User talk:Wikid77

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Wikid77!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 18:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nopngs.gif[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you created Image:Nopngs.gif and put a bunch of POV, untrue statements on its image description page. Please take a look at en:Special:Contributions/PNG crusade bot for a list of images that benefited from conversion to PNG. Also, en:Image:WikiscannerScrsht.jpg is a great example of JPEG being a terrible format for non-photographic data. The JPEG copy is 114 KB, whereas the PNG copy is 14 KB. PNG images also support the full range of colors, whereas GIFs are limited to 256 colors.

That said:

  • JPEG is fine for photographic data. But please don't recommend that people use it for non-photographic data.
  • GIF is fine for simple animations. But please don't recommend that people use it for non-animated images.

Remember the dot (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

congratulations[edit]

Your version of the Neckar River watershed is a considerable improvement over the earlier map.

Congratulations!

How did you do it? I would like to make better maps.

Cheers! Geo Swan 20:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image[edit]

Regarding http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Panama-Canal-rough-diagram-quick.jpg could you tell me where you sourced this image, it would be useful to know if there are more images there that I might use for some of my own pages Parrot of Doom 13:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Skelleftealven River map closer.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below).... This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gray star on lavendar.gif[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. ...
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems,...
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Map HK Lantau closer.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself... ... Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 04:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ike[edit]

Hi. If an image is within a subcategory like "Hurricane Ike in Texas" it does not need to also have a parent category like "Hurricane Ike" added as well; that is redundant to the Commons:Categories system. On a related point, I have suggested that "Category:Hurricane Ike (2008) be renamed simply "Category:Hurricane Ike"; see Category talk:Hurricane Ike (2008) and comment there if you wish. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Map_Wyoming_counties_USA.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nyttend (talk) 13:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin shapefiles?[edit]

could you tell me where I could find shapefiles of Berlin and its boroughs?

Tcat780

LIFE Photo Archive[edit]

Hi, Wikid77. I noticed that you have already uploaded an image using the new {{LIFE}} tag. This is great! However, please do not upload the high-resolution images on Google since they contain watermarking. The smaller resolution ones are of sufficiently good quality and do not have watermarking. Moreover, I have explained in the template documentation's copyright section why using {{PD-US}} is usually inappropriate. It is generally far safer to upload pre-1889 images, unless the author is confirmed to have died before 1939. As for your suggestions, I have replied to them on the village pump. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 14:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikid77. I was thinking exactly the same thing. Time Inc. has said 97% of the photos (i.e. the overwhelming majority) are unpublished, meaning that photos created between 1889 and 1923 may still be under copyright. I think the safest is to start by uploading pre-1889 photos (and that's already a huge workload!!). If Carl Lindberg's assertion on the village pump that the Copyright Term Extension Act wasn't retroactive (I am waiting for Cornell to update their chart to be sure about this), then we can also upload images created between 1889 and 1897. Images created after that should only be uploaded if their photographer died before 1939. Your guess is probably correct: I don't think we would find many photographers in that category, although it is by no means impossible. I'm sure there's a list of LIFE photographers somewhere on the web, so with a bit of research we can come up with a few names whose photos would be OK on Commons. As for post-1939 photos, they are clearly not free. Photos which use a 1939+ year in the {{LIFE}} template should be automatically marked for deletion. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Graph WP extended growth 2025.gif[edit]

Just as a matter of interest, how did you make the predictions for this graph, did you just arbitrarily invent it, or is there an equation for it?Wolfkeeper (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Berlin Bezirke 2001.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Revolus (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Wikid77!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 04:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Size[edit]

This edit removed the ability to localize the numbers in the user's preferred output language. The rounding error is marginal and doesn't occur in most cases, but a lack of localization affects millions of users. --Slomox (talk) 11:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way: The fault lies not at the template, it's the Mediawiki software that sucks with operations like {{#expr: trunc( ( 0.12 - 0.1 ) * 100 ) }} = 1, instead of correctly 2. --Slomox (talk) 11:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I added a hack to the template. I hope the rounding errors are fixed now ;-) Please check the pages, where you encountered the rounding errors and if they are okay, please undo your edit. --Slomox (talk) 11:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Knox Kercher house Perugia Italy.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--FormerIP (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABBA_mirrored_BB.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quibik (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PD-old-auto[edit]

Hi Wikid77, concerning your change at File:Rozier engraving.jpg: The year in this template is not the date of production/engraving. It is the death date of the artist/author. I reverted your change. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 12:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thasos labeld map[edit]

are you the author? --Haubi (talk) 08:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gary_Kildall_older_style.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gary_Kildall_older_style.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gary_Kildall_older_style.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gary_Kildall_older_style.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gary_Kildall_older_style.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems caused by your changes[edit]

If you change a template which is used on more the 25000 Pages, please do it in a correct manner or keep away.

Fix this problem!

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Die_Gartenlaube_%281881%29_b_037.jpg

What is about this curiosity??

??? Extracted image (if any): File:Die Gartenlaube (1881) b 039.jpg - hi res, ~2.5 MB. ???

most of the pages have no pictures at all, so this is a more than useless comment.

Die Gartenlaube is the name of this periodical, which should not be translated or would you translate the The Harald Tribune

("The Garden Arbor")

Could you please stick to the naming conventions which are used in de wikisorce

Greetings --Joergens.mi (talk) 05:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kercher_Knox_house_Perugia_Italy.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guinnog (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Hi I am a Singaporean student from the National University of Singapore and I am working on OCT. It would be great if you could send me the 3D reconstruction code you use to obtain the HautFingerspitzeOCT image. It would be very helpful for my Final Year Project. I am currently using MATLAB to process my 2D images i acquire from my OCT set up. Thanks!

Regards Nithya Nithyaram (talk) 05:43, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
I am Nithya, I had just sent you a message, and my email address is nithyar89@gmail.com. Thanks. Nithyaram (talk) 05:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Attack page[edit]

The simple conversion of this English Wikipedia policy into a Commons essay is inappropriate, because the language is all wrong. You must either rewrite as an essay, or take steps to propose it as a policy/guideline. If you don't want to do either, I will nominate it for deletion. Rd232 (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikid77

According to its description, this is for files uploaded with the Wizard. Is there a specific reason why you remove it from file description pages? [1] --  Docu  at 04:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I did not see the need to link the category, which already has more than 714,000 pages linked. Is there some reason why each image must be bloated with a link to that large nebulous category? -Wikid77 (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Attack page has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rd232 (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KJV-King-James-Version-Bible-first-edition-title-page-1611.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, whym (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

a heads-up[edit]

You have made some beautiful maps that were adapted from maps I made. I think I have told you I recognize that your derived images were superior to mine.

I noticed File:Neckar watershed closer.gif was re-used here -- and, unfortunately, was credited solely to me.

I'm sorry, because it was your improvements that took one of the ugliest maps I made and turned it into something beautiful and useful.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Nauru map bold.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nauru map bold.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

23:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:PD-old-90 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katrina 2005 track quick.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 08:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kercher Knox house Perugia concept.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mardi Gras boxes yellow.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFXtalk 10:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]