User talk:W. Bulach

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, W. Bulach!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Antarktische Halbinsel - Paradise Bay.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Framawiki: I question this tagging - these images seem to be unique (not found on the net) and contain exif data. Unless you have any additional information, I can't see why you doubt these are own work. - 4ing (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello 4ing, I found this publication of theses images on a website (look for example File:Deception Islands - Whalers Bay.jpg). Cordially --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Framawiki: The images at the Russian site is of lower resolution, and probably without exif data. I find the images at Panoramio, uploaded by the user "Bulach". I think it is more likely that the Russian site has copied images from Panoramio than vice versa. - 4ing (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks 4ing. If the panoramio file page that you as found mentioned free licence, it's ok for me. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 12:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:0 1310 Viadukt von Millau (Viaduc de Millau), Frankreich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

68.193.210.74 16:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:00 7884 Göteborg - Hafen Lilla Bommen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00 1312 Viadukt von Millau, Frankreich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

67.84.96.111 01:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:0 1310 Viadukt von Millau (Viaduc de Millau), Frankreich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

67.84.96.111 01:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stick to sub-categories when parent-categories are overpopulated[edit]

Could you please stop overpopulating Category:Göteborg? Those pictures already have been placed in sub-categories, there's no need for you to keep putting them back into Category:Göteborg. --Vogler (talk) 14:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Block warning[edit]

Following from above, I see you're also placing lakes in Western Australia into categories for Northern Territory. I suggest that if you don't know how to categorise images, you should stop and find out before taking one more step. If your edits don't improve you will have to be blocked from editing here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:55, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Due to a misunderstanding, you were blocked for three days. I have removed that block, but found that you were describing Lake Argyle as being in Northern Territory. If you look at the map using the geocoordinates that you yourself provided, you'll see that Lake Argyle lies wholly in Western Australia. This wouldn't have happened in the first place if you have been taking more care with your edits, and I advise that you do so in order to avoid being blocked in future. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Administrator Rodhullandemu, thanks for pointing to erroneous assignments (block warnig).The note obviously refers to File: 00 2098 and File: 00 21 2100 (Western Australia - Lake Agryle). The artificial lake is actually located in Northern Territory - but in absolute neighbors to the border of Western Territory / Northern Territory. I regret my mistake. You corrected the error. Thank you. I am a beginner and still have to learn. That I am still accused because of the error of vandalism has shocked me somewhat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by W. Bulach (talk • contribs) If my pictures and their descriptions do not meet the requirements of Wikipedia, I will cease my activities. Regards.

Please don't be disheartened, your photographs are valuable here and we welcome them. But it does help if you respond to comments made here, and there is always someone around to help. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:37, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00 1309 Milan - Viadukt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

67.84.96.111 21:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00 1312 Viaduc de Millau - France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

67.84.96.111 21:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00436Bayeux - Fontaine Saint-Patrice Ou Moutier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00 7449 Bad Gandersheim - Stift Gandersheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:21, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | Österreichisches Deutsch | Schweizer Hochdeutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Dialog-go-hand-ltr.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

--Sitacuisses (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Lieber W. Bulach, deine Fotos sind toll. Es ist schön, dass es sie gibt. Deine Arbeit an den Kategorien dagegen ist noch verbesserungswürdig. Was soll dies hier, bitte sehr? Das sieht nach Zufallsprinzip aus. Ein Blick in die Kategorie Comput ecclésiastique de l'horloge astronomique de Strasbourg hätte genügt, um zu sehen, dass dein Bild da gar nicht hineingehört (das betreffende Motiv wird auf deinem Foto nämlich gar nicht dargestellt). Bitte nehme in Zukunft darauf Rücksicht! Herzlich, --Edelseider (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:00 0891 Geothermal features.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

轻语者 (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Die Aufnahme (File:00 0891 Geothermal features.jpg) entstand im Jahre 1985 durch einem Diapositivfilm. Das gerahmte Einzeldia wurde im Jahre 2004 mit einem Diascanner in das JPG-Format umgewandelt und zur Bildverbesserung mit Adobe Photoshop Elements 18.0 bearbeitet (Medaten-Kennung: adobe: docid:photoshop:9735 afa2-6d32-11d8-9bfc-eeb4dca55127). Das Bild befand sich einige Zeit auf meiner Homepage www.bulach-gp.de .und wurde ggf. von dem Betreiber der Seite http://m.blog.daum.net/ygyung/15988217 unberechtigt heruntergeladen.

Image corruption detected in File:00 5105 Catherine Palace (Большой Екатерининский дворец) in Pushkin, Russia.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello W. Bulach, it appears that the version of File:00 5105 Catherine Palace (Большой Екатерининский дворец) in Pushkin, Russia.jpg which you uploaded 2019-03-11T11:01:55Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 08:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:00 2365 Eilean Donan Castle - Scottish Highland.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  čeština  català  English  español  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  українська  中文(简体)  slovenščina  polski  Ελληνικά  日本語  slovenčina  فارسی  македонски  中文(繁體)  русский  հայերեն  suomi  Nederlands  français  magyar  עברית  italiano  português  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Purnululu (Bungle Bungle) Nationalpark[edit]

Stunning pictures, but what is the point of Category:Purnululu (Bungle Bungle) Nationalpark when we already have Category:Purnululu National Park? Calistemon (talk) 00:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gemäß dem Reiseführer DUMONT umfasst der 1987 gegründete Purnululu Nationalpark die im Südosten liegende Bungle Bungle Range Bis zum Zeitpunkt der Parkgründung war das Gebirge nahezu unzugänglich und nur den Aborigines bekannt. Nach meiner Kenntnis wird meist Bungle Bungle als Synonym für die im Nationalpark befindliche Bienenkorb-Formationen verwendet. Ich habe deshalb zusätzlich die Bezeichnung „Purnululu (Bungle Bungle) Nationalpark“ zur eindeutigen Zuordnung der Fotos gewählt. Siehe hierzu auch „Bungle Bungle - Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org > wiki > Bungle_Bungle). Dieser Seite können allerdings unter Weblinks keine Fotos zugefügt werden. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, W. Bulach

This belongs to the travel guide DUMONT the Purnululu National Park, founded in 1987, the Bungle Bungle Range, which has been tried and tested in the southeast. Until the same time the park was founded, the mountains were inaccessible and only known to the Aborigines. As far as I know, Bungle Bungle is mostly used as a synonym for the beehive formations oriented in the national park. I heard that the identity “Purnululu (Bungle Bungle) National Park” belongs to the preservation of the assignment of the photos. See also “Bungle Bungle - Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org > wiki > Bungle_Bungle). However, this page cannot be included under web links to include any photos. Sincerely, W. Bulach.

Sorry if I'm answering in English rather than German but my keyboard does not do German very well. If I understand you right, you wished to create a category or gallery page for de:Bungle Bungle (en:Bungle Bungle Range). Both is possible and can be linked to the two articles through Wikidata, but I wouldn't name it Category:Purnululu (Bungle Bungle) Nationalpark or National Park, that is just confusing. Rather, I suggest you name it just Category:Bungle Bungle or, for clarity, Category:Bungle Bungle formation. Using German names for categories, like Nationalpark, here on Commons goes against Commons:Naming categories and does not make much sense when the topic is a landform in an English speaking country. You blanked the category, as you did with Category:Nambung (The Pinnacles) Nationalpark. Do you have anymore plans in that direction, to create categories for the landforms rather than the national parks? Calistemon (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00 2558 Sankt-Sebastian-Kirche Magdeburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elly (talk) 06:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Das Foto File:00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg zeigt die Stadt Millau vom Standort östlich der Stadt an der „Route du Causse Noir“. Aus dieser Blickrichtung auf die Stadt kommt in einem Bildfeld zur Aufnahme des gesamten Stadtareals zwangsläufig der „Viaduc de Millau“ in die Aufnahme. Beabsichtigt war nicht eine Aufnahme des Viadukts, sondern das Stadtbild. Ob in diesem Falle eine Verletzung des Urheberrechts vorliegt, zweifle ich an. Mit freundlichen Grüßen W. Bulach
The photo file: 00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg shows the city of Millau from the location east of the city on the "Route du Causse Noir". From this direction of view of the city, the “Viaduc de Millau” inevitably appears in an image field to capture the entire city area. The intention was not to record the viaduct, but the cityscape. I doubt whether there is a violation of copyright in this case. Sincerely, W. Bulach W. Bulach (talk) 13:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I made a crop, a little more radically than suggested by Labattblueboy in the deletion discussion, removing (nearly) all of the bridge: File:Millau 00 0238.jpg. I thought the pylons were distracting if just cropping down to the deck. –LPfi (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And another one as suggested by Labattblueboy: File:Millau 00 0238 (2).jpg. –LPfi (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Guten Tag Martin Sg.! Ich konnte leider in Ihrem Löschantrag zum Foto „File:.00 4098 Innenraum der Jesuitenkirche in Koblenz.jpg“ keine für mich verständliche Begründung finden. Ihre Ausführungen:
Reason for deletion request:: copyvio; contemp. artworks, no fop.
Grund des Löschantrags: copyvio; zeitgenössisch. Kunstwerke, kein Geck.
Sollte sich Ihr Antrag auf im Bild befindlichen urheberrechtliche geschützte Kunstwerke (z. B. Kirchenfenster) beziehen, so möchte ich feststellen: Die betreffende Kirche ist allgemein öffentlich zugänglich und Fotografierverbote sind nicht erkennbar angebracht. Die Aufnahme zeigt außerdem den gesamten Kirchenraum und sollten ein tatsächlich urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk in Teilen unabwendbar mit abgebildet sein, so gilt im deutschen Recht die Panoramafreiheit. Für diesen Fall muss der Urheber des Werkes nicht um Erlaubnis ersucht werden. Ich halte Ihren Löschantrag als nicht begründigt und stelle dieses zur Diskusion. MfG W. Bulach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Martin Sg! Unfortunately, I could not find a reason that I could understand in your deletion request for the photo "File:.00 4098 Interior of the Jesuit Church in Koblenz.jpg". Your remarks:
Reason for deletion request::copyvio; contemp. artworks, no fop.
Grund des Löschantrags: copyvio; zeitgenössisch. Kunstwerke, kein Geck.
If your application relates to works of art protected by copyright (e.g. church windows) in the picture, I would like to state that the church in question is open to the general public and there are no recognizable bans on photography. The photo also shows the entire church interior and if parts of a work that is actually protected by copyright are inevitably shown, then freedom of panorama applies under German law. In this case, the author of the work does not have to be asked for permission. I consider your deletion request to be unfounded and put this up for discussion. Yours sincerely, W. Bulach W. Bulach (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Guten Tag Martin Sg.! Ich konnte leider in Ihrem Löschantrag zum Foto „File:.00 4098 Innenraum der Jesuitenkirche in Koblenz.jpg“ keine für mich verständliche Begründung finden. Ihre Ausführungen:
Reason for deletion request:: copyvio; contemp. artworks, no fop.
Grund des Löschantrags: copyvio; zeitgenössisch. Kunstwerke, kein Geck.
Sollte sich Ihr Antrag auf im Bild befindlichen urheberrechtliche geschützte Kunstwerke (z. B. Kirchenfenster) beziehen, so möchte ich feststellen: Die betreffende Kirche ist allgemein öffentlich zugänglich und Fotografierverbote sind nicht erkennbar angebracht. Die Aufnahme zeigt außerdem den gesamten Kirchenraum und sollten ein tatsächlich urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk in Teilen unabwendbar mit abgebildet sein, so gilt im deutschen Recht die Panoramafreiheit. Für diesen Fall muss der Urheber des Werkes nicht um Erlaubnis ersucht werden. Ich halte Ihren Löschantrag als nicht begründigt und stelle dieses zur Diskusion. MfG W. Bulach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Martin Sg! Unfortunately, I could not find a reason that I could understand in your deletion request for the photo "File:.00 4098 Interior of the Jesuit Church in Koblenz.jpg". Your remarks:
Reason for deletion request::copyvio; contemp. artworks, no fop.
Grund des Löschantrags: copyvio; zeitgenössisch. Kunstwerke, kein Geck.
If your application relates to works of art protected by copyright (e.g. church windows) in the picture, I would like to state that the church in question is open to the general public and there are no recognizable bans on photography. The photo also shows the entire church interior and if parts of a work that is actually protected by copyright are inevitably shown, then freedom of panorama applies under German law. In this case, the author of the work does not have to be asked for permission. I consider your deletion request to be unfounded and put this up for discussion. Yours sincerely, W. Bulach W. Bulach (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories[edit]

Please note that because Category:Lindesnes fyr is a subcategory of Category:Lighthouses in Norway, no files in Category:Lindesnes fyr should be in Category:Lighthouses in Norway also.--Hjart (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

00 3380 Cathédrale Saint-Dié de Saint-Dié-des-Vosges - Frankreich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 00 3380 Cathédrale Saint-Dié de Saint-Dié-des-Vosges - Frankreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:00 3320 Mittlere Wegerich (Plantago media).jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:00 3320 Mittlere Wegerich (Plantago media).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

information about : File:00 1222 Georges d`Hérault - Frankreich.jpg[edit]

Hallo, Thanks for your pictures! I notice that the picture File:00 1222 Georges d`Hérault - Frankreich.jpg do not has precise location indication, and I doubt it's along the Gorges of the Héraut river. What is the village on the picture ? Danke, Thym (talk) 10:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, thank you for critically viewing the image File:00 1222 Georges d`Hérault - France.jpg. The picture was taken on the D108E8 road with the coordinates 43.910008|3.737456 (43 54 36.03 N / 3 44 14.84 E). The town in question, on the opposite side of the gorge, is Agonès with coordinates 43.904025|3.727797 (43 54 14.49 N / 3 43 40.07 E). The photo shows the Georges d'Hérault and the location information is, in my opinion, sufficiently correct. Sincerely, W. Bulach
Guten Tag, danke für kritische Betrachtung des Bildes File:00 1222 Georges d`Hérault - Frankreich.jpg. Die Aufnahme entstand an der Straße D108E8 mit den Koordinaten 43.910008|3.737456 (43 54 36,03 N / 3 44 14,84 E). Die fragliche Ortschaft auf der gegenüber liegenden Seite der Schlucht ist Agonès mit den Koordinaten 43.904025|3.727797 (43 54 14,49 N / 3 43 40,07 E). Das Foto zeigt die Georges d´Hérault und die Ortangaben sind nach meiner Überzeugung hinreichen stimmig. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, W. Bulach W. Bulach (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Guten Tag, I am sorry to let you know that there may be a mix up in your pictures. I know well the location of D108E8 and Agonès, and I went there. The picture is not from there, the village is not Agonès. You can have a look on google earth to convince you. https://earth.google.com/web/search/43.910008+3.737456 The cliffs on the pictures are higher than in Gorges de l'Héraut, and some roofs on of the villages are covered with flagstone, which is not the case in this valley. Thym (talk) 10:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


@W. Bulach:
Guten Tag W. Bulach,
ich hatte das schönes Bild der Dactylorhiza majalis‎ von der Unterteilung "Gesamtpflanzen " zu "Blütenstände" sortiert. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 10:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00 3452 Sjømannsmonumentet, Bergen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]