User talk:Wilfredor

Userboxes

This user comes from Venezuela.

This user comes from Brazil.

This user comes from Canada.

This user is a license reviewer on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user has patroller rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user has rollback rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user has file mover rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user has rollback rights on Wikipedia.

This user has reviewer rights on Wikipedia.

This user is autopatrolled on Wikipedia.

back

Welcome to my user talk page!

Red archives[edit]

Just curious, but why are there twenty (20) links in your archive navigation box? It just seems odd. It skips 31 (thirty-one) and goes straight to 50 (fifty). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Donald Trung you are right, I deleted it lol --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

How are you? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 03:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Tudo bom e o senhor, tenho tempo sem saber nada de voce --Wilfredor (talk) 23:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Dei uma pausa em ralação à internet, às vezes a gente precisa se desintoxicar do mundo virtual. Parabéns pela candidata à Imagem do Ano! Por que voltou a usar o seu nome real como nome de usuário? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Voce ta certisimo, tem muitas coisas totalmente inuteis como jogos de video, redes sociais, jogo de tronos, etc.. Coisas que na realidade nao dao nada adicional na sua vida, e muito importante fazer prioridades. Eu mesmo tenho ficado um pouco longe do computador por causa disso especialmente do Facebook. Obrigado pelo parabens, voltei de novo pois faz tempo que nao preciso, nao moro mais na Venezuela e acho que nao voltarei entao nao preciso esconder meu nome real. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Mas houve algum tipo de perseguição contra você no seu país? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

User:ArionEstar na Venezuela tem perseguicao para qualquer quem tente mostrar a verdade do que acontece, mesmo subir fotos no commons sobre prostestos e bem perigoso --Wilfredor (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Você está no Canadá não é? Pretende retornar ao seu país se a situação melhorar alguma dia? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

User:ArionEstar Ninguem quere morar fora de seu pais, mas agora nao da para morar na Venezuela. Mas no Brasil ainda da para morar, eu vejo mas probavel voltar para o Brasil que para a Venezuela. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:50, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Como está Béria? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

User:ArionEstar eu nao sei nada dela faz tempo pois sempre ta na universidade estudando e eu trabalho, acho que ela esta bem. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique Notre Dame de Québec, Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Considering the magnificient sharpness this really is a QI. I'd just like to ask if you could do something with that rest of lens distortion. --PtrQs 23:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Please, add notes or comments to guide me where are the distortions. Thanks for the review --Wilfredor 00:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Cecilia Haddad (2844338233).jpg[edit]

File:Cecilia Haddad (2844338233).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 19:19, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Flor común de noche, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2364355664).jpg[edit]

File:Flor común de noche, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2364355664).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 13:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:Flor común, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2354832165).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 08:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Fontaine de Tourny, Centre-Ville de Québec alt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fontaine de Tourny, Centre-Ville de Québec.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Photographie[edit]

Bonjour Wilfredor, un incontournable pour la photo d'oiseaux à Québec est le Domaine de Maizerets (mais surtout à l'hiver et pendant la migration). Sinon, il y aurait le Parc de la Plage-Jacques-Cartier (sentier des grèves), le Parc linéaire des rivières Saint-Charles et du Berger et la Base de plein air de Sainte-Foy. --Cephas (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Cephas J'habite à Limoilou sur 25em rue, donc Domaine de Maizerets est relativement proche. Merci beaucoup --Wilfredor (talk) 22:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

À l'hiver et au printemps, on y trouve souvent des hibous et autres rapaces assez faciles à photographier, car habitués à la présence des gens. Il y a également de nombreux photographes et observateurs d'oiseaux qui nous renseignent sur les choses intéressantes qui se sont vues. Aussi, sur le rivage de la Baie de Beauport en fin d'été et à l'automne, on observe souvent des limicoles. --Cephas (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Photo walk in Stockholm[edit]

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Dear Frank Schulenburg, thank you very much for your invitation and I would really love a lot to do this walk, however, my scholarship was rejected, sorry maybe in a future opportunity --Wilfredor (talk) 03:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that, my friend. Hope you'll get an opportunity to join next time. Thanks for all your contributions here! Can't wait to see you in person again. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Frank Schulenburg yes I hope to see you too again without hours of jetlag and with a better level of spoken English :) --Wilfredor (talk) 03:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Barbie Expo of Montreal 110.jpg[edit]

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Barbie Expo of Montreal 110.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Barbie Expo of Montreal 110.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

What Patrick Rogel? --Wilfredor (talk) 11:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Please read COM:TOY. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Patrick Rogel its not aplicable to Barbie toys. Please take a look to Tom Forsythe--Wilfredor (talk) 11:46, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Well you may explain it on the discussion below. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Patrick Rogel Thank you, I also had the same question before reading about the case --Wilfredor (talk) 11:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:Barbie Expo of Montreal 110.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:53, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

75px

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbie Expo of Montreal 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Panorama Montreal[edit]

Me he permitido volver a subir su foto como JPG y la he nominado en QIC [1]. Muy bonita foto! --Ralf Roletschek 19:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Ralf Roletschek Solo un pequeno detalle, en el Source colocaste "Own work", cuando en realidad deberia estar el enlace que colocaste de other versions. Gracias --Wilfredor (talk) 23:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

75px

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbie Expo of Montreal 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Comment - I love it, but - I hate to bring this up - does the copyright Mattel has on Barbie dolls make publication of these photos impossible? -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Ikan Kekek for the question, its not applicable to Barbie, you could take a look to Tom Forysthe case,btw there is already a deletion nomination in progress where I have also placed the link. Thanks --Wilfredor 12:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. This might be a possible FP, though perhaps the sharpness could be slightly improved. -- Ikan Kekek 17:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

COM:VP[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Village pump#Licence reviewer recall?. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

--Roy17 (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Heteronotus maculatus (17156966088).jpg[edit]

File:Heteronotus maculatus (17156966088).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

190.15.129.60 14:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vagina collage 15.jpg[edit]

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vagina collage 15.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vagina collage 15.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:Vagina collage 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:IGA store in limoulou, Québec city, Canadá 019.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Chirimena (1341689114).jpg[edit]

File:Chirimena (1341689114).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ganímedes (talk) 11:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]

Hallo Wilfredor,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Jardín (1044347743).jpg[edit]

File:Jardín (1044347743).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ganímedes (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil[edit]

Saudações. Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque, em outro ano, participou da competição fotográfica Wiki Loves Monuments. Escrevo em nome do grupo organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments deste ano para convidá-lo/convidá-la a participar de novo!

O Wiki Loves Monuments é o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Permite ampliar o conhecimento global sobre o Brasil, mostrando a riqueza cultural e histórica do país. Neste ano, ampliamos enormemente as listas de monumentos a serem registrados e isso ajuda na difusão da diversidade brasileira.

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil e ganhe prêmios! Serão premiadas as melhores fotografias e também aqueles e aquelas que mais contribuirem com registros fotográficos diversos do patrimônio cultural e histórico brasileiro. Leia as instruções com cuidado!

De novo, obrigado por participar do Wiki Loves Monuments e melhorar o conhecimento livre disponível na internet! Se tiver dúvidas, não hesite em entrar em contato!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲»22:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Full color (1663335236).jpg[edit]

File:Full color (1663335236).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ganímedes (talk) 11:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ahaetulla prasina, oriental whipsnake - Kaeng Krachan National Park (15895767306).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ahaetulla prasina, oriental whipsnake - Kaeng Krachan National Park (15895767306).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Panorama 360 of Basilique Saint-Patrick, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama 360 of Basilique Saint-Patrick, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Paris 75018 Rue des Saules Advertising cards for sale.jpg[edit]

File:Paris 75018 Rue des Saules Advertising cards for sale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Steet art in Paris 2008-09-06 - 0752.jpg[edit]

File:Steet art in Paris 2008-09-06 - 0752.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Wall Street (8513827570).jpg[edit]

File:Wall Street (8513827570).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Featured video UserBox[edit]

Hi Wilfredor,

If you wish you can use the new userbox for FV which shows

This user has uploaded 2 featured videos to Wikimedia Commons.

. -- Eatcha (talk) 09:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

editToken[edit]

Hello Wilfredor. I just wanted to let you know that editToken has been removed from MediaWiki, and you still use it in one or more of your userspace scripts. If you want your user script(s) to work properly, please replace editToken with csrfToken in source code of the scripts. You'll need to change the following script(s):

User:Wilfredor/QICvote temp.js

Regards, Ahmad^talk 21:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Ahmad, done thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 23:07, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Escalada Pico Bolívar Año 1954 HD.webm[edit]

File:Escalada Pico Bolívar Año 1954 HD.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Túrelio (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Henrique Capriles y Diputados - Pregunta Capriles - Venezuela. Programa Completo. Abril 30 de 2017.webm[edit]

File:Henrique Capriles y Diputados - Pregunta Capriles - Venezuela. Programa Completo. Abril 30 de 2017.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Trains (9326740044).jpg[edit]

File:Trains (9326740044).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mind matrix 15:31, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations[edit]

I see you won 5 of the top 10 photos in WLM Canada. Well done! I was not so lucky this year. -- Colin (talk) 09:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Colin Thank you Colin for your congratulations, as usual I am not very happy with the result of the WLM evaluations (Maybe they should take into account the community by selecting juries among commons users and not clubs or photographers of interredicha quality who don't know the criteria of our community). I remember having stopped participating in WLM Venezuela since the winners were selected with Facebook likes also the best photographer in commons of Venezuela withdrew from commons due to this problem (User:Paolostefano1412). In the case of Canada, I don't know how the photographs were evaluated and it would be very easy to say from my winning position (I won 5 pictures of the top 10 of the winners) that I strongly agree but no, I think there were many better photos even than the first place that were not selected, It also leaves much to think about the third place that is not even a monument. Anyway, it is already something known, these contests say absolutely nothing, and every year they lose more participation. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes WLM at the country-level is often disappointing with several images in each country's top 10 that are just awful technically, or unoriginal. Lighthouses always seem to do well, for some reason. The UK "interior" winning entry is just awful quality from a mobile (and not one of the new ones we talked about with amazing computational photography). The Canada #8 is also terrible quality and just a tourist snap. The UK #4 has a photo of statue facing away which I can't see any merit for. It doesn't put me off entering, since I'd have been taking and uploading the photos anyway, but it does make me upset that so much volunteer time is spent reviewing the images and then the judges for the final selection just blow it with weird choices. Good luck for the international competition -- some serious money available there. -- Colin (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

I have been reviewing in more detail the winners of the countries and I have encountered serious problems, such as false images (see false moon in Brazil) or with excessive processing. Leaving aside that some winning images give little or no importance to the main objective that is the Monument. I honestly think that some results are disrespectful to photographers. Photos taken by phone are selected in many cases with saturation filters, I hope that the international jury will be something more serious. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Colin There is a common practice that I have been following not only in photography events and this practice is carried out regardless of nationality, they work this way: 1) A false community of members is created. (This is particularly evident, it can be easily observed by their contributions and user pages (user pages are created by the same chapter president)). 2) A group or chapter is created with this fictional community 2) This fictional community (which simulates representing 20 people when in reality they are two maximum) or chapter begins to organize an event (WLM, WLE, Wiki Loves University, WXX .. ) and request a grant. 3) As the main objective is to obtain financing, the event is carried out with a mediocre quality due to a fictitious jury, images evaluated by people with little or no knowledge in photography. The main purpose is to obtain grants where WMF also benefits. This begins to become more in practice than the exception, so these events have declined a lot in both participation and quality. Photographers feel disappointed by the results. I have denounced this several times, but I think that more and more this project has deviated in a more monetary interest than by sharing knowledge to humanity. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Also came by to say congratulations. WikiConference North America was last week in Cambridge, Massachusetts (a pretty big Wikimedia conference). It was there they first revealed the winners of WLM USA and CA. They displayed each winning image in order, announcing the name of each photographer. When they went through Canada, it was funny that again and again they said the name "Wilfredor". I think some people thought the slide text was accidentally copy/pasted, and eventually they added "Wilfredor is a very skilled photographer" for context. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: Thank you for commenting on this, however, it is not that I doubt my abilities but I think it is more a lack of participation of photographers in the country. How to instill more participation ?, making more propaganda, improving the list of monuments and better evaluating the photos. I may take over WLM next year, it's something I've talked to WMCA --Wilfredor (talk) 00:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

If you'll still be in Canada next year, they announced that the conference will be held in Toronto next year. The press around that may present a good opportunity to also talk about WLM? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: Thanks for your idea, and yes I live in Canada, however, I live far away of Toronto (I'm on Quebec city) and I don't know if I am available to travel to Toronto and not only for the cost this represents because I have a job to fulfill, the only reason I would go is if Colin goes too to know him. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

I've never seen WLM mentioned on photography websites or magazines. In contrast, other large photo competitions do get a mention both when they start and when the prizes are nominated. This is something the organisers could improve, both at national level, and perhaps international/WMF level. --Colin (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

@Colin: For example, I cant find a wiki page where WLMCA that clearly shows the prizes and btw this year I got the second position and I only realized that I had won after seeing the WLM oficial list of winners, none of the WLMCA organizers gave me any prizes or even a congratulations email. The photographers seek recognition or awards, when these things are not clear, and we add the element of an unclear jury, then the result is low participation --Wilfredor (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Canada is the only page I can find. In the UK there is a dedicated website with Judging and Prizes page. Perhaps Canada has no prizes? That would be sad. In the past, when I have won a prize, I was told in advance and asked to keep quiet about it just before it was announced. You can see the Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2019/Participating countries with contact people. User:Rhododendrites do you know anything about this? What is the conference you say is in Toronto? I thought Wikimania 2020 is Bangkok. --Colin (talk) 12:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiConference North America. I don't know how definite the location is. There was an announcement that Wikimedia Canada would be hosting and that it would be in Toronto. Of course, WMF's been cutting funding for chapters and events, and this year's Wikicon only happened because of a partnership with CredCon (i.e. private funding :/ ), so we'll see what happens next year. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! I tried to participate some years ago in WLM and in WLE but it was very confusing. For WLE first I took some pictures in the conservation areas and after the beginning they just explained that the pictures must be from the provincial and national parks, it was not written anywhere. And, yes, some choices made by the jury were disappointing. Maybe I am not so professional, but still some just normal pictures to illustrate articles are better than nothing. Anyway, nice to hear that we have people who are caring about Wikipedia pictures. All the best! Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 05:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

QICvote bug report[edit]

Hi, Wilfredo Rodríguez!
QICvote bug report:
If you add a comment with QICvote, then the state goes to “Nomination”, but it should not change.
With best regards, George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

George Chernilevsky Thanks, I will take a look --Wilfredor (talk) 13:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Dear Wilfredor,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--01:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Dear Wilfredor,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2020, Wilfredor! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Sebastián Colmenares (15950347150).jpg[edit]

File:Sebastián Colmenares (15950347150).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:Replenished. Thanks for the hookup, @jasminemurcia! -SPAM -tocino -Filipino (15858719100).jpg

And also:

File:Teriyaki SPAM, now at your local Costco (at least in the Bay). IMHO, the Tocino SPAM is way better. Wish that was still available in the States. (15655794115).jpg Ə XPLICIT 05:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 11.jpg[edit]

File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Editing my talk page.[edit]

Please do not remove anything from my talk page. I believe strongly that in order to be as transparent as possible we should never actually delete anything -- when people want to retract things, they are expected to strike them out, not delete them. I also wonder why you think you have the right to remove something from my talk page -- even something written by a serious nuisance block evader.

BTW, I really like this: File:Metro de São Paulo, Luz Station, Brazil.jpg.

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 02:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

(Jameslwoodward) Ok, I underestand, sorry for the rollback. I thought it was a rude claim/vandalism --Wilfredor (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your best shot 2019[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

It's early 2020, which means it's time again to look back at photographs taken over the course of the past 12 months. As always, I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2019 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2019

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Frank Schulenburg thanks, however, I'm developing my best shoot of 2019, I hope spend two month to develop and select the best. :) --Wilfredor (talk) 14:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Sounds good to me :-) Good luck and all the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Bot task[edit]

Hi Wilfredor,

Following up on our IRC conversation as you left before I could respond. If you run this task on your main account, after being told your bot task would not be approved, you will be blocked. You have been told about the venues available to make this change across the approx. 40,000 pages, and I have personally offered to do this for you on a bot account. If you would like me or another bot operator to do this for you, then let us know. Otherwise, consider this a warning. ~riley (talk) 20:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Dear User:~riley, Sorry I had to go out to eat quickly, then I was doing it manually with VFC (recomended by a user in the same IRC conversation), however, it is a very difficult job (you need load too much images in the browser) and not to annoy others with this matter, but if you are available, thank you very much for do that --Wilfredor (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

User:~riley I didn't know that using VFC could block me, I thought you were referring to pywikipediabot --Wilfredor (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

The conversation and my onwiki warning were clear. VFC was recommended by another editor before you informed us the task involved 40,000 files. Once you informed us of the task size, both him and I agreed you needed a bot flag to complete a task of this size. After being told your own personal bot would not be approved, you were informed that you would need to make a request at Commons:Bots/Work requests. Yes, you can be used for blocking VFC. Especially when you configure the script by overriding the maxSimultaneousReq to increase from 10 to 50 (5x) which allowed you to hit 1038 edits per minute. You, and you alone are responsible for your actions. ~riley (talk) 22:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for 3 days. The reason for the block is completing a bot task on your main account after being explicitly informed a bot flag was required, regardless of the software used. You were warned offwiki and formally, onwiki, yet you proceeded to edit at a rate as high as 1038 edits per minute. (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

-- ~riley (talk) 22:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "* There was a conversation on IRC about changing my previous user's name, because this makes it easier for me to find my same photos and be able to use them in a wikimedia project.

I commented that I was configuring pywikipediabot to do this, however, I was announced not to use it because my user would be blocked.
I decided to use VFC on a recommendation from a user in the same IRC conversation.
I allready used VFC for replacement tasks many times and I was never blocked, using the same mechanism to add or remove categories or templates of miles of items in the same time and I was never blocked.
There is no warning on the VFC page about blocking due to the use of this tool.
Also I allready used similar editions with severals gadgets like cat-a-lot and I was never blocked.
~~I have been blocked because the VFC tool does not know how to limit the number of edits per minute? Anyway I will stop using this tool until this problem is corrected in the tool.~~ A wrong value on my commons.js

--Wilfredor (talk) 22:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)"

Unblock reason: "Unblock granted, continuing block at this point would be punitive as user has now demonstrated awareness for their actions. I have reduced their maxsim setting in their common.js to prevent such a high edit rate in the future, and the user is aware that it is not appropriate to take on such large tasks without bot flag, regardless of the tool being used. ~riley (talk) 06:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)"

This template should be archived normally.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Requesting an unblock less than 30 minutes after being blocked shows you have not taken the time to consider your choices. The conversation was explicitly clear - You were informed both by myself and the user who originally recommended VFC that you needed a bot flag. You left the chat saying "I am going to do this manually", so I proceeded to leave you an onwiki formal warning not to complete the task on your main account.

The VFC tool does know limits in terms of edits per minutes, however, you have configured it to edit at extreme rates as indicated by User:Wilfredor/common.js which shows "maxSimultaneousReq:50" - this controls your edit speed by setting the maximum API requests you can send to the server, the default is 10, so yours is 5x higher than the default.

I have reduced your block to 24 hours, but have maintained it, because it is clear you do not have an understanding that you are responsible for your edits. Editing at 1000+ edits per minute, with a meaningless edit summary is unacceptable, especially after being told this task requires a bot flag. ~riley (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

riley maxSimultaneousReq It has been there with the same value for almost 5 years, it was a value that I copied from an example configuration. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

riley Yes I have been responsible, what I am saying is that it was not something done on purpose. I took yours warnings into account but I thought they were referring to pywikipediabot and not VFC which I have used for years without any inconvenience until today. I appreciate that you have reduced the blockage to 24 hours riley --Wilfredor (talk) 22:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

riley BTW, I was warned on my talk page while I was running VFC (This tool runs in full screen without updating the page, it is necessary to update the page to know that I have received a message in my talk page), The tool began to run a minute after the message you left in my talk page, but I had already begun to select the pages within the VFC tool, that is, I could not see the warning message until the tool finished --Wilfredor (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

I am a reasonable person, but the reason why I will not process this unblock request is because you are deflecting rather than taking ownership. "I thought they were referring to pywikipediabot" No, you were told the job was too large to complete without a bot flag. "I will stop using the tool until this problem with the tool is corrected" There is no problem with the tool, you set it up to work that way. "I was warned on my talk page while I was running VFC" The warning was issued 36 minutes prior to you making your first edit with the tool. ~riley (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

riley I honestly didn't see the warning on my discussion page and I didn't know that the variable I added so many years ago would cause that effect. I know that I had the absolute fault in which this happened, however it was not something premeditated, Sorry to be so insistent, but I usually use weekends to edit. This was my absolute fault next time I will be more careful, I am telling the truth and the only raison that why I can change the value from 50 to 10 in maxSimultaneousReq is because Im blocked, maybe it could fix the problem in my commons.js --Wilfredor (talk) 00:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

riley Anyway thanks for change the code on VFC too, I will continue tomorrow. Good night --Wilfredor (talk) 00:33, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

See above. What do you mean you will continue tomorrow? ~riley (talk) 06:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Continue today talking with you here and editing on commons. Thanks for the unblock, this was just a misunderstanding on my part, of course, that doesn't absolve me of guilt. BTW, is it enough, or something else has to be done to make VFC work well with my account?--Wilfredor (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. I am sorry if I was unclear earlier and caused a misunderstanding. The change to your common.js is enough. I continued where you left off with my bot, there is only a few that I missed left; see here. Should you consider to move your user categories (over 20,000 files), this would also be a task appropriate for a bot. ~riley (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Dear riley, you were quite clear, I had a bad interpretation because I thought that pywikipedia acted on the server side and therefore it would have to regulate its use very well and for some reason I thought that the scripts could not cause problems but I did not have my bad configuration of commons.js. On the other hand, I started to do the process and I didn't see your message on the discussion page (because VFC run on full screen and with ajax) that was very clear, it was also something I had done many times in the past. Obviously this dirties the page of recent changes, I will follow your recommendation. BTW I can't edit the last file in your list --Wilfredor (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

What about this do you not understand? I specifically stated above "Should you consider to move your user categories (over 20,000 files), this would also be a task appropriate for a bot.", yet, you proceed to move over 11,000 files from your user categories on your main account. You stated above that "Obviously this dirties the page of recent changes, I will follow your recommendation,", but you proceed to do it anyways? Where is your integrity? If you proceed, I will block you again. ~riley (talk) 00:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

riley You told me that there would be no problems after changing the parameter in commons.js I was having a conversation with you here (4 days ago) to receive your help (I was even looking for you on IRC today), I know you must be busy, being active in commons on another situation, but you only appear to claim me about problems how If you are looking to scold me. Finally, the category with the most files (the one I thought you were referring to) was never moved --Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

I adjusted the paramater for one tool in your common.js; you are using another tool that it meant for small tasks. I was and am available on IRC if you ping me, however, I don't spend my day staring at the channel. I did not refer to a specific category, I clearly stated user categories which encompasses all your categories. It might as well have been that category (15,000 files), considering you moved 11,000 files.. How do I get it through your head that you shouldn't be editing at high edit speeds and completing bot tasks on your main account when there are literally bots sitting by ready to complete this task? With one edit, any admin can command User:CommonsDelinker to move a large category for you. Once again, you are making excuses. What changed between 4 days ago and now? You said you understand that editing like this floods recent changes (and watchlists, by the way), yet you proceed to make over 11,000 edits in short periods of time? I would not be scolding you if you demonstrated judgement and insight. ~riley (talk) 00:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

List me the clear rules and I will be able to respect them, I really am not understanding you. So VFC and cat-a-lot cannot be used because moving files from one category to another is bad? I am not understanding you, I do not know if there is an admin that speaks Spanish, Portuguese or French, maybe that can help. An example of clear rules would be: 1) You can make 500 maximum editions per day, 2) You can only make 400 editions with cat-a-lot per hour. A suggestion is very different from a rule --Wilfredor (talk) 01:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed response - you didn't ping me so I assumed you didn't respond. Commons is very guidelines based and has many unwritten rules, whereas wikis like enwiki have a user essay, guideline and policy for everything. Commons is intentionally less restricted, but in moments like this, it makes it harder to reference a specific policy. Tools like VFC and cat-a-lot are awesome, but they are meant for small tasks. I.e. tag 200 images, move a category of 500 images, etc. Large tasks, which cause you to edit at extreme speeds, put a strain on the server (expensive on resources) and flood rc/watchlists. When we talk about edit speed, bots are encouraged to do 12 edits per minute. Seeing that small number, can you understand why such a large number (200/epm, 1,000/epm, etc) is unreasonable? The guideline you should consider when moving forward is to stop and think: will I strain the server? will I flood recent changes and watchlists to the point it is disruptive? If yes, stop and ask a bot operator to do it for you. If no, proceed while keeping in mind that if you move a 2,000 file category all at once, it is going to spit out at a high edit rate. Consider moving in reasonable batches. ~riley (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

~riley Why does mediawiki let me make so many edits per minute, shouldn't there be a technical limitation by IP in the number of requests to the server? --Wilfredor (talk) 01:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Hey Wilfredor, I wish I could answer that question for you, I am not sure! I know it does on other wikis (like enwiki), but the limit got raised on Commons wiki per request - that wasn't for making high edit speeds, but high requests for loading pages and such (i think). There are ways to monitor server usage, overload, lag etc (thats how I noticed your edits) but there isn't the resources in place to enforce or slow down the use of those resources. Sometimes a dev catches on - I had my bot once run all of it's tasks at the same time, rather than staggered as planned, which resulted in 1,000+ epm like you did. A dev was paying attention and noticed within minutes, threatening to shut down my bot if I didn't do it myself. ~riley (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

User:~riley Thanks for taking your time to answer, I am convinced, I will vote for you --Wilfredor (talk) 23:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Man playing an acoustic brazilian guitar (Violão) on Marco Zero Square, Refice, Pernambuco, Brazil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Man playing an acoustic brazilian guitar (Violão) on Marco Zero Square, Refice, Pernambuco, Brazil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waste picker of Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mask Diabo of Portugal used on folk fest and rituals.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mask used on folk ritual Kamentsa on Chaquiras indigenous people of Colombia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Back of Se Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Very good photo. Just so you know, the English word you're looking for is "back". "Backside" is another word for a person's behind, at least in the U.S. but I think also in at least some other English-speaking countries. -- Ikan Kekek 02:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Ikan Kekekthanks for you correction its done :) Good weekend --Wilfredor 19:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Sure thing. -- Ikan Kekek 07:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Generic Camera Icon.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Well done! However, the red ribbon makes me immediately think of a Nikon camera. Nikon cameras are great, but this should be a generic camera icon ;–). The red ribbon had already been removed, but another user restored it; how about resetting the file to the penultimate version (without the ribbon)? --Aristeas 10:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Done Aristeas thanks --Wilfredor 20:42, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Support Thank you very much! I see it was not easy to edit the file. Good quality. --Aristeas 10:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Homeless sleeping on Paulista Avenue, São Paulo city, Brazil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Homeless sleeping on Paulista Avenue, São Paulo city, Brazil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Man playing Brazilian folk music on Marco Zero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Is this the same copy as the B+W one in FP? --Ermell 20:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Ermell Yes --Wilfredor 22:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prostitution in Sao Paulo, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonsecours Market 324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Geocode would be useful --Podzemnik 04:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Homeless person in São Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plage de l'Horloge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Great composition. Geocode would be good --Podzemnik 04:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spices of Mercado Municipal de São Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapisserie Chasse à courre de Detti by Jules Pansu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Cayambe 07:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sao Paulo downtown (Bras).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liberdade of Sao Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Exécution de la Punition de Fouet et Negres ao Tronco by Jean-Baptiste Debret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Horroble subject. Good image quality. --Cayambe 18:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre Dame of Montreal, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luz Station, Sao Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 12:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum João Mendes Junior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinacoteca de Sao Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chandeliers in Pinacoteca of Sao Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Cvmontuy 16:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood Sculptures Christ sitting and teaching Saint Peter and Saint Paul on Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Can you improve the bottom crop? Ezequiel's podest is cut off. There are also strange fringes around the windows on the right. Also a more specific cat would be good. --Poco a poco 16:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Poco a poco thanks for the review, I uploaded another version with more space on bottom. I dont underestand the strange fringes. Thanks --Wilfredor 21:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Support Never mind, looks ok now --Poco a poco 20:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:L'Exécution de la Punition de Fouet et Negres ao Tronco by Jean-Baptiste Debret.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:L'Exécution de la Punition de Fouet et Negres ao Tronco by Jean-Baptiste Debret.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Africa 2020[edit]


Contribute to Wiki Loves Africa and to how the world sees Africa!	Contribuez à Wiki Loves Africa et impactez la façon dont le monde voit l’Afrique!
Dear Wilfredor In the past, you contributed to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. This February, you have another opportunity to create beautiful photographs on the theme of "transportation" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa. As with previous years, there are also many exciting cash prizes. Wiki Loves Africa is an annual public contest where people across Africa can contribute media (photographs, video and audio) about their environment to Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation. Images from the competition have helped millions learn more about Africa and see Africa more clearly from an African perspective. Overall, nearly 5000 people like you have contributed to this photo contest, and contributed 18,000 images about Africa. When does it take place? The 2020 competition will start on the 15th of February 2020 and close on 31st March 2020. What should we contribute? Pictures ! audios ! videos ! The theme for the 2020 contest is... Africa on the Move ! This theme encompasses a host of approaches and is intentionally open to interpretation. It encourages the submission of visual representations of movement or transportation, whether by path, road, sea air, by self-propelled, animal or mechanical means, or the historical or contemporary structures that have been created to facilitate movement or the transportation of people, goods, or animals. In addition to the value your photos contribute to understanding and African visibility, there are several prizes on offer. The international prizes are: 1st prize: US$1000 2nd prize: US$800 3rd prize: US$500 Additional categories are: Culturally specific or traditional representations of transport or structures that facilitate transportation : US$500 Prize for best quality video: $500 Each winner will also receive a pack of goodies (proposed: a hat "I edit Wikipedia from Africa", a branded battery, stickers). Additional prizes will be available in some countries. For rules and information about how to participate, or to join the contest, click on Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest. Warmest, Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team	Cher ou chère Wilfredor, Au cours des années passées, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Ce mois de février vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème du "transport", qui pourraient profondément modifier la façon dont le reste du monde voit l’Afrique et comprend ses habitants et ses coutumes. Bonus, comme lors des années précédentes, il y a plusieurs prix à la clé. Wiki Loves Africa un concours public annuel où chacun est invité à partager des illustrations via Wikimedia Commons, en rapport avec le thème de l’année, illustrations qui pourront être utilisées sur Wikipédia ou les autres sites de la Wikimedia Foundation. Les photos collectées par le passé dans le cadre du concours ont aidé des millions de personne à mieux connaitre et comprendre l’Afrique et à la voir selon une perspective africaine. Au cours des dernières années, près de 5000 personnes comme vous ont contribué au concours, un total de 18,000 photos sur l’Afrique. Quand le concours se déroule t-il? Le concours 2020 démarre le 15 février 2020 et cloture le 31 mars 2020. Quelles sont les contenus attendus? Des photos ! Des enregistrements audio ! Des vidéos ! Le thème du concours 2020 est ... Le transport. Ce thème englobe de nombreuses approches, il est aussi intentionnellement ouvert à l’interprétation. Le thème Transport ! encourage à proposer des représentations liées au mouvement ou au transport, que ce soit par la route, ou l’air, ou l’eau, de façon auto-propulsée ou avec l’aide de la force animale ou mécanique, ou bien également les structures architecturales historiques ou contemporaines qui sont à l’origine ou ont facilité le mouvement et le transport des êtres humains, des animaux ou des biens. En plus de la valeur intrinsèque que vos photos apportent pour une meilleure visibilité et compréhension de l’Afrique à travers le monde, il y a de nombreux prix à gagner. Les prix internationaux sont les suivants: 1er prix: US$1000 2ème prix: US$800 3ème prix: US$500 Catégories additionnelles: Transport ou structures de transport traditionnelles : US$500 Prix de la meilleure vidéo: US$500 Chaque gagnant recevra également des cadeaux supplémentaires tels qu'une casquette "I edit Wikipedia from Africa", une batterie portable, des stickers... Des prix supplémentaires seront offerts dans certains pays. Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation et pour participer au concours, cliquez sur Participer au concours Wiki Loves Africa. Bien à vous, Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Man biking on Recife city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Very good, congratulations! -- Ikan Kekek 19:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! São Paulo Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support - I'm calling this good quality because the grain is obviously intentional, though it's heavy for my taste. -- Ikan Kekek 19:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Ikan Kekek, thanks for understand the old style, however, take a look to the version without noise in the image history if you want :). Thanks !! --Wilfredor 19:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Sure thing. I do like the other version better. It has a bit of noise in some places, but it has a cleaner appearance to me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Man sleeping on Catedral Metropolitana de São Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Interesting --Podzemnik 20:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praça Rio Branco (Recife).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 20:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budapest, V. Eötvös Square. Oldsmobile, Chain Bridge and Castle Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Atmospheric and good quality -- Spurzem 19:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Buda Hong Kong.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

turtle editing[edit]

Hi Wilfredo. Very many thanks for the work you did on my turtle FPC. I would love to know how you did it. I used a DNG Converter to convert Canon's .CR2 to .DNG. I use Photoshop CS6. I adjusted white balance, shadows and highlights in RAW, then saved as .jpg. I've never been an editing expert, but this week I then used the sharpening tool like a paintbrush (25% hardness 25% strength) on the turtle and then surface blur for the whole image (setting radius 4 and threshold 4). I then did a bit more blur on the background using blur tool. For the last year I have been using Unsharp Mask (amount 50% radius 1 threshold 0) and then noise reduction (strength 70%, preserve details 70%, colour NR 30%). Where am I going wrong please! [I love waterfalls and have been to Canaima and flown around Angel Falls - but in 1999 before I had nice camera gear) Charles (talk) 10:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Dear Charles, First of all, Im not a expert and I apologize for having uploaded a version of your image, I took the boldness and seeing now in retrospect, I shouldn't have done it. Your work is very good, and I must accept that I am a fan of your photos. That said, we must be very careful in eliminating the noise of a photo, the noise of a photo is information and in eliminating it we are also removing valuable information. I always recommend using a version in which no noise or sharpness filter has been applied, and then uploading the version to which the modifications have been made, because that way you leave the path open for future correction using Better technique or better software. You will surprise yourself to see how things you used to do today are of poor quality and that is fine because we are improving as photographers and also the techniques and tools we use. If you want to know the mechanism that applies to your images, visit this topic. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I'd never heard of Topaz and have just downloaded a trial version to play with. I always keep the original RAW files and out-of-camera JPGs to play with. Charles (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Charles Some Topaz Gigapixel AI results are simply magical, they are a little scary to rescue so many details. Some faces are poorly rendered but others are simply miraculous, I can't imagine the future that awaits us --Wilfredor (talk) 04:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

I'm going to buy the Sharpen AI, Noise AI and Gigapixel AI package. Even if they're no better than painstaking masking etc, they will save me boring editing time. But I agree they seem amazing, though some of the Youtube vidoes by third parties rave about pretty dodgy results. Unfortunately, something better will appear in 12 months! PS If you do focus-stacking, Helicon Soft is pretty good. Charles (talk) 11:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your edits to American and Bridal Veil Falls winter.jpg[edit]

Hello Wilfredor, thank you very much for your edits to this photo, I'm quite impressed by the results! It was also done using Topaz? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

The Cosmonaut Yes :) --Wilfredor (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indifference.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Captured very well and moving. – @Wilfredor: I have added some additional categories based on your description and location. Could you check if the categories are correct? Thanks! --Aristeas 11:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circus in Maracaibo Lago Mall Shopping Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Bee edit[edit]

Hello Wilfredor, thank you for your efforts on my FP candidate. How did you edit the picture? Topaz? I use NIK and DEFINE for sharpening and denoising but in this case I only used Lightroom tools. I didn't have the impression that the picture was missing something but I admit that it looks better. However, the file becomes considerably larger. To ask before is always more polite but what does politeness count nowadays? ;-) --Ermell (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Ermell First of all, I apologize for having uploaded a version of your image, My recommendation is to always upload the original version with noise and without focus, then you can use a combination between Topaz Denoise AI and Topaz Gigapixel AI. :P --Wilfredor (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

FV Promotion[edit]

Play media

★ This video has been promoted to Featured video! ★

The video File:Le Marché de Noël allemand de Québec.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest videos on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured video candidates/File:Le Marché de Noël allemand de Québec.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FVCBot (talk) 05:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 178 Rue Aberdeen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Recife 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Mapping Haitian History[edit]

Hi, I think this site might be copyright free? https://www.mappinghaitianhistory.com/ Broichmore (talk) 10:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

@Broichmore: Thanks for the question, I could not find any information about the copyright of this page, by default when not finding any information, it is assumed that there are copyright incompatible with wikimedia commons --Wilfredor (talk) 13:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. Broichmore (talk) 13:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sad face of a Wayuu Woman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Recife 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinacoteca de Sao Paulo 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Good FP candidate --Podzemnik 03:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recife, the Brazilian capital of social inequality.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dulce Piñonate, Isla Margarita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Children playing in a ravine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Comment - Unnecessarily large, and I can't view it at full size for more than a second before the image stops being visible. However, it looks to be of good quality at a reasonable size. Please note, though, that that is a drainage ditch and not remotely similar to a ravine. Or, if you meant "ravineI", I have no idea what that is. -- Ikan Kekek 09:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Comment I wonder how this 17,920 × 14,332 pixels image was created. It does not look like a stiched panorama. If I view it at 100%, there are interesting structures and artefacts visible. Upscaled, maybe just by accident? --Aristeas 09:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks guys, I made a rollback about my changes to the smaller version. I tried to get more details using artificial intelligence, however, this resulted in a super massive image with a series of generated artifacts --Wilfredor 16:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Comment Description: I can not see that the children are playing. -- Spurzem 17:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
they were letting themselves fall from that slope, it is a dangerous game. I cant managed to capture exactly the moment where they are dropped --Wilfredor 18:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Best to explain that in your file description. Sharpness isn't pinpoint, but I'll say it's a QI.

Support. -- Ikan Kekek 05:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tropidacris collaris a orillas del Lago de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Definitely a Tropidacris, but the red body suggests it may be a Tropidacris cristata rather than a Tropidacris collaris – your thoughts? --GRDN711 03:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Matches the species, however, I am not an expert --Wilfredor 16:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Support I am also not an entomologist and there is considerable variation in the coloration of this species. Let's assume it's a Tropadacris collaris until informed otherwise :) Good quality. --GRDN711 16:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishmonger smiling, Maracaibo street market, Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital de Especialidades Pediátricas de Maracaibo.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recife, the Brazilian capital of social inequality.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon en La Barraca, Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Description is insufficient --MB-one 15:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Done added more info --Wilfredor 00:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portrait of Simón Bolívar by Arturo Michelena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
El Libertador en traje de campaña by Arturo Michelena.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa das Rosas 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancien African Art of Recife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recife Favela Detran street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montreal downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec city 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Cayambe 14:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! São Paulo Metro 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrasse du Chevalier-de-Lévis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Cayambe 08:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Recife, the Brazilian capital of social inequality.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Recife, the Brazilian capital of social inequality.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Child bicycle Managing ports Altagracia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Depth of field is just right, and the motion blur affects only the bicycle tires. --Bobulous 19:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua en Plaza Rafael Urdaneta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeropostal in Santiago Mariño International Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rafael Urdaneta Bridge, Edo Zulia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medio de Transporte en la Isla de San Carlos, Estado Zulia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise on Vereda del Lago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Nice! Good quality.--Biso 10:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
need to adjust tilted horizon --Charlesjsharp 13:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 21:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Support thanks --Charlesjsharp 09:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:Wall street (9071954241).jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luz Train Station, Sao Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

good, but some purple CA in the top-left (windows and left side of lights) --Rhododendrites 00:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Done --Wilfredor 22:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 13:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Santa Lucia in the Evening.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 17:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agraulis vanillae in Margarita island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Dixy52 13:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Johann Moritz Rugendas in Brazil.jpg for VIC[edit]

Hi, Wilfredor. I'd like to nominate File:Johann Moritz Rugendas in Brazil.jpg for VIC for Valuable Image under its title, but I'm a little confused because what you give as the English title is in French. What language is the original title in? I'd translate it into English as "Public Punishment in the praça Santa Ana", because we normally don't translate the names of streets and plazas. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Dear Ikan Kekek , I added the correct description to a version that IMHO is better here --Wilfredor (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll trust you on the colors.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

It was just a white balance :P. Thanks you --Wilfredor (talk) 12:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Name of instrument[edit]

olà, Wilfredor, do you know the name of this percussion instrument, which I suppose is being used in Northern Brazil? --Emeritus (talk) 13:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

hallo, Dear Emeritus This is an African-American ceremonial instrument used for some music from the Brazilian Northeast. I've tried finding out by calling people. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Emeritus done, added to image description --Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typical street of San Juan Valley, Margarita Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Fine image, but additional categorization needed --MB-one 11:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
done --Wilfredor 16:27, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Inte namngivet diagram.svg[edit]

File:Inte namngivet diagram.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification[edit]

Play media

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Le Marché de Noël allemand de Québec.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Marie-Josephte Corriveau ?[edit]

Bonjour Wilfredor,

Je suppose que cette photo de tatouages (ci-contre) a été prise au Musée de la civilisation au cours de l'exposition Sortir de sa réserve : 400 objets d'émotion (février 2018-septembre 2019), que j'ai aussi visitée, à peu près au même moment que toi. Un autre important objet était exposé immédiatement à côté des tatouages, ce qu'on nomme la "cage de la Corriveau" ou le "gibet de fer de Marie-Josephte Corriveau" (fiche de l'objet sur le site du musée ici - autres photos sur Commons). J'aimerais savoir si tu n'aurais pas aussi photographié cet objet ?

Bien cordialement, BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

N. B. We can use English as well.

BeatrixBelibaste Je cherchais les photos que j'ai prises ce jour-là sur mon ancien ordinateur, mais je pense qu'elles ont été perdues, cependant, je te promets de prendre des photos de cet objet la prochaine fois que j'irai dans ce musée à la fin de la quarantaine. :) --Wilfredor (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Merci Wilfredor pour tes vérifications. Ce n'est pas grave : on a d'autres photos de la "cage". L'objet n'est malheureusement plus en exposition en ce moment (quarantaine ou pas). Il est très fragile et n'est montré que pendant des expositions temporaires. Je ne sais pas quand sera la prochaine fois. Bonne fin de quarantaine et prends soin de toi ! Au plaisir de te recroiser, --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 02:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Madonna files[edit]

Hey there, I saw you blew up the size of this file, I was wondering if you could do it with other files from the Blond Ambition World Tour, The Girlie Show World Tour and Who's That Girl World Tour categories?? I look forward to your answer. Thank youǃǃ--Chrishm21 (talk) 20:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Chrishm21 done!, let me know what do you think --Wilfredor (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

El Calvario[edit]

¡Buenas! He estado buscando imágenes recientes de El Calvario en Caracas con licencia libre, específicamente en Flickr, pero no he podido conseguir. ¿Crees saber dónde podría conseguir? ¡Gracias de antemano! --Jamez42 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Jamez42 Saludos muchas gracias por hacerme preguntas, siempre son bienvenidas. Te cuento que Flickr es un desorden total, las personas suben las fotos sin buenas descripciones, asi que es muy probable que solo hayan colocado Caracas, aquí te dejo el enlace en donde podemos buscar pues es de todas las fotos sobre caracas con licencia libre compatible con commons[2], este otro enlace son para aquellas personas que si colocaron que era el calvario, pero como ves son pocas. [3]. Un abrazo --Wilfredor (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

¡Muchísimas gracias! Te comentaré si encuentro algo. ¡Saludos! --Jamez42 (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Jamez42 a tu orden, por favor avisame si subes la foto o para revisar y colocarle la plantilla de revisión (soy revisor de licencias), de esa forma si la licencia cambia ya yo la revise y nadie podrá borrarla de commons --Wilfredor (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy water and wine for Mass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 11:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brazil Nordest House interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Some noise is acceptable. --Carschten 02:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of Igreja de Santo Antônio (Recife).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality, nice --PantheraLeo1359531 18:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezuelan woman of 94 years old from Margarita island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niños siendo transportados en un camion 350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Living room of a typical rural house in northeast Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niños siendo transportados en un camion 350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Caracas, Venezuela 1900 restored version.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tools used on Brazil's Nordest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Fishmonger smiling, Maracaibo street market, Venezuela.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fishmonger smiling, Maracaibo street market, Venezuela.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitchen from Northeast Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House on Joao Alfredo, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SENIAT in Punta de Piedras, Isla de Margarita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindóia by José Maria de Medeiros, 1882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 21:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Painting on Pinacoteca of Sao Paulo, Brazil 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --Llez 05:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
but a poor file name and description - Crianças should be in file name and description. Charlesjsharp 08:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
done, thanks --Wilfredor 13:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec city 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

About a cheetah image[edit]

Hi! I was looking for images of the northwest African cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus hecki) when I found this beautiful upload of yours [4]. But I also found a very similar image [5] listed in the Category:Acinonyx jubatus soemmeringii in zoos which is another subspecies (northeast African cheetah). The original Flickr page doesn't identify the subspecies either. Can we be sure of the subspecies pictured in any way? Thanks :) Sainsf (talk) 05:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Fotografía de Carlos Donoso[edit]

-wikfredor, Gracias por tu preocupación sobre los derechos de autor con respecto a la fotografía de mi padre. Mi nombre es Ronald Donoso hijo de Carlos, soy nuevo en el tema de subir contenido a Wikipedia, pero esa foto tampoco pertenece al diario que me mencionas, pertenece a mi padre y a nosotros, puesto que esa fotografía fue tomada en una sesión de fotos que hicimos hace muchos años y la hemos usado infinidades de veces para publicaciones en diarios, shows, etc... Quisiera que fuera esa la foto que representa a mi padre y no la ilustración que está actualmente en la página. Podrías ayudarme? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.47.16.199 (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.47.16.199 (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)@190.47.16.199: Es un enorme honor que me escribas por este medio!. Lo mejor que puedes hacer es encontrar alguna foto familiar que no haya sido publicada antes y subirla aquí, si necesitas ayuda escríbeme a mi correo wilfredor@gmail.com, paralelamente estoy pidiendo restablecer también la foto anterior. Mi sentido pésame --Wilfredor (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Comentario[edit]

Hola. El fotógrafo (no la persona en la imagen) debe enviar este permiso al correo de OTRS. Si el fotógrafo ha vendido los derechos al fotografiado, necesitamos ver el contrato porque muchas veces solo permiten el uso, pero no transfieren la totalidad de los derechos. El fotógrafo (profesional o no) siempre es el poseedor de los derechos de autor a menos que exista un contrato. Tal vez se le pida la imagen original para verificar la información en EXIF. Solo el poseedor de los derechos de autor puede enviar el permiso, aunque es posible que un tercero lo envíe si está en jpg o pdf. Saludos. --Ganímedes (talk) 02:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Ganímedes Muchas gracias por tu preocupación, le he explicado esto por privado a su familia, sin embargo, quizás tarden en responder. Siendo sincero, veo poco probable que este tipo de contrato exista conociendo como se manejan las cosas en Venezuela. Yo cumplí con explicarles, en la medida de que respondan podre ayudarlos. Un abrazo compañero. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Si no hay contrato, entonces el fotógrafo debe enviar el permiso. Puede hacerlo él mismo, o firmarlo (ya sea impreso o escrito a mano), sacarle foto y tu o alguien más enviarlo por correo, como jpg o pdf. Soy de las usuarias más activas en OTRS, así que hay muchas probabilidades que lo reciba y lo procese. Saludos. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Ganímedes Me puse en comunicación con uno de sus hijos, le he explicado esto, sin embargo, ha estado sumamente ocupado con todo lo que son los preparativos religiosos para el velorio. En este momento solo podemos esperar, si se alguna otra cosa te mantendré informada. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda y disposición --Wilfredor (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Mount Roraima, Venezuela (12372703395).jpg[edit]

File:Mount Roraima, Venezuela (12372703395).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calidris alba on Margarita island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Living room of a typical rural house in northeast Brazil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Living room of a typical rural house in northeast Brazil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Bridge at Night (15849254405).jpg[edit]

File:Bridge at Night (15849254405).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 20:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Medicom Bearbrick (3225227229).jpg[edit]

File:Medicom Bearbrick (3225227229).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonial House back yard in San Juan Bautista.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 16:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux-Limoilou 0077 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. Nice! --Zcebeci 23:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux-Limoilou 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Very nice. --King of Hearts 23:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Limoilu 0001 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Limoilou, Québec city, Canadá 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Limoilou, Quebec city, Canada snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Atmospheric good image -- Spurzem 13:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

RE:FPC[edit]

Jaja es que paso por FPC, me votan en contra y me sacan las ganas, casualmente estoy buscano fotos para restaurar y nominarlas, asi que me van a seguir viendo por allí, tus cosas como andan? Ezarateesteban 15:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Limoilou, Québec city 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Could you get rid of the red light on the right and, if posible, center the image? --Poco a poco 13:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
@Poco a poco:

Done Thanks --Wilfredor 17:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Limoilou, Québec city 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. --Moroder 05:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on May 30, 2020[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I’d like to invite you to our group’s first Virtual Meeting on Saturday, May 30, 2020. The meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Please take a look at the meeting page and add your name to the list of participants if you’re planning to attend.

Hope to see you in a week! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)