User talk:Wilfredor

Userboxes

es

Este usuario es un hablante nativo del español.

en-3

This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English.

fr-4

Cette personne parle français à un niveau comparable à la langue maternelle.

pt-4

Este utilizador tem um nível de português semelhante ao de um nativo.

This user comes from Venezuela.

This user is a license reviewer on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user has rollback rights on Wikipedia.

This user has reviewer rights on Wikipedia.

This user is autopatrolled on Wikipedia.

Welcome to my user talk page!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc du réservoir Beaudet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard champlain, Old Quebec, Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 06:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tree in Plaines d'Abraham.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc du réservoir Beaudet 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Sensor dust throughout the image. --King of Hearts 01:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
@King of Hearts:

Done Thanks, i uploaded another version --Wilfredor 13:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc du réservoir Beaudet 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good but there are at least 3 dust spots --Poco a poco 08:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
@Poco a poco:

Done Thanks, i uploaded another version --Wilfredor 13:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministère des Finances Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Beautiful! The sky is a bit noisy (OK for me, but probably not for all people ;–), so I would suggest to apply some local denoising to the sky only. --Aristeas 09:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
@Aristeas:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 23:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 11:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela Dourada, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro de Santa Isabel, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pano Parc du réservoir Beaudet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good qulity --Llez 06:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevrolet car in Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Le Concorde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument d’Honoré Mercier, premier ministre du Québec, 1887-1891, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Needs noise reduction. --Ermell 23:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
@Ermell:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 02:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assemblée nationale du Québec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

several dust specks around the tower plus artefacts to the right of it --Virtual-Pano 22:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@Virtual-Pano:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 23:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
most of them are gone indeed, thanks - please take a look to left and right of the clock there are still specks and a smudge --Virtual-Pano 07:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
@Virtual-Pano: I uploaded another version, please, let me know if its ok now --Wilfredor 13:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
dust removed - smudge gone - but what happened to twigs at far right & sculptures on the roof left & right of the tower which were spot on in the first version? --Virtual-Pano 00:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Please could you be more specific? --Wilfredor 10:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Support the denoising had a negative impact - the first version undusted and desmudged works for me - excellent composition and the chosen colour scheme compliments the content quite nicely --Virtual-Pano 17:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 06:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 02:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset Hôtel Le Concorde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

CommentCould you remove the red CAs left and right? --KaiBorgeest 23:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Good quality. --Moroder 06:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande Allée Drill Hall National Historic Site of Canada 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Top a bit narrow, but good in all --PantheraLeo1359531 17:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martello Tower 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality, very nice atmosphere :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec city skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 05:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pano du Parc du réservoir Beaudet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 07:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Parc du réservoir Beaudet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parc du réservoir Beaudet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Dear Wilfredor,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral da Sé, São Paulo, Brasil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 03:40, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ballet Don Quijote en Teatro Teresa Carreño 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ballet Don Quijote en Teatro Teresa Carreño 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petit champlain, Quebec Ville, Canada 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Very beautiful. There are some dust spots in the sky, and IMHO a perspective correction is necessary, because the verticals are leaning out. --Aristeas 16:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
@Aristeas:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 02:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 11:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Château Frontenac, Quebec city, Canada.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château Frontenac, Quebec city, Canada.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Teatro de Santa Isabel, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teatro de Santa Isabel, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Verdun (9155923812).jpg[edit]

File:Verdun (9155923812).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Premiação Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 Brasil[edit]

	Melhores imagens - 3º, 7º e 9º lugares
	Esta comenda reconhece sua atuação no Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil. Na edição de 2020, suas fotografias Praça do Marco Zero, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg, Teatro de Santa Isabel, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg e Vale do Anhangabaú, Sao Paulo, Brasil.jpg foram premiadas com o 3º, 7º e 9º lugares, respectivamente, na categoria melhores imagens e farão parte da lista de candidatas representando o Brasil na etapa internacional do concurso. Você pode conferir as demais imagens vencedoras nesta categoria. Parabéns pelo seu empenho e muito obrigado pelas suas colaborações!
	Por favor, verifique seu e-mail para a premiação!
	-- EPorto (WMB) (talk) 21:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Nazareno de San Pablo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nazareno de San Pablo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mask used on folk ritual Kamentsa on Chaquiras indigenous people of Colombia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mask used on folk ritual Kamentsa on Chaquiras indigenous people of Colombia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breakfast in Venezuela 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Bgag 00:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goat neonato.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Bgag 00:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group meeting on Saturday[edit]

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

I'd like to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, December 12. We'll have two presentations: Habib Mhenni aka Dyolf77 will answer the question Do "we" need DSLRs anymore? and Martin Falbisoner will walk us through the making of his featured picture File:Caribbean_Sea_-_Long_Exposure.jpg.

If you can make it, please add your name to the list of attendees to this page:

Virtual Meeting on December 12, 2020

I hope to see you in three days. Also, I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2021. Your contributions to Commons make a big difference.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2020[edit]

Oooh. You did rather well this year! Three in Brazil and four in Canada. Big congratulations! -- Colin (talk) 21:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typical Breakfast in Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 05:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trabajadora de chicharronera en Boquerón.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 05:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danbo vs Pepsi Man (8589896746).jpg[edit]

File:Danbo vs Pepsi Man (8589896746).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danbo Pepsi Version - New Gear Acquired! (9045079527).jpg[edit]

File:Danbo Pepsi Version - New Gear Acquired! (9045079527).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Wilfredor! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mask Diabo of Portugal used on folk fest and rituals.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mask Diabo of Portugal used on folk fest and rituals.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:FarkFK Anime Girl (4531887564).jpg[edit]

File:FarkFK Anime Girl (4531887564).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Place Royale at night, Vieux-Québec, Quebec ville, Canada.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Place Royale at night, Vieux-Québec, Quebec ville, Canada.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Teatro de Santa Isabel, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Municipal Market of São Paulo city.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:The Pearl (13960210505).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Pearl (13957032831).jpg[edit]

File:The Pearl (13957032831).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your most memorable shot 2020[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:

Your most memorable shot 2020

I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phpnuke.gif[edit]

File:Phpnuke.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 08:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on![edit]

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Québec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek 01:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domaine de Maizerets, Québec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Pretty winterscape. Maybe add a category for blue hour if that's appropriate. -- Ikan Kekek 01:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Gomin, Quebec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université Laval, Quebec Canada 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 22:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Bgag 00:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Bgag 00:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière St-Ignace-de-Loyola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 06:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Canada 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Canada 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.

Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

Virtual Meeting on March 20, 2020

Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:

Questions for Ben

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Canada interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 22:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle dans l'Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

OK --Jacek79 18:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CheHigh.jpg[edit]

File:CheHigh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hellbat31 (talk) 15:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Capela Dourada, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Canada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Question There is some substantial noise in the shadows, I guess they were pushed because of the light coming from the back. Is it possible to denoise a bit? Otherwise it's a nice picture. I'd be willing to accept that noise. --Etaped 08:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Etaped:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 21:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Nice quality! --Etaped 23:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 19:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikon Z 7II[edit]

I just wanted to drop an idea -- there are still no pictures of the Nikon Z 7II on Commons, so you might wish to go ahead and take and upload one. --A.Savin 18:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done @A.Savin: Thanks for ask me it (File:Nikon Z7ii + nikkor z 24-70mm f2.8 s.jpg) --Wilfredor (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Catedral da Sé, São Paulo, Brasil.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame-de-Lourdes Chapel, on Saint-Catherine street, Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Very nice image, but the top of the picture isn't sharp and the sky is a bit too noisy. Can you fix it? --Tournasol7 22:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
@Tournasol7:

Done Please, let me know if it is ok --Wilfredor 17:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Support Much better, thanks :) --Tournasol7 21:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 06:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Ballet Don Quijote en Teatro Teresa Carreño 3.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée (Charlesbourg) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Bgag 00:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manège militaire Voltigeurs de Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Bgag 00:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Maison Maizerets 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. But please improve the filename. --XRay 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Maizerets 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Please improve the filename. "Photographs of" isn't a good choice. --XRay 04:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université Laval, Quebec, Canada 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Relique dans Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Relique dans Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Maison Maizerets 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université Laval, Quebec, Canada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château Ango des Maizerets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Please check the verticals and please check (and improve) the filename. --XRay 07:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Done @XRay: Thanks --Wilfredor 14:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 16:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université Laval, Quebec, Canada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality, maybe some CA on the nearest post on the right. -- Ikan Kekek 17:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Ikan, please, could you add a note, i cant see it --Wilfredor 17:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
I added a note. I'm not sure it's CA. If it's not, just let me know. -- Ikan Kekek 08:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: I cant to see any CA, however, its a temporal object (to mesure the snow) and i removed it. Let me know if its ok. Thanks mate --Wilfredor 17:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
It's fine and I'll promote, but if what I saw was just the product of some blurring and not CA, why not revert? -- Ikan Kekek 11:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
yes you are right --Wilfredor 16:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand what happened to my promotion, so I changed the status again to promotion. -- Ikan Kekek 13:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:A Brazilian family in Rio de Janeiro by Jean-Baptiste Debret 1839.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood statue of Virgin Mary in church Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Fuchs B (talk) 10:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

duda[edit]

Hola, tienes correo electrónico, soy luisa desde Sevilla, España —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.230.191.126 (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Africa[edit]

Dear Wilfredor

In the past, you contributed to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. You have another opportunity to create and submit beautiful photographs on the theme of "Health and Wellness" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa. As with previous years, there are also many exciting national and international prizes.

For rules and information about how to participate, theme, or prizes click on Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest or directly add picture from the button !

Warmest, Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

Cher ou chère Wilfredor,
Au cours des années passées, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème de "la santé et le bien-être", qui pourraient profondément modifier la façon dont le reste du monde voit l’Afrique et comprend ses habitants et ses coutumes. Bonus, comme lors des années précédentes, il y a plusieurs prix à la clé !

Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation, le thème ou les prix, cliquez sur Participer au concours Wiki Loves Africa ou téléversez des photos en cliquant sur le bouton !

Bien à vous, Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality, but add a category for stained glass and describe what we're looking at (not only that it's stained glass, but where in the cathedral) in the file description. I'll wait for you to do similar work as needed on categories and descriptions before looking at any of the other photos in this series. -- Ikan Kekek 18:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Done Please, let me know if its right. Thanks mate --Wilfredor 19:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment Almost, but I still want to know where in the cathedral the stained glass is. Is it on a side (right or left)? At the apse? The left or right transept? Etc. -- Ikan Kekek 00:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
its in the upper left back but it depends where you are looking, how I could describe it in the best way --Wilfredor 13:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment You could just say where it is, if you're on the nave, facing toward the altar. -- Ikan Kekek 14:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Done thanks --Wilfredor 16:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)}

Support Great. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 02:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internal street in the Université Laval, Quebec Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File Permissions[edit]

Hello there, I noticed that on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uva_de_playa_(Coccoloba_uvifera).jpg - the permissions text was left as-is, even though presumably you have released the file to the public domain via a CC0 dedication. I think it would be best if you changed the permissions text yourself.

I don't really know how to gather all such files' permissions text, but it would probably be a good idea to try to automate the search to see if there are any category-vs-text conflicts. There are two searches I tried:

incategory:"CC-Zero" incategory:"Files_by_Wilfredor" "GFDL and cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0"

and

incategory:"CC-Zero" incategory:"Files_by_Wilfredor" "GFDL and Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-2.5"

both of which actually produce a lot of files. If you intend for all of them to be in Public Domain, perhaps you can do a public declaration, else I don't think it would be proper for someone else to change the text.

By the way, thank you for your CC0 images. I'm sure there will be someone who finds a use for them. Xenmorpha (talk) 13:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Commons Photographers meeting tomorrow[edit]

Just a quick reminder: the meeting with large format-photographer Ben Horne will happen tomorrow, Saturday, March 20. If you haven't done yet, please consider signing up for the event and add your questions to this page. This will be our first virtual meeting in 2021 and I'd be super happy if you could join. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée (Charlesbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Adoravel! --Túllio F 02:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ice sculpture in Quebec city downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Support amazing photo! Really good quality :) --Yitzilitt 04:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle dans l'Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec 0-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Support Good quality.I loved --Túllio F 02:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Comment I am not an expert in music, but the subject looks like pipe organ, not a piano. Please, check categorisation. --LexKurochkin 09:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Done based on detailed description

Support good quality --LexKurochkin 20:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rafael Urdaneta photo.jpg[edit]

File:Rafael Urdaneta photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monastere des Augustines, Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Le Concorde and Plains of Abraham.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral-Basilica of Notre-Dame de Québec 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universite Laval, Les Presses Universitaires Laval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Bethanie, Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House 23 in Quebec city downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ice sculpture in Quebec city downtown.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ice sculpture in Quebec city downtown.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barber shop, Quebec city, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support I like this image. Really good. --Satdeep Gill 07:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gilber Caro March 2019.png

Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 13:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Salumi Sandwich, McClure's Pickle Chips, Purity Lemonade.jpg

Yours sincerely, Zppix (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:00, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Beautiful shot. The upper part gets a bit noisy compared to the bottom (which looks good to me as it is). Could you try to mitigate the noise selectively on that section? Thank you. --Lion-hearted85 00:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
@Lion-hearted85:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 16:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Support It looks a good compromise to me. Thank you. --Lion-hearted85 19:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City , Canada 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality, a strong B/W photo. --Aristeas 09:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Or In Colour...? (19725547104).jpg[edit]

File:Or In Colour...? (19725547104).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

— Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 6- Veronica essuie le visage de Jésus, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 1- Jésus est condamné à mort, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Can you add better description and categories? Same for other yours nomination. s. --Tournasol7 20:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
@Tournasol7:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 12:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Support Good quality now, thanks for category. I added more precise descriptions. --Tournasol7 19:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 2- Jésus reçoit sa croix, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 4- Jésus rencontre sa mère, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 3- Jésus tombe pour la première fois, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 5- Simon Le Cyreneen aide Jesus, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 10- Jésus est dépouillé de ses vêtements, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 7- Jésus tombe pour la deuxième fois, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 8- Jésus rencontre les femmes de Jérusalem qui pleurent, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 9- Jésus tombe pour la troisième fois, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Pl. add CAT "Station 9: ..." if appropriate --Tagooty 08:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphere lamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Maybe more black background than necessary, but a nice sharp photo of the lamp. -- Ikan Kekek 21:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passage du Château Frontenac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc du Bois-de-Coulonge, Quebec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de L'Aqueduc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière Saint-Charles de Québec, Québec ville, Canada 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de L'Aqueduc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière Saint-Charles de Québec, Québec ville, Canada 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Promenade Saint-Charles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière Saint-Charles de Québec, Québec ville, Canada 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --Llez 05:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park Anse-à-Cartier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. I like it, but I would improve white (or green). --XRay 06:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Make the sky more white? --Wilfredor 02:43, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Not the sky more white ... Improving white means the image becomes more brighter. Grayscale or black-and-white development often means to have the gray tones from black to white. The image contains black, but IMO the white part should be improved. --XRay 10:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Support But: Second view: It's OK for QI. Some improvements are possible, but for QI OK. --XRay 10:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Promenade Saint-Charles 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Are these actual colors? Looks manipulated. --Discostu 22:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
The light and colors was altered to show a dramatic scene --Wilfredor 20:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Support I like the choice of emphasizing the complementary colours of the main subject and its surroundings. This makes the subject stand out and the scene more interesting. Given the 40 MP resolution, sharpness is acceptable throughout the frame, in my opinion. --Lion-hearted85 12:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huawei P30 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Some fringes left at the top. --Ermell 08:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
it's a slight shadow of the same phone --Wilfredor 00:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison in Rue des Remparts, Quebec City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:New York City (9073637510).jpg[edit]

File:New York City (9073637510).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Regards, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc de la Chute-Montmorency 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. Beautiful landscape. --Ximonic 08:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House in Quebec city 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --NeoMeesje 20:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House close to Parc de la Chute-Montmorency 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

I like picture. But is English description correct one? --Miha Peče 12:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment Right, the description needs to be changed, but Miha Peče, we don't need to change the nomination's status to "Discuss" and thereby move this to Consensual Review for that purpose. Please see Commons talk:Quality images candidates#Confusion over the use of "Discuss", and your participation in this thread would be appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek 20:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 16:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House in the Parc de la Chute-Montmorency 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Wrong caption and category? We're not looking at falls. Same for 007.jpg above. -- Ikan Kekek 01:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The french description was right, but now I think that it is fixed --Wilfredor 16:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FPC File:Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 09 - Deckengemälde Michael.jpg[edit]

Hallo Wilfredor, what do you mean by Please, use Artwork? --Llez (talk) 05:50, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Parc de la Chute-Montmorency 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parc de la Chute-Montmorency 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Promenade Saint-Charles 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bank of Montreal, Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

From a bank to a souvenir shop. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Please add street description and GPS coordinates of this building to image description. --GRDN711 00:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Done @GRDN711: Thanks --Wilfredor 14:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --GRDN711 16:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chute-Montmorency, Quebec city, Canada.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fabrique de la paroisse Saints-Anges-de-Montmorency.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Partially a bit soft (I wonder why, maybe the lens has some field curvature at 70mm), but given the resolution still good, and the delicate reduced colours are excellent. --Aristeas 09:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Promenade Saint-Charles 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 03:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House in Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Charles Cemetery and Saint-Charles river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 04:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc de la Chute-Montmorency 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:FVA Logo.gif[edit]

File:FVA Logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 13:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fleur de Lys centre commercial 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:06, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Boulevard Champlain from Parc du Bois-de-Coulonge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support QI --Lmbuga 18:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrasse Dufferin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support I Think that it's QI--Lmbuga 18:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Dominique 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality (however in full resolution - 77 Mpix - appears a bit unsharp, as if it is upscaled). --C messier 21:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
It was not upscaled, I think that its because the vertical perspective fix the top became a bit unsharp --Wilfredor 16:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Police du Québec,Manifestation anti-vaccins au Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rivière Saint-Charles (Capitale-Nationale) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manifestation anti-vaccins au Québec 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

No problem to fix the verticals I think. --Ermell 21:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
done --Wilfredor 22:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc du Vieux Passage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedrocarmona.jpg[edit]

File:Pedrocarmona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

186.139.151.3 14:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594725876).jpg[edit]

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594725876).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Artwork created in 2014. See source. Delete per COM:FOP US.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594782680).jpg[edit]

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594782680).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Contemporary artwork with matching garbage can. This is not public domain. It even has a website for the artist on the mural. Per COM:FOP US.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594901252).jpg[edit]

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594901252).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 15:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:My Public Lands Magazine, Spring 2015 (16441469038).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:My Public Lands Magazine, Spring 2015 (16441469038).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:My Public Lands Magazine, Spring 2015 (16441469038).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Missvain (talk) 22:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uknow circuite.JPG[edit]

File:Uknow circuite.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intérieur de la basilique-cathédrale Notre-Dame de Québec 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of the Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue principale de la basilique-cathédrale Notre-Dame de Québec 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Noisy, but acceptable. --Steindy 23:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passage du Chien-d’Or, Quebec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Go