. Reader-10.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Church of St. Anthony the Great September 29, 2019. Reader-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Brianjd (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 27.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellywa (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bulgarian Orthodox Church of Saints Cyril and Methodius (Budapest)[edit]

Привет! Позвольте мне порекомендовать вам эту категорию. Продолжайте хорошую работу! --Sir Morosus (talk) 16:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jüdischer Friedhof Velbert-Neviges[edit]

Hallo, Velopilger,

die Kategorisierung Deiner Fotos vom Jüdischen Friedhof in Neviges war nicht falsch, allerdings leicht zu übersehen, da Neviges ja zu Velbert gehört. Ich habe deshalb eine Umleitung eingerichtet. Außerdem hast Du Deine schönen Fotos gar nicht in die Liste der Baudenkmäler in Velbert verlinkt. Daher war ich davon ausgegangen, dass es vom Friedhof noch keine Commons-Fotos gibt und hatte mich im Februar, um die Lücke zu schließen, auf den gar nicht so leicht zu findenden Weg dorthin gemacht. Das war ein schöner kleiner Spaziergang (den ich sonst gar nicht unternommen hätte), allerdings hätte ich, hätte ich Deine Fotos nicht erst jetzt durch Zufall entdeckt, mindestens die Hälfte meiner Fotos gar nicht erst hochgeladen.

Daher Gratulation zu Deinen Aufnahmen verbunden mit der Bitte, sie, wenn sie Bau- oder Bodendenkmäler zeigen, doch in die Wiki-Listen einzutragen.

Gruß --Im Fokus (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Ihre Arbeit, (Velopilger), oder Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]