User talk:Vert

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Account suspended by user

Reverts[edit]

As long there is a discussion about renamings, there is no need to have a request in the image. And you can request my adminstraive descission - but you are not allowed to set back my descission as you want it. Next time I see it as vandalism. Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Adminstraive descission? What's this? The first and last instance? supreme court or something? The request is valid and it is pending, till the discussion will be solved. Vert (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
I blocked your account for 3 days for move and edit warring. We are not Wikipedia, but you are still expected to discuss and not to edit-war.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Concerning User:Ymblanter - Only because I dared to claim that some activities of his friend (Shakko) are unjustified he found a reason to block me.

Like a mafia (only my friend is right) - "Yaroslav, you do not have a look there, if there is time? There Leningradartist just launched activities, and do not believe me. Very miss you: ((--Shakko"

Admire what a wonderful person I am here нашла[1]. In stock and Madame Gritsatsuyeva, and Lieutenant Schmidt, and Cabbages and Kings ... great. And thank you, Jaroslav that for my page to keep a close eye Commons. - Shakko ( talk) 07:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

- Shakko to Ymblanter (google translation, I don't know Russian)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ymblanter&offset=20130724133101&limit=500&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ymblanter&diff=575255548&oldid=574566056

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shakko&diff=117679765&oldid=117679230

and if someone is attacking my friend in any way, I will destroy him.

Due to power given to administrators such persons should be impartial. It is obvious and basic rule for almost every community, but apparently not here. Whenever an administrator is engaging for the benefit of a friend, such person should almost automatically risk de-adminship. With such clear evidence of partiality I cannot imagine that the person in question will be will an administrator here.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shakko&diff=133626051&oldid=133580314

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Catherine_II_by_A.Albertrandi_after_Rokotov.jpg

Vert (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Block notice 15.09.2014[edit]

I indefinitely blocked your account for battleground behaviour and starting a crusade. I reported the block to the administrator noticeboard and asked an uninvolved administrator to review the block.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Encouragement for an unblock request[edit]

Hi Vert, I notice your case due to you having made 11,000 edits to Commons and the more unusual reasons given for the block. The noticeboard discussion mentioned above is archived here. There was a mixed consensus for action, the weaker interpretation would be that at least a 3 month block was appropriate. Had that been implemented then you would be due to be unblocked next week. I encourage you to consider making an unblock request here, recognizing that your actions were disruptive at that time and could be handled in a more collegiate way now, then possibly with a similar rationale to mine below. -- (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: Hi, I am concerned about your rationale in the block log, which refers to an English Wikipedia policy which is irrelevant for Commons; indef blocks are rare on this project unless a remarkable pattern of disruption is established. It is the norm to consider a series of escalating blocks first, this did not happen in this case, with the only prior blocks being of 3 days and 1 week duration, both only shortly before your indef block. Considering that 3 months has passed, would you consider converting this to a 3 month block and consider this as time served? Should you prefer, I can raise this on COM:AN for wider comment. Thanks -- (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

I discussed the block at the administrator's noticeboard, there were no objections. The user also expressed his absence of willingness to contribute to the project anymore. Having said this, I do not object a different administrator lifting the block if they manage to explain to the user what stalking actually is, why it is not acceptable at Wikimedia projects, and that they will be immediately reblock if they continue.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for this statement. As Vert appears inactive and has not responded since I picked up this thread, I'll leave it in their hands if they want to request an unblock on this basis. -- (talk) 07:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Gierymski Reconnaissance.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gierymski Reconnaissance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Krd 14:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Zak Pierrot.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Zak Pierrot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

195.50.31.213 21:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)