User talk:Veverve

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Veverve!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | magyar | Nederlands | polski | português | sicilianu | suomi | svenska | Ελληνικά | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | македонски | русский | українська | हिन्दी | বাংলা | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文(中国大陆)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | עברית | العربية | +/−


Hello Veverve, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Unification council of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine vidomosti.kiev.ua 135.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
Hello. This is a reminder for you that removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page without addressing the identified issues is discouraged according to our community guidelines. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history, and doing so is often seen as rude or hostile by the community. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions. You can have this done automatically for you - simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

Sealle (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:PrincipiaSynGen.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:PrincipiaSynGen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Book cover
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

— JJMC89(T·C) 06:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustav Vasas bibel 1541 - title page 3 (cropped).jpg[edit]

Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 06:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Didym (talk) 00:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bibles[edit]

Why have you done this? It's obviously controversial since "Bibles" are instances of "The Bible". Please consider reverting. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodhullandemu: I believe it was confusing to have both categories, and both were used in the same way, i.e. nobody made the distinction you made. This is why I decided to merge both categories into the one which was linked to WP. Veverve (talk) 09:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there is more than one Bible- the Christian and the Hebrew at least. So "The Bible" I agree is less than helpful, but under "Bibles" should be subcategories for "The Holy Bible" and "The Hebrew Bible". So File:Chained Bible, Hornby Library.jpg should be in some subcat for examples/instances of The Holy Bible. That's how I see it. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodhullandemu: The Jewish bible is Category:Tanakh. Again, in practice no one uses the difference you make between "Bible" and "Bibles" on WC. Veverve (talk) 11:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"WC"? Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodhullandemu: WikiCommons. Veverve (talk) 11:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We just call it "Commons". But I'm not surprised. People very often don't think deeply enough about what they're doing when they create categories. This may be unfamiliarity with the finer points of the English language, but it's more often "Oh, this'll do, we don't need precision here". We do. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marathi Bible[edit]

Hi Veverve,

Can you please stop reverting edits rather than discussing or I need to report this editwarring? --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi> the deletion request > should it be removed from this file?[edit]

Hi. Based on your comments on the discussion page of this file it seems that the deletion requested should not have been made. See

File:Baptism-drawing-1.jpg
baptism drawing with license to share

... The request has been there since April but it seems you changed your mind. Who would remove the deletion request off the file? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Eloquent Peasant: Yes, it was a mistake to nominate this image. Veverve (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the image might have come from the Good News for Modern Man Bible too, checked every page this morning and it's not in that bible. Thanks. Hopefully someone will close the nomination. Have a nice day.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bibel Pattloch.jpg[edit]

Lieber Veverve, danke, dass Du mich auf die Urheberrechtsverletzung aufmerksam gemacht hast, sie war in keiner Weise von mir beabsichtigt, und ich entschuldige mich ausdrücklich dafür. Die Bibel ist mein Eigentum, und ich war in dem Irrglauben, das Cover scannen zu dürfen. Mir war nicht bewusst, dass dieser Titeltext urheberrechtlich geschützt ist, sonst hätte ich ihn sicherlich nicht gescannt. Das Ganze ist mir sehr unangenehm, deshalb lasse das hochgeladene Bild bitte schnellstens löschen. Das Bild habe ich bereits aus dem Artikel "Einheitsübersetzung" entfernt. Herzlichen Dank und nochmals sorry! Mabit1 (talk) 22:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mabit1: no problem! An admin should delete the image in a few hours since it has been marked for speedy deletion. As for copyright rules on Commons, see: Commons:Copyright rules#not OK and Commons:Threshold of originality. Veverve (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! Mabit1 (talk) 22:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your request[edit]

Hi, I saw your help on the Greek characters, thanks. For your request Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Map_of_schisms_from_the_Russian_Orthodox_Church, if no one has picked it up in a a week or so you can ping me and I will take it. --Goran tek-en (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: It has been a bit less than one week. Are you still available to take this request? Veverve (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

✓ Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contact?[edit]

I got an email that you left me a message but I couldn't find any. If you do please add a new topic. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: I simply modified one of my previous requests, one for which you told me to wait 15 days. I did not know it would notify you, sorry. While I am at it, do you still want me to wait, or can I revive my three requests now? Veverve (talk) 15:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

I can work on them now, please start a new topic. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please rename all graphics[edit]

Please rename all graphics to be consistent.--93.193.170.30 10:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Veverve (talk) 10:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, you missed the chinese, german, portuguese and swahili versions.--93.193.170.30 10:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bible × lectionary[edit]

Hi, I react to this diff. Although the description contains the word "bible", the book in the picture would be more likely a lectionary. We cannot read, what is in the book, but it definitely ressembles of a red-and-black typesetting of a lectionary (2, 3) or, possibly, a missal. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Draceane: I can read most of the last line, it says "homme à sa perfection dans le Christ". It looks like it is a lectionary, and it is confirmed here and here (the latter contains most of the text of the right page). You were right, I will revert my edit and change the description. Veverve (talk) 20:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert[edit]

Hi, I totally agree with your revert on Main schisms from the Russian Orthodox Church (2021). User JoKalliauer has explained to me (he has deep code knowledge) and I think I can use some of this knowledge later on. I'm not a code person I depend on what I see in Inkscape for my work here. Sometimes I just have to accept I can't get it perfect and a lot of this is also viewer dependent; type of system, browser, fonts etc. So I hope you are fine with all of this. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: No problem, you have done a tremeldous job already! Veverve (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: Also, out of pure curiosity, how is Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Convert_Almohad_banner_to_SVG progessing? Veverve (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's coming there, slowly. I'm working on the text pieces now then it will be done, hopefully. It's a lot of work with it. --Goran tek-en (talk) 11:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic[edit]

Hi, I tried to put "Illustration of: " in Arabic in this file File:Banner of the Moors (1212).svg but you changed something. I don't speak or write Arabic so I just made a guess, probably wrong? --always ping me--Goran tek-en (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: you had written something in Arabic outside the Information template, so I removed it. Sorry if it bothered you. Veverve (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Category talk:Orthodox crosses#May 2021[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Category talk:Orthodox crosses#May 2021. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucien Lacroix[edit]

Bonjour elle est dans ma collection personnelle. Plus de 70 ans d'âge donc hors droits bonne journée. Thomon (d) 12:04 10 juillet 2021 (CET).

Reworked[edit]

I did think I started this somewhere but I cant find it now.

@Goran tek-en:
1)
Could you move those two symbols a bit more to the right, like this?
Could you move "Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church" a bit more to the left, like this?
"Serbian Orthodox Church", "1346", and "Serbian Patriarchate of Peć" should be in bold here.
"927" and "1018", are not in bold, they should be.
the "/" here, here and here should not be in bold (maybe the are not in bold and I do not see it properly).
The feedback for the other timelines will come soon. Veverve (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en:
2) I see no problem.
3) This line should look like this.
Veverve (talk) 18:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Timeline of the History of the main autocephalous Eastern Orthodox Churches, E. Orthodox point of view (2021)-2.
1) I moved stuff around 1936-1948 instead so check.
3) This is how the line has been before, should I change? --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en:
1) It is good now.
3) Yes, change it please. Veverve (talk) 14:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New versions uploaded. --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: The Serbian timeline in 2,560 × 895 pixels is put atop of the screen. Other resolutions do not have this problem. Veverve (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean, I can't see anything strange on that link. --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: It must be due to my computer's page zoom, then. Veverve (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustav Vasas bibel 1541 (1938 reprint) - title page (cropped).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gustav Vasas bibel 1541 (1938 reprint) - title page (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taivo (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I have only been told indirectly that my DRs were "questionable". I have, despite what the blocking message says, never received any "warnings", despite asking the person who requested admin intervention. I would not have made those DR, had I been aware of the COM:INUSE policy."
Unblock reason: "Now you are aware of INUSE policy and in my opinion you can be unblocked. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

By the way, the unblock instruction states:

add {{unblock|your reason for requesting an unblock here}} to your user talk page. Blocked users may edit their own user talk page, unless specifically disallowed from doing so, e.g., for incivility. If you are not logged in as a registered user, use the talk page for your IP address.

It is is wrong: one has to add "{{unblock|1=your reason for requesting an unblock here}}", otherwise the reason is not displayed. Veverve (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When the value of an unnamed parameter contains equal signs, always the form parameter=value needs to be used. This should be well-known, but anyway I clarified the template documentation about that point. -- sarang사랑 05:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: could you review my unblock request (and possibly take into accouny my 17:25 feedback)? Veverve (talk) 12:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio tagging[edit]

Regarding File:Saarlandenwappen.gif, please take a look again at COM:CSD#F1: "Content is a clear copyright violation, with evidence that no Commons-compatible licensing has been issued by the copyright holder. This does not apply whenever there is a reasonable possibility of discovering that the work is public domain through further research or a plausible argument that it is below the threshold of originality." Your rationale, "Looks like a poor scan and not an original work", reads more like mere suspicion, which is a valid reason to open a DR but should never be used for speedy deletion. -- King of ♥ 06:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kievan Rus in 1237 (ru).svg[edit]

Здравствуйте. Причина отмены? Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: the Kievan Rus is not Russia. Veverve (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

мини|лево|250п|the Russia is not Kievan Rus. Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: It is written "Русь" as in w:ru:Киевская Русь, not "Россия" on the map. Why do you want to say "Russian"? Generally, are you POV-pushing for the Kievan Rus to be called "Russia"? Veverve (talk) 20:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ru:ВП:ВПНЕАИ Несмотря на то что статьи Википедии должны основываться на авторитетных источниках, сама Википедия не является авторитетным источником. Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 04:29, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ru:Россия (название) Впер­вые назв. «Ро­сия» на греч. яз. (‘Ρωσία ) ис­поль­зо­ва­но ви­зант. имп. Кон­стан­ти­ном VII Баг­ря­но­род­ным в трак­та­те «Об управ­ле­нии им­пе­ри­ей» (сер. 9 в.) для обо­зна­че­ния Древ­не­рус­ско­го го­су­дар­ст­ва[1]. ru:Большая российская энциклопедия Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: So, you are POV-pushing that the Kievan Rus' is actually Russia. Please have a look at ru:Русь (название)
I have started a discussion at File talk:Historical map of Russian, 1054-1240.gif. Veverve (talk) 07:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ru:ВП:ВПНЕАИ Несмотря на то что статьи Википедии должны основываться на авторитетных источниках, сама Википедия не является авторитетным источником. Роусь, romanized: Rusĭ, or роусьскаѧ землѧ, romanized: rusĭskaę zemlę, "Rus' land" Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 10:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: "Russia" is not the Rus'/Kievan Rus, just like Poland or Ukraine are not the Rus'/Kievan Rus', and Italy is not the Roman empire. Those are different names for different periods for different entities. Veverve (talk) 12:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Россия" - это Русь, точно не, Польша или Украина. Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 12:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: "Россия" is not "Русь" either! Veverve (talk) 12:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
de:Russland, nl:Russland. Роусь, romanized: Rusĭ, or роусьскаѧ землѧ, romanized: rusĭskaę zemlę, "Rus' land" Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 12:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: I am getting tired of your POV-pushing based on play on words. w:de:Russlandw:de:Kiewer Rus (you can try with every WP, Russian WP included). Veverve (talk) 12:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Пиши на русском языке. Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: I do not speak Russian, all I can do is more or less read Cyrilic alphabet and understand a few words. I have pinged a Russian native speaker at File talk:Historical map of Russian, 1054-1240.gif. Veverve (talk) 13:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://translate.yandex.ru/?from=tabbar&text=%D0%94%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B5%20%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE&lang=ru-en Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 13:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: I know it is. It is also the ancestor of Ukraine, Belarus, and some Baltic countries (and the Novgorod Republic); so calling it Russia 1) goes against the very title of the map, 2) is POV-pushing. Veverve (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
НЕТ, Русь это Русская земля, это "Rus' land" "Russia" Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Фев­раль­ская ре­во­лю­ция 1917 от­кры­ла воз­мож­ность ак­тив­ной по­ли­тич. дея­тель­но­сти для ру­ко­во­ди­те­лей укр. нац. дви­же­ния (как на­хо­див­ших­ся в Рос­сии, так и вер­нув­ших­ся из Ав­ст­ро-Венг­рии). 7(20).3.1917 на со­бра­нии Т-ва укр. прог­рес­си­стов в Кие­ве был соз­дан пред­ста­вит. ор­ган – Цен­траль­ная ра­да во гла­ве с М. С. Гру­шев­ским. 11–12(24–25).12.1917 в Харь­ко­ве со­сто­ял­ся 1-й Все­ук­ра­ин­ский съезд Со­ве­тов, объ­я­вив­ший о соз­да­нии Укр. нар. рес­пуб­ли­ки Со­ве­тов. 4-м Уни­вер­са­лом Центр. ра­ды 9(22).1.1918 бы­ла про­воз­гла­ше­на не­за­ви­си­мость Ук­ра­ин­ской на­род­ной рес­пуб­ли­ки (УНР)[2]. Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

По­сле Февральской ре­во­лю­ции 1917 власть в Белоруссии пе­ре­шла к ме­ст­ным ор­га­нам вла­сти, пред­став­ляв­шим Вре­мен­ное пра­ви­тель­ст­во. В Белоруссии соз­да­ва­лись Со­ве­ты ра­бо­чих и сол­дат­ских де­пу­та­тов (в мар­те – апреле 1917 офор­ми­лось 37 Со­ве­тов). Ве­ду­щую роль в них иг­ра­ли эсе­ры, мень­ше­ви­ки, бун­дов­цы. Во­зоб­но­ви­ла свою дея­тель­ность БСГ. В мар­те 1917 в Мин­ске со­сто­ял­ся съезд бе­ло­русских национальных ор­га­ни­за­ций, ко­то­рый вы­дви­нул тре­бо­ва­ния государственной ав­то­но­мии Белоруссии в со­ста­ве Российской Фе­де­ра­тив­ной Де­мо­кра­тической Рес­пуб­ли­ки и из­брал ис­пол­нительный ор­ган – Бе­ло­русский национальный комитет (БНК), пред­се­да­те­лем ко­то­ро­го стал Р. Скир­мунт. По ини­циа­ти­ве БСГ в ию­ле 1917 со­сто­ял­ся съезд бе­ло­русских ор­га­ни­за­ций и пар­тий, вме­сто БНК соз­да­на Центральная ра­да бе­ло­русских ор­га­ни­за­ций, ре­ор­га­ни­зо­ван­ная в Ве­ли­кую бе­ло­русскую ра­ду (ВБР, см. Бе­ло­рус­ские ра­ды).

В один день с по­бе­дой Октябрьской ре­во­лю­ции 1917 в Пет­ро­гра­де [25.10(7.11).1917] советская власть бы­ла про­воз­гла­ше­на в Мин­ске; функ­ции управ­ле­ния Белоруссией взял на се­бя ВРК Северо-Западной об­лас­ти и Западного фрон­та. В но­ябре 1917 – январе 1918 на съез­дах сол­дат­ских, ра­бо­чих и кре­сть­ян­ских де­пу­та­тов Мин­ской, Мо­ги­лёв­ской, Ви­теб­ской гу­бер­ний, 2-м съез­де сол­дат­ских ко­ми­те­тов ар­мий Западного фрон­та бы­ла при­зна­на советская власть. 26.11(9.12).1917 соз­дан Об­ласт­ной ис­пол­нительный комитет Со­ве­тов ра­бо­чих, сол­дат­ских и кре­сть­ян­ских де­пу­та­тов Западной об­лас­ти и фрон­та (Обл­ис­пол­зап), под ру­ко­вод­ст­вом ко­то­ро­го на­ча­лось ус­та­нов­ле­ние советской вла­сти в Восточной и Центральной Белоруссии. В от­вет ВБР в декабре 1917 в Мин­ске со­зва­ла 1-й Все­бело­русский съезд (кон­гресс), на ко­то­ром при­зва­ла к борь­бе с советской вла­стью и по­тре­бо­ва­ла для Белоруссии ав­то­но­мии в рам­ках бур­жу­аз­но-де­мо­кра­тического Российского государства. Ру­ко­во­дство Обл­ис­пол­за­па ра­зо­гна­ло этот съезд. В феврале 1918 германскими вой­ска­ми бы­ла ок­ку­пи­ро­ва­на поч­ти вся тер­ри­то­рия Белоруссии (до конца 1918). В мар­те 1918 про­воз­гла­ше­на Бе­ло­рус­ская На­род­ная Рес­пуб­ли­ка (БНР)[3].Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
[4] Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: please first get a consensus in all other Wikiprojects that the expression "Rus' " or "Kievan Rus' " redirect to "Russia".
en:United Kingdom, en:Kingdom of Great Britain, en:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Чръный человек: I am at my wit's end here. Could you confirm that I am facing a POV-pusher or is it a WP ru consensus? Veverve (talk) 17:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see no valid argumentation from Зайцев Руслан Викторович, so I declined his rename requests and fulfilled the request by Veverve. en:Russia and (ancient, Kievan, etc.) en:Rus are universally accepted different entities. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalism![edit]

Раджу припинити свій путінський вандалізм, бо знову будеш заблокований! --Микола Василечко (talk) 11:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Микола Василечко: there is no problem with my deletion proposals from what I see. Which policy are you invoking? I have listed mines in my deletion proposals. Veverve (talk) 11:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Микола Василечко: as I explained on your talk page, I did not intend to nominate your image as a copyright violation. Sorry! Veverve (talk) 12:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Микола Василечко: and what are you saying on my DRs? I am not blocked, and you have not explained here anything about those DRs. Veverve (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taivo (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: how are they bad? I genuinely do no understand. None of the images I nominated are used in a main space. Veverve (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
COM:INUSE says: "The uploading of small numbers of images for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project." Taivo (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: how can all those be considered to be for personnal use and not simply as using WCommons as a free webhost to host politically engaged, personal (user) militant content? There is no way to tell. Микола Василечко (whose images I nominated) never gave this personnal use argument. Two of those images at Commons:Deletion requests/File:STOP Putin.png even have clear instructions by the uploader to use them during political demonstrations. And since 10 of those images were uploaded by the same user, User:Birkho, how can they be considered "small numbers of images"?
Anyone active or previously active on a project could game the system if there is no limit to how the part of COM:INUSE you quoted is used. Veverve (talk) 18:19, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Every Commons image can be used for every purpose, including political demonstrations. What is "small number of images", this is not specified, but considering, that Birkho account was created 8 years ago and (s)he has almost 500 edits in Commons, 10 files is not too much. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to chime in and say good block. The File:Krakow war protest 9.jpg is properly licensed and attributed, yet Veverve tagged it as speedy delete. The speedy was, without a doubt, made in bad faith and this shows a clear pattern of misuse. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@OhanaUnited: I answer you here since I am blocked. The picture being under CC 4.0 does not mean its content is. Taking a picture of a copyrighted material and releasing the picture under CC 4.0 does not change the copyright of the content of the picture. See for example cases where no Commons:Freedom of panorama exists. Veverve (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@OhanaUnited: looking at this makes me feel you should have thought twice before judging me so harshly and semi-en:WP:GRAVEDANCE. We can also say: good deletion, as it fits a WCommons policy. I have never interacted with you before today, no need to be so judgemental. Veverve (talk) 19:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't paint yourself as the victim here. This is not grave dancing. I wouldn't have said anything and would have gone through undeleteion request if you weren't blocked twice in a year for creating bad deletion requests (including some that were filed today that led to your second block). OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Премиерот Ковачевски во дводневна посета во Рим и Ватикан -23.05.2022- (52092992938).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Премиерот Ковачевски во дводневна посета во Рим и Ватикан -23.05.2022- (52092992938).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~ R.T.G 09:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]