User talk:Wistula

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Ch64 DSC0298.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ch64 DSC0298.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oleola (talk) 14:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bayerische Milchkoenigin 2013.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bayerische Milchkoenigin 2013.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bayerische Milchkoenigin 2013.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lymantria (talk) 13:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bayerische Milchkoenigin 1985.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bayerische Milchkoenigin 1985.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bayerische Milchkoenigin 1985.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lymantria (talk) 13:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Misc6DSC 0318.JPG[edit]

Gdzie zostało zrobione te zdjęcie? Zwiadowca 21 22:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

nie pamietam. --Wistula (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Train_station_in_Przeworsk[edit]

Category discussion warning

Train station in Przeworsk has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

Therud (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Warsaw photo requests[edit]

Hi! Do you do photo requests in Warsaw?

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 04:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

No, sorry, --Wistula (talk) 16:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:WarsawMDMDSC 2545.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:WarsawMDMDSC 2545.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Vera (talk) 11:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:WarsawMDMDSC 2545.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:WarsawMDMDSC 2545.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klo13DSC 1116.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Klo13DSC 1116.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Wola6 DSC0005.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wola6 DSC0005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

W3ird N3rd (talk) 16:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Fundacja Przyjaciele Szpitali Dziecięcych w Warszawie. DSC 1479.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fundacja Przyjaciele Szpitali Dziecięcych w Warszawie. DSC 1479.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fundacjaprzyjaciol (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Rekat[edit]

Na przyszłość polecam takie narzędzie. Bardzo pomaga jeśli chcemy zmienić kategorę większej ilości plików. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Zgadza się, pozdrawiam. --Wistula (talk) 07:43, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Mostar - red bull divnig mostar[edit]

Bier mostar.jpg

Next time we drink a beer together :-) --Z thomas 13:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Ja, lustig. --Wistula (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
und können auch auf deutsch reden. :-) und wir haben das springen von beiden seiten dokumentiert. viel mehr bilder hab ich aber von mostar nicht, das war eher so ein rein-raus-ding von dubrovnik aus. viele grüße --Z thomas 13:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
ich war auch nur auf Durchreise, Red Bull war unerwartet. Voll, aber lustig; in unserem Restaurant gab es leider kein Bier, vielleicht wegen des hohen Moslem-Anteils. Gruss --Wistula (talk) 13:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Gutshof Königsborn[edit]

Lass bitte deine Finger von dieser Kategorie. Wir benennen Objekte nach ihrer amtlichen Bezeichnung und nicht nach einer Umgangssprachlichen. Genauso wenig macht es Sinn Category für nicht vorhandene Ortsteile zuerstellen, nur weil es zur Unterscheidung irgend wann mal so genannt wurde. --Adnon (talk) 07:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Ich denke, die Diskussion sollte an einem Ort: hier geführt werden. Wistula (talk) 07:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Re:Prosta/Pańska[edit]

You probably made a mistake and writing "Prosta 35" you meant "Prosta 47". However, officially there are no adresses Prosta 47 and Prosta 49 (even if there are house number plates), as you can find at official maps (city, country). Municipal cultural heritage evidence uses "Prosta 47" and "Prosta 49", but as an alternative adresses for buildings with adresses at Pańska (here. Anyway,frankly speaking, I see no problem in using separate categories for northern and southern halves of these buildings. Panek (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

SGGW[edit]

Yes, I understand that for many people SGGW almost equals complex in Ursynów, but I am old enough to have a first association: SGGW is at Rakowiecka. SGGW still is one of the most potent land owners in Poland (even if much it's land has been sold). There are more and more old pictures of Warsaw at Commons, so maybe some pictures of SGGW at Rakowiecka will also appear. I also understand that name "Raczyński Campus" is obscure (I learnt it just recently, maybe "Ursynów Campus" would be more familiar, but it is not formal at any degree). Faculty categories are difficult in every university - faculties and institutes split and merge every now and then, change name etc. That's why I prefer to separate institutional categories (faculties, institutes) from material categories (buildings). When I studied biology at University of Warsaw, the main building of my faculty was under construction, and I studied at almost 10 venues including 3 at Main Campus, another ones near Main Campus and several other located from Aleje Ujazdowskie to Campus Ochota. So, from my personal experience - faculty is very often located at several buildings and the same category for faculty and building is not typical. Speaking about SGGW, last year it had a reformation - faculties are now responsible for education only and institutes emancipated as research units. They share personnel and buildings, but probably they will evolve in different pace. The problem with addresses is another one. I don't know, how to cope it, as most buildings at Raczyński campus are officially at Nowoursynowska 159, even if located near Ciszewskiego or Anody, and their internal numeration has no official representation. Panek (talk) 20:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

  • I generally agree, that categorization has to be complex and not always is perfect (speaking of Politechnika main campus - there are buildings, trees, statue etc. that are in the most central triangle and that are not heritage monuments (yet), so formally they shouldn't be categorized in this category, but it is unconvenient to have separate categories for the campus itself and for heritage complex with its unique register number etc.). I agree that sometimes buildings have to have redundant categorization in regard to street. I am not very often present in SGGW campus, so probably I won't be very active in its categorization. Panek (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:No_bike_signs[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:No_bike_signs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 11:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Reminder[edit]

Hi Wistula. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)