User talk:Wolfgang glock

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Wolfgang glock!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 23:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Category:Ägydiuskirche[edit]

hello there, I undeleted your request for Ägydiuskirche and created a disambiguation instead, I hope that is fine and it should be resolved in this manner in the future if there are multiple places or buildings with the same name, see also Category:Grand Bazaar for example. sincerely Gryffindor 15:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


Image:WrNeustadt_NeunkichnerStr_02.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:WrNeustadt_NeunkichnerStr_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

wg 22:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Foto Serbenhalle[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Glock, für das Buch "Wir vom Jahrgang 1942", Wartberg-Verlag, würde ich gerne Ihr Foto von der "Serbenhalle http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:WrNeustadt_Serbenhalle.JPG verwenden. Falls möglich bitte ich Sie um einen kurzen schriftlichen Vermerk per Email an mich, in dem Sie mir das für alle Auflagen der Publikation genehmigen. Als Fotocredit würde ich Wolfgang Glock/CC-BY-SA 3.0 angeben, es sei denn Sie wünschen etwas anderes. Als Bildgeber stünde Ihnen auch ein Belegexemplar zu, wenn Sie das in Anspruch nehmen wollen bitte um Bekanntgabe Ihrer Postadresse.

Vielen Dank für Ihr Entgegenkommen,

mit freundlichen Grüßen

Helmuth Santler

Lieber Herr Santler! Da ich leider keine E-Mailadresse von Ihnen habe, auf diesem Weg meine Antwort: Gerne können Sie das Foto verwenden - das ergibt sich schon aus der Lizenz, unter der ich es veröffentlicht habe. Der Fotocredit in der von Ihnen vorgeschlagenen Form ist ganz ok. Für das Angebot eines Belegexemplars danke ich herzlich, möchte davon aber nicht Gebrauch machen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen: Wolfgang Glock. --wg (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Carnuntum - Thermae[edit]

römische Badewanne

Hallo Wolfgang glock,

so ein Zufall, beinahe hätten wir uns im April im Archäologiepark Carnuntum getroffen! Soeben habe ich drei weitere Bilder von den Thermen hochgeladen, darunter diese Innenaufnahme. Kannst du im Beschreibungstext bitte ergänzen, um welchen Raum es sich handelt? Ich habe es mir leider nicht notiert, aber du als "Lateiner" weißt sicher Bescheid.

Schönen Gruß aus der deutschen Partnerstadt Hainburgs. --E-W (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Wolfgang glock,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Foto:Figuren-Schreitende und Schreitender-01.jpg[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang glock! Du hast bei meinem Foto den FOP-Baustein eingefügt, ist es sinnvoll wenn ich diesen Baustein auch bei den anderen von mir geknipsten Denkmälern einfüge? Ist er auch bei Fotos von Gebäuden notwendig? Gruß Priwo (talk) 18:39, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Priwo! Ich gebe den Baustein immer dann, wenn Bauwerke oder Kunstwerke abgebildet sind, deren Schöpfer vor weniger als 70 Jahren verstorben ist, weil in manchen Ländern auch bloße Abbildungen davon urherberrechtlich geschützt sind (z.B. in Belgien - siehe Commons:Freedom of panorama). In Österreich und ähnlich in Deutschland ist das wegen der sog. Panoramafreiheit kein Problem. (Dabei bevorzuge ich {{FOP}}, weil dieser Baustein allgemein gehalten ist, während {{Panoramafreiheit}} speziell auf die Situation in Deutschland abzielt.) L.G., --wg (talk) 21:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Piesting Kupelwieser-Haus 02.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Erledigt. --wg (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Steinhofmauer[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang! Danke, daß Du Dich um mein Bild von der Steinhofmauer Sanatoriumstraße gekümmert hast! Allerdings hab ich einen Teil Deiner Änderung wieder rausgenommen, da die Steinhofmauer Sanatorium nur den Teil des Sanatoriums umgibt, der Teil Heschweg hingegen nur die Steinhofgründe. Daher ist auch der Teil Heschweg extra geschützt, während der Teil Sanatoriumstraße mit dem Sanatorium geschützt ist. In der Bildbeschreibung sollte das dann nicht in einen Topf geworfen werden. Danke und liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 22:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, in der Genauigkeit war mir das nicht klar! LG --wg (talk) 21:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Wolfgang glock,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Research of the 1800-1880s[edit]

Dear Wolf, I hope you are reading this, I just finished making a contribution to your english wiki page:.http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Wolfgang_glock. You can change it as you see fit. The language barrier might make it a bit difficult. I hope you speak enough english so we can correspond. I think what you are doing is essential to preserving our history.

Tell me what you think of this picture.

http://rdrsteelsales.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/632px-Bessemerbirne-300x284.jpg Posted: April 10th, 2013.

Air blasting technology revolutionized iron and steel production, a huge leap for 1847.

Copyright status: File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 04.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 04.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Done --wg (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 05.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 05.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Done --wg (talk) 18:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)



català | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | svenska | עברית | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear Wolfgang glock,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Public Art team

Wiki Loves Public Art logo

Copyright status: File:Piesting Kupelwieser-Haus 03.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Piesting Kupelwieser-Haus 03.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 05:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Done 28 July 2013.--wg (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

dein Foto auf flickr[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang, da geht jemand mit deinem Foto hausieren, noch dazu mit falscher Autorin und mit Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Magst du dich drum kümmern? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, hab's vor kurzem selbst gesehen, bin aber noch ein bisschen unschlüssig, was ich am besten tue. LG Wolfgang--wg (talk) 21:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Einvernehmlich erledigt.--wg (talk) 20:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Attribution for The Reichstag, 3.2-S7[edit]

Dear Mr. Glock, I am writing to thank you for making your photograph available for publication through Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. We plan to use the following photograph for inclusion in Harold Kalman, Heritage Planning, to be published in 2014 by Routledge. The image that we plan to use is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reichstag_Plenarsaal_Kuppel.JPG

You will be credited as the photographer in the caption as Wolfgang Glock.

If you have any questions please contact me by email at skicbbc@gmail.com.

Thank you,

Susan


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Wolfgang glock,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Wolfgang glock,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Copyright status: File:Kitzbuhel FW + RK 02.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kitzbuhel FW + RK 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Accidentally forgotten! Done. --wg (talk) 21:46, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:LUAS single ticket.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:LUAS single ticket.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

darkweasel94 04:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

siehe dort. --wg (talk) 22:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiener Neustädter Grundlinie[edit]

Servus Wolfgang! Die Wiener Neustädter Grundlinie sollte eine Entfernung von 12.158 Meter haben. Hat aber angeblich von einem Autofahrer festgestellt zwischen den Endpunktdenkmälern nur eine Entfernung von ca. 10 km. Du hast ja eine ziemlich eindeutige GEO-Angabe zum südlichen Basis-Punkt gegeben. Leider sind beide Endpunkte nicht denkmalgeschützt. Wo mag der Fehler liegen? --Anton-kurt (talk) 08:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Servus Anton-kurt! Bei einer überschlagsmaßigen Kontrolle anhand der Österreichischen Karte (via NÖ Atlas) komme ich auch nur auf etwa 9.650 m. Jetzt auf die Schnelle kann ich nicht sagen, ob die beiden Säulen noch immer exakt am ursprünglichen Aufstellungsort stehen. Schließlich ist die Neunkirchner Allee seit damals sicher x-mal um- und ausgebaut worden und der Nördliche Basisendpunkt steht mitten im Knoten A2 - Neunkirchner Allee. --wg (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich[edit]

... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an info@wikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über verein@wikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest[edit]

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, ist ein Bild von Dir: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 08:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Lizenz[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang glock, ich bin auf dein Foto File:Bezirksamt XV.JPG gestoßen. Du hast die Lizenz als PD-Old eingegeben. Diese allerdings für Fotos vorgesehen, deren Fotograf 70 Jahre tot ist ;-) - Kannst du die Lizenz bitte korrigieren. --danke K@rl (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Wollte damals wohl betonen, dass die Architekten seit mehr als 70 Jahren tot sind. --wg (talk) 21:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Versteh - gruß K@rl (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich[edit]

... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)